Friday, June 19, 2026

 

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Maintains Fed Funds Rate Unchanged at 3 ½ to 3 ¾ Percent, Prices of Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy Increase 3.3 Percent in 12 Months

I United States Inflation

IA Mediocre Cyclical United States Economic Growth

IA1 Stagnating Real Private Fixed Investment

IID United States International Terms of Trade

I United States Employment Situation

I Real Disposable Income                                                                                                

I United States Industrial Production

I United States Inflation

II Long-term United States Inflation

III Current United States Inflation

IV Global Inflation

V World Economic Slowdown

VA United States

VB Japan

VC China

VD Euro Area

VE Germany

VF France

VG Italy

VH United Kingdom

VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets

VII Economic Indicators

VIII Interest Rates

IX Conclusion

References

Appendixes

Appendix I The Great Inflation

IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies

IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact

IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort

IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis

IV Global Inflation

V World Economic Slowdown

VA United States

VB Japan

VC China

VD Euro Area

VE Germany

VF France

VG Italy

VH United Kingdom

VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets

VII Economic Indicators

VIII Interest Rates

IX Conclusion

References

Appendixes

Appendix I The Great Inflation

IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies

IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact

IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort

IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis

 

 

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.

 

Note: This Blog will post only the Preamble of the US economy while we concentrate efforts in completing a book-length manuscript in the critically important subject of INFLATION.

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Maintains Fed Funds Rate Unchanged at 3 ½ to 3 ¾ Percent

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.

 Note: This Blog will post only the Preamble of the US economy while we concentrate efforts in completing a book-length manuscript in the critically important subject of INFLATION.

There is no deflation in the US economy that could justify further unconventional monetary policy open-ended or forever with very low interest rates and cessation of bond-buying by the central bank but with reinvestment of interest and principal, or QE even if the economy grows back to potential. The FOMC engaged in increases in the Fed balance sheet. Financial repression of very low interest rates constituted protracted distortion of resource allocation by clouding risk/return decisions, preventing the economy from expanding along its optimal growth path. On Aug 22, 2025, the Federal Open Market Committee changed its Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, including the following (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/monetary-policy-strategy-tools-and-communications-statement-on-longer-run-goals-monetary-policy-strategy-2025.htm): “Durably achieving maximum employment fosters broad-based economic opportunities and benefits for all Americans. The Committee views maximum employment as the highest level of employment that can be achieved on a sustained basis in a context of price stability. The maximum level of employment is not directly measurable and changes over time owing largely to nonmonetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the labor market. Consequently, it would not be appropriate to specify a fixed goal for employment; rather, the Committee's policy decisions must be informed by assessments of the maximum level of employment, recognizing that such assessments are necessarily uncertain and subject to revision. The Committee considers a wide range of indicators in making these assessments.

Price stability is essential for a sound and stable economy and supports the well-being of all Americans. The inflation rate over the longer run is primarily determined by monetary policy, and hence the Committee can specify a longer-run goal for inflation. The Committee reaffirms its judgment that inflation at the rate of 2 percent, as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, is most consistent over the longer run with the Federal Reserve's statutory maximum employment and price stability mandates. The Committee judges that longer-term inflation expectations that are well anchored at 2 percent foster price stability and moderate long-term interest rates and enhance the Committee's ability to promote maximum employment in the face of significant economic disturbances. The Committee is prepared to act forcefully to ensure that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored.

 emphasis added).

      The statement of the FOMC at the conclusion of its meeting on Dec 12, 2012, revealed policy intentions (http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20121212a.htm). The FOMC updated in the statement at its meeting on Dec 16, 2015 with maintenance of the current level of the balance sheet and liftoff of interest rates (http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20151216a.htm) followed by the statement of Jun17, 2026 (https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260617a.htm): “Press Release

 

June 17, 2026

Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement

For release at 2:00 p.m. EDT

The Federal Open Market Committee approved the following statement for release by a 12 – 0 vote:

The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3-1/2 to 3-3/4 percent, in support of the Federal Reserve's dual mandate. The Committee reaffirmed its policy of maintaining ample reserves in the banking system.

