Volatility of Financial Asset Valuations at Zero Interest Rates, Recovery without Hiring, Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs, Youth and Middle-Age Unemployment, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, United States Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities, United States Producer Prices, World Cyclical Slow Growth and Global Recession Risk: Part V

 

Volatility of Financial Asset Valuations at Zero Interest Rates, Recovery without Hiring, Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs, Youth and Middle-Age Unemployment, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, United States Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities, United States Producer Prices, World Cyclical Slow Growth and Global Recession Risk

Carlos M. Pelaez

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

I Recovery without Hiring

IA1 Hiring Collapse

IA2 Labor Underutilization

ICA3 Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs

IA4 Theory and Reality of Cyclical Slow Growth Not Secular Stagnation: Youth and

Middle-Age Unemployment

IB Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation

II United States Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities

IIA United States Producer Prices

IV Global Inflation

V World Economic Slowdown

VA United States

VB Japan

VC China

VD Euro Area

VE Germany

VF France

VG Italy

VH United Kingdom

VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets

VII Economic Indicators

VIII Interest Rates

IX Conclusion

References

Appendixes

Appendix I The Great Inflation

IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies

IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact

IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort

IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis

IIIGA Monetary Policy with Deficit Financing of Economic Growth

IIIGB Adjustment during the Debt Crisis of the 1980s

V World Economic Slowdown. Table V-1 is constructed with the database of the IMF (http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=29) to show GDP in dollars in 2013 and the growth rate of real GDP of the world and selected regional countries from 2013 to 2017. The data illustrate the concept often repeated of “two-speed recovery” of the world economy from the recession of 2007 to 2009. The IMF has changed its forecast of the world economy to 3.4 percent in 2014 but accelerating to 3.5 percent in 2015, 3.8 percent in 2016 and 3.8 percent in 2016. Slow-speed recovery occurs in the “major advanced economies” of the G7 that account for $34,883 billion of world output of $75,471 billion, or 46.2 percent, but are projected to grow at much lower rates than world output, 2.1 percent on average from 2014 to 2017 in contrast with 3.6 percent for the world as a whole. While the world would grow 15.3 percent in the four years from 2014 to 2017, the G7 as a whole would grow 8.6 percent. The difference in dollars of 2013 is high: growing by 15.2 percent would add around $11.5 trillion of output to the world economy, or roughly, two times the output of the economy of Japan of $4,920 billion but growing by 8.6 percent would add $6.5 trillion of output to the world, or about the output of Japan in 2013. The “two speed” concept is in reference to the growth of the 150 countries labeled as emerging and developing economies (EMDE) with joint output in 2013 of $29,358 billion, or 38.9 percent of world output. The EMDEs would grow cumulatively 19.9 percent or at the average yearly rate of 4.7 percent, contributing $5.8 trillion from 2014 to 2017 or the equivalent of somewhat less than the GDP of $9,469 billion of China in 2013. The final four countries in Table V-1 often referred as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), are large, rapidly growing emerging economies. Their combined output in 2013 adds to $15,814 billion, or 21.0 percent of world output, which is equivalent to 45.3 percent of the combined output of the major advanced economies of the G7.

Table V-1, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Real GDP Growth

	GDP USD 2013	Real GDP ∆% 2014	Real GDP ∆% 2015	Real GDP ∆% 2016	Real GDP ∆% 2017
World	75,471	3.4	3.5	3.8	3.8
G7	34,883	1.7	2.3	2.3	2.0
Canada	1,839	2.5	2.2	2.0	2.0
France	2,807	0.4	1.2	1.5	1.7
DE	3,731	1.6	1.6	1.7	1.5
Italy	2,138	-0.4	0.5	1.1	1.1
Japan	4,920	-0.1	1.0	1.2	0.4
UK	2,680	2.6	2.7	2.3	2.2
US	16,768	2.4	3.1	3.1	2.7
Euro Area	13,143	0.9	1.5	1.7	1.6
DE	3,731	1.6	1.6	1.7	1.5
France	2,807	0.4	1.2	1.5	1.7
Italy	2,138	-0.4	0.5	1.1	1.1
POT	225	0.9	1.6	1.5	1.4
Ireland	232	4.8	3.9	3.3	2.8
Greece	242	0.7	2.5	3.7	3.2
Spain	1,393	1.4	2.5	2.0	1.8
EMDE	29,358	4.6	4.3	4.7	5.0
Brazil	2,391	0.1	-1.0	1.0	2.3
Russia	2,079	0.6	-3.8	-1.1	1.0
India	1,875	7.2	7.5	7.5	7.6
China	9,469	7.4	6.8	6.3	6.0

Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries); POT: Portugal

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx

Continuing high rates of unemployment in advanced economies constitute another characteristic of the database of the WEO (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx ). Table V-2 is constructed with the WEO database to provide rates of unemployment from 2013 to 2017 for major countries and regions. In fact, unemployment rates for 2014 in Table I-2 are high for all countries: unusually high for countries with high rates most of the time and unusually high for countries with low rates most of the time. The rates of unemployment are particularly high in 2014 for the countries with sovereign debt difficulties in Europe: 13.9 percent for Portugal (POT), 11.3 percent for Ireland, 26.5 percent for Greece, 24.5 percent for Spain and 12.8 percent for Italy, which is lower but still high. The G7 rate of unemployment is 7.1 percent. Unemployment rates are not likely to decrease substantially if slow growth persists in advanced economies.

Table I-2, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Unemployment Rate as Percent of Labor Force

	% Labor Force 2013	% Labor Force 2014	% Labor Force 2015	% Labor Force 2016	% Labor Force 2017
World	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
G7	7.1	6.4	6.0	5.8	5.8
Canada	7.1	6.9	7.0	6.9	6.8
France	10.3	10.2	10.1	9.9	9.7
DE	5.2	5.0	4.9	4.8	4.8
Italy	12.2	12.8	12.6	12.3	12.0
Japan	4.0	3.6	3.7	3.7	3.8
UK	7.6	6.2	5.4	5.4	5.4
US	7.4	6.2	5.5	5.2	5.0
Euro Area	12.0	11.6	11.1	10.6	10.3
DE	5.2	5.0	4.9	4.8	4.8
France	10.3	10.2	10.1	9.9	9.7
Italy	12.2	12.8	12.6	12.3	12.0
POT	16.2	13.9	13.1	12.6	12.1
Ireland	13.0	11.3	9.8	8.8	8.3
Greece	27.5	26.5	24.8	22.1	20.0
Spain	26.1	24.5	22.6	21.1	19.9
EMDE	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Brazil	5.4	4.8	5.9	6.3	5.9
Russia	5.5	5.1	6.5	6.5	6.0
India	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
China	4.1	4.1	4.1	4.1	4.1

Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries)

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx

Table V-3 provides the latest available estimates of GDP for the regions and countries followed in this blog from IQ2012 to IQ2015 available now for all countries. There are preliminary estimates for most countries for IQ2015. Growth is weak throughout most of the world.

• Japan. The GDP of Japan increased 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 4.1 percent at SAAR (seasonally adjusted annual rate) and 3.5 percent relative to a year earlier but part of the jump could be the low level a year earlier because of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan is experiencing difficulties with the overvalued yen because of worldwide capital flight originating in zero interest rates with risk aversion in an environment of softer growth of world trade. Japan’s GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIQ2012 at the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of minus 1.8 percent, which is much lower than 4.1 percent in IQ2012. Growth of 3.5 percent in IIQ2012 in Japan relative to IIQ2011 has effects of the low level of output because of Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.4 percent in IIIQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 1.8 percent and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 0.6 percent and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan grew 1.3 percent in IQ2013 at the SAAR of 5.3 percent and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IIQ2013 at the SAAR of 2.9 percent and increased 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP grew 0.5 percent in IIIQ2013 at the SAAR of 2.0 percent and increased 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Japan’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent at the SAAR of minus 0.9 percent, increasing 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 1.1 percent in IQ2014 at the SAAR of 4.4 percent and increased 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, Japan’s GDP fell 1.7 percent at the SAAR of minus 6.8 percent and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.5 percent in IIIQ2014 at the SAAR of minus 2.0 percent and fell 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, Japan’s GDP grew 0.3 percent, at the SAAR of 1.2 percent, decreasing 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Japan increased 1.0 percent in IQ2015 at the SAAR of 3.9 percent and decreased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier.
• China. China’s GDP grew 1.4 percent in IQ2012, annualizing to 5.7 percent, and 8.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew at 2.1 percent in IIQ2012, which annualizes to 8.7 percent and 7.6 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.0 percent in IIIQ2012, which annualizes at 8.2 percent and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, China grew at 1.9 percent, which annualizes at 7.8 percent, and 7.9 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, China grew at 1.7 percent, which annualizes at 7.0 percent and 7.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, China grew at 1.8 percent, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.3 percent in IIIQ2013, which annualizes at 9.5 percent and 7.9 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 1.8 percent in IVQ2013, which annualized to 7.4 percent and 7.6 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.6 percent in IQ2014, which annualizes to 6.6 percent, and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 2.0 percent in IIQ2014, which annualizes at 8.2 percent, and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.9 percent in IIIQ2014, which is equivalent to 7.8 percent in a year, and 7.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew 1.5 percent in IVQ2014, which annualizes at 6.1 percent, and 7.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew at 1.3 percent in IQ2015, which annualizes at 5.3 percent, and 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier. There is decennial change in leadership in China (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/index.htm). Growth rates of GDP of China in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier have been declining from 2011 to 2015.
• Euro Area. GDP fell 0.2 percent in the euro area in IQ2012 and decreased 0.5 in IQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP contracted 0.3 percent IIQ2012 and fell 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.1 percent and declined 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.3 percent relative to the prior quarter and fell 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, the GDP of the euro area fell 0.4 percent and decreased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, euro area GDP increased 0.2 percent and fell 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.3 percent in IVQ2013 and increased 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, the GDP of the euro area increased 0.2 percent and 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.1 percent in IIQ2014 and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The euro area’s GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.4 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. Euro are GDP increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015 and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier.
• Germany. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IQ2012 and 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.1 percent and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier but 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier when adjusted for calendar (CA) effects. In IIIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.1 percent and 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP contracted 0.4 percent in IVQ2012 and decreased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Germany’s GDP decreased 0.4 percent and fell 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.8 percent and 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IIIQ2013 and 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.4 percent and 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.8 percent in IQ2014 and 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, Germany’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IQ2015 and increased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier.
• United States. Growth of US GDP in IQ2012 was 0.6 percent, at SAAR of 2.3 percent and higher by 2.6 percent relative to IQ2011. US GDP increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2012, 1.6 percent at SAAR and 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, US GDP grew 0.6 percent, 2.5 percent at SAAR and 2.7 percent relative to IIIQ2011. In IVQ2012, US GDP grew 0.0 percent, 0.1 percent at SAAR and 1.6 percent relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, US GDP grew at 2.7 percent SAAR, 0.7 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.7 percent relative to the same quarter in 2013. In IIQ2013, US GDP grew at 1.8 percent in SAAR, 0.4 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.8 percent relative to IIQ2012. US GDP grew at 4.5 percent in SAAR in IIIQ2013, 1.1 percent relative to the prior quarter and 2.3 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/dollar-devaluation-and-carry-trade.html). In IVQ2013, US GDP grew 0.9 percent at 3.5 percent SAAR and 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, US GDP decreased 0.5 percent, increased 1.9 percent relative to a year earlier and fell 2.1 percent at SAAR. In IIQ2014, US GDP increased 1.1 percent at 4.6 percent SAAR and increased 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. US GDP increased 1.2 percent in IIIQ2014 at 5.0 percent SAAR and increased 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, US GDP increased 0.5 percent at SAAR of 2.2 percent and increased 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP decreased 0.2 percent in IQ2015 at SAAR of minus 0.7 percent and grew 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier.
• United Kingdom. In IQ2012, UK GDP increased 0.1 percent, increasing 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.2 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIIQ2012 and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.3 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IIIQ2012 and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.6 percent in IQ2013 and 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2013 and 1.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, UK GDP increased 0.7 percent and 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.4 percent in IVQ2013 and 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, UK GDP increased 0.9 percent and 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIQ2014 and 2.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2014, UK GDP increased 0.6 percent and increased 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.6 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 3.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2015, GDP increased 0.3 percent and 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier.
• Italy. Italy has experienced decline of GDP in seven consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IQ2013 and in IQ2014, IIQ2014 and IIIQ2014. Italy’s GDP fell 1.0 percent in IQ2012 and declined 2.3 percent relative to IQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell 0.6 percent in IIQ2012 and declined 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, Italy’s GDP fell 0.5 percent and declined 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy contracted 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and fell 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.9 percent and fell 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and declined 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2013 and decreased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, Italy’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent and fell 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy fell 0.1 percent in IIQ2014 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2014, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy changed 0.0 percent in IVQ20214 and declined 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2015, Italy’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier
• France. France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IQ2012 and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, France’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2012 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, France’s GDP increased 0.1 percent and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.8 percent in IIQ2013 and increased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2013 and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, France’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, France’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and decreased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2014 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.6 percent in IQ2015 and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier

Table V-3, Percentage Changes of GDP Quarter on Prior Quarter and on Same Quarter Year Earlier, ∆%

	IQ2012/IVQ2011	IQ2012/IQ2011
United States	QOQ: 0.6        SAAR: 2.3	2.6
Japan	QOQ: 1.0 SAAR: 4.1	3.5
China	1.4	8.1
Euro Area	-0.2	-0.5
Germany	0.3	1.5
France	0.0	0.4
Italy	-1.0	-2.3
United Kingdom	0.1	1.0
	IIQ2012/IQ2012	IIQ2012/IIQ2011
United States	QOQ: 0.4         SAAR: 1.6	2.3
Japan	QOQ: -0.5 SAAR: -1.8	3.5
China	2.1	7.6
Euro Area	-0.3	-0.8
Germany	0.1	0.3 0.8 CA
France	-0.3	0.2
Italy	-0.6	-3.1
United Kingdom	-0.2	0.6
	IIIQ2012/ IIQ2012	IIIQ2012/ IIIQ2011
United States	QOQ: 0.6  SAAR: 2.5	2.7
Japan	QOQ: –0.4 SAAR: –1.8	0.2
China	2.0	7.4
Euro Area	-0.1	-0.9
Germany	0.1	0.1
France	0.3	0.3
Italy	-0.5	-3.1
United Kingdom	0.8	0.7
	IVQ2012/IIIQ2012	IVQ2012/IVQ2011
United States	QOQ: 0.0 SAAR: 0.1	1.6
Japan	QOQ: -0.1 SAAR: -0.6	0.0
China	1.9	7.9
Euro Area	-0.3	-0.9
Germany	-0.4	-0.3
France	0.0	0.0
Italy	-0.5	-2.7
United Kingdom	-0.3	0.4
	IQ2013/IVQ2012	IQ2013/IQ2012
United States	QOQ: 0.7 SAAR: 2.7	1.7
Japan	QOQ: 1.3 SAAR: 5.3	0.4
China	1.7	7.8
Euro Area	-0.4	-1.1
Germany	-0.4	-1.8
France	0.1	0.1
Italy	-0.9	-2.6
UK	0.6	0.9
	IIQ2013/IQ2013	IIQ2013/IIQ2012
United States	QOQ: 0.4 SAAR: 1.8	1.8
Japan	QOQ: 0.7 SAAR: 2.9	1.4
China	1.8	7.5
Euro Area	0.4	-0.5
Germany	0.8	0.5
France	0.8	1.1
Italy	0.0	-2.0
UK	0.6	1.7
	IIIQ2013/IIQ2013	III/Q2013/  IIIQ2012
USA	QOQ: 1.1 SAAR: 4.5	2.3
Japan	QOQ: 0.5 SAAR: 2.0	2.2
China	2.3	7.9
Euro Area	0.2	-0.2
Germany	0.3	0.8
France	-0.1	0.8
Italy	0.1	-1.4
UK	0.7	1.6
	IVQ2013/IIIQ2013	IVQ2013/IVQ2012
USA	QOQ: 0.9 SAAR: 3.5	3.1
Japan	QOQ: -0.2 SAAR: -0.9	2.3
China	1.8	7.6
Euro Area	0.3	0.5
Germany	0.4	1.0
France	0.2	1.0
Italy	0.0	-0.9
UK	0.4	2.4
	IQ2014/IVQ2013	IQ2014/IQ2013
USA	QOQ -0.5 SAAR -2.1	1.9
Japan	QOQ: 1.1 SAAR: 4.4	2.4
China	1.6	7.4
Euro Area	0.2	1.1
Germany	0.8	2.6
France	-0.2	0.7
Italy	-0.2	-0.2
UK	0.9	2.7
	IIQ2014/IQ2014	IIQ2014/IIQ2013
USA	QOQ 1.1 SAAR 4.6	2.6
Japan	QOQ: -1.7 SAAR: -6.8	-0.4
China	2.0	7.5
Euro Area	0.1	0.8
Germany	-0.1	1.0
France	-0.1	-0.2
Italy	-0.1	-0.3
UK	0.8	2.9
	IIIQ2014/IIQ2014	IIIQ2014/IIIQ2013
USA	QOQ: 1.2 SAAR: 5.0	2.7
Japan	QOQ: -0.5 SAAR: -2.0	-1.4
China	1.9	7.3
Euro Area	0.2	0.8
Germany	0.1	1.2
France	0.2	0.2
Italy	-0.1	-0.5
UK	0.6	2.8
	IVQ2014/IIIQ2014	IVQ2014/IVQ2013
USA	QOQ: 0.5 SAAR: 2.2	2.4
Japan	QOQ: 0.3 SAAR: 1.2	-1.0
China	1.5	7.3
Euro Area	0.4	0.9
Germany	0.7	1.6
France	0.0	0.0
Italy	0.0	-0.4
UK	0.6	3.0
	IQ2015/IVQ2014	IQ2015/IQ2014
USA	QOQ: -0.2 SAAR: -0.7	2.7
Japan	QOQ: 1.0 SAAR: 3.9	-0.9
China	1.3	7.0
Euro Area	0.4	1.0
Germany	0.3	1.1
France	0.6	0.7
Italy	0.3	0.1
UK	0.3	2.4

QOQ: Quarter relative to prior quarter; SAAR: seasonally adjusted annual rate

Source: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/aboutus/stat_int.html

Table V-4 provides two types of data: growth of exports and imports in the latest available months and in the past 12 months; and contributions of net trade (exports less imports) to growth of real GDP.

• Japan. Japan provides the most worrisome data (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/impatience-with-monetary-policy-of.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/world-financial-turbulence-squeeze-of.html and earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/patience-on-interest-rate-increases.html and earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/monetary-policy-world-inflation-waves.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html and earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/interest-rate-risks-world-inflation.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/global-financial-risk-world-inflation.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations_8763.html http://cmpass ocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/paring-quantitative-easing-policy-and_4699.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/thirty-one-million-unemployed-or.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_24.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/contraction-of-united-states-real_25.html and for GDP http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html and earlier http://cmpassocreulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/recovery-without-hiring-united-states.html). In Apr 2015, Japan’s exports increased 8.0 percent in 12 months while imports decreased 4.2 percent. The second part of Table V-4 shows that net trade deducted 1.4 percentage points from Japan’s growth of GDP in IIQ2012, deducted 1.9 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 and deducted 0.4 percentage points from GDP growth in IVQ2012. Net trade added 0.3 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2012, 1.6 percentage points in IQ2013 and 0.2 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.5 percentage points from GDP growth in Japan. Net trade ducted 2.1 percentage points from GDP growth in Japan in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.2 percentage point from GDP growth of Japan in IQ2014. Net trade added 4.2 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2014. Net trade added 0.2 percentage points to GDP growth in IIIQ2014 and added 0.9 percentage points in IVQ2014.

