Monday, August 3, 2020

Contraction of United States GDP at 32.9 Percent SAAR in First Quarter 2020 in the Global Recession, with Output in the US Reaching a High in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the Lockdown of Economic Activity in the COVID-19 Event, Mediocre Cyclical United States Growth in the Lost Economic Cycle of the Global Recession with Economic Growth Underperforming Below Trend Worldwide, Contraction of Real Private Fixed Investment at 29.9 Percent SAAR, United States Terms of Trade, Beginning Recovery in United States New House Sales, United States House Prices, World Cyclical Slow Growth, and Government Intervention in Globalization: Part I

Carlos M. Pelaez

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.

IA Mediocre Cyclical United States Economic Growth
            IA1 Stagnating Real Private Fixed Investment
IID United States Terms of International Trade
IIA United States Housing Collapse
            IIA1 Sales of New Houses
            IIA2 United States House Prices
III World Financial Turbulence
IV Global Inflation
V World Economic Slowdown
VA United States
VB Japan
VC China
VD Euro Area
VE Germany
VF France
VG Italy
VH United Kingdom
VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets
VII Economic Indicators
VIII Interest Rates
IX Conclusion
References
Appendixes
Appendix I The Great Inflation
IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies
IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact
IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort
IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis

The revisions and enhancements of United States GDP and personal income accounts by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) (http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm) also provide critical information in assessing the current rhythm of US economic growth. The economy appears to be moving at a pace around 1.2 percent per year. Table Summary GDP provides the data.

  1. Average Annual Growth in the Past Thirty-Three Quarters. GDP growth in the four quarters of 2012, the four quarters of 2013, the four quarters of 2014, the four quarters of 2015, the four quarters of 2016, the four quarters of 2017, the four quarters of 2018, the four quarters of 2019 and the two quarters of 2020 accumulated to 7.5 percent. This growth is equivalent to 0.9 percent per year, obtained by dividing GDP in IIQ2020 of $17,205.8 billion by GDP in IVQ2011 of $16,004.1 billion and compounding by 4/34: {[($17,205.8/$16,004.1)4/34 -1]100 = 0.9 percent}.
  2. Average Annual Growth in the Past Four Quarters. GDP growth in the four quarters from IQ2019 to IIQ2020 accumulated to minus 9.5 percent that is equivalent to minus 32.9 percent in a year. This is obtained by dividing GDP in IIQ2020 of $17,205.8 billion by GDP in IIQ2019 of $19,020.6 billion and compounding by 4/4: {[($17,205.8/$19,020.6)4/4 -1]100 = -9.5%}. The US economy decreased 9.5 percent in IIQ2020 relative to the same quarter a year earlier in IIQ2019 (See Table 6 at https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/gdp2q20_adv.pdf and the complete data at https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm). Growth was at annual equivalent 5.5 percent in IIQ2014 and 5.0 percent IIIQ2014 and only at 2.3 percent in IVQ2014. GDP grew at annual equivalent 3.8 percent in IQ2015, 2.7 percent in IIQ2015, 1.5 percent in IIIQ2015 and 0.6 percent in IVQ2015. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.3 percent in IQ2016 and at 1.3 percent annual equivalent in IIQ2016. GDP increased at 2.2 percent annual equivalent in IIIQ2016 and at 2.5 percent in IVQ2016. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.3 percent in IQ2017 and at annual equivalent 1.7 percent in IIQ2017. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.9 percent in IIIQ2017. GDP grew at annual equivalent 3.9 percent in IVQ2017. GDP grew at annual equivalent 3.8 percent in IQ2018, increasing at 2.7 percent annual equivalent in IIQ2018. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.1 percent in IIIQ2018 and at 1.3 percent in IVQ2018. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.9 percent in IQ2019 and at annual equivalent 1.5 percent in IIQ2019. GDP grew at annual equivalent 2.6 percent in IIIQ2019 and at 2.4 percent annual equivalent in IVQ2019. Growth was at annual equivalent minus 5.0 percent in IQ2020. Growth was at annual equivalent minus 32.9 percent in IIQ2020. Another important revelation of the revisions and enhancements is that GDP was flat at 0.1 in IVQ2012, which is in the borderline of contraction, and negative in IQ2014. US GDP fell 0.3 percent in IQ2014. The rate of growth of GDP in the revision of IIIQ2013 is 3.2 percent in seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR).