Economic activity is expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty that owes, in part, to the conflict in the Middle East. Productivity growth and capital investment are strong. Job gains have kept pace with the workforce, and the unemployment rate has changed little.

Inflation remains elevated relative to the Committee's 2 percent goal, in part reflecting supply shocks that have driven price increases in certain sectors, including energy. The Committee will deliver price stability.

For media inquiries, please email media@frb.gov or call 202-452-2955.

Implementation Note issued June 17, 2026

Last Update: June 17, 2026”  

In his classic restatement of the Keynesian demand function in terms of “liquidity preference as behavior toward risk,” James Tobin (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1981/tobin-bio.html) identifies the risks of low interest rates in terms of portfolio allocation (Tobin 1958, 86):

“The assumption that investors expect on balance no change in the rate of interest has been adopted for the theoretical reasons explained in section 2.6 rather than for reasons of realism. Clearly investors do form expectations of changes in interest rates and differ from each other in their expectations. For the purposes of dynamic theory and of analysis of specific market situations, the theories of sections 2 and 3 are complementary rather than competitive. The formal apparatus of section 3 will serve just as well for a non-zero expected capital gain or loss as for a zero expected value of g. Stickiness of interest rate expectations would mean that the expected value of g is a function of the rate of interest r, going down when r goes down and rising when r goes up. In addition to the rotation of the opportunity locus due to a change in r itself, there would be a further rotation in the same direction due to the accompanying change in the expected capital gain or loss. At low interest rates expectation of capital loss may push the opportunity locus into the negative quadrant, so that the optimal position is clearly no consols, all cash. At the other extreme, expectation of capital gain at high interest rates would increase sharply the slope of the opportunity locus and the frequency of no cash, all consols positions, like that of Figure 3.3. The stickier the investor's expectations, the more sensitive his demand for cash will be to changes in the rate of interest (emphasis added).”

Tobin (1969) provides more elegant, complete analysis of portfolio allocation in a general equilibrium model. The major point is equally clear in a portfolio consisting of only cash balances and a perpetuity or consol. Let g be the capital gain, r the rate of interest on the consol and re the expected rate of interest. The rates are expressed as proportions. The price of the consol is the inverse of the interest rate, (1+re). Thus, g = [(r/re) – 1]. The critical analysis of Tobin is that at extremely low interest rates there is only expectation of interest rate increases, that is, dre>0, such that there is expectation of capital losses on the consol, dg<0. Investors move into positions combining only cash and no consols. Valuations of risk financial assets would collapse in reversal of long positions in carry trades with short exposures in a flight to cash. There is no exit from a central bank created liquidity trap without risks of financial crash and another global recession. The net worth of the economy depends on interest rates. In theory, “income is generally defined as the amount a consumer unit could consume (or believe that it could) while maintaining its wealth intact” (Friedman 1957, 10). Income, Y, is a flow that is obtained by applying a rate of return, r, to a stock of wealth, W, or Y = rW (Friedman 1957). According to a subsequent statement: “The basic idea is simply that individuals live for many years and that therefore the appropriate constraint for consumption is the long-run expected yield from wealth r*W. This yield was named permanent income: Y* = r*W” (Darby 1974, 229), where * denotes permanent. The simplified relation of income and wealth can be restated as:

W = Y/r (1)

Equation (1) shows that as r goes to zero, r→0, W grows without bound, W→∞. Unconventional monetary policy lowers interest rates to increase the present value of cash flows derived from projects of firms, creating the impression of long-term increase in net worth. An attempt to reverse unconventional monetary policy necessarily causes increases in interest rates, creating the opposite perception of declining net worth. As r→∞, W = Y/r →0. There is no exit from unconventional monetary policy without increasing interest rates with resulting pain of financial crisis and adverse effects on production, investment and employment.

Table IV-6 provides percentage changes in 12 months of prices of personal consumption expenditures.