• China. In May 2015, China exports decreased 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier and imports decreased 17.6 percent.
• Germany. Germany’s exports increased 1.9 percent in the month of Apr 2015 and increased 7.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015. Germany’s imports decreased 1.3 percent in the month of Apr 2015 and increased 2.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr. Net trade contributed 0.8 percentage points to growth of GDP in IQ2012, contributed 0.4 percentage points in IIQ2012, contributed 0.3 percentage points in IIIQ2012, deducted 0.5 percentage points in IVQ2012, deducted 0.3 percentage points in IQ2013 and added 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded deducted 0.5 percentage points from Germany’s GDP growth in IIIQ2013 and added 0.5 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2014. Net trade added 0.2 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2014 and added 0.4 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.3 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 0.2 percentage points in IQ2015.
• United Kingdom. Net trade contributed 0.7 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.7 percentage points from UK growth. Net trade contributed 0.1 percentage points to UK value added in IVQ2013. Net trade contributed 0.1 percentage points to UK value added in IQ2014 and 0.2 percentage points in IIQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.5 percentage points to GDP growth in IIIQ2014 and added 0.8 percentage points in IVQ2014.
• France. France’s exports increased 1.4 percent in Apr 2015 while imports decreased 2.1 percent. France’s exports increased 6.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 and imports increased 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. Net traded added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IIIQ2012 and 0.1 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IQ2013 and added 0.3 percentage points in IIQ2013, deducting 1.7 percentage points in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IVQ2013 and deducted 0.1 percentage points in IQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.2 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IIQ2014 and deducted 0.3 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade added 0.2 percentage points to France’s GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 0.5 percentage points in IQ2015
• United States. US exports increased 1.0 percent in Apr 2015 and goods exports decreased 4.6 percent in Jan-Apr 2015 relative to a year earlier. Imports decreased 3.7 percent in Apr 2015 and goods imports decreased 3.0 percent in Jan-Apr 2015 relative to a year earlier. Net trade deducted 0.04 percentage points from GDP growth in IIQ2012 and added 0.39 percentage points in IIIQ2012 and 0.79 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.08 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2013 and deducted 0.54 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded added 0.59 percentage points to US GDP growth in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 1.08 percentage points to US GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.66 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2014 and deducted 0.34 percentage points in IIQ2014. Net trade added 0.78 percentage points to IIIQ2014. Net trade deducted 1.03 percentage points from GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 1.90 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2015. The Federal Reserve completed its annual revision of industrial production and capacity utilization on Mar 28, 2014 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm). The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm):

“Industrial production decreased 0.3 percent in April for its fifth consecutive monthly loss. Manufacturing output was unchanged in April after recording an upwardly revised gain of 0.3 percent in March. In April, the index for mining moved down 0.8 percent, its fourth consecutive monthly decrease; a sharp fall in oil and gas well drilling has more than accounted for the overall decline in mining this year. The output of utilities fell 1.3 percent in April. At 105.2 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production in April was 1.9 percent above its year-earlier level. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector decreased 0.4 percentage point in April to 78.2 percent, a rate that is 1.9 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2014) average.” In the six months ending in Apr 2015, United States national industrial production accumulated change of 0.0 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 0.0 percent, which is lower than growth of 1.9 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015. Excluding growth of 1.1 percent in Nov 2014, growth in the remaining five months from Nov 2014 to Apr 2015 accumulated to minus 1.1 percent or minus 2.6 percent annual equivalent. Industrial production declined in five of the past six months. Industrial production contracted at annual equivalent 2.8 percent in the most recent quarter from Feb 2015 to Apr 2015 and expanded at 2.8 percent in the prior quarter Nov 2014 to Jan 2015. Business equipment accumulated growth of 0.0 percent in the six months from Nov 2014 to Apr 2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 0.0 percent, which is lower than growth of 2.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015. The Fed analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): “Capacity utilization for the industrial sector decreased 0.4 percentage point in April to 78.2 percent, a rate that is 1.9 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2014) average.” United States industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate followed by possible acceleration and weakening growth in past months.

Manufacturing fell 21.9 from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased 25.1 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2014. Manufacturing grew 25.7 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Apr 2015. Manufacturing output in Apr 2015 is 1.9 percent below the peak in Jun 2007. The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire cycle from IVQ2007 to IQ2015 would have accumulated to 23.9 percent. GDP in IQ2015 would be $18,574.8 billion (in constant dollars of 2009) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $2,270.0 billion than actual $16,304.8 billion. There are about two trillion dollars of GDP less than at trend, explaining the 24.7 million unemployed or underemployed equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 14.9 percent of the effective labor force (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/quite-high-equity-valuations-and.html). US GDP in IQ2015 is 12.2 percent lower than at trend. US GDP grew from $14,991.8 billion in IVQ2007 in constant dollars to $16,304.8 billion in IQ2015 or 8.8 percent at the average annual equivalent rate of 1.2 percent. Cochrane (2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for recovery of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas (2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth at average 3.3 percent per year from Apr 1919 to Apr 2015. Growth at 3.3 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output from 99.2392 in Dec 2007 to 125.9172 in Apr 2015. The actual index NSA in Apr 2015 is 101.1122, which is 19.7 percent below trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 2.4 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2014. Using trend growth of 2.4 percent per year, the index would increase to 118.0899 in Apr 2015. The output of manufacturing at 101.1122 in Apr 2015 is 14.4 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.

Table V-4, Growth of Trade and Contributions of Net Trade to GDP Growth, ∆% and % Points

	Exports M ∆%	Exports 12 M ∆%	Imports M ∆%	Imports 12 M ∆%
USA	1.0 Apr	-4.6 Jan-Apr	-3.7 Jan	-3.0 Jan-Mar
Japan		Apr 2015 8.0 Mar 8.5 Feb 2.4 Jan 17.0 Dec 12.9 Nov 4.9 Oct 9.6 Sep 6.9 Aug -1.3 Jul 3.9 Jun -2.0 May 2014 -2.7 Apr 2014 5.1 Mar 2014 1.8 Feb 2014 9.5 Jan 2014 9.5 Dec 2013 15.3 Nov 2013 18.4 Oct 2013 18.6 Sep 2013 11.5 Aug 2013 14.7 Jul 2013 12.2 Jun 2013 7.4 May 2013 10.1 Apr 2013 3.8 Mar 2013 1.1 Feb 2013 -2.9 Jan 2013 6.4 Dec -5.8 Nov -4.1 Oct -6.5 Sep -10.3 Aug -5.8 Jul -8.1		Apr 2015 -4.2 Mar -14.5 Feb -3.6 Jan -9.0 Dec 1.9 Nov -1.7 Oct 2.7 Sep 6.2 Aug -1.5 Jul 2.3 Jun 8.4 May 2014 -3.6 Apr 2013 3.4 Mar 2014 18.1 Feb 2014 9.0 Jan 2014 25.0 Dec 2013 24.7 Nov 2013 21.1 Oct 2013 26.1 Sep 2013 16.5 Aug 2013 16.0 Jul 2013 19.6 Jun 2013 11.8 May 2013 10.0 Apr 2013 9.4 Mar 2013 5.5 Feb 2013 7.3 Jan 2013 7.3 Dec 1.9 Nov 0.8 Oct -1.6 Sep 4.1 Aug -5.4 Jul 2.1
China		2015 -2.5 Apr -6.4 Apr -15.0 Mar 48.3 Feb -3.3 Jan 2014 9.7 Dec 4.7 Nov 11.6 Oct 15.3 Sep 9.4 Aug 14.5 Jul 7.2 Jun 7.0 May 0.9 Apr -6.6 Mar -18.1 Feb 10.6 Jan 2013 4.3 Dec 12.7 Nov 5.6 Oct -0.3 Sep 7.2 Aug 5.1 Jul -3.1 Jun 1.0 May 14.7 Apr 10.0 Mar 21.8 Feb 25.0 Jan		2015 -17.6 Apr -12.7 Mar -20.5 Feb -19.9 Jan 2014 -2.4 Dec -6.7 Nov 4.6 Oct 7.0 Sep -2.4 Aug -1.6 Jul 5.5 Jun -1.6 May -0.8 Apr -11.3 Mar 10.1 Feb 10.0 Jan 2013 8.3 Dec 5.3 Nov 7.6 Oct 7.4 Sep 7.0 Aug 10.9 Jul -0.7 Jun -0.3 May 16.8 Apr 14.1 Mar -15.2 Feb 28.8 Jan
Euro Area	2.2 12 M-Feb	1.8 Jan-Feb	0.1 12-M Feb	-2.8 Jan-Feb
Germany	1.9 Apr CSA	7.5 Apr	-1.3 Apr CSA	2.8 Apr
France Apr	1.4	6.5	-2.1	2.6
Italy Feb	2.5	3.7	0.6	1.0
UK	1.2 Apr	-1.6 Jan 15-Apr 15 /Jan 14-Apr 14	-3.1 Apr	-1.1 Jan 15-Apr 15 /Jan 14-Apr 14
Net Trade % Points GDP Growth	Points
USA	IQ2015 -1.90 IVQ2014 -1.03 IIIQ2014 0.78 IIQ2014 -0.34 IQ2014 -1.66 IVQ2013 1.08 IIIQ2013 0.59 IIQ2013 -0.54 IQ2013 -0.08 IVQ2012 +0.79 IIIQ2012 0.39 IIQ2012 -0.04 IQ2012 -0.11
Japan	0.3 IQ2012 -1.5 IIQ2012 -1.9 IIIQ2012 -0.6 IVQ2012 1.6 IQ2013 0.1 IIQ2013 -1.5 IIIQ2013 -2.1 IVQ2013 -1.3 IQ2014 4.3 IIQ2014 0.2 IIIQ2014 1.1 IVQ2014 -0.7 IQ2015
Germany	IQ2012 0.8 IIQ2012 0.4 IIIQ2012 0.3 IVQ2012 -0.5 IQ2013 -0.3 IIQ2013 0.1 IIIQ2013 -0.5 IVQ2013 0.5 IQ2014 -0.1 IIQ2014 0.2 IIIQ2014 0.4 IVQ2014 -0.3 IQ2015 -0.2
France	0.1 IIIQ2012 0.1 IVQ2012 -0.1 IQ2013 0.3 IIQ2013 -1.7 IIIQ2013 0.1 IVQ2013 -0.1 IQ2014 -0.2 IIQ2014 -0.3 IIIQ2014 0.2 IVQ2014 -0.5 IQ2015
UK	0.7 IIQ2013 -1.7 IIIQ2013 0.1 IVQ2013 0.1 IQ2014 0.2 IIQ2214 -0.5 IIIQ2014 0.8 IVQ2014 -0.9 IQ2015

Sources: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/

The geographical breakdown of exports and imports of Japan with selected regions and countries is in Table V-5 for Apr 2015. The share of Asia in Japan’s trade is close to one-half for 52.8 percent of exports and 48.1 percent of imports. Within Asia, exports to China are 17.1 percent of total exports and imports from China 24.2 percent of total imports. While exports to China increased 2.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015, imports from China increased 2.5 percent. The largest export market for Japan in Apr 2015 is the US with share of 20.8 percent of total exports, which is close to that of China, and share of imports from the US of 10.8 percent in total imports. Japan’s exports to the US increased 21.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 and imports from the US increased 23.9 percent. Western Europe has share of 10.0 percent in Japan’s exports and of 11.2 percent in imports. Rates of growth of exports of Japan in Apr 2015 are 21.4 percent for exports to the US, 13.3 percent for exports to Brazil and minus 6.9 percent for exports to Germany. Comparisons relative to 2011 may have some bias because of the effects of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Deceleration of growth in China and the US and threat of recession in Europe can reduce world trade and economic activity. Growth rates of imports in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 are mixed. Imports from Asia increased 2.0 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 while imports from China increased 2.5 percent. Data are in millions of yen, which may have effects of recent depreciation of the yen relative to the United States dollar (USD).

Table V-5, Japan, Value and 12-Month Percentage Changes of Exports and Imports by Regions and Countries, ∆% and Millions of Yen

Apr 2015	Exports Millions Yen	12 months ∆%	Imports Millions Yen	12 months ∆%
Total	6,551,467	8.0	6,604,907	-4.2
Asia	3,458,704 % Total 52.8	6.0	3,174,261 % Total 48.1	2.0
China	1,121,254 % Total 17.1	2.4	1,597,187 % Total 24.2	2.5
USA	1,362,901 % Total 20.8	21.4	714,133 % Total 10.8	23.9
Canada	91,088	21.2	106,566	14.9
Brazil	50,497	13.3	72,010	-1.7
Mexico	120,230	22.3	52,292	40.9
Western Europe	654,484 % Total 10.0	0.8	736,584 % Total 11.2	2.6
Germany	157,767	-6.9	188,797	-2.7
France	56,607	3.5	86,642	-13.9
UK	96,797	6.3	56,467	-15.2
Middle East	265,205	7.6	813,214	-34.9
Australia	134,701	1.8	376,510	-11.8

Source: Japan, Ministry of Finance http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm

World trade projections of the IMF are in Table V-6. There is increasing growth of the volume of world trade of goods and services from 3.5 percent in 2013 to 3.7 percent in 2015 and 5.0 percent on average from 2016 to 2019. World trade would be slower for advanced economies while emerging and developing economies (EMDE) experience faster growth. World economic slowdown would be more challenging with lower growth of world trade.

Table V-6, IMF, Projections of World Trade, USD Billions, USD/Barrel and Annual ∆%

	2013	2014	2015	Average ∆% 2016-2019
World Trade Volume (Goods and Services)	3.5	3.4	3.7	5.0
Exports Goods & Services	3.7	3.3	4.0	5.0
Imports Goods & Services	3.3	3.4	3.4	5.1
World Trade Value of Exports Goods & Services USD Billion	23,117	23,476	21,818	Average ∆% 2007-2016 20,724
Value of Exports of Goods USD Billion	18,632	18,817	17,285	Average ∆% 2007-2016 16,612
Average Oil Price USD/Barrel	104.07	96.25	58.14	Average ∆% 2007-2016 84.21
Average Annual ∆% Export Unit Value of Manufactures	-1.4	-0.8	-3.3	Average ∆% 2007-2016 0.9
Exports of Goods & Services	2013	2014	2015	Average ∆% 2016-2019
Euro Area	2.1	4.2	4.4	4.4
EMDE	4.6	3.4	5.3	6.0
G7	2.0	3.7	4.1	4.1
Imports Goods & Services
Euro Area	1.0	4.3	4.3	4.3
EMDE	5.5	3.7	3.5	6.0
G7	1.6	3.7	4.1	4.6
Terms of Trade of Goods & Services
Euro Area	0.9	0.8	1.4	-0.5
EMDE	-0.3	-0.6	-3.7	-0.1
G7	0.9	0.5	1.4	0.05
Terms of Trade of Goods
Euro Area	1.2	1.0	1.7	-0.6
EMDE	-0.1	0.2	-4.0	0.3
G7	0.8	0.2	1.0	0.1

Notes: Commodity Price Index includes Fuel and Non-fuel Prices; Commodity Industrial Inputs Price includes agricultural raw materials and metal prices; Oil price is average of WTI, Brent and Dubai

Source: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook databank

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx

The JP Morgan Global All-Industry Output Index of the JP Morgan Manufacturing and Services PMI^™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, with high association with world GDP, decreased to 53.6 in mAY from 54.9 in Apr, indicating expansion at slower rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c690870f3b0d41f5bcc2647ff00ce73f). This index has remained above the contraction territory of 50.0 during 32 consecutive months. The employment index increased from 52.6 in Apr to 52.9 in May with input prices rising at faster rate, new orders increasing at slower rate and output increasing at slower rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c690870f3b0d41f5bcc2647ff00ce73f). David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan, finds slowing world growth with potential acceleration in IIIQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c690870f3b0d41f5bcc2647ff00ce73f). The JP Morgan Global Manufacturing PMI^™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, increased to 51.2 in May from 51.0 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4b72bb1ed8c243b8b8d4544bf40d309c). New export orders fell after increases in twenty-one consecutive months. David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan Chase, finds mild growth in global manufacturing that could recover in the second half (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4b72bb1ed8c243b8b8d4544bf40d309c). The HSBC Brazil Composite Output Index, compiled by Markit, decreased from 44.2 in Apr to 42.9 in May, indicating contraction in activity of Brazil’s private sector (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/80ecb76d5b1846da8aaed8b75853749d). The HSBC Brazil Services Business Activity index, compiled by Markit, decreased from 44.6 in Apr to 42.5 in May, indicating contracting services activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/80ecb76d5b1846da8aaed8b75853749d). Pollyana De Lima, Economist at Markit, finds probable contraction of GDP in IIQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/80ecb76d5b1846da8aaed8b75853749d). The HSBC Brazil Purchasing Managers’ Index^TM (PMI^™) decreased from 46.0 in Apr to 45.9 in Apr, indicating deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/773a3b32453a43ae9d38c8d716ac9b06). Pollyanna De Lima, Economist at Markit, finds decline in output and new orders (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/773a3b32453a43ae9d38c8d716ac9b06).

VA United States. The Markit Flash US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index^™ (PMI^™) seasonally adjusted decreased to 53.8 in May from 54.1 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a1972463970c4c208c7b400689223bf5). New export orders declined partly because of dollar revaluation. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that manufacturing expanding with challenges to competitiveness from the strong dollar (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a1972463970c4c208c7b400689223bf5). The Markit Flash US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index decreased from 57.4 in Apr to 56.4 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a54aca6971864d7caa43671575958d89). The Markit Flash US Composite PMI™ Output Index decreased from 57.0 in Apr to 56.1 in May. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the surveys are consistent with slowing GDP growth that may accelerate to about 3.0 percent in the second quarter (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a54aca6971864d7caa43671575958d89). The Markit US Composite PMI™ Output Index of Manufacturing and Services decreased to 56.0 in May from 57.0 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e66ed08a14684077a3da1d250160966c). The Markit US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index decreased from 57.4 in Apr to 56.2 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e66ed08a14684077a3da1d250160966c). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the indexes suggesting the slowest growth of the US since Jan 2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e66ed08a14684077a3da1d250160966c). The Markit US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index^™ (PMI^™) decreased to 54.0 in May from 54.1 in Apr, which indicates expansion at slower rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/14f4ed734b494fa59dddc2d47900c858). New foreign orders decreased. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the index suggests restrain of foreign orders and corporate profits because of dollar appreciation (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/14f4ed734b494fa59dddc2d47900c858). The purchasing managers’ index (PMI) of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Report on Business^® increased 1.3 percentage points from 51.5 in Apr to 52.8 in May, which indicates growth at the faster rate (https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/ISMReport/MfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=29347). The index of new orders increased 2.3 percentage points from 53.5 in Apr to 55.8 in May. The index of new export orders decreased 1.5 percentage points from 51.5 in Apr to 50.0 in May, contracting from growing. The Non-Manufacturing ISM Report on Business^® PMI decreased 2.1 percentage points from 57.8 in Apr to 55.7 in May, indicating growth of business activity/production during 70 consecutive months, while the index of new orders decreased 1.3 percentage points from 59.2 in Apr to 57.9 in May (https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/ISMReport/NonMfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=29348). Table USA provides the country economic indicators for the US.