Real GDP, Billions Chained 2012 Dollars
∆% Relative to IVQ2007
∆% Relative to Prior Quarter
∆%
over
Year Earlier
IVQ2007
15,762.0
NA
0.6
2.0
IVQ2011
16,004.1
1.5
1.2
1.6
IQ2012
16,129.5
2.3
0.8
2.7
IIQ2012
16,198.8
2.8
0.4
2.4
IIIQ2012
16,220.7
2.9
0.1
2.5
IVQ2012
16,239.1
3.0
0.1
1.5
IQ2013
16,383.0
3.9
0.9
1.6
IIQ2013
16,403.2
4.1
0.1
1.3
IIIQ2013
16,531.7
4.9
0.8
1.9
IVQ2013
16,663.6
5.7
0.8
2.6
IQ2014
16,616.5
5.4
-0.3
1.4
IIQ2014
16,841.5
6.8
1.4
2.7
IIIQ2014
17,047.1
8.2
1.2
3.1
IVQ2014
17,143.0
8.8
0.6
2.9
IQ2015
17,305.8
9.8
0.9
4.1
IIQ2015
17,422.8
10.5
0.7
3.5
IIIQ2015
17,486.0
10.9
0.4
2.6
IVQ2015
17,514.1
11.1
0.2
2.2
IQ2016
17,613.3
11.7
0.6
1.8
IIQ2016
17,668.2
12.1
0.3
1.4
IIIQ2016
17,764.4
12.7
0.5
1.6
IVQ2016
17,876.2
13.4
0.6
2.1
IQ2017
17,977.3
14.1
0.6
2.1
IIQ2017
18,054.1
14.5
0.4
2.2
IIIQ2017
18,185.6
15.4
0.7
2.4
IVQ2017
18,359.4
16.5
1.0
2.7
IQ2018
18,530.5
17.6
0.9
3.1
IIQ2018
18,654.4
18.4
0.7
3.3
IIIQ2018
18,752.4
19.0
0.5
3.1
IVQ2018
18,813.9
19.4
0.3
2.5
IQ2019
18,950.3
20.2
0.7
2.3
IIQ2019
19,020.6
20.7
0.4
2.0
IIIQ2019
19,141.7
21.4
0.6
2.1
IVQ2019
19,254.0
22.2
0.6
2.3
IQ2020
19,010.8
20.6
-1.3
0.3
IIQ2020
17,205.8
9.2
-9.5
-9.5
Cumulative ∆% IQ2012 to IIQ2020
7.5


Annual Equivalent ∆%
0.9


Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

Chart GDP of the US Bureau of Economic Analysis provides the rates of growth of GDP at SAAR (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the 16 quarters from IIIQ2016 to IIQ2020. Growth has been fluctuating. The final data point is minus 32.9 in percent in IIQ2020 in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.
Chart GDP, Seasonally Adjusted Quarterly Rates of Growth of United States GDP, ∆%
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

Table I-5 shows the mediocre average annual equivalent growth rate of 1.2 percent of the US economy in the forty-four quarters of the current cyclical expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2020. There is sharp contraction in IIQ2020 at SAAR of minus 32.9 percent in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.  In sharp contrast, the average growth rate of GDP was:

  • 5.7 percent in the first thirteen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1986
  • 5.3 percent in the first fifteen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1986
  • 5.1 percent in the first sixteen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1986
  • 5.0 percent in the first seventeen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1987
  • 5.0 percent in the first eighteen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1987
  • 4.9 percent in the first nineteen quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1987
  • 5.0 percent in the first twenty quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1987
  • 4.9 percent in the first twenty-first quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1988
  • 4.9 percent in the first twenty-two quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1988
  • 4.8 percent in the first twenty-three quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988
  • 4.8 percent in the first twenty-four quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1988
  • 4.8 percent in the first twenty-five quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1989
  • 4.7 percent in the first twenty-six quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1989
  • 4.6 percent in the first twenty-seven quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1989
  • 4.5 percent in the first twenty-eight quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1989
  • 4.5 percent in the first twenty-nine quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1990
  • 4.4 percent in the first thirty quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1990
  • 4.3 percent in the first thirty-one quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1990
  • 4.0 percent in the first thirty-two quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1990
  • 3.8 percent in the first thirty-three quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1991
  • 3.8 percent in the first thirty-four quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1991
  • 3.8 percent in the first thirty-five quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1991
  • 3.7 percent in the thirty-six quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1991
  • 3.7 percent in the thirty-seven quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1992
  • 3.7 percent in the thirty-eight quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIQ1992
  • 3.7 percent in the thirty-nine quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1992
  • 3.8 percent in the forty quarters of expansion from IQ1983 to IVQ1992
  • 3.7 percent in the forty-one quarters from IQ1983 to IQ1993
  • 3.6 percent in the forty-two quarters from IQ1983 to IIQ1993
  • 3.6 percent in the forty-three quarters from IQ1983 to IIIQ1993
  • 3.7 percent in the forty-four quarters from IQ1983 to IVQ1993

The line “average first four quarters in four expansions” provides the average growth rate of 7.7 percent with 7.8 percent from IIIQ1954 to IIQ1955, 9.2 percent from IIIQ1958 to IIQ1959, 6.1 percent from IIIQ1975 to IIQ1976 and 7.9 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983. The United States missed this opportunity of high growth in the initial phase of recovery.  BEA data show the US economy in standstill relative to historical experience with annual growth of 2.6 percent in 2010 decelerating to 1.6 percent annual growth in 2011, 2.2 percent in 2012, 1.8 percent in 2013, 2.5 percent in 2014, 3.1 percent in 2015, 1.7 percent in 2016, 2.3 percent in 2017, 3.0 percent in 2018 and 2.2 percent in 2019 (http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm).  The expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1986 was at the average annual growth rate of 5.7 percent, 5.1 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1986, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1988, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988. 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1989, 4.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1989, 4.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1989. 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1989, 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1990, 4.4 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1990, 4.3 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1990. 4.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1990. 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1991. 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1992, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1993. 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1993. 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1993, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1993 and at 7.9 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm). GDP grew 2.8 percent in the first four quarters of the expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2010. GDP growth in the thirty-four quarters from IQ2012 to IIQ2020 accumulated to 18.6 percent. This growth is equivalent to 0.9 percent per year, obtained by dividing GDP in IIQ2020 of $17,205.8 billion by GDP in IVQ2011 of $16,004.1 billion and compounding by 4/34: {[($17,205.8/$16,004.1)4/34 -1]100 = 0.9 percent}.
Table I-5, US, Number of Quarters, Cumulative Growth and Average Annual Equivalent Growth Rate in Cyclical Expansions

Number
of
Quarters
Cumulative Growth
∆%
Average Annual Equivalent Growth Rate
IIIQ 1954 to IQ1957
11
12.8
4.5
First Four Quarters IIIQ1954 to IIQ1955
4
7.8