The target of monetary policy is PCEX (Prices of Personal Consumption Expenditures) that increased from 1.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 1919 to 3.3 percent in the 12 months ending in April 2026, which is the latest available observation, well above the target of around 2 percent.

Table IV-6, US, Percentage Change in 12 Months of Prices of Personal Consumption

Expenditures ∆%

 

PCE

PCEG

PCEG
-D

PCES

PCEX

PCEF

PCEE

2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apr

3.8

4.4

3.4

3.5

3.3

2.5

18.3

Mar

3.5

3.8

3.3

3.4

3.2

1.7

14.4

Feb

2.9

1.8

2.8

3.3

3.0

2.3

-0.2

Jan

2.9

1.3

2.1

3.6

3.1

2.0

-0.9

2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

2.9

1.7

2.0

3.4

3.0

2.1

2.2

Nov

2.8

1.5

1.0

3.4

2.8

2.0

4.4

Oct

2.7

1.3

0.9

3.4

2.8

2.2

2.7

Sep

2.8

1.4

0.9

3.4

2.8

2.4

2.7

Aug

2.7

0.9

1.2

3.6

2.9

2.2

-0.1

Jul

2.6

0.6

1.1

3.6

2.9

1.8

-1.9

Jun

2.6

0.6

1.0

3.5

2.8

2.0

-1.3

May

2.5

0.1

0.5

3.6

2.8

1.8

-3.8

Apr

2.3

-0.3

-0.4

3.5

2.6

1.7

-4.2

Mar

2.4

-0.3

-1.1

3.6

2.7

1.9

-3.8

Feb

2.7

0.3

-1.0

3.8

3.0

1.4

-0.6

Jan

2.6

0.5

-1.2

3.6

2.8

1.6

0.7

2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

2.7

-0.1

-1.3

4.0

3.0

1.6

-1.0

Nov

2.6

-0.4

-1.2

4.0

3.0

1.4

-4.0

Oct

2.5

-1.0

-1.7

4.1

3.0

1.0

-6.0

Sep

2.3

-1.2

-1.8

3.9

2.8

1.2

-8.1

Aug

2.4

-0.9

-2.1

4.0

2.9

1.1

-5.0

Jul

2.6

-0.2

-2.4

3.9

2.8

1.2

0.4

Jun

2.5

-0.4

-2.8

4.0

2.8

1.3

0.4

May

2.7

-0.3

-3.1

4.1

2.8

1.2

3.0

Apr

2.8

0.0

-2.1

4.2

3.0

1.3

1.8

Mar

2.9

0.0

-1.9

4.3

3.1

1.5

1.4

Feb

2.7

-0.3

-2.1

4.2

3.1

1.4

-2.2

Jan

2.7

-0.5

-2.3

4.3

3.2

1.5

-4.6

2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

2.8

0.1

-2.2

4.1

3.1

1.5

-2.1

Nov

2.8

-0.2

-2.0

4.2

3.3

1.8

-5.9

Oct

3.0

0.3

-2.1

4.4

3.5

2.5

-4.7

Sep

3.4

1.0

-2.2

4.7

3.7

2.8

0.1

Aug

3.4

0.8

-1.7

4.8

3.8

3.2

-3.7

Jul

3.4

-0.2

-0.9

5.2

4.3

3.8

-13.2

Jun

3.3

-0.4

-0.5

5.2

4.4

4.8

-17.6

May

4.0

1.2

0.4

5.4

4.7

5.9

-12.3

Apr

4.5

2.2

0.6

5.6

4.8

7.0

-5.7

Mar

4.4

2.0

0.5

5.7

4.8

8.0

-7.9

Feb

5.2

3.7

0.4

6.0

4.9

9.5

4.1

Jan

5.5

4.6

0.7

6.0

4.9

10.6

7.8

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

5.5

4.8

1.6

5.8

5.0

11.1

6.7

Nov

6.0

6.3

2.8

5.9