Table USA, US Economic Indicators

Consumer Price Index	Apr 12 months NSA ∆%: minus 0.2; ex food and energy ∆%: 1.8 Apr month SA ∆%: 0.1; ex food and energy ∆%: 0.3 Blog 5/24/15
Producer Price Index	Finished Goods May 12-month NSA ∆%: -3.0; ex food and energy ∆% 2.0 May month SA ∆% = 1.5; ex food and energy ∆%: 0.3 Final Demand May 12-month NSA ∆%: -1.1; ex food and energy ∆% 0.6 May month SA ∆% = 0.5; ex food and energy ∆%: -0.1 Blog 6/14/15
PCE Inflation	Apr 12-month NSA ∆%: headline 0.1; ex food and energy ∆% 1.2 Blog 6/7/15
Employment Situation	Household Survey: May Unemployment Rate SA 5.5% Blog calculation People in Job Stress Mar: 24.7 million NSA, 14.9% of Labor Force Establishment Survey: May Nonfarm Jobs +280,000; Private +262,000 jobs created  Apr 12-month Average Hourly Earnings Inflation Adjusted ∆%: 2.3 Blog 6/7/15
Nonfarm Hiring	Nonfarm Hiring fell from 63.3 million in 2006 to 54.2 million in 2013 or by 9.1 million and to 58.7 million in 2014 or by 4.6 million Private-Sector Hiring Apr 2015 5.162 million lower by 0.201 million than 5.363 million in Apr 2006 Blog 6/14/15
GDP Growth	BEA Revised National Income Accounts IQ2012/IQ2011 ∆%: 2.6 IIQ2012/IIQ2011 2.3 IIIQ2012/IIIQ2011 2.7 IVQ2012/IVQ2011 1.6 IQ2013/IQ2012 1.7 IIQ2013/IIQ2012 1.8 IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 2.3 IVQ2013/IVQ2012 3.1 IQ2014/IQ2013 1.9 IIQ2014/IIQ2013 2.6 IIIQ2014/IIIQ2013 2.7 IVQ2014/IVQ2013 2.4 IQ2015/IVQ2014 2.7 IQ2012 SAAR 2.3 IIQ2012 SAAR 1.6 IIIQ2012 SAAR 2.5 IVQ2012 SAAR 0.1 IQ2013 SAAR 2.7 IIQ2013 SAAR 1.8 IIIQ2013 SAAR 4.5 IVQ2013 SAAR 3.5 IQ2014 SAAR -2.1 IIQ2014 SAAR 4.6 IIIQ2014 SAAR 5.0 IVQ2014 SAAR 2.2 IQ2015 SAAR -0.7 Blog 5/31/15
Real Private Fixed Investment	SAAR IQ2015 ∆% minus 1.3 IVQ2007 to IQ2015: 3.0% Blog 5/31/15
Corporate Profits	IQ2015 SAAR: Corporate Profits -5.9; Undistributed Profits -22.3 Blog 5/31/15
Personal Income and Consumption	Apr month ∆% SA Real Disposable Personal Income (RDPI) SA ∆% 0.3 Real Personal Consumption Expenditures (RPCE): 0.0 12-month Apr NSA ∆%: RDPI: 3.5; RPCE ∆%: 2.7 Blog 6/7/15
Quarterly Services Report	IQ15/IQ14 NSA ∆%: Information 3.0 Financial & Insurance 3.7 Earlier Data: Blog 3/22/15
Employment Cost Index	Compensation Private IVQ2014 SA ∆%: 0.6 Dec 12 months ∆%: 2.3 Blog 2/1/15
Industrial Production	Apr month SA ∆%: -0.3 Apr 12 months SA ∆%: 1.9 Manufacturing Apr SA 0.0 ∆% Apr 12 months SA ∆% 2.3, NSA 2.3 Capacity Utilization: 78.2 Blog 5/17/15
Productivity and Costs	Nonfarm Business Productivity IQ2015∆% SAAE -3.1; IQ2015/IQ2014 ∆% 0.3; Unit Labor Costs SAAE IQ2015 ∆% 6.7; IQ2015/IQ2014 ∆%: 1.8 Blog 6/7/15
New York Fed Manufacturing Index	General Business Conditions From Apr -1.19 to May 3.09 New Orders: From Apr minus 6.00 to May 3,85 Blog 5/17/15
Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index	General Index from Apr 7.5 to May 6.7 New Orders from Apr 0.7 to May 4.0 Blog 5/24/15
Manufacturing Shipments and Orders	New Orders SA Apr ∆% -0.4 Ex Transport 0.0 Jan-Apr NSA New Orders ∆% minus 5.6 Ex transport minus 6.2 Earlier data: Blog 4/5/15
Durable Goods	Apr New Orders SA ∆%: -0.5; ex transport ∆%: minus 0.5 Jan-Apr 15/Jan-Apr 14 New Orders NSA ∆%: -1.3; ex transport ∆% -0.7 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15
Sales of New Motor Vehicles	May 2015 7,044,585; May 2014 6,742,948. May 15 SAAR 17.79 million, Apr 15 SAAR 16.50 million, May 2014 SAAR 16.73 million Blog 5/3/15
Sales of Merchant Wholesalers	Jan-Apr 2015/Jan-Apr 2014 NSA ∆%: Total -2.7; Durable Goods: 3.5; Nondurable Goods: -7.9 EARLIER DATA: Blog 4/12/15
Sales and Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers	Apr 15 12-M NSA ∆%: Sales Total Business -2.5; Manufacturers -3.7 Retailers 0.4; Merchant Wholesalers -3.6 Blog 6/14/15
Sales for Retail and Food Services	Jan-May 2015/Jan-May 2014 ∆%: Retail and Food Services 1.9; Retail ∆% 1.0 Blog 6/14/15
Value of Construction Put in Place	Apr SAAR month SA ∆%: 2.2 Apr 12-month NSA: 4.1 Earlier Data: Blog 4/5/15
Case-Shiller Home Prices	Mar 2015/ Mar 2014 ∆% NSA: 10 Cities 4.7; 20 Cities: 5.0; National: 4.2 ∆% Mar SA: 10 Cities 0.9 ; 20 Cities: 1.0 Blog 5/31/15
FHFA House Price Index Purchases Only	Mar SA ∆% 0.3; 12 month NSA ∆%: 5.2 Blog 5/31/15
New House Sales	Apr 2015 month SAAR ∆%: 6.8 Jan-Apr 2015/Jan-Apr 2014 NSA ∆%: 21.9 Blog 5/31/15
Housing Starts and Permits	Apr Starts month SA ∆% 20.2; Permits ∆%: 10.1 Jan-Mar 2015/Jan-Mar 2014 NSA ∆% Starts 5.5; Permits  ∆% 8.1 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Trade Balance	Balance Apr SA -$40,879 million versus Mar -$50,566 million Exports Apr SA ∆%: 1.0 Imports Apr SA ∆%: -3.7 Goods Exports Jan-Apr 2015/Jan-Apr 2014 NSA ∆%: -4.6 Goods Imports Jan-Apr 2015/Jan-Apr 2014 NSA ∆%: -3.0 Blog 6/7/15
Export and Import Prices	May 12-month NSA ∆%: Imports -9.6; Exports -5.9 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Consumer Credit	Apr ∆% annual rate: Total 7.3; Revolving 11.6; Nonrevolving 5.8 Earlier Data: Blog 5/10/15
Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term Treasury Securities	Mar Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term US Securities: minus $1.6 billion Major Holders of Treasury Securities: China $1261.0 billion; Japan $1226.9 billion; Total Foreign US Treasury Holdings Jan $6175.9 billion Blog 5/17/15
Treasury Budget	Fiscal Year 2015/2014 ∆% May: Receipts 8.6; Outlays 4.0; Individual Income Taxes 12.4 Deficit Fiscal Year 2011 $1,300 billion Deficit Fiscal Year 2012 $1,087 billion Deficit Fiscal Year 2013 $680 billion Deficit Fiscal Year 2014 $483 billion Blog 6/14/2015
CBO Budget and Economic Outlook	2012 Deficit $1087 B 6.8% GDP Debt $11,281 B 70.4% GDP 2013 Deficit $680 B, 4.1% GDP Debt $11,983 B 72.3% GDP 2014 Deficit $483 B 2.8% GDP Debt $12,779 B 74.1% GDP 2025 Deficit $1,088B, 4.0% GDP Debt $21,605B 78.7% GDP 2039: Long-term Debt/GDP 106% Blog 8/26/12 11/18/12 2/10/13 9/22/13 2/16/14 8/24/14 9/14/14 3/1/15
Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities	May 2015 SAAR ∆%: Securities 12.8 Loans 3.3 Cash Assets minus 39.0 Deposits minus 4.3 Blog 6/14/15
Flow of Funds Net Worth of Families and Nonprofits	IVQ2014 ∆ since 2007 Assets +$15,921.0 BN Nonfinancial $898.5 BN Real estate $172.1 BN Financial +15,022.4 BN Net Worth +$16,162.4 BN Blog 3/29/15
Current Account Balance of Payments	IVQ2014 -111,222 MM % GDP 2.6 Blog 3/22/15
Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation	Blog 6/14/15
IMF View	World Real Economic Growth 2015 ∆% 3.5 Blog 4/26/15

Links to blog comments in Table USA:

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

5/10/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/quite-high-equity-valuations-and.html

5/3/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/dollar-devaluation-and-carry-trade.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/29/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html

3/22/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/impatience-with-monetary-policy-of.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html

9/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitics-monetary-policy-and.html

8/24/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/monetary-policy-world-inflation-waves.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

9/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

2/10/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/united-states-unsustainable-fiscal.html

Sales of manufacturers changed 0.0 percent in Apr 2015 after increasing 0.5 percent in Mar and decreasing 3.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015, as shown in Table VA-1. Retailers’ sales increased 0.1 percent in Apr 2015 after increasing 1.6 percent in Mar and increased 0.4 percent in 12 months ending in Apr 2015. Sales of merchant wholesalers increased 1.6 percent in Apr, decreased 0.3 percent in Mar and decreased 3.6 percent in 12 months ending in Apr. Sales of total business increased 0.6 percent in Apr 2015 after decreasing 0.6 percent in Mar and decreased 2.5 percent in 12 months.

Table VA-1, US, Percentage Changes for Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers

	Apr 15/Mar 15 ∆% SA	Apr 2015 Millions of Dollars NSA	Mar 15/ Feb 15  ∆% SA	Apr 15/ Apr 14 ∆% NSA
Total Business	0.6	1,327,549	0.6	-2.5
Manufacturers	0.0	485,395	0.5	-3.7
Retailers	0.1	385,130	1.6	0.4
Merchant Wholesalers	1.6	457,024	-0.3	-3.6

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-1 of the US Census Bureau provides total US sales of manufacturing, retailers and wholesalers seasonally adjusted (SA) in millions of dollars. The series with adjustment evens fluctuations following seasonal patterns. There is sharp recovery from the global recession in a robust trend, which is mixture of price and quantity effects because data are not adjusted for price changes. There is stability in the final segment with subdued prices with data not adjusted for price changes.

Chart VA-1, US, Total Business Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, SA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Apr 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-2 of the US Census Bureau provides total US sales of manufacturing, retailers and wholesalers not seasonally adjusted (NSA) in millions of dollars. The series without adjustment shows sharp jagged behavior because of monthly fluctuations following seasonal patterns. There is sharp recovery from the global recession in a robust trend, which is mixture of price and quantity effects because data are not adjusted for price changes. There is stability in the final segment with monthly marginal weakness in data without adjustment for price changes.

Chart VA-2, US, Total Business Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, NSA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Apr 2015

US Census Bureau

http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Businesses added cautiously to inventories to replenish stocks. Retailers’ inventories increased 0.8 percent in Apr 2015 and increased 0.3 percent in Feb with growth of 3.8 percent in 12 months, as shown in Table VA-2. Total business increased inventories by 0.4 percent in Apr, 0.1 percent in Mar and increased 2.6 percent in 12 months. Inventories sales/ratios of total business continued at a level close to 1.30 under careful management to avoid costs and risks, increasing to 1.36 in Apr 2015. Inventory/sales ratios of manufacturers and retailers are higher than for merchant wholesalers. There is stability in inventory/sales ratios in individual months and relative to a year earlier with increase at the margin.

Table VA-2, US, Percentage Changes for Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers and Inventory/Sales Ratios

Inventory Change	Apr 15 Millions of Dollars NSA	Apr 15/ Mar 15 ∆% SA	Mar 15/  Feb 15 ∆% SA	Apr 15/Apr 14 ∆% NSA
Total Business	1,799,912	0.4	0.1	2.6
Manufacturers	652,206	0.1	-0.1	-0.1
Retailers	567,750	0.8	0.3	3.8
Merchant Wholesalers	579,956	0.4	0.2	4.4
Inventory/ Sales Ratio	Apr 15 Millions of Dollars NSA	Apr 2015 SA	Mar 2015 SA	Apr 2014 SA
Total Business	1,799,912	1.36	1.36	1.29
Manufacturers	652,206	1.35	1.34	1.30
Retailers	567,750	1.46	1.45	1.42
Merchant Wholesalers	579,956	1.29	1.30	1.19

US Census Bureau

http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-3 of the US Census Bureau provides total business inventories of manufacturers, retailers and merchant wholesalers seasonally adjusted (SA) in millions of dollars from Jan 1992 to Apr 2015. The impact of the two recessions of 2001 and IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 is evident in the form of sharp reductions in inventories. Inventories have surpassed the peak before the global recession. Data are not adjusted for price changes.

Chart VA-3, US, Total Business Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, SA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Apr 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-4 provides total business inventories of manufacturers, retailers and merchant wholesalers not seasonally adjusted (NSA) from Jan 1992 to Apr 2015 in millions of dollars. The recessions of 2001 and IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 are evident in the form of sharp reductions of inventories. There is sharp upward trend of inventory accumulation after both recessions. Total business inventories are higher than in the peak before the global recession.

Chart VA-4, US, Total Business Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, NSA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Apr 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Inventories follow business cycles. When recession hits sales inventories pile up, declining with expansion of the economy. In a fascinating classic opus, Lloyd Meltzer (1941, 129) concludes:

“The dynamic sequences (i) through (6) were intended to show what types of behavior are possible for a system containing a sales output lag. The following conclusions seem to be the most important:

(i) An economy in which business men attempt to recoup inventory losses will always undergo cyclical fluctuations when equilibrium is disturbed, provided the economy is stable.

This is the pure inventory cycle.

(2) The assumption of stability imposes severe limitations upon the possible size of the marginal propensity to consume, particularly if the coefficient of expectation is positive.

(3) The inventory accelerator is a more powerful de-stabilizer than the ordinary acceleration principle. The difference in stability conditions is due to the fact that the former allows for replacement demand whereas the usual analytical formulation of the latter does not. Thus, for inventories, replacement demand acts as a de-stabilizer. Whether it does so for all types of capital goods is a moot question, but I believe cases may occur in which it does not.

(4) Investment for inventory purposes cannot alter the equilibrium of income, which depends only upon the propensity to consume and the amount of non-induced investment.

(5) The apparent instability of a system containing both an accelerator and a coefficient of expectation makes further investigation of possible stabilizers highly desirable.”

Chart VA-5 shows the increase in the inventory/sales ratios during the recession of 2007-2009. The inventory/sales ratio fell during the expansions. The inventory/sales ratio declined to a trough in 2011, climbed and then stabilized at current levels in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 with increase into 2015.

Chart VA-5, Total Business Inventories/Sales Ratios 2006 to 2015

Source: US Census Bureau

http://www2.census.gov/mtis/historical/img/mtisbrf.gif

Sales of retail and food services increased 1.2 percent in May 2015 after increasing 0.2 percent in Apr 2015 seasonally adjusted (SA), growing 1.9 percent in Jan-May 2015 relative to Jan-May 2014 not seasonally adjusted (NSA), as shown in Table VA-3. Excluding motor vehicles and parts, retail sales increased 1.0 percent in May 2015, increasing 0.1 percent in Apr 2015 SA and increasing 0.5 percent NSA in Jan-May 2015 relative to a year earlier. Sales of motor vehicles and parts increased 2.0 percent in May 2015 after increasing 0.7 percent in Apr 2015 SA and increasing 7.1 percent NSA in Jan-May 2015 relative to a year earlier. Gasoline station sales increased 3.7 percent SA in May 2015 after decreasing 0.6 percent in Apr 2015 in oscillating prices of gasoline that are moderating, decreasing 21.8 percent in Jan-May 2015 relative to a year earlier.

Table VA-3, US, Percentage Change in Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services, ∆%

	May/Apr ∆% SA	Apr/Mar ∆% SA	Jan-May 2015 Million Dollars NSA	Jan-May 2015 from Jan-May 2014 ∆% NSA
Retail and Food Services	1.2	0.2	2,125,476	1.9
Excluding Motor Vehicles and Parts	1.0	0.1	1,673,990	0.5
Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers	2.0	0.7	451,486	7.1
Retail	1.4	0.1	1,870,801	1.0
Building Materials	2.1	-0.4	134,040	4.8
Food and Beverage	0.2	-0.2	277,108	3.3
Grocery	0.3	-0.3	248,608	3.0
Health & Personal Care Stores	-0.3	0.4	128,013	4.7
Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores	1.5	0.0	96,215	2.2
Gasoline Stations	3.7	-0.6	175,624	-21.8
General Merchandise Stores	0.8	-0.7	260,119	0.0
Food Services & Drinking Places	0.1	1.1	254,675	8.9

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-6 provides monthly percentage changes of sales of retail and food services. There is significant monthly volatility that prevents identification of clear trends.

Chart VA-6, US, Monthly Percentage Change of Retail and Food Services Sales, Jan 1992-May 2015

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-7 of the US Census Bureau provides total sales of retail trade and food services seasonally adjusted (SA) from Jan 1992 to May 2015 in millions of dollars. The impact on sales of the shallow recession of 2001 was much milder than the sharp contraction in the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. There is flattening in the final segment of the series followed by another increase/decrease. Data are not adjusted for price changes.

Chart VA-7, US, Total Sales of Retail Trade and Food Services, SA, Jan 1992-May 2015, Millions of Dollars

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-8 of the US Census Bureau provides total sales of retail trade and food services not seasonally adjusted (NSA) in millions of dollars from Jan 1992 to May 2015. Data are not adjusted for seasonality, which explains sharp jagged behavior, or price changes. There was contraction during the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 with strong rebound to a higher level and stability followed by strong increase in the final segment. Sales decline in the last observation.