IIQ1958 to IIQ1959
5
10.0
7.9
First Four Quarters
IIIQ1958 to IIQ1959
4
9.2

IIQ1975 to IVQ1976
8
8.3
4.1
First Four Quarters IIIQ1975 to IIQ1976
4
6.1

IQ1983-IQ1986
IQ1983-IIIQ1986
IQ1983-IVQ1986
IQ1983-IQ1987
IQ1983-IIQ1987
IQ1983 to IIIQ1987
IQ1983 to IVQ1987
IQ1983 to IQ1988
IQ1983 to IIQ1988
IQ1983 to IIIQ1988
IQ1983 to IVQ1988
IQ1983 to IQ1989
IQ1983 to IIQ1989
IQ1983 to IIIQ1989
IQ1983 to IVQ1989
IQ1983 to IQ1990
IQ1983 to IIQ1990
IQ1983 to IIIQ1990
IQ1983 to IVQ1990
IQ1983 to IQ1991
IQ1983 to IIQ1991
IQ1983 to IIIQ1991
IQ1983 to IVQ1991
IQ1983 to IQ1992
IQ1983 to IIQ1992
IQ1983 to IIIQ1992
IQ1983 to IVQ1992
IQ1983 to IQ1993
IQ1983 to IIQ1993
IQ1983 to IIIQ1993
IQ1983 to IVQ1993
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
19.8
21.5
22.1
23.0
24.4
25.4
27.6
28.3
29.9
30.7
32.5
33.8
34.8
35.8
36.1
37.6
38.1
38.2
36.9
36.3
37.3
38.0
38.5
40.2
41.7
43.1
44.6
44.8
45.7
46.4
48.3
5.7
5.3
5.1
5.0
5.0
4.9
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.7
First Four Quarters IQ1983 to IVQ1983
4
7.9

Average First Four Quarters in Four Expansions*

7.7

IIIQ2009 to IIQ2020
44
13.7
1.2
First Four Quarters IIIQ2009 to IIQ2010

2.8

*First Four Quarters: 7.8% IIIQ1954-IIQ1955; 9.2% IIIQ1958-IIQ1959; 6.1% IIIQ1975-IQ1976; 7.8% IQ1983-IVQ1983
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm
Chart I-8 shows US real quarterly GDP growth from 1980 to 1993. The economy contracted during the recession and then expanded vigorously throughout the 1980s, rapidly eliminating the unemployment caused by the contraction. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm).
Chart I-8, US, Real GDP, 1980-1993
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Chart I-9 shows the entirely different situation of real quarterly GDP in the US between 2007 and 2020. The economy has underperformed during the first forty-four quarters of expansion for the first time in the comparable contractions since the 1950s. The US economy was in a perilous cyclical slow growth now in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event, shown by contraction sharp contractions in the final data points in IQ2020 and IIQ2020.

Chart I-9, US, Real GDP, 2007-2020
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