5.2

11.1

13.6

Oct

6.5

7.4

4.1

6.0

5.5

11.5

18.3

Sep

6.7

8.2

5.7

5.9

5.6

11.7

20.0

Aug

6.6

8.6

5.4

5.6

5.4

12.2

24.0

Jul

6.8

9.6

5.7

5.3

5.1

11.8

33.6

Jun

7.2

10.7

6.3

5.5

5.3

11.0

43.1

May

6.8

9.9

7.1

5.3

5.2

10.6

35.8

Apr

6.7

9.7

8.5

5.2

5.3

9.6

31.4

Mar

6.9

10.6

10.1

5.1

5.6

8.9

33.2

Feb

6.5

9.6

10.8

5.0

5.6

7.6

26.5

Jan

6.3

8.8

10.5

5.0

5.4

6.4

28.2

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

6.1

8.5

9.2

5.0

5.2

5.6

30.3

Nov

5.9

8.2

8.4

4.8

4.9

5.4

34.0

Oct

5.3

7.4

7.9

4.3

4.4

4.6

30.3

Sep

4.7

6.1

6.8

4.1

4.0

4.0

25.0

Aug

4.6

5.6

6.8

4.1

4.0

2.8

25.0

Jul

4.5

5.5

6.9

4.0

3.9

2.4

23.7

Jun

4.3

5.4

7.2

3.8

3.9

1.0

24.4

May

4.1

5.1

5.6

3.6

3.5

0.7

27.4

Apr

3.6

4.1

3.9

3.4

3.1

1.1

24.0

Mar

2.7

2.4

1.6

2.8

2.2

3.0

13.2

Feb

1.8

0.9

1.0

2.3

1.7

3.3

1.8

Jan

1.6

0.4

1.3

2.2

1.7

3.5

-4.6

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

1.3

-0.1

1.4

2.0

1.5

4.0

-7.5

Nov

1.2

-0.5

0.6

2.0

1.5

3.7

-9.7

Oct

1.2

-0.6

0.2

2.1

1.4

3.8

-9.2

Sep

1.3

-0.4

-0.1

2.1

1.5

3.7

-8.0

Aug

1.2

-0.5

-0.1

2.0

1.4

4.1

-9.8

Jul

0.9

-1.1

-1.2

1.9

1.2

4.1

-11.7

Jun

0.8

-1.5

-2.5

1.8

1.0

5.0

-12.4

May

0.5

-2.2

-1.9

1.8

1.0

4.5

-18.3

Apr

0.5

-2.1

-1.9

1.7

1.0

3.9

-17.7

Mar

1.2

-1.0

-1.5

2.2

1.5

1.2

-6.4

Feb

1.7

0.3

-1.6

2.4

1.7

0.9

3.3

Jan

1.8

0.7

-2.0

2.3

1.6

0.9

8.3

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec

1.6

0.4

-1.7

2.1

1.5

0.7

3.8

Nov

1.4

-0.2

-1.3

2.1

1.5

0.9

-0.6

Oct

1.3

-0.7

-0.9

2.2

1.6

1.1

-4.9

Sep

1.3

-0.7

-0.8

2.2

1.6

0.8

-4.9

Aug

1.4

-0.4

-1.1

2.3

1.7

0.9

-4.0

Jul

1.5

-0.4

-1.2

2.3

1.6

0.9

-1.5

Jun

1.4

-0.4

-0.4

2.3

1.7

1.1

-2.8

May

1.5

-0.3

-1.1

2.3

1.6

1.3

-0.2

Apr

1.6

-0.2

-1.2

2.4

1.6

0.8

1.4

Mar

1.5

-0.1

-0.7

2.3

1.6

1.4

-0.4

Feb

1.4

-0.7

-0.5

2.4

1.7

1.4

-5.6

Jan

1.4

-0.8

-0.7

2.5

1.8

0.8

-6.0

Notes: percentage changes in price index relative to the same month a year earlier of PCE: personal consumption expenditures; PCEG: PCE goods; PCEG-D: PCE durable goods; PCES: PCE services; PCEX: PCE excluding food and energy; PCEF: PCE food; PCEE: PCE energy goods and services

Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.