Chart VA-8, US, Total Sales of Retail Trade and Food Services, NSA, Jan 1992-May 2015, Millions of Dollars

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Table IIAI-2 provides additional information required for understanding the deficit/debt situation of the United States. The table is divided into four parts: Treasury budget in the 2015 fiscal year beginning on Oct 1, 2014 and ending on Sep 30, 2015; federal fiscal data for the years from 2009 to 2014; federal fiscal data for the years from 2005 to 2008; and Treasury debt held by the public from 2005 to 2014. Receipts increased 8.6 percent in the cumulative fiscal year 2015 ending in May 2015 relative to the cumulative in fiscal year 2014. Individual income taxes increased 12.4 percent relative to the same fiscal period a year earlier. Outlays increased 4.0 percent relative to a year earlier. There are also receipts, outlays, deficit and debt for fiscal years 2013 and 2014. Total revenues of the US from 2009 to 2012 accumulate to $9021 billion, or $9.0 trillion, while expenditures or outlays accumulate to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, with the deficit accumulating to $5090 billion, or $5.1 trillion. Revenues decreased 6.5 percent from $9653 billion in the four years from 2005 to 2008 to $9021 billion in the years from 2009 to 2012. Decreasing revenues were caused by the global recession from IVQ2007 (Dec) to IIQ2009 (Jun) and also by growth of only 2.2 percent on average in the cyclical expansion from IIIQ2009 to IQ2015. In contrast, the expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988 was at the average annual growth rate of 4.8 percent and at 7.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983 (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html). Because of mediocre GDP growth, there are 24.7 million unemployed or underemployed in the United States for an effective unemployment/underemployment rate of 14.9 percent (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html). Weakness of growth and employment creation is analyzed in II Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation (Section I and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html). In contrast with the decline of revenue, outlays or expenditures increased 30.2 percent from $10,839 billion, or $10.8 trillion, in the four years from 2005 to 2008, to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, in the four years from 2009 to 2012. Increase in expenditures by 30.2 percent while revenue declined by 6.5 percent caused the increase in the federal deficit from $1186 billion in 2005-2008 to $5090 billion in 2009-2012. Federal revenue was 14.9 percent of GDP on average in the years from 2009 to 2012, which is well below 17.4 percent of GDP on average from 1965 to 2014. Federal outlays were 23.3 percent of GDP on average from 2009 to 2012, which is well above 20.1 percent of GDP on average from 1965 to 2014. The lower part of Table IIA1-2 shows that debt held by the public swelled from $5803 billion in 2008 to $12,779 billion in 2014, by $6976 billion or 120.2 percent. Debt held by the public as percent of GDP or economic activity jumped from 39.3 percent in 2008 to 74.1 percent in 2014, which is well above the average of 38.2 percent from 1965 to 2014. The United States faces tough adjustment because growth is unlikely to recover, creating limits on what can be obtained by increasing revenues, while continuing stress of social programs restricts what can be obtained by reducing expenditures.

Table IIA1-6, US, Treasury Budget in Fiscal Year to Date Million Dollars

May	Fiscal Year 2015	Fiscal Year 2014	∆%
Receipts	2,103,987	1,936,739	8.6
Outlays	2,469,144	2,373,122	4.0
Deficit	-365,156	-436,384
Individual Income Tax	1,014,673	903,024	12.4
Corporation Income Tax	182,685	164,840	10.8
Social Insurance	515,033	493,716	4.3
	Receipts	Outlays	Deficit (-), Surplus (+)
$ Billions
Fiscal Year 2014	3,021	3,504	-483
% GDP	17.5	20.3	2.8
Fiscal Year 2013	2,775	3,455	-680
% GDP	16.7	20.8	-4.1
Fiscal Year 2012	2,450	3,537	-1,087
% GDP	15.2	22.0	-6.8
Fiscal Year 2011	2,304	3,603	-1,300
% GDP	15.0	23.4	-8.4
Fiscal Year 2010	2,163	3,457	-1,294
% GDP	14.6	23.4	-8.8
Fiscal Year 2009	2,105	3,518	-1,413
% GDP	14.6	24.4	-9.8
Total 2009-2012	9,021	14,109	-5,090
Average % GDP 2009-2012	14.9	23.3	-8.4
Fiscal Year 2008	2,524	2,983	-459
% GDP	17.1	20.2	-3.1
Fiscal Year 2007	2,568	2,729	-161
% GDP	17.9	19.0	-1.1
Fiscal Year 2006	2,407	2,655	-248
% GDP	17.6	19.4	-1.8
Fiscal Year 2005	2,154	2,472	-318
% GDP	16.7	19.2	-2.5
Total 2005-2008	9,653	10,839	-1,186
Average % GDP 2005-2008	17.3	19.5	-2.1
Debt Held by the Public	Billions of Dollars	Percent of GDP
2005	4,592	35.6
2006	4,829	35.3
2007	5,035	35.1
2008	5,803	39.3
2009	7,545	52.3
2010	9,019	61.0
2011	10,128	65.8
2012	11,281	70.1
2013	11,982	72.0
2014	12,779	74.1

Source: http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/mthTreasStmt/mthTreasStmt_home.htm CBO (2012NovMBR). CBO (2011AugBEO); Office of Management and Budget 2011. Historical Tables. Budget of the US Government Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: OMB; CBO. 2011JanBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Jan. CBO. 2012AugBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Aug 22. CBO. 2012Jan31. Historical budget data. Washington, DC, Jan 31. CBO. 2012NovCDR. Choices for deficit reduction. Washington, DC. Nov. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO (2013Aug12). 2013AugHBD. Historical budget data—August 2013. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Aug. CBO, Historical Budget Data—February 2014, Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb. CBO, Historical budget data—April 2014 release. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Apr. Congressional Budget Office, August 2014 baseline: an update to the budget and economic outlook: 2014 to 2024. Washington, DC, CBO, Aug 27, 2014. CBO, Monthly budget review: summary of fiscal year 2014. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Nov 10, 2014. CBO, The budget and economic outlook: 2015 to 2025. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Jan 26, 2015.

VB Japan. The GDP of Japan grew at 1.0 percent per year on average from 1991 to 2002, with the GDP implicit deflator falling at 0.8 percent per year on average. The average growth rate of Japan’s GDP was 4 percent per year on average from the middle of the 1970s to 1992 (Ito 2004). Low growth in Japan in the 1990s is commonly labeled as “the lost decade” (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 81-115). Table VB-GDP provides yearly growth rates of Japan’s GDP from 1995 to 2014. Growth weakened from 1.9 per cent in 1995 and 2.6 percent in 1996 to contractions of 2.0 percent in 1998 and 0.2 percent in 1999. Growth rates were below 2 percent with exception of 2.3 percent in 2000, 2.4 percent in 2004 and 2.2 percent in 2007. Japan’s GDP contracted sharply by 1.0 percent in 2008 and 5.5 percent in 2009. As in most advanced economies, growth was robust at 4.7 percent in 2010 but mediocre at minus 0.5 percent in 2011 because of the tsunami and 1.7 percent in 2012. Japan’s GDP grew 1.6 percent in 2013 and stagnated in 2014 at minus 0.1. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). Japan’s real GDP in calendar year 2014 is 0.6 percent higher than in calendar year 2007 (http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html).

Table VB-GDP, Japan, Yearly Percentage Change of GDP  ∆%

Calendar Year	∆%
1995	1.9
1996	2.6
1997	1.6
1998	-2.0
1999	-0.2
2000	2.3
2001	0.4
2002	0.3
2003	1.7
2004	2.4
2005	1.3
2006	1.7
2007	2.2
2008	-1.0
2009	-5.5
2010	4.7
2011	-0.5
2012	1.7
2013	1.6
2014	-0.1

Source: Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html

The Markit/JMMA Flash Japan Manufacturing PMI Index™ with the Flash Japan Manufacturing PMI™ increased from 49.9 in Apr to 50.9 in May and the Flash Japan Manufacturing Output Index™ increased from 49.3 in Apr to 51.7 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/00b8ed52e9154549b1e39c2d675b033b). New export orders increased at faster pace. Amy Brownbill, Economist at Markit, finds improvement in Japan’s manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/00b8ed52e9154549b1e39c2d675b033b). The Markit Composite Output PMI Index increased from 50.7 in Apr to 51.6 in May, indicating improving business activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/36176c5ad6c9451691a22bf323f473d7). The Markit Business Activity Index of Services increased to 51.5 in May from 51.3 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/36176c5ad6c9451691a22bf323f473d7). Amy Brownbill, Ecoomist at Markit and author of the report, finds improved conditions with weakening business expectations (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/36176c5ad6c9451691a22bf323f473d7). The Markit/JMMA Purchasing Managers’ Index^™ (PMI™), seasonally adjusted, increased from 49.9 in Apr to 50.9 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a70dba7b7ace4731af2d58fd03bd5a53). New orders increased while growth of foreign orders continued. Amy Brownbill, Economist at Markit, finds manufacturing improving with weak growth foreign orders even with devaluation of the yen (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a70dba7b7ace4731af2d58fd03bd5a53).Table JPY provides the country data table for Japan.

Table JPY, Japan, Economic Indicators

Historical GDP and CPI	1981-2010 Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation 1981-2010 Blog 8/9/11 Table 26
Corporate Goods Prices	May ∆% 0.3 12 months ∆% -2.1 Blog 6/14/15
Consumer Price Index	Apr NSA ∆% 0.4; Apr 12 months NSA ∆% 0.6 Blog 5/31/15
Real GDP Growth	IQ2015 ∆%: 1.0 on IVQ2014;  IVQ2014 SAAR 3.9; ∆% from quarter a year earlier: -0.9 % Blog 6/16/13 8/18/13 9/15/13 11/17/13 12/15/13 2/23/14 3/16/14 5/18/14 6/15/14 8/17/14 9/14/14 11/23/14 12/14/14 2/22/15 3/15/15 5/24/15 6/14/15
Employment Report	Apr Unemployed 2.34 million Change in unemployed since last year: minus 200 thousand Unemployment rate: 3.3 % Blog 5/31/15
All Industry Indices	Mar month SA ∆% -1/3 12-month NSA ∆% -2.4 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15
Industrial Production	Apr SA month ∆%: 1.0 Mar -0.8 Apr 12-month NSA ∆% -0.1 Mar -1.7 Earlier Data: Blog 3/29/15
Machine Orders	Total Apr ∆% -1.1 Private ∆%: -16.5 Apr ∆% Excluding Volatile Orders minus 3.8 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Tertiary Index	Apr month SA ∆% -0.2 Apr 12 months NSA ∆% minus -2.0 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15
Wholesale and Retail Sales	Apr 12 months: Total ∆%: 2.7 Wholesale ∆%: 1.8 Retail ∆%: 5.0 Earlier Data: Blog 3/29/15
Family Income and Expenditure Survey	Apr 12-month ∆% total nominal consumption -0.5, real -1.3 Earlier Data: Blog 3/29/15
Trade Balance	Exports Apr 12 months ∆%: 8.0 Imports A[r 12 months ∆% -4.2 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15

Links to blog comments in Table JPY:

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

3/29/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

2/22/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/world-financial-turbulence-squeeze-of.html

12/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/global-financial-and-economic-risk.html

11/23/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.htm

9/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitics-monetary-policy-and.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html

2/23/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.html

12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

Japan’s economy grew 1.1 percent in IQ2014, seasonally adjusted, partly because of anticipation of purchases to avoid the increase in the tax on value added of consumption in Apr 2014, contracting 1.7 percent in IIQ2014, as shown in Table VB-1, incorporating the latest estimates and revisions. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.5 percent in IIIQ2014 and grew 0.3 percent in IVQ2014. The GDP of Japan increased 1.0 percent in IQ2015. The economy of Japan contracted 0.2 percent in IVQ2013 after growing 0.5 percent in IIIQ2013, 0.7 percent in IIQ2013 and 1.3 percent in IQ2013. Japan’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IIIQ2012. IQ2012 GDP growth was revised to 1.0 percent; IIQGDP growth was revised to -0.5 percent; and IIIQ2012 growth was revised to -0.4 percent. The economy of Japan had already weakened in IVQ2010 when GDP fell revised 0.5 percent. As in other advanced economies, Japan’s recovery from the global recession has not been robust. GDP fell 1.9 percent in IQ2011 and fell again 0.6 percent in IIQ2011 because of the disruption of the tragic Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Recovery was robust in the first two quarters of 2010 but GDP grew at 1.5 percent in IIIQ2010 and fell 0.5 percent in IVQ2010. The deepest quarterly contractions in the global recession were 3.3 percent in IVQ2008 and 4.0 percent in IQ2009. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). Using seasonally adjusted and price adjusted data (http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html), Japan’s GDP fell 9.2 percent from the pre-downturn peak in IQ2008 to the lowest reading in IQ2009. Japan’s GDP fell 0.1 percent from IQ2008 to IQ2015. GDP in Japan grew 10.1 percent from IIQ2009 to IQ2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 1.6 percent, using the latest revision (http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html).

Table VB-1, Japan, Real GDP ∆% Changes from the Previous Quarter Seasonally Adjusted ∆%

	IQ	IIQ	IIIQ	IVQ
2015	1.0
2014	1.1	-1.7	-0.5	0.3
2013	1.3	0.7	0.5	-0.2
2012	1.0	-0.5	-0.4	-0.1
2011	-1.9	-0.6	2.7	0.2
2010	1.5	1.1	1.5	-0.5
2009	-4.0	1.7	0.1	1.7
2008	0.7	-1.2	-1.1	-3.3
2007	1.0	0.1	-0.4	0.9
2006	0.4	0.4	-0.1	1.3
2005	0.2	1.3	0.3	0.2
2004	0.9	0.1	0.1	-0.3
2003	-0.6	1.3	0.4	1.0
2002	-0.2	1.1	0.6	0.4
2001	0.6	-0.2	-1.1	-0.1
2000	1.6	0.2	-0.3	0.7
1999	-0.9	0.4	-0.2	0.5
1998	-1.9	-0.5	0.3	0.6
1997	0.8	-1.0	0.4	-0.1

Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html

Table VB-2 provides contributions to real GDP at seasonally adjusted annual rates (SAAR). GDP grew at 3.9 percent in IQ2015 with highest contributions of 0.9 percent by personal consumption expenditures (PC) and increase in inventory investment (PINV) at 2.2 percent. Gross Fixed Capital Formation increased at 1.4 percent while trade deducted 0.7 percentage points and government consumption expenditures deducted 0.1 percentage points. GDP expanded at 1.2 percent in IVQ2014 with contribution of 0.9 percent by personal consumption expenditures, 1.1 percent by net trade and 0.2 percent by government consumption expenditures. Gross fixed capital formation deducted 0.1 percent and private inventory divestment deducted 1.0 percent. Trade added 1.1 percentage points. Japan contracted at 2.0 percent in IIIQ2014 with deduction of 0.4 percentage points of GFCF and deduction of 2.8 percentage points of inventory divestment. Traded added 0.2 percentage points and government 0.2 percent. Japan’s GDP contracted at 6.8 percent in IIQ2014 with deductions of 12.6 percent by personal consumption and 4.1 percent by gross fixed capital formation. Trade added 4.3 percentage points and government expenditures 0.2 percent. Inventory divestment added 5.3 percent. The GDP of Japan expanded at 4.4 percent in IQ2014 with contributions of 5.2 percent by personal consumption and 2.9 percent of gross fixed capital formation. There were deductions of 1.3 percent by trade, 2.2 percent by inventory divestment and 0.2 percent by government expenditures. The GDP of Japan contracted at 0.9 percent annual equivalent in IVQ2013 with contraction of personal consumption expenditures of 0.4 percent and growth of GFCF at 1.2 percent. Trade deducted 2.1 percentage points. Japan grew at 2.0 percent in IIIQ 2013 with contribution of 0.8 percentage points by personal consumption and 2.0 percentage points by GFCF. Trade deducted 1.5 percentage points. Japan grew at 2.9 percent SAAR in IIQ2013 driven by contributions of 2.1 percent of personal consumption (PC), 0.1 percent of net trade and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) at 2.1 percent. In IQ2013, Japan’s GDP increased at the SAAR of 5.3 percent in large part because of 3.1 percent in personal consumption and 1.6 percent in trade. The SAAR of GDP in IVQ2012 was minus 0.6 percent: 0.1 percentage points from growth of personal consumption expenditures (PC) less 0.6 percentage points of net trade (exports less imports) less 0.5 percentage points of private inventory investment (PINV) plus 0.5 percentage points of government consumption and minus 0.1 percentage points of gross fixed capital formation (GFCF). The SAAR of GDP in IIIQ2011 was revised to a high 11.1 percent. Net trade deducted from GDP growth in three quarters of 2011 and provided the growth impulse of 3.9 percentage points in IIIQ2011. Growth in 2011 and IQ2012 was driven by personal consumption expenditures that deducted 0.8 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 but added 0.1 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2012.

Table VB-2, Japan, Contributions to Changes in Real GDP, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates (SAAR), %

	GDP	PC	GFCF	Trade	PINV	GOVC
2015
I	3.9	0.9	1.4	-0.7	2.2	-0.1
2014
I	4.4	5.2	2.9	-1.3	-2.2	-0.2
II	-6.8	-12.6	-4.1	4.3	5.3	0.2
III	-2.0	0.8	-0.4	0.2	-2.8	0.2
IV	1.2	0.9	-0.1	1.1	-1.0	0.2
2013
I	5.3	3.1	0.2	1.6	-0.2	0.7
II	2.9	2.1	2.1	0.1	-2.1	0.5
III	2.0	0.8	2.0	-1.5	0.8	-0.1
IV	-0.9	-0.4	1.2	-2.1	0.2	0.0
2012
I	4.1	1.4	-0.6	0.3	2.0	1.0
II	-1.8	1.6	0.6	-1.5	-2.2	-0.3
III	-1.8	-0.8	-0.9	-1.9	1.4	0.4
IV	-0.6	0.1	-0.1	-0.6	-0.5	0.5
2011
I	-7.4	-4.0	-0.3	-1.2	-1.8	-0.1
II	-2.5	2.6	0.3	-4.5	-1.4	0.4
III	11.1	3.9	1.3	3.9	1.7	0.1
IV	0.8	1.0	3.3	-2.9	-0.7	0.2
2010
I	6.1	1.8	0.1	2.4	2.4	-0.5
II	4.5	0.2	1.2	0.0	1.9	1.2
III	6.0	3.1	0.9	0.5	1.3	0.3
IV	-2.1	-1.1	-1.1	-0.3	0.1	0.3
2009
I	-15.0	-1.9	-2.1	-4.4	-7.4	0.8
II	7.1	4.2	-2.9	7.3	-2.2	0.7
III	0.2	-0.1	-1.4	2.2	-1.4	1.0
IV	7.1	3.4	0.0	2.8	0.5	0.3
2008
I	2.8	1.5	0.3	1.2	-0.3	-0.1
II	-4.6	-3.1	-2.2	0.4	1.0	-0.8
III	-4.2	-0.6	-1.0	0.0	-2.6	0.0
IV	-12.5	-2.8	-4.5	-11.4	5.7	0.3
2007
I	4.1	0.9	0.5	1.2	1.3	0.4
II	0.6	0.6	-1.5	0.7	0.0	0.5
III	-1.6	-1.0	-1.7	2.0	-0.6	-0.2
IV	3.5	0.3	0.3	1.4	0.9	0.6

Note: PC: Private Consumption; GFCF: Gross Fixed Capital Formation; PINV: Private Inventory; Trade: Net Exports; GOVC: Government Consumption

Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/

Long-term economic growth in Japan significantly improved by increasing competitiveness in world markets. Net trade of exports and imports is an important component of the GDP accounts of Japan. Table VB-3 provides quarterly data for net trade, exports and imports of Japan. Net trade had strong positive contributions to GDP growth in Japan in all quarters from IQ2007 to IIQ2009 with exception of IVQ2008 and IQ2009. The US recession is dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) as beginning in IVQ2007 (Dec) and ending in IIQ2009 (Jun) (http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html). Net trade contributions helped to cushion the economy of Japan from the global recession. Net trade deducted from GDP growth in seven of the nine quarters from IVQ2010 IQ2012. The only strong contribution of net trade was 3.9 percent in IIIQ2011. Net trade added 1.6 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2013 and 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013 but deducted 1.5 percentage points in IIIQ2013 and deducted 2.1 percentage points in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.3 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2014. Net trade added 4.3 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2014 and 0.2 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade added 1.1 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.7 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2015. Private consumption assumed the role of driver of Japan’s economic growth but should moderate as in most mature economies.

Table VB-3, Japan, Contributions to Changes in Real GDP, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates (SAAR), %

	Net Trade	Exports	Imports
2015
I	-0.7	1.8	-2.4
2014
I	-1.3	4.0	-5.2
II	4.3	0.0	4.3
III	0.2	1.1	-0.9
IV	1.1	2.3	-1.2
2013
I	1.6	2.3	-0.7
II	0.1	1.7	-1.6
III	-1.5	-0.2	-1.2
IV	-2.1	0.0	-2.1
2012
I	0.3	1.6	-1.3
II	-1.5	-0.2	-1.2
III	-1.9	-2.3	0.4
IV	-0.6	-2.1	1.6
2011
I	-1.2	-0.5	-0.7
II	-4.5	-4.6	0.2
III	3.9	5.8	-1.9
IV	-2.9	-2.0	-0.9
2010
I	2.4	3.7	-1.3
II	0.0	2.7	-2.7
III	0.5	1.4	-0.9
IV	-0.3	0.1	-0.4
2009
I	-4.4	-16.4	12.0
II	7.3	4.7	2.6
III	2.2	5.3	-3.1
IV	2.8	4.1	-1.3
2008
I	1.2	2.1	-0.9
II	0.4	-1.6	2.0
III	0.0	0.1	-0.2
IV	-11.4	-10.2	-1.2
2007
I	1.2	1.7	-0.5
II	0.7	1.6	-0.9
III	2.0	1.4	0.6
IV	1.4	2.1	-0.6

Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html

Japan’s percentage growth of GDP not seasonally adjusted in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier is shown in Table VB-4. Contraction of GDP in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier extended over seven quarters from IIQ2008 through IVQ2009. Contraction was sharpest in IQ2009 with output declining 9.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Yearly quarterly rates of growth of Japan were relatively high for a mature economy through the decade with the exception of the contractions from IVQ2001 to IIQ2002 and after 2007. The Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011 caused flat GDP in IQ2011 at 0.1 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier and decline of 1.5 percent in IIQ2011. GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIIQ2011 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2011 relative to a year earlier. Growth resumed with 3.5 percent in IQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Growth of 3.5 percent in IIQ2012 is largely caused by the low level in IIQ2011 resulting from the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2012 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.5 percent in IQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 1.4 percent in IIQ2013. Growth of 2.2 percent in IIIQ2013 relative to a year earlier is partly due to the decline of 0.4 percent in GDP in IIIQ2012.  GDP increased 2.3 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Japan increased 2.4 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.4 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP contracted 1.4 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP contracted 1.0 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier in IQ2015. Japan faces the challenge of recovery from the devastation of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011 in an environment of declining world trade and bouts of risk aversion that cause appreciation of the Japanese yen, eroding the country’s competitiveness in world markets. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977).  Using price adjusted but not seasonally adjusted data (http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html), Japan’s GDP contracted 11.5 percent from the high in IVQ2007 to the low in IIQ2009. GDP fell 1.0 percent from IVQ2007 to IQ2015. Japan’s GDP grew 11.8 percent from IIIQ2009 to IQ2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 2.0 percent.

Table VB-4, Japan, Real GDP ∆% Changes from Same Quarter Year Earlier, NSA ∆%

	IQ	IIQ	IIIQ	IVQ
2015	-0.9
2014	2.4	-0.4	-1.4	-1.0
2013	0.4	1.4	2.2	2.3
2012	3.5	3.5	0.2	0.0
2011	0.1	-1.5	-0.5	0.1
2010	5.0	4.5	6.1	3.4
2009	-9.4	-6.6	-5.6	-0.5
2008	1.4	-0.1	-0.6	-4.7
2007	2.8	2.3	2.0	1.6
2006	2.6	1.3	0.9	2.0
2005	0.4	1.4	1.5	1.9
2004	4.0	2.6	2.2	0.7
2003	1.7	1.8	1.5	1.8
2002	-1.6	-0.2	1.4	1.6
2001	1.6	0.9	0.0	-1.0
2000	2.7	2.4	2.2	1.8
1999	-0.3	0.1	-0.1	-0.5
1998	-2.4	-1.8	-2.3	-1.5
1997	3.5	1.5	1.7	-0.2

Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

Long-term economic growth in Japan significantly improved by increasing competitiveness in world markets. Net trade of exports and imports is an important component of the GDP accounts of Japan. Table VB-3 provides quarterly data for net trade, exports and imports of Japan. Net trade had strong positive contributions to GDP growth in Japan in all quarters from IQ2007 to IIQ2009 with exception of IVQ2008 and IQ2009. The US recession is dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) as beginning in IVQ2007 (Dec) and ending in IIQ2009 (Jun) (http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html). Net trade contributions helped to cushion the economy of Japan from the global recession. Net trade deducted from GDP growth in seven of the nine quarters from IVQ2010 IQ2012. The only strong contribution of net trade was 3.9 percent in IIIQ2011. Net trade added 1.6 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2013 and 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013 but deducted 1.5 percentage points in IIIQ2013 and deducted 2.1 percentage points in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.3 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2014. Net trade added 4.3 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2014 and 0.2 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade added 1.1 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.7 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2015. Private consumption assumed the role of driver of Japan’s economic growth but should moderate as in most mature economies.

Table VB-3, Japan, Contributions to Changes in Real GDP, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates (SAAR), %

	Net Trade	Exports	Imports
2015
I	-0.7	1.8	-2.4
2014
I	-1.3	4.0	-5.2
II	4.3	0.0	4.3
III	0.2	1.1	-0.9
IV	1.1	2.3	-1.2
2013
I	1.6	2.3	-0.7
II	0.1	1.7	-1.6
III	-1.5	-0.2	-1.2
IV	-2.1	0.0	-2.1
2012
I	0.3	1.6	-1.3
II	-1.5	-0.2	-1.2
III	-1.9	-2.3	0.4
IV	-0.6	-2.1	1.6
2011
I	-1.2	-0.5	-0.7
II	-4.5	-4.6	0.2
III	3.9	5.8	-1.9
IV	-2.9	-2.0	-0.9
2010
I	2.4	3.7	-1.3
II	0.0	2.7	-2.7
III	0.5	1.4	-0.9
IV	-0.3	0.1	-0.4
2009
I	-4.4	-16.4	12.0
II	7.3	4.7	2.6
III	2.2	5.3	-3.1
IV	2.8	4.1	-1.3
2008
I	1.2	2.1	-0.9
II	0.4	-1.6	2.0
III	0.0	0.1	-0.2
IV	-11.4	-10.2	-1.2
2007
I	1.2	1.7	-0.5
II	0.7	1.6	-0.9
III	2.0	1.4	0.6
IV	1.4	2.1	-0.6

Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html

There was milder increase in Japan’s export corporate goods price index during the global recession in 2008 but similar sharp decline during the bank balance sheets effect in late 2008, as shown in Chart IV-5 of the Bank of Japan. Japan exports industrial goods whose prices have been less dynamic than those of commodities and raw materials. As a result, the export CGPI on the yen basis in Chart IV-5 trends down with oscillations after a brief rise in the final part of the recession in 2009. The export corporate goods price index on the yen basis fell from 104.9 in Jun 2009 to 94.0 in Jan 2012 or minus 10.4 percent and increased to 113.4 in May 2015 for gain of 20.6 percent relative to Jan 2012 and 8.1 percent relative to Jun 2009. The choice of Jun 2009 is designed to capture the reversal of risk aversion beginning in Sep 2008 with the announcement of toxic assets in banks that would be withdrawn with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) (Cochrane and Zingales 2009). Reversal of risk aversion in the form of flight to the USD and obligations of the US government opened the way to renewed carry trades from zero interest rates to exposures in risk financial assets such as commodities. Japan exports industrial products and imports commodities and raw materials. The recovery from the global recession began in the third quarter of 2009.

Chart IV-5, Japan, Export Corporate Goods Price Index, Monthly, Yen Basis, 2008-2015

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index_en.html

Chart IV-5A provides the export corporate goods price index on the basis of the contract currency. The export corporate goods price index on the basis of the contract currency increased from 97.9 in Jun 2009 to 103.1 in Apr 2012 or 5.3 percent but dropped to 93.8 in May 2015 or minus 9.0 percent relative to Apr 2012 and fell 4.2 percent to 93.8 in May 2015 relative to Jun 2009.

Chart IV-5A, Japan, Export Corporate Goods Price Index, Monthly, Contract Currency Basis, 2008-2015

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index_en.html

Japan imports primary commodities and raw materials. As a result, the import corporate goods price index on the yen basis in Chart IV-6 shows an upward trend after declining from the increase during the global recession in 2008 driven by carry trades from fed funds rates. The index increases with carry trades from zero interest rates into commodity futures and declines during risk aversion from late 2008 into beginning of 2008 originating in doubts about soundness of US bank balance sheets. More careful measurement should show that the terms of trade of Japan, export prices relative to import prices, declined during the commodity shocks originating in unconventional monetary policy. The decline of the terms of trade restricted potential growth of income in Japan (for the relation of terms of trade and growth see Pelaez 1979, 1976a). The import corporate goods price index on the yen basis increased from 93.5 in Jun 2009 to 113.1 in Apr 2012 or 21.0 percent and to 115.4 in May 2015 or gain of 2.0 percent relative to Apr 2012 and 23.4 percent relative to Jun 2009.

Chart IV-6, Japan, Import Corporate Goods Price Index, Monthly, Yen Basis, 2008-2015

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index_en.html

Chart IV-6A provides the import corporate goods price index on the contract currency basis. The import corporate goods price index on the basis of the contract currency increased from 86.2 in Jun 2009 to 119.5 in Apr 2012 or 38.6 percent and to 92.2 in May 2015 or minus 22.8 percent relative to Apr 2012 and gain of 7.0 percent relative to Jun 2009. There is evident deterioration of the terms of trade of Japan: the export corporate goods price index on the basis of the contract currency decreased 4.2 percent from Jun 2009 to May 2015 while the import corporate goods price index increased 7.0 percent. Prices of Japan’s exports of corporate goods, mostly industrial products, increased only 5.3 percent from Jun 2009 to Apr 2012, while imports of corporate goods, mostly commodities and raw materials increased 38.6 percent. Unconventional monetary policy induces carry trades from zero interest rates to exposures in commodities that squeeze economic activity of industrial countries by increases in prices of imported commodities and raw materials during periods without risk aversion. Reversals of carry trades during periods of risk aversion decrease prices of exported commodities and raw materials that squeeze economic activity in economies exporting commodities and raw materials. Devaluation of the dollar by unconventional monetary policy could increase US competitiveness in world markets but economic activity is squeezed by increases in prices of imported commodities and raw materials. Unconventional monetary policy causes instability worldwide instead of the mission of central banks of promoting financial and economic stability.

Chart IV-6A, Japan, Import Corporate Goods Price Index, Monthly, Contract Currency Basis, 2008-2015

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index_en.html

Table IV-6B provides the Bank of Japan’s Corporate Goods Price indexes of exports and imports on the yen and contract bases from Jan 2008 to May 2015. There are oscillations of the indexes that are shown vividly in the four charts above. For the entire period from Jan 2008 to May 2015, the export index on the contract currency basis decreased 5.4 percent and decreased 1.8 percent on the yen basis. For the entire period from Jan 2008 to May 2015, the import price index decreased 8.4 percent on the contract currency basis and decreased 3.0 percent on the yen basis. During significant part of the expansion period, prices of Japan’s exports of corporate goods, mostly industrial products, increased only 5.3 percent from Jun 2009 to Apr 2012, while imports of corporate goods, mostly commodities and raw materials increased 38.6 percent. The charts show sharp deteriorations in relative prices of exports to prices of imports during multiple periods. Price margins of Japan’s producers are subject to periodic squeezes resulting from carry trades from zero interest rates of monetary policy to exposures in commodities.

Table IV-6B, Japan, Exports and Imports Corporate Goods Price Index, Contract Currency Basis and Yen Basis

	X-CC	X-Y	M-CC	M-Y
2008/01	99.2	115.5	100.7	119.0
2008/02	99.8	116.1	102.4	120.6
2008/03	100.5	112.6	104.5	117.4
2008/04	101.6	115.3	110.1	125.2
2008/05	102.4	117.4	113.4	130.4
2008/06	103.5	120.7	119.5	140.3
2008/07	104.7	122.1	122.6	143.9
2008/08	103.7	122.1	123.1	147.0
2008/09	102.7	118.3	117.1	137.1
2008/10	100.2	109.6	109.1	121.5
2008/11	98.6	104.5	97.8	105.8
2008/12	97.9	100.6	89.3	93.0
2009/01	98.0	99.5	85.6	88.4
2009/02	97.5	100.1	85.7	89.7
2009/03	97.3	104.2	85.2	93.0
2009/04	97.6	105.6	84.4	93.0
2009/05	97.5	103.8	84.0	90.8
2009/06	97.9	104.9	86.2	93.5
2009/07	97.5	103.1	89.2	95.0
2009/08	98.3	104.4	89.6	95.8
2009/09	98.3	102.1	91.0	94.7
2009/10	98.0	101.2	91.0	94.0
2009/11	98.4	100.8	92.8	94.8
2009/12	98.3	100.7	95.4	97.5
2010/01	99.4	102.2	97.0	100.0
2010/02	99.7	101.6	97.6	99.8
2010/03	99.7	101.8	97.0	99.2
2010/04	100.5	104.6	99.9	104.6
2010/05	100.7	102.9	101.7	104.9
2010/06	100.1	101.6	100.0	102.3
2010/07	99.4	99.0	99.9	99.8
2010/08	99.1	97.3	99.5	97.5
2010/09	99.4	97.0	100.0	97.2
2010/10	100.1	96.4	100.5	95.8
2010/11	100.7	97.4	102.6	98.2
2010/12	101.2	98.3	104.4	100.6
2011/01	102.1	98.6	107.2	102.6
2011/02	102.9	99.5	109.0	104.3
2011/03	103.5	99.6	111.8	106.3
2011/04	104.1	101.7	115.9	111.9
2011/05	103.9	99.9	118.8	112.4
2011/06	103.8	99.3	117.5	110.5
2011/07	103.6	98.3	118.3	110.2
2011/08	103.6	96.6	118.6	108.1
2011/09	103.7	96.1	117.0	106.2
2011/10	103.0	95.2	116.6	105.6
2011/11	101.9	94.8	115.4	105.4
2011/12	101.5	94.5	116.1	106.2
2012/01	101.8	94.0	115.0	104.2
2012/02	102.4	95.8	115.8	106.4
2012/03	102.9	99.2	118.3	112.9
2012/04	103.1	98.7	119.5	113.1
2012/05	102.3	96.3	118.1	109.8
2012/06	101.4	95.0	115.2	106.7
2012/07	100.6	94.0	112.0	103.5
2012/08	100.9	94.1	112.4	103.6
2012/09	101.0	94.1	114.7	105.2
2012/10	101.1	94.7	113.8	105.2
2012/11	100.9	95.9	113.2	106.5
2012/12	100.7	98.0	113.4	109.5
2013/01	101.0	102.4	113.8	115.4
2013/02	101.5	105.9	114.8	120.2
2013/03	101.3	106.6	115.1	122.0
2013/04	100.2	107.5	114.1	123.8
2013/05	99.6	109.1	112.6	125.3
2013/06	99.2	106.1	112.0	121.2
2013/07	99.1	107.5	111.6	122.8
2013/08	99.0	106.1	111.8	121.3
2013/09	99.0	107.2	113.0	124.0
2013/10	99.2	106.7	113.1	122.9
2013/11	99.1	108.0	113.1	124.9
2013-12	99.1	110.4	113.8	129.0
2014-01	99.2	110.7	114.4	130.1
2014-02	98.9	109.2	113.8	127.7
2014-03	98.6	109.1	113.4	127.4
2014-04	98.3	109.0	112.7	126.9
2014-05	98.1	108.2	112.4	125.9
2014-06	97.9	108.0	112.5	126.2
2014-07	98.0	107.9	112.5	125.9
2014-08	98.1	108.8	112.3	126.7
2014-09	97.9	111.0	111.5	129.4
2014-10	97.3	110.7	109.6	127.9
2014-11	96.9	115.7	106.9	131.6
2014-12	96.0	116.4	103.3	129.3
2015-01	94.5	113.2	98.3	121.4
2015-02	93.8	112.2	93.1	114.8
2015-03	93.8	113.0	93.8	116.9
2015-04	93.7	112.3	92.3	114.4
2015-05	93.8	113.4	92.2	115.4

Note: X-CC: Exports Contract Currency; X-Y: Exports Yen; M-CC: Imports Contract; M-Y: Imports Yen

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/index.htm/

Chart IV-7 provides the monthly corporate goods price index (CGPI) of Japan from 1970 to 2015. Japan also experienced sharp increase in inflation during the 1970s as in the episode of the Great Inflation in the US. Monetary policy focused on accommodating higher inflation, with emphasis solely on the mandate of promoting employment, has been blamed as deliberate or because of model error or imperfect measurement for creating the Great Inflation (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/slowing-growth-global-inflation-great.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-economics-of-rose-garden-turned.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/is-there-second-act-of-us-great.html and Appendix I The Great Inflation; see Taylor 1993, 1997, 1998LB, 1999, 2012FP, 2012Mar27, 2012Mar28, 2012JMCB and http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/rules-versus-discretionary-authorities.html). A remarkable similarity with US experience is the sharp rise of the CGPI of Japan in 2008 driven by carry trades from policy interest rates rapidly falling to zero to exposures in commodity futures during a global recession. Japan had the same sharp waves of consumer price inflation during the 1970s as in the US (see Chart IV-4 and associated table at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate_97.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/dollar-devaluation-and-carry-trade.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitical-and-financial-risks_71.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-uncertainty-mediocre-cyclical_8145.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world_1.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or_561.html and at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/increasing-interest-rate-risk_1.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/recovery-without-jobs-stagnating-real_09.html).

Chart IV-7, Japan, Domestic Corporate Goods Price Index, Monthly, 1970-2015

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.stat-search.boj.or.jp/index_en.html

The producer price index of the US from 1970 to 2015 in Chart IV-8 shows various periods of more rapid or less rapid inflation but no bumps. The major event is the decline in 2008 when risk aversion because of the global recession caused the collapse of oil prices from $148/barrel to less than $80/barrel with most other commodity prices also collapsing. The event had nothing in common with explanations of deflation but rather with the concentration of risk exposures in commodities after the decline of stock market indexes. Eventually, there was a flight to government securities because of the fears of insolvency of banks caused by statements supporting proposals for withdrawal of toxic assets from bank balance sheets in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), as explained by Cochrane and Zingales (2009). The bump in 2008 with decline in 2009 is consistent with the view that zero interest rates with subdued risk aversion induce carry trades into commodity futures.

Chart IV-8, US, Producer Price Index Finished Goods, Monthly, 1970-2015

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics

http://www.bls.gov/ppi/

Further insight into inflation of the corporate goods price index (CGPI) of Japan is provided in Table IV-7. The increase in the tax on value added of consumption caused sharp increases in prices across all segments. Petroleum and coal with weight of 5.7 percent increased 3.8 percent in May 2015 and decreased 21.1 percent in 12 months. Japan exports manufactured products and imports raw materials and commodities such that the country’s terms of trade, or export prices relative to import prices, deteriorate during commodity price increases. In contrast, prices of production machinery, with weight of 3.1 percent, increased 0.3 percent in May 2015 and increased 1.6 percent in 12 months. In general, most manufactured products have been experiencing negative or low increases in prices while inflation rates have been high in 12 months for products originating in raw materials and commodities. Ironically, unconventional monetary policy of zero interest rates and quantitative easing that intended to increase aggregate demand and GDP growth deteriorated the terms of trade of advanced economies with adverse effects on real income (for analysis of terms of trade and growth see Pelaez (1979, 1976a). There are now inflation effects of the intentional policy of devaluing the yen and recent collapse of commodity prices.

Table IV-7, Japan, Corporate Goods Prices and Selected Components, % Weights, Month and 12 Months ∆%

May 2015	Weight	Month ∆%	12 Month ∆%
Total	1000.0	0.3	-2.1
Food, Beverages, Tobacco, Feedstuffs	137.5	0.0	0.8
Petroleum & Coal	57.4	3.8	-21.1
Production Machinery	30.8	0.3	1.6
Electronic Components	31.0	0.0	-1.8
Electric Power, Gas & Water	52.7	0.5	0.8
Iron & Steel	56.6	-0.2	-2.8
Chemicals	92.1	0.1	-5.9
Transport Equipment	136.4	0.0	0.2

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/index.htm/

Percentage point contributions to change of the corporate goods price index (CGPI) in May 2015 are provided in Table IV-8 divided into domestic, export and import segments. The final block provides change in the corporate goods price without the effects of the increase in the tax on value added of consumption. In the domestic CGPI, increasing 0.3 percent in May 2015, the energy shock is evident in the contribution of 0.22 percentage points by petroleum and coal products and 0.04 percentage points by electric power, gas and water in renewed carry trades of exposures in commodity futures. The exports CGPI increased 0.1 percent on the basis of the contract currency with contribution of 0.20 percentage points by chemicals and related products and deduction of 0.08 percentage points by electric and electronic products. The imports CGPI decreased 0.1 percent on the contract currency basis. Petroleum, coal and natural gas products deducted 0.11 percentage points. Shocks of risk aversion cause unwinding carry trades that result in declining commodity prices with resulting downward pressure on price indexes. The volatility of inflation adversely affects financial and economic decisions worldwide. The final block D shows that the change in the domestic corporate goods price index without the effects of the consumption tax is 0.3 percent.

Table IV-8, Japan, Percentage Point Contributions to Change of Corporate Goods Price Index

Groups May 2015	Contribution to Change Percentage Points
A. Domestic Corporate Goods Price Index	Monthly Change:  0.3%
Petroleum & Coal Products	0.22
Nonferrous Metals	0.05
Electric Power, Gas & Water	0.04
Chemicals & Related Products	0.01
Production Machinery	0.01
Pulp, Paper & Related Products	0.01
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishery Products	-0.02
B. Export Price Index	Monthly Change:    0.1% contract currency
Chemicals & Related Products	0.20
Other Primary Products & Manufactured Goods	0.04
Electric & Electronic Products	-0.08
General Purpose, Production & Business Oriented Machinery	-0.07
C. Import Price Index	Monthly Change: -0.1% contract currency basis
Petroleum, Coal & Natural Gas	-0.11
Foodstuffs & Feedstuffs	-0.10
Electric & Electronic Products	-0.03
Chemicals & Related Products	0.05
Metals & Related Products	0.04
Other Primary Products & Manufactured Goods	0.03
D. Domestic Corporate Goods Price Index Excluding Consumption Tax	Monthly Change: 0.3%
Petroleum & Coal Products	0.22
Nonferrous Metals	0.05
Electric Power, Gas & Water	0.04
Chemicals & Related Products	0.01
Production Machinery	0.01
Pulp, Paper & Related Products	0.01
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishery Products	-0.02

Source: Bank of Japan

http://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/index.htm/

VC China. China estimates an index of nonmanufacturing purchasing managers based on a sample of 1200 nonmanufacturing enterprises across the country (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Table CIPMNM provides this index and components. The total index increased from 55.7 in Jan 2011 to 58.0 in Mar 2012, decreasing to 53.9 in Aug 2013. The index decreased from 56.0 in Nov 2013 to 54.6 in Dec 2013, easing to 53.4 in Jan 2014. The index moved to 53.2 in May 2015. The index of new orders increased from 52.2 in Jan 2012 to 54.3 in Dec 2012 but fell to 50.1 in May 2013, barely above the neutral frontier of 50.0. The index of new orders stabilized at 51.0 in Nov-Dec 2013, easing to 50.9 in Jan 2014. The index of new orders moved to 49.5 in May 2015.

Table CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted

	Total Index	New Orders	Interm. Input Prices	Subs Prices	Exp
May 2015	53.2	49.5	52.8	50.4	60.1
Apr	53.4	49.1	50.8	48.9	60.0
Mar	53.7	50.3	50.0	48.4	58.8
Feb	53.9	51.2	52.5	51.2	58.7
Jan	53.7	50.2	47.6	46.9	59.6
Dec 2014	54.1	50.5	50.1	47.3	59.5
Nov	53.9	50.1	50.6	47.7	59.7
Oct	53.8	51.0	52.0	48.8	59.9
Sep	54.0	49.5	49.8	47.3	60.9
Aug	54.4	50.0	52.2	48.3	61.2
Jul	54.2	50.7	53.4	49.5	61.5
Jun	55.0	50.7	56.0	50.8	60.4
May	55.5	52.7	54.5	49.0	60.7
Apr	54.8	50.8	52.4	49.4	61.5
Mar	54.5	50.8	52.8	49.5	61.5
Feb	55.0	51.4	52.1	49.0	59.9
Jan	53.4	50.9	54.5	50.1	58.1
Dec 2013	54.6	51.0	56.9	52.0	58.7
Nov	56.0	51.0	54.8	49.5	61.3
Oct	56.3	51.6	56.1	51.4	60.5
Sep	55.4	53.4	56.7	50.6	60.1
Aug	53.9	50.9	57.1	51.2	62.9
Jul	54.1	50.3	58.2	52.4	63.9
Jun	53.9	50.3	55.0	50.6	61.8
May	54.3	50.1	54.4	50.7	62.9
Apr	54.5	50.9	51.1	47.6	62.5
Mar	55.6	52.0	55.3	50.0	62.4
Feb	54.5	51.8	56.2	51.1	62.7
Jan	56.2	53.7	58.2	50.9	61.4
Dec 2012	56.1	54.3	53.8	50.0	64.6
Nov	55.6	53.2	52.5	48.4	64.6
Oct	55.5	51.6	58.1	50.5	63.4
Sep	53.7	51.8	57.5	51.3	60.9
Aug	56.3	52.7	57.6	51.2	63.2
Jul	55.6	53.2	49.7	48.7	63.9
Jun	56.7	53.7	52.1	48.6	65.5
May	55.2	52.5	53.6	48.5	65.4
Apr	56.1	52.7	57.9	50.3	66.1
Mar	58.0	53.5	60.2	52.0	66.6
Feb	57.3	52.7	59.0	51.2	63.8
Jan	55.7	52.2	58.2	51.1	65.3

Notes: Interm.: Intermediate; Subs: Subscription; Exp: Business Expectations

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart CIPMNM provides China’s nonmanufacturing purchasing managers’ index. The index fell from 56.0 in Oct 2013 to 53.2 in May 2015.

Chart CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

Table CIPMMFG provides the index of purchasing managers of manufacturing seasonally adjusted of the National Bureau of Statistics of China. The general index (IPM) rose from 50.5 in Jan 2012 to 53.3 in Apr 2012, falling to 49.2 in Aug 2012, rebounding to 50.6 in Dec 2012. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013, barely above the neutral frontier at 50.0, recovering to 51.4 in Nov 2013 but falling to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.5 in Jan 2014, 50.1 in Dec 2014 and 50.2 in May 2015. The index of new orders fell from 54.5 in Apr 2012 to 51.2 in Dec 2012. The index of new orders fell from 52.3 in Nov 2013 to 52.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.9 in Jan 2014 and moved to 50.4 in Dec 2014. The index moved to 50.6 in Mar 2015.

Table CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted

	IPM	PI	NOI	INV	EMP	SDEL
2015
May	50.2	52.9	50.6	48.2	48.2	50.9
Apr	50.1	52.6	50.2	48.2	48.0	50.4
Mar	50.1	52.1	50.2	48.0	48.4	50.1
Feb	49.9	51.4	50.4	48.2	47.8	49.9
Jan	49.8	51.7	50.2	47.3	47.9	50.2
2014
Dec	50.1	52.2	50.4	47.5	48.1	49.9
Nov	50.3	52.5	50.9	47.7	48.2	50.3
Oct	50.8	53.1	51.6	48.4	48.4	50.1
Sep	51.1	53.6	52.2	48.8	48.2	50.1
Aug	51.1	53.2	52.5	48.6	48.2	50.0
Jul	51.7	54.2	53.6	49.0	48.3	50.2
Jun	51.0	53.0	52.8	48.0	48.6	50.5
May	50.8	52.8	52.3	48.0	48.2	50.3
Apr	50.4	52.5	51.2	48.1	48.3	50.1
Mar	50.3	52.7	50.6	47.8	48.3	49.8
Feb	50.2	52.6	50.5	47.4	48.0	49.9
Jan	50.5	53.0	50.9	47.8	48.2	49.8
Dec 2013	51.0	53.9	52.0	47.6	48.7	50.5
Nov	51.4	54.5	52.3	47.8	49.6	50.6
Oct	51.4	54.4	52.5	48.6	49.2	50.8
Sep	51.1	52.9	52.8	48.5	49.1	50.8
Aug	51.0	52.6	52.4	48.0	49.3	50.4
Jul	50.3	52.4	50.6	47.6	49.1	50.1
Jun	50.1	52.0	50.4	47.4	48.7	50.3
May	50.8	53.3	51.8	47.6	48.8	50.8
Apr	50.6	52.6	51.7	47.5	49.0	50.8
Mar	50.9	52.7	52.3	47.5	49.8	51.1
Feb	50.1	51.2	50.1	49.5	47.6	48.3
Jan	50.4	51.3	51.6	50.1	47.8	50.0
Dec 2012	50.6	52.0	51.2	47.3	49.0	48.8
Nov	50.6	52.5	51.2	47.9	48.7	49.9
Oct	50.2	52.1	50.4	47.3	49.2	50.1
Sep	49.8	51.3	49.8	47.0	48.9	49.5
Aug	49.2	50.9	48.7	45.1	49.1	50.0
Jul	50.1	51.8	49.0	48.5	49.5	49.0
Jun	50.2	52.0	49.2	48.2	49.7	49.1
May	50.4	52.9	49.8	45.1	50.5	49.0
Apr	53.3	57.2	54.5	48.5	51.0	49.6
Mar	53.1	55.2	55.1	49.5	51.0	48.9
Feb	51.0	53.8	51.0	48.8	49.5	50.3
Jan	50.5	53.6	50.4	49.7	47.1	49.7

IPM: Index of Purchasing Managers; PI: Production Index; NOI: New Orders Index; EMP: Employed Person Index; SDEL: Supplier Delivery Time Index

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

China estimates the manufacturing index of purchasing managers on the basis of a sample of 820 enterprises (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Chart CIPMMFG provides the manufacturing index of purchasing managers. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013. The index decreased from 51.4 in Nov 2013 to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index moved to 50.2 in May 2015.

Chart CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Cumulative growth of China’s GDP in IQ2015 relative to the same period in 2014 was 7.0 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDP. Secondary industry accounts for 42.9 percent of cumulative GDP in IQ2015. In cumulative IQ2015, industry accounts for 38.0 percent of GDP and construction for 5.1 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 51.6 percent of cumulative GDP in IQ2015 and primary industry for 5.5 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is shifting to lower growth rates with improvement in living standards. The bottom block of Table VC-GDP provides quarter-on-quarter growth rates of GDP and their annual equivalent. China’s GDP growth decelerated significantly from annual equivalent 10.4 percent in IIQ2011 to 7.4 percent in IVQ2011 and 5.7 percent in IQ2012, rebounding to 8.7 percent in IIQ2012, 8.2 percent in IIIQ2012 and 7.8 percent in IVQ2012. Annual equivalent growth in IQ2013 fell to 7.0 percent and to 7.4 percent in IIQ2013, rebounding to 9.5 percent in IIIQ2013. Annual equivalent growth was 7.4 percent in IVQ2013, declining to 6.6 percent in IQ2014 and increasing to 8.2 percent in IIQ2014. Annual equivalent growth slowed to 7.8 percent in IIIQ2014 and 6.1 percent in IVQ2014. Growth slowed to annual equivalent 5.3 percent in IQ2015.

Table VC-GDP, China, Quarterly Growth of GDP, Current CNY 100 Million and Inflation Adjusted ∆%

Cumulative GDP IVQ2014	Value Current CNY Billion	IQ2015 Year-on-Year Constant Prices ∆%
GDP	14,066.7	7.0
Primary Industry	777.0	3.2
Farming	807.9	3.3
Secondary Industry	6,029.2	6.4
Industry	5,345.2	6.1
Construction	715.0	8.8
Tertiary Industry	7,260.5	7.9
Transport, Storage, Post	707.2	5.5
Wholesale, Retail Trades	1,346.0	5.8
Accommodation and Restaurants	255.9	5.3
Finance	1,366.9	15.9
Real Estate	970.3	2.0
Other	2,552.4	9.0
Growth in Quarter Relative to Prior Quarter	∆% on Prior Quarter	∆% Annual Equivalent
2015
IQ2015	1.3	5.3
2014
IVQ2014	1.5	6.1
IIIQ2014	1.9	7.8
IIQ2014	2.0	8.2
IQ2014	1.6	6.6
2013
IVQ2013	1.8	7.4
IIIQ2013	2.3	9.5
IIQ2013	1.8	7.4
IQ2013	1.7	7.0
2012
IVQ2012	1.9	7.8
IIIQ2012	2.0	8.2
IIQ2012	2.1	8.7
IQ2012	1.4	5.7
2011
IVQ2011	1.8	7.4
IIIQ2011	2.2	9.1
IIQ2011	2.5	10.4
IQ2011	2.3	9.5

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Cumulative growth of China’s GDP in IQ2015 relative to the same period in 2014 was 7.0 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDPA. Secondary industry accounts for 42.6 percent of cumulative GDP in IVQ2014. Secondary industry accounts for 42.9 percent of cumulative GDP in IQ2015. In cumulative IQ2015, industry accounts for 38.0 percent of GDP and construction for 5.1 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 51.6 percent of cumulative GDP in IQ2015 and primary industry for 5.5 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is shifting to lower growth rates with improvement in living standards. GDP growth decelerated from 12.1 percent in IQ2010 and 11.2 percent in IIQ2010 to 7.8 percent in IQ2013, 7.5 percent in IIQ2013 and 7.9 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP grew 7.6 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 1.8 percent relative to IIIQ2013, which is equivalent to 7.4 percent per year. GDP grew 7.4 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 1.6 percent in IQ2014 that is equivalent to 6.6 percent per year. GP grew 7.5 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 2.0 percent relative to the prior quarter, which is equivalent 8.2 percent. In IIIQ2014, GDP grew 7.3 percent relative to a year earlier and 1.9 percent relative to the prior quarter, which is 7.8 percent in annual equivalent. GDP grew 1.5 percent in IVQ2014, which is 6.1 percent in annual equivalent and 7.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2015, GDP grew 1.3 percent, which is equivalent in a year to a year earlier.

Table VC-GDPA, China, Growth Rate of GDP, ∆% Relative to a Year Earlier and ∆% Relative to Prior Quarter

	IQ2015
GDP	7.0
Primary Industry	3.2
Secondary Industry	6.4
Tertiary Industry	7.9
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter	1.3
	IQ 2013	IIQ 2013	IIIQ 2013	IVQ 2013	IQ 2014	IIQ 2014	IIIQ 2014	IVQ 2014
GDP	7.8	7.5	7.9	7.6	7.4	7.5	7.3	7.3
Primary Industry	3.4	3.0	3.4	4.0	3.5	3.9	4.2	4.1
Secondary Industry	7.8	7.6	7.8	7.8	7.3	7.4	7.4	7.3
Tertiary Industry	8.3	8.3	8.4	8.3	7.1	8.0	7.9	8.1
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter	1.7	1.8	2.3	1.8	1.6	2.0	1.9	1.5
	IQ 2011	IIQ 2011	IIIQ 2011	IVQ 2011	IQ  2012	IIQ 2012	IIIQ 2012	IVQ 2012
GDP	9.7	9.5	9.1	8.9	8.1	7.6	7.4	7.9
Primary Industry	3.5	3.2	3.8	4.5	3.8	4.3	4.2	4.5
Secondary Industry	11.1	11.0	10.8	10.6	9.1	8.3	8.1	8.1
Tertiary Industry	9.1	9.2	9.0	8.9	7.5	7.7	7.9	8.1
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter	2.3	2.5	2.2	1.8	1.4	2.1	2.0	1.9
	IQ 2010	IIQ 2010	IIIQ 2010	IVQ 2010
GDP	12.1	11.2	10.7	12.1
Primary Industry	3.8	3.6	4.0	3.8
Secondary Industry	14.5	13.3	12.6	14.5
Tertiary Industry	10.5	9.9	9.7	10.5

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart VC-GDP of the National Bureau of Statistics of China provides annual value and growth rates of GDP. China’s GDP growth in 2013 is still high at 7.7 percent but at the lowest rhythm in five years.

Chart VC-GDP, China, Gross Domestic Product, Million Yuan and ∆%, 2009-2013

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart VC-FXR provides China’s foreign exchange reserves. FX reserves grew from $2399.2 billion in 2009 to $3821.3 billion in 2013 driven by high growth of China’s trade surplus.

Chart VC-FXR, China, Foreign Exchange Reserves, 2009-2013

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

Chart VC-Trade provides China’s imports and exports. Exports exceeded imports with resulting large trade balance surpluses that increased foreign exchange reserves.

Chart VC-Trade, China, Imports and Exports of Goods, 2009-2013, $100 Million US Dollars

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

The HSBC Flash China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index^™ (PMI^™) compiled by Markit (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e01f1a716c744d1786b87e2b721c6451) is mixed. The overall Flash HSBC China Manufacturing PMI^™ increased from 48.9 in Apr to 49.1 in May, while the Flash HSBC China Manufacturing Output Index decreased from 50.0 in Apr to 48.4 in Apr, indicating moderate contraction. Exports orders indicate contraction. Annabel Fiddes, Economist at Markit, finds moderate deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e01f1a716c744d1786b87e2b721c6451). The HSBC China Services PMI^™, compiled by Markit, shows the HSBC Composite Output, combining manufacturing and services, decreasing from 51.3 in Apr to 51.2 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/00406d732b77465fbb9928513d923e88). Annabel Fiddes, Economist at Markit, finds stronger services with relatively weaker manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/00406d732b77465fbb9928513d923e88). The HSBC China Services Business Activity index increased from 52.9 in Apr to 53.5 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/00406d732b77465fbb9928513d923e88). The HSBC Purchasing Managers’ Index^™ (PMI^™), compiled by Markit, increased to 49.2 in May from 48.9 in Apr, indicating moderate deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/16f30626510a418bb63621a867ad1563). New export orders decreased. Annabel Fiddes, Economist at Markit, finds weak manufacturing in China. (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/16f30626510a418bb63621a867ad1563). Table CNY provides the country data table for China.

Table CNY, China, Economic Indicators

Price Indexes for Industry	May 12-month ∆%: minus 4.6 May month ∆%: -0.1 Blog 6/14/15
Consumer Price Index	May 12-month ∆%: 1.2 May month ∆%: -0.2 Blog 6/14/15
Value Added of Industry	May month ∆%: 0.52 Jan-May 2015/Jan-Apr 2014 ∆%: 6.2 Earlier Data Blog 4/19/15
GDP Growth Rate	Year IQ2015 ∆%: 7.0 First Quarter 2015 ∆%: 7.0 Quarter IQ2015 AE ∆%: 5.3 Blog 4/26/15
Investment in Fixed Assets	Total Jan-May 2015 ∆%: 11.4 Real estate development: 5.1 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Retail Sales	Apr month ∆%: 0.81 Jan-Apr 12 month ∆%: NA Jan-May ∆%: 10.4 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Trade Balance	May balance $59.1 billion Exports 12M ∆% -2.5 Imports 12M ∆% -17.6 Cumulative May 2015: $217.16 billion Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table CNY:

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

VD Euro Area. Using calendar and seasonally adjusted data (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of the euro area (18 countries) fell 5.8 percent from the high pre-recession date on IQ2008 to the trough in IIQ2009 while the GDP of the euro area (19 countries) fell 5.8 percent. The GDP of the euro area (18 countries) increased 4.5 percent from IIIQ2009 to IQ2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 0.8 percent while that of the euro area (19 countries) increased 4.5 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 0.8 percent. The GDP of the euro area (18) countries in IQ2015 is lower by 1.5 percent relative to the pre-recession peak in IQ2008 and that of the euro area (19 countries) is lower by 1.5 percent relative to the pre-recession peak in IQ2008. The GDP of the euro area (18) countries increased at the average yearly rate of 2.3 percent from IQ1999 to IQ2008 while that of the euro area (19 countries) increased at 2.3 percent. Table VD-EUR provides yearly growth rates of the combined GDP of the members of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro area since 1999. Growth was very strong at 3.3 percent in 2006 and 3.1 percent in 2007. The global recession had strong impact with growth of only 0.5 percent in 2008 and decline of 4.5 percent in 2009. Recovery was at lower growth rates of 2.0 percent in 2010 and 1.6 percent in 2011. EUROSTAT estimates growth of GDP of the euro area of minus 0.8 percent in 2012 and minus 0.4 percent in 2013 but 0.9 percent in 2014.

Table VD-EUR, Euro Area, Yearly Percentage Change of Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices, Unemployment and GDP ∆%

Year	HICP ∆%	Unemployment %	GDP ∆%
1999	1.2	9.7	2.9
2000	2.2	8.9	3.8
2001	2.4	8.3	2.1
2002	2.3	8.6	0.9
2003	2.1	9.1	0.7
2004	2.2	9.3	2.2
2005	2.2	9.1	1.7
2006	2.2	8.4	3.3
2007	2.2	7.5	3.1
2008	3.3	7.6	0.5
2009	0.3	9.6	-4.5
2010	1.6	10.2	2.0
2011	2.7	10.2	1.6
2012	2.5	11.4	-0.8
2013	1.3	12.0	-0.4
2014	0.4	11.6	0.9

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

The GDP of the euro area in 2013 in current US dollars in the dataset of the World Economic Outlook (WEO) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is $12,753.7 billion or 17.1 percent of world GDP of $74,699.3 billion (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx). The sum of the GDP of France $2807.3 billion with the GDP of Germany of $3635.9 billion, Italy of $2071.9 billion and Spain $1358.7 billion is $9873.8 billion or 77.4 percent of total euro area GDP and 13.2 percent of World GDP. The four largest economies account for slightly more than three quarters of economic activity of the euro area. Table VD-EUR1 is constructed with the dataset of EUROSTAT, providing growth rates of the euro area as a whole and of the largest four economies of Germany, France, Italy and Spain annually from 1996 to 2014. The impact of the global recession on the overall euro area economy and on the four largest economies was quite strong. There was sharp contraction in 2009 and growth rates have not rebounded to earlier growth with exception of Germany in 2010 and 2011.

Table VD-EUR1, Euro Area, Real GDP Growth Rate, ∆%

	Euro Area	Germany	France	Italy	Spain
2014	0.9	1.6	0.4	-0.4	1.4
2013	-0.4	0.1	0.3	-1.7	-1.2
2012	-0.8	0.4	0.3	-2.8	-2.1
2011	1.6	3.6	2.1	0.6	-0.6
2010	2.0	4.1	2.0	1.7	0.0
2009	-4.5	-5.6	-2.9	-5.5	-3.6
2008	0.5	1.1	0.2	-1.0	1.1
2007	3.1	3.3	2.4	1.5	3.8
2006	3.3	3.7	2.4	2.0	4.2
2005	1.7	0.7	1.6	0.9	3.7
2004	2.2	1.2	2.8	1.6	3.2
2003	0.7	-0.7	0.8	0.2	3.2
2002	0.9	0.0	1.1	0.3	2.9
2001	2.1	1.7	2.0	1.8	4.0
2000	3.8	3.0	3.9	3.7	5.3
1999	2.9	2.0	3.4	1.6	4.5
1998	2.9	2.0	3.6	1.4	4.3
1997	2.6	1.8	2.3	1.8	3.7
1996	1.6	0.8	1.4	1.3	2.7

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

The Flash Eurozone PMI Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI^®, combining activity in manufacturing and services, decreased from 53.9 in Apr to 53.4 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/05f244462a684f919365061ec0875dcc). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI index suggests GDP growth at around 0.4 percent in IIQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/05f244462a684f919365061ec0875dcc). The Markit Eurozone PMI^® Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing activity with close association with GDP decreased from 53.9 in Apr to 53.6 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/62a9ca2890dd4d709884b711cad5641e). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds potential for growth of 2 percent in 2015 with risks (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/62a9ca2890dd4d709884b711cad5641e). The Markit Eurozone Services Business Activity Index decreased from 54.1 in Apr to 53.8 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/62a9ca2890dd4d709884b711cad5641e). The Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI^® increased from 52.0 in Apr to 52.3 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3b005b2cc36d4e01a5fc6a6dead19d1d). New export orders increased. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds improvement of industrial growth in the euro area at a quarterly rate of 0.5 percent (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3b005b2cc36d4e01a5fc6a6dead19d1d). Table EUR provides the data table for the euro area.

Table EUR, Euro Area Economic Indicators

GDP	IQ2015 ∆% 0.4; IQ2015/IQ2014 ∆% 1.0 Blog 6/14/15
Unemployment	Apr 2015: 11.1 % unemployment rate; Apr 2015: 17.846 million unemployed Blog 6/7/15
HICP	Apr month ∆%: 0.2 12 months Apr ∆%: 0.0 Blog 5/24/15
Producer Prices	Euro Zone industrial producer prices Apr ∆%: -0.1 Apr 12-month ∆%: 0.8 Blog 6/7/15
Industrial Production	Apr Month ∆%: 0.1; 12 months ∆%: 1.8 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Retail Sales	Apr month ∆%:0.7 Apr 12 months ∆%: 2.2 Earlier Data: Blog 3/15/15
Confidence and Economic Sentiment Indicator	Sentiment 103.8 May 2015 Consumer minus 5.5 May 2015 Earlier Data: Blog 4/5/15
Trade	Jan-Mar 2015/Jan-Mar 2014 Exports ∆%: 5.0 Imports ∆%: 0.4 Mar 2015 12-month Exports ∆% 10.9 Imports ∆% 7.3 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table EUR:

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

Table VD-1 provides percentage changes of euro area real GDP in a quarter relative to the prior quarter. Real GDP fell 0.3 percent in IVQ2011, fell 0.2 in IQ2012 and fell in the final three quarters of 2012: 0.3 percent in IIQ2012, 0.1 percent in IIIQ2012 and 0.3 percent in IVQ2012. GDP fell 0.4 percent in IQ2013 and increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2013. Growth slowed at 0.2 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP increased 0.3 percent in IVQ2013. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.2 percent in IQ2014 and increased 0.1 percent in IIQ2014. GDP in the euro area increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.4 percent in IVQ2014. Euro area GDP increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015. The global recession manifested in the euro area in five consecutive quarterly declines from IIQ2008 to IIQ2009. The strongest impact was contraction of 2.9 percent in IQ2009. Recovery began in IIIQ2009 with cumulative growth of 4.1 percent to IQ2011 or at the annual equivalent rate of 2.3 percent. Growth was much more vigorous from IVQ2003 to IQ2008. Using calendar and seasonally adjusted data (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of the euro area (19 countries) fell 5.8 percent from IQ2008 to IIQ2009. The GDP of the euro area (19 countries) increased 4.5 percent from IIIQ2009 to IQ2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 0.8 percent. The GDP of the euro area (19 countries) is lower by 1.5 percent relative to the pre-recession peak in IQ2008. The GDP of the euro area (18) countries increased at the average yearly rate of 2.3 percent from IQ1999 to IQ2008 while that of the euro area (19 countries) increased at 2.3 percent.

Table VD-1, Euro Area, Real GDP, Percentage Change from Prior Quarter, Calendar and Seasonally and Working Day Adjusted ∆%

	IQ	IIQ	IIIQ	IVQ
2015	0.4
2014	0.2	0.1	0.2	0.4
2013	-0.4	0.4	0.2	0.3
2012	-0.2	-0.3	-0.1	-0.3
2011	0.9	0.0	0.0	-0.3
2010	0.4	1.0	0.4	0.5
2009	-2.9	-0.2	0.3	0.5
2008	0.7	-0.4	-0.6	-1.8
2007	0.8	0.7	0.5	0.5
2006	0.9	1.1	0.6	1.1
2005	0.2	0.7	0.7	0.6
2004	0.5	0.6	0.3	0.3
2003	-0.2	0.1	0.5	0.8
2002	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.0
2001	0.9	0.1	0.1	0.1
2000	1.2	0.9	0.5	0.7
1999	0.9	0.7	1.1	1.2

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Table VD-2 provides percentage change in real GDP in the euro area in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier. Growth rates were quite strong from 2004 to 2007. There were five consecutive quarters of sharp declines in GDP in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier from IVQ2008 to IVQ2009 with sharp contractions of 5.6 percent in IQ2009, 5.4 percent in IIQ2009 and 4.6 percent in IIIQ2009. Growth rates decline in magnitude with 1.4 percent in IIIQ2011, 0.6 percent in IVQ211 and -0.5 percent in IQ2012 followed by contractions of 0.8 percent in IIQ2012, 0.9 percent in IIIQ2012 and 0.9 percent in IVQ2012. GDP contracted 1.1 percent in IQ2013 relative to a year earlier and contracted 0.5 percent in IIQ2013 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP contracted 0.2 percent in IIIQ2013 relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.5 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 1.1 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, the GDP of the euro area increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.8 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.9 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP increased 1.0 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier.

Table VD-2, Euro Area, Real GDP Percentage Change in a Quarter Relative to Same Quarter a

Year Earlier, Seasonally and Working Day Adjusted ∆%

	IQ	IIQ	IIIQ	IV
2015	1.0
2014	1.1	0.8	0.8	0.9
2013	-1.1	-0.5	-0.2	0.5
2012	-0.5	-0.8	-0.9	-0.9
2011	2.8	1.9	1.4	0.6
2010	1.0	2.2	2.3	2.3
2009	-5.6	-5.4	-4.6	-2.4
2008	2.3	1.2	0.2	-2.1
2007	3.6	3.2	3.0	2.4
2006	3.0	3.4	3.3	3.8
2005	1.4	1.6	1.9	2.2
2004	1.9	2.4	2.2	1.7
2003	0.7	0.3	0.5	1.2
2002	0.5	0.9	1.2	1.2
2001	3.1	2.2	1.8	1.2
2000	4.2	4.5	3.9	3.4
1999	2.2	2.4	2.9	3.9

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Table VD-3 provides growth of euro area real GDP in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier not seasonally adjusted. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2013 NSA relative to a year earlier and increased 0.4 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 1.1 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 0.6 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 0.9 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 1.1 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2013 relative to a year earlier without seasonal adjustment and declined 1.7 percent in IQ2013 relative to a year earlier without seasonal adjustment. Growth rates in 2006 and 2007 were quite strong followed by sharp declines of 5.7 percent in IQ2009, 6.0 percent in IIQ2009 and 4.4 percent in IQ2009.

Table VD-3, Euro Area, Real GDP Percentage Change in a Quarter Relative to Same Quarter a Year Earlier, Not Seasonally Adjusted ∆%

	IQ	IIQ	IIIQ	IV
2015	1.1
2014	1.1	0.6	0.8	0.9
2013	-1.7	-0.3	0.2	0.4
2012	-0.2	-1.1	-1.0	-1.0
2011	3.0	2.0	1.4	0.2
2010	1.1	2.4	2.3	2.2
2009	-5.7	-6.0	-4.4	-2.1
2008	1.9	1.6	0.6	-2.1
2007	3.5	3.2	3.1	2.5
2006	3.6	2.7	3.1	3.6
2005	1.0	2.1	1.9	1.7
2004	2.2	2.6	2.2	2.0
2003	0.9	0.1	0.4	1.2
2002	0.1	1.1	1.6	1.0
2001	3.0	2.3	1.7	1.4
2000	4.9	4.3	3.4	2.8
1999	2.2	2.6	2.8	3.9

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Table VD-4 provides GDP growth in IVQ2014 and relative to the same quarter a year earlier with SAWDA (seasonal and working day adjustment) and NSA (not seasonally adjusted) for the euro zone, European Union, Japan and the US. The GDP of the euro zone increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015 and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier SWDA and 1.1 percent NSA for IQ2015. The GDP of the European Union increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015, increased 1.5 percent SWDA in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier and increased 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier NSA in IQ2015. Growth in IQ2015 was weak worldwide with somewhat stronger performance by the US but still insufficient to reduce unemployment and underemployment (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/quite-high-equity-valuations-and.html) and motivate hiring (Section I and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html).

Table VD-4, Euro Zone, European Union, Japan and USA, Real GDP Growth

	∆% IQ2015/ IVQ2014 SAWDA	∆% IQ2015/ IQ2014 SWDA	∆% IQ2015/ IQ2014 NSA
Euro Zone	0.4	1.0	1.1
European Union	0.4	1.5	1.4
Germany	0.3	1.0	1.1
France	0.6	0.7	0.8
Netherlands	0.4	2.4	2.4
Finland	-0.1	0.1	-0.1
Belgium	0.3	0.9	0.9
Portugal	0.4	1.5	1.8
Ireland	NA	NA	NA
Italy	0.3	0.1	0.1
Greece	-0.2	0.4	0.2
Spain	0.9	2.7	2.9
United Kingdom	0.3	2.4	1.8
Japan	1.0	NA	-0.9
USA	-0.2	2.7	NA

*SAWDA: Seasonally and Working Day Adjusted except UK, Japan and USA

***NSA

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

VE Germany. Table VE-DE provides yearly growth rates of the German economy from 1971 to 2014, price adjusted chain-linked and price and calendar-adjusted chain-linked. Germany’s GDP fell 5.6 percent in 2009 after growing below trend at 1.1 percent in 2008. Recovery has been robust in contrast with other advanced economies. The German economy grew at 4.1 percent in 2010, 3.6 percent in 2011 and 0.4 percent in 2012. Growth decelerated to 0.1 percent in 2013, increasing to 1.6 percent in 2014.

The Federal Statistical Agency of Germany analyzes the fall and recovery of the German economy (http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/EN/Content/Statistics/VolkswirtschaftlicheGesamtrechnungen/Inlandsprodukt/Aktuell,templateId=renderPrint.psml):

“The German economy again grew strongly in 2011. The price-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 3.0% compared with the previous year. Accordingly, the catching-up process of the German economy continued during the second year after the economic crisis. In the course of 2011, the price-adjusted GDP again exceeded its pre-crisis level. The economic recovery occurred mainly in the first half of 2011. In 2009, Germany experienced the most serious post-war recession, when GDP suffered a historic decline of 5.1%. The year 2010 was characterised by a rapid economic recovery (+3.7%).”

Table VE-DE, Germany, GDP ∆% on Prior Year

	Price Adjusted Chain-Linked	Price- and Calendar-Adjusted Chain Linked
Average ∆% 1991-2014	1.3
Average ∆% 1991-1999	1.5
Average ∆% 2000-2007	1.4
Average ∆% 2003-2007	2.2
Average ∆% 2007-2014	0.7
Average ∆% 2009-2014	1.9
2014	1.6	1.6
2013	0.1	0.2
2012	0.4	0.6
2011	3.6	3.7
2010	4.1	3.9
2009	-5.6	-5.6
2008	1.1	0.8
2007	3.3	3.4
2006	3.7	3.9
2005	0.7	0.9
2004	1.2	0.7
2003	-0.7	-0.7
2002	0.0	0.0
2001	1.7	1.8
2000	3.0	3.2
1999	2.0	1.9
1998	2.0	1.7
1997	1.8	1.9
1996	0.8	0.8
1995	1.7	1.8
1994	2.5	2.5
1993	-1.0	-1.0
1992	1.9	1.5
1991	5.1	5.2
1990	5.3	5.5
1989	3.9	4.1
1988	3.7	3.4
1987	1.4	1.3
1986	2.3	2.3
1985	2.3	2.6
1984	2.8	2.9
1983	1.6	1.5
1982	-0.4	-0.5
1981	0.5	0.6
1980	1.4	1.3
1979	4.2	4.3
1978	3.0	3.1
1977	3.3	3.5
1976	4.9	4.5
1975	-0.9	-0.9
1974	0.9	1.0
1973	4.8	5.0
1972	4.3	4.3
1971	3.1	3.0
1970	NA	NA

Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/NationalAccounts.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/DomesticProduct/CurrentRevision.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Methods/NationalAccountRevision/Revision2014_BackgroundPaper.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/02/PE14_048_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/08/PE13_278_811.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/11/PE13_381_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/01/PE14_016_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressekonferenzen/2014/BIP2013/Pressebroschuere_BIP2013.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/05/PE14_167_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/09/PE14_306_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/11/PE14_401_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/02/PE15_048_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/02/PE15_61_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/05/PE15_173_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/05/PE15_187_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/DomesticProduct/DomesticProduct.html

The Flash Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Germany PMI^®, combining manufacturing and services, decreased from 54.1 in Apr to 52.8 in May. The index of manufacturing output reached 52.7 in May, decreasing from 54.3 in Apr, while the index of services decreased to 52.9 in May from 54.0 in Apr. The overall Flash Germany Manufacturing PMI^® decreased from 52.1 in Apr to 51.4 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c8063ea227634aad8ebc68c535e086ab). New orders in manufacturing expanded moderately. Oliver Kolodseike, Economist at Markit, finds continuing GDP growth at slower rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c8063ea227634aad8ebc68c535e086ab). The Markit Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Germany Services PMI^®, combining manufacturing and services with close association with Germany’s GDP, decreased from 54.1 in Apr to 52.6 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4f7e962ac61247bcb59d1d2f36aab93a). Oliver Kolodseike, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds slowing improvement in 2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4f7e962ac61247bcb59d1d2f36aab93a). The Germany Services Business Activity Index decreased from 54.0 in Apt to 53.0 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/317d980899924deeada58333a5bdfd82). The Markit/BME Germany Purchasing Managers’ Index^® (PMI^®), showing close association with Germany’s manufacturing conditions, decreased from 52.1 in Apr to 51.1 in

May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/85aa4f0bcb9a49939bfc096003e6be75). New export orders increased. Oliver Kolodseike, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds slowing growth of manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/85aa4f0bcb9a49939bfc096003e6be75).Table DE provides the country data table for Germany.

Table DE, Germany, Economic Indicators

GDP	IQ2015 0.3 ∆%; IQ2015/IQ2014 ∆% 1.1 2014/2013: 1.6% GDP ∆% 1970-2014 Blog 8/26/12 5/27/12 11/25/12 2/24/13 5/19/13 5/26/13 8/18/13 8/25/13 11/17/13 11/24/13 1/26/14 2/16/14 3/2/14 5/18/14 5/25/14 8/17/14 9/7/14 11/16/14 11/30/14 2/15/15 3/1/15 5/17/15 5/24/15
Consumer Price Index	Apr month NSA ∆%: 0.0 Apr 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.5 Blog 5/17/15
Producer Price Index	Apr month ∆%: 0.1 NSA, 0.0 CSA 12-month NSA ∆%: -1.5 Blog 5/24/15
Industrial Production	MFG Apr month CSA ∆%: 0.8 12-month NSA: 0.6 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Machine Orders	MFG Apr month ∆%: 1.4 Apr 12-month ∆%: 0.5 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Retail Sales	Apr Month ∆% 1.7 Mar -1.4 12-Month ∆% 1.0 Mar 4.3 Earlier Data: Blog 4/5/15
Employment Report	Unemployment Rate SA Apr 4.9% Blog 6/7/15
Trade Balance	Exports Apr 12-month NSA ∆%: 7.5 Imports Apr 12 months NSA ∆%: 2.8 Exports Apr month CSA ∆%: 1.9; Imports Apr month CSA -1.3 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15

Links to blog comments in Table DE:

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

11/30/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

9/7/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/competitive-monetary-policy-and.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

1/26/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/capital-flows-exchange-rates-and.html

11/24/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html

8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

There is extremely important information in Table VE-1 for the current sovereign risk crisis in the euro zone. Table VE-1 provides the structure of regional and country relations of Germany’s exports and imports with newly available data for Apr 2015. German exports to other European Union (EU) members are 56.9 percent of total exports in Apr 2015 and 58.2 percent in cumulative Jan-Apr 2015. Exports to the euro area are 36.2 percent of the total in Apr and 36.8 percent cumulative in Jan-Apr. Exports to third countries are 43.2 percent of the total in Apr and 41.7 percent cumulative in Jan-Apr. There is similar distribution for imports. Exports to non-euro countries are increasing 6.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015, increasing 7.1 percent cumulative in Jan-Apr 2015 relative to a year earlier while exports to the euro area are increasing 3.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 and increasing 3.1 percent cumulative in Jan-Apr 2015. Exports to third countries, accounting for 43.2 percent of the total in Apr 2015, are increasing 11.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2015 and increasing 7.9 percent cumulative in Jan-Apr 2015, accounting for 41.7 percent of the cumulative total in Jan-Apr 2015. Price competitiveness through devaluation could improve export performance and growth. Economic performance in Germany is closely related to Germany’s high competitiveness in world markets. Weakness in the euro zone and the European Union in general could affect the German economy. This may be the major reason for choosing the “fiscal abuse” of the European Central Bank considered by Buiter (2011Oct31) over the breakdown of the euro zone. There is a tough analytical, empirical and forecasting doubt of growth and trade in the euro zone and the world with or without maintenance of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro zone. Germany could benefit from depreciation of the euro because of high share in its exports to countries not in the euro zone but breakdown of the euro zone raises doubts on the region’s economic growth that could affect German exports to other member states.

Table VE-1, Germany, Structure of Exports and Imports by Region, € Billions and ∆%

	Apr 2014  € Billions	Apr 12-Month ∆%	Cumulative Jan-Apr 2015 € Billions	Cumulative Jan-Apr 2015/ Jan-Apr 2014 ∆%
Total Exports	100.4	7.5	393.8	5.9
A. EU Members	57.1 % 56.9	4.5	229.3 % 58.2	4.5
Euro Area	36.3 % 36.2	3.3	145.1 % 36.8	3.1
Non-euro Area	20.7 % 20.6	6.6	84.2 % 21.4	7.1
B. Third Countries	43.4 % 43.2	11.8	164.4 % 41.7	7.9
Total Imports	78.3	2.8	313.1	2.1
C EU Members	51.6 % 65.9	1.7	203.9 % 65.1	1.2
Euro Area	35.8 % 45.7	2.8	140.7 % 44.9	1.1
Non-euro Area	15.7 % 20.1	-0.8	63.2 % 20.2	1.4
D Third Countries	26.7 % 34.1	5.1	109.2 % 34.9	3.7

Notes: Total Exports = A+B; Total Imports = C+D

Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Homepage.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/06/PE15_205_51.html

VF France. Table VF-FR provides growth rates of GDP of France with the estimates of Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE). The long-term rate of GDP growth of France from IVQ1949 to IVQ2014 is quite high at 3.2 percent. France’s growth rates were quite high in the four decades of the 1950s, 1960, 1970s and 1980s with an average growth rate of 4.0 percent compounding the average rates in the decades and discounting to one decade. The growth impulse diminished with 2.0 percent in the 1990s and 1.8 percent from 2000 to 2007. The average growth rate from 2000 to 2014, using fourth quarter data, is 1.0 percent because of the sharp impact of the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. Cobet and Wilson (2002) provide estimates of output per hour and unit labor costs in national currency and US dollars for the US, Japan and Germany from 1950 to 2000 (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 137-44). The average yearly rate of productivity change from 1950 to 2000 was 2.9 percent in the US, 6.3 percent for Japan and 4.7 percent for Germany while unit labor costs in USD increased at 2.6 percent in the US, 4.7 percent in Japan and 4.3 percent in Germany. From 1995 to 2000, output per hour increased at the average yearly rate of 4.6 percent in the US, 3.9 percent in Japan and 2.6 percent in Germany while unit labor costs in US fell at minus 0.7 percent in the US, 4.3 percent in Japan and 7.5 percent in Germany. There was increase in productivity growth in the G7 in Japan and France in the second half of the 1990s but significantly lower than the acceleration of 1.3 percentage points per year in the US. Lucas (2011May) compares growth of the G7 economies (US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada) and Spain, finding that catch-up growth with earlier rates for the US and UK stalled in the 1970s.

Table VF-FR, France, Average Growth Rates of GDP Fourth Quarter, 1949-2014

Period	Average ∆%
1949-2014	3.2
2007-2014	0.3
2000-2014	1.0
2000-2013	1.1
2000-2007	1.8
1990-1999	2.0
1980-1989	2.6
1970-1979	3.7
1960-1969	5.7
1950-1959	4.2

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20150513

The Markit Flash France Composite Output Index increased from 50.6 in Apr to 51.0 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/15ae18943c084e04b701d404ecc98c61). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds moderate growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/15ae18943c084e04b701d404ecc98c61). The Markit France Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing with close association with French GDP, increased from 50.6 in Apr to 52.0 in May, indicating expansion at faster pace (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/5f18dba699704987b84747eb008a915e). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Services PMI^®, finds improving business activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/5f18dba699704987b84747eb008a915e). The Markit France Services Activity index increased from 51.4 in Apr to 52.8 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/5f18dba699704987b84747eb008a915e). The Markit France Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index^® increased to 49.4 in May from 48.0 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/82f01467d418423a8ddf4fd3db119111). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Manufacturing PMI^®, finds stabilizing manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/82f01467d418423a8ddf4fd3db119111). Table FR provides the country data table for France.

Table FR, France, Economic Indicators

CPI	May month ∆% 0.2 12 months ∆%: 0.3 6/14/15
PPI	Apr month ∆%: -0.4 Apr 12 months ∆%: -1.9 Blog 5/31/15
GDP Growth	IQ2015/IVQ2014 ∆%: 0.6 IQ2015/IQ2014 ∆%: 0.7 Blog 3/31/13 5/19/12 6/30/13 9/29/13 11/17/13 12/29/13 2/16/14 4/6/14 5/18/14 6/29/14 8/17/14 9/28/14 11/16/14 12/28/14 2/15/15 3/29/15 5/17/15
Industrial Production	Apr ∆%: Manufacturing -1.0 12-Month ∆%: 0.2 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Consumer Spending	Manufactured Goods Apr ∆%: 0.3 Apr 12-Month Manufactured Goods ∆%: 2.0 Earlier Data: Blog 4/5/15
Employment	Unemployment Rate: IQ2014 10.0% Blog 6/7/15
Trade Balance	Apr Exports ∆%: month 1.4, 12 months 6.5 Imports ∆%: month -2.1, 12 months 2.6 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Confidence Indicators	Historical average 100 May Mfg Business Climate 103.0 Earlier Data: Blog 3/29/15

Links to blog comments in Table FR:

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/29/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

12/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

9/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

6/30/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/tapering-quantitative-easing-policy-and.html

5/19/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/word-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

VG Italy. Table VG-IT provides revised percentage changes of GDP in Italy of quarter on prior quarter and quarter on same quarter a year earlier. GDP increased 0.3 percent in IQ2015 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2014 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIIQ2014 and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIQ2014 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy decreased 0.2 percent in IQ2014 and fell 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2013 and fell 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and fell 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IIQ2013, interrupting seven consecutive quarterly declines, and fell 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.9 percent in IQ2013 and declined 2.6 percent relative to IQ2012. GDP had been growing during six consecutive quarters but at very low rates from IQ2010 to IIQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell in seven consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IQ2013 at increasingly higher rates of contraction from 0.5 percent in IIIQ2011 to 1.0 percent in IVQ2011, 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 0.6 percent in IIQ2012 and 0.5 percent in IIIQ2012. The pace of decline accelerated to minus 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and minus 0.9 percent in IQ2013. GDP contracted cumulatively 4.9 percent in seven consecutive quarterly contractions from IIIQ2011 to IQ2013 at the annual equivalent rate of minus 2.8 percent. The total contraction in the 12 quarters including IQ2014, IIQ2014 and IIIQ2014 accumulates to 5.3 percent. The yearly rate has fallen from 2.3 percent in IVQ2010 to minus 2.6 percent in IQ2013, minus 2.0 percent in IIQ2013 and minus 1.4 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP fell 0.9 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.2 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.4 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.1 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier. Using seasonally and calendar adjusted data in the dataset of EUROSTAT (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of Italy in IQ2015 is lower by 9.3 percent relative to IQ2008. The fiscal adjustment of Italy is significantly more difficult with the economy not growing especially on the prospects of increasing government revenue. The strategy is for reforms to improve productivity, facilitating future fiscal consolidation.

Table VG-IT, Italy, GDP ∆%

	Quarter ∆% Relative to Preceding Quarter	Quarter ∆% Relative to Same Quarter Year Earlier
IQ2015	0.3	0.1
IVQ2014	0.0	-0.4
IIIQ2014	-0.1	-0.5
IIQ2014	-0.1	-0.3
IQ2014	-0.2	-0.2
IVQ2013	0.0	-0.9
IIIQ2013	0.1	-1.4
IIQ2013	0.0	-2.0
IQ2013	-0.9	-2.6
IVQ2012	-0.5	-2.7
IIIQ2012	-0.5	-3.1
IIQ2012	-0.6	-3.1
IQ2012	-1.0	-2.3
IVQ2011	-1.0	-1.0
IIIQ2011	-0.5	0.4
IIQ2011	0.2	1.4
IQ2011	0.4	2.0
IVQ2010	0.4	2.3
IIIQ2010	0.5	1.8
IIQ2010	0.7	1.9
IQ2010	0.5	0.7
IVQ2009	-0.1	-3.5
IIIQ2009	0.4	-5.0
IIQ2009	-0.3	-6.6
IQ2009	-3.5	-6.9
IVQ2008	-1.6	-3.0
IIIQ2008	-1.3	-1.9
IIQ2008	-0.5	-0.2
IQ2008	0.5	0.5
IV2007	-0.4	0.1
IIIQ2007	0.3	1.7
IIQ2007	0.2	2.0
IQ2007	0.0	2.4

Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica

http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/161241

The Markit/ADACI Business Activity Index decreased from 53.1 in Apr to 52.5 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/573a3eb5d3464ee9887706aa27999d43). Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italy Services PMI^®, finds signs of expansion of private sector activity with potential for growth at 0.3 percent in IIQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/573a3eb5d3464ee9887706aa27999d43). The Markit/ADACI Purchasing Managers’ Index^® (PMI^®), increased from 53.8 in Apr to 54.8 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/32fa0029d59b44cbb387173f70b2dc23). New export orders continued to increase. Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italian Manufacturing PMI^®, finds strengthening conditions in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/32fa0029d59b44cbb387173f70b2dc23). Table IT provides the country data table for Italy.

Table IT, Italy, Economic Indicators

Consumer Price Index	May month ∆%: 0.2 May 12-month ∆%: 0.2 Blog 5/31/15
Producer Price Index	Apr month ∆%: -0.3 Apr 12-month ∆%: -3.1 Blog 5/31/15
GDP Growth	IQ2015/IVQ2014 SA ∆%: 0.3 IQ2015/IQ2014 NSA ∆%: 0.1 Blog 3/17/13 6/16/13 8/11/13 9/15/13 11/17/13 12/15/13 2/16/14 3/16/14 5/18/14 6/15/14 8/10/14 8/31/14 10/19/14 11/16/14 12/7/14 2/15/15 3/15/15 5/17/15 5/31/15
Labor Report	Apr 2015 Participation rate 64.2% Employment ratio 56.1% Unemployment rate 12.4% Youth Unemployment 40.9% Blog 6/7/15
Industrial Production	Apr month ∆%: 0.3 12 months CA ∆%: 0.1 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15
Retail Sales	Mar month ∆%: -0.1 Mar 12-month ∆%: -0.2 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15
Business Confidence	Mfg May 103.5, Jan 100.0 Construction May 111.8, Jan 107.2 Earlier Data: Blog 4/5/15
Trade Balance	Balance Mar SA €3894 million versus Feb €4461 Exports Mar month SA ∆%: 1.8; Imports month ∆%: 4.0 Exports 12 months Mar NSA ∆%: 9.2 Imports 12 months NSA ∆%: 9.7 Earlier Data: Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table IT:

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

12/7/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/financial-risks-twenty-six-million.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

10/19/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/imf-view-squeeze-of-economic-activity.html

8/31/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitical-and-financial-risks.html

8/10/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/volatility-of-valuations-of-risk_10.html

6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

8/11/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/recovery-without-hiring-loss-of-full.html

6/16/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/recovery-without-hiring-seven-million.html

3/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

VH United Kingdom. Annual data in Table VH-UK show the strong impact of the global recession in the UK with decline of GDP of 4.3 percent in 2009 after dropping 0.3 percent in 2008. Recovery of 1.9 percent in 2010 is relatively low in comparison with annual growth rates in 2007 and earlier years. Growth was only 1.6 percent in 2011 and 0.7 percent in 2012. Growth increased to 1.7 percent in 2013 and 2.8 percent in 2014. The bottom part of Table VH-UK provides average growth rates of UK GDP since 1948. The UK economy grew at 2.6 percent per year on average between 1948 and 2014, which is relatively high for an advanced economy. The growth rate of GDP between 2000 and 2007 is higher at 2.9 percent. Growth in the current cyclical expansion from 2010 to 2014 has been only at 1.7 percent as advanced economies struggle with weak internal demand and world trade. GDP in 2014 higher by 4.0 percent relative to 2007 while it would have been 22.2 higher at trend of 2.9 percent as from 2000 to 2007.

Table VH-UK, UK, Gross Domestic Product, ∆%

	∆% on Prior Year
1998	3.5
1999	3.2
2000	3.8
2001	2.7
2002	2.5
2003	4.3
2004	2.5
2005	2.8
2006	3.0
2007	2.6
2008	-0.3
2009	-4.3
2010	1.9
2011	1.6
2012	0.7
2013	1.7
2014	2.8
Average Growth Rates ∆% per Year
1948-2014	2.6
1950-1959	3.1
1960-1969	3.1
1970-1979	2.6
1980-1989	3.1
1990-1999	2.2
2000-2007	2.9
2007-2013*	1.1
2007-2014*	4.0
2000-2014	1.7

*Absolute change from 2007 to 2013 and from 2007 to 2014

Source: UK Office for National Statistics

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/naa2/second-estimate-of-gdp/q1-2015/index.html

The Business Activity Index of the Markit/CIPS UK Services PMI^® decreased from 59.5 in Apr to 56.5 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f9e8d4b7164946b992ae5c64f9440595). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the combined indices consistent with the UK economy growing at around 0.4 percent in IIQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f9e8d4b7164946b992ae5c64f9440595). The Markit/CIPS UK Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index^® (PMI^®) increased to 52.0 in May from 51.8 in Apr (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/ff03cfe0f4ff42eaa31fd5cd6eac82c7). New export orders stabilized. Rob Dobson, Senior Economist at Markit that compiles the Markit/CIPS Manufacturing PMI^®, finds weakening manufacturing conditions (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/ff03cfe0f4ff42eaa31fd5cd6eac82c7). Table UK provides the economic indicators for the United Kingdom.

Table UK, UK Economic Indicators

CPI	Apr month ∆%: 0.2 Apr 12-month ∆%: -0.1 Blog 5/24/15
Output/Input Prices	Output Prices: Apr 12-month NSA ∆%: -1.7; excluding food, petroleum ∆%: 0.1 Input Prices: Apr 12-month NSA ∆%: -11.7 Excluding ∆%: -3.1 Blog 5/24/15
GDP Growth	IQ2015 prior quarter ∆% 0.3; year earlier same quarter ∆%: 2.4 Blog 3/31/13 4/28/13 5/26/13 7/28/13 8/25/13 9/29/13 10/27/13 12/1/13 12/22/13 2/2/14 3/2/14 4/6/14 5/4/14 5/25/14 6/29/14 7/27/14 8/17/14 10/5/14 10/26/14 11/30/14 12/28/14 2/1/15 3/1/15 4/5/15 5/3/15 5/31/15
Industrial Production	Apr 2015/Apr 2014 ∆%: Production Industries 1.2; Manufacturing 0.2 Earlier Data: Blog 4/12/15
Retail Sales	Apr month ∆%: 1.2 Apr 12-month ∆%: 4.7 Earlier Data: Blog 4/26/15
Labor Market	Jan-Mar Unemployment Rate: 5.5% Blog 5/17/15 LMGDP 5/17/15
GDP and the Labor Market	IQ2015 Employment 104.8 IQ2008 =100 GDP IQ15=104.0 IQ2008=100 Blog 5/17/14
Trade Balance	Balance SA Apr minus ₤1202 million Exports Apr%: 1.2; Jan-Apr ∆%: -1.6 Imports Apr ∆%: -3.1 Jan-Apr ∆%: -1.1 EARLIER DATA: Blog 4/12/15

Links to blog comments in Table UK:

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

5/3/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/dollar-devaluation-and-carry-trade.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html

12/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/30/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

10/26/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/financial-oscillations-world-inflation.html

10/5/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/world-financial-turbulence-twenty-seven.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

7/27/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html

6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html

5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

5/4/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html

4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html

3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html

2/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html

12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html

12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html

10/27/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html

9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html

7/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html

5/26/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

4/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_28.html

03/31/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.