As shown in Tables I-4 and I-5 above the loss of real GDP in the US during the contraction was 4.0 percent but the gain in the cyclical expansion has been only 13.7 percent (first to the last row in Table I-5), using all latest revisions. As a result, the level of real GDP in IIQ2020 with the second estimate and revisions is higher by only 9.2 percent than the level of real GDP in IVQ2007. The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire cycle from IVQ2007 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event would have accumulated to 44.7 percent. GDP in IIQ2020 would be $22,807.6 billion (in constant dollars of 2012) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $5601.8 billion than actual $17,205.8 billion. There are more than five trillion dollars of GDP less than at trend, explaining the 41.3 million unemployed or underemployed equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 23.9 percent of the effective labor force with the largest part originating in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/07/increase-of-total-nonfarm-payroll-jobs.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/06/creation-of-three-million-private.html). Unemployment is decreasing while employment is increasing in initial adjustment of the lockdown of economic activity in the global recession resulting from the COVID-19 event (https://www.bls.gov/cps/employment-situation-covid19-faq-june-2020.pdf). US GDP in IQ2020 is 24.6 percent lower than at trend. US GDP grew from $15,762.0 billion in IVQ2007 in constant dollars to $17,205.8 billion in IQ2020 or 9.2 percent at the average annual equivalent rate of 0.7 percent. Professor John H. Cochrane (2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. Cochrane (2016May02) measures GDP growth in the US at average 3.5 percent per year from 1950 to 2000 and only at 1.76 percent per year from 2000 to 2015 with only at 2.0 percent annual equivalent in the current expansion. Cochrane (2016May02) proposes drastic changes in regulation and legal obstacles to private economic activity. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for recovery of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas (2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9 percent per year from Jun 1919 to Jun 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 154.8159 in Jun 2020. The actual index NSA in Jun 2020 is 95.097 which is 38.6 percent below trend. The underperformance of manufacturing in Jun 2020 originates partly in the earlier global recession augmented by the current global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 162.5089 in Jun 2020. The actual index NSA in Jun 2020 is 95.0970, which is 41.5 percent below trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.6 percent between Dec 1986 and Jun 2020. Using trend growth of 1.6 percent per year, the index would increase to 132.0671 in Jun 2020. The output of manufacturing at 95.0970 in Jun 2020 is 28.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 96.1857 in Jun 2020 or 11.4 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5 percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 163.9940 in Jun 2020. The NAICS index at 96.1857 in Jun 2020 is 41.3 below trend. The NAICS manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999 to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 131.6999 in Jun 2020. The NAICS index at 96.1857 in Jun 2020 is 27.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.
Table I-6 shows that the contraction concentrated in two quarters: decline of 2.2 percent in IVQ2008 relative to the prior quarter and decline of 1.1 percent in IQ2009 relative to IVQ2008. The combined fall of GDP in IVQ2008 and IQ2009 was 3.3 percent {[(1-0.022) x (1-0.011) -1]100 = -3.3%}, or {[(IQ2009 $15,155.9)/(IIIQ2008 $15,677.0) – 1]100 = -3.3%} except for rounding. Those two quarters coincided with the worst effects of the financial crisis (Cochrane and Zingales 2009). GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIQ2009 but grew 0.4 percent in IIIQ2009, which is the beginning of recovery in the cyclical dates of the NBER. Most of the recovery occurred in five successive quarters from IVQ2009 to IVQ2010 of growth of 1.1 percent in IVQ2009, 0.4 percent in IQ2010, 0.9 percent in IIQ2010 and nearly equal growth at 0.7 percent in IIIQ2010 and 0.5 percent in IVQ2010 for cumulative growth in those five quarters of 3.8 percent, obtained by accumulating the quarterly rates {[(1.011 x 1.004 x 1.009 x 1.007 x 1.005) – 1]100 = 3.7%} or {[(IVQ2010 $15,750.6)/(IIIQ2009 $15,189.2) – 1]100 = 3.7%} with minor rounding difference. The economy then stalled during the first half of 2011 with decline of 0.2 percent in IQ2011 and growth of 0.7 percent in IIQ2011 for combined annual equivalent rate of 1.0 percent {(0.998 x 1.007)2}. The economy grew 0.0 percent in IIIQ2011 for annual equivalent growth of 0.0 percent in the first three quarters {[(0.998 x 1.007 x 1.00)4/3 -1]100 = 0.7%}. Growth picked up in IVQ2011 with 1.2 percent relative to IIIQ2011. Growth in a quarter relative to a year earlier in Table I-6 slows from over 2.6 percent during three consecutive quarters from IIQ2010 to IVQ2010 to 1.9 percent in IQ2011, 1.7 percent in IIQ2011, 0.9 percent in IIIQ2011 and 1.6 percent in IVQ2011. As shown below, growth of 1.2 percent in IVQ2011 was partly driven by inventory accumulation. In IQ2012, GDP grew 0.8 percent relative to IVQ2011 and 2.7 percent relative to IQ2011, decelerating to 0.4 percent in IIQ2012 and 2.4 percent relative to IIQ2011 and 0.1 percent in IIIQ2012 and 2.5 percent relative to IIIQ2011. Growth was 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 with 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier but mostly because of deduction of 1.70 percentage points of inventory divestment and 0.63 percentage points of reduction of one-time national defense expenditures. Growth was 0.9 percent in IQ2013 and 1.6 percent relative to IQ2012 in large part because of burning savings to consume caused by financial repression of zero interest rates. There is similar growth of 0.1 percent in IIQ2013 and 1.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, GDP grew 0.8 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.9 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier with inventory accumulation contributing 1.48 percentage points to growth at 3.2 percent SAAR in IIIQ2013. GDP increased 0.8 percent in IVQ2013 and 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.3 percent in IQ2014 and grew 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Inventory divestment deducted 1.40 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2014. GDP grew 1.4 percent in IIQ2014, 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier and at 5.5 SAAR with inventory change contributing 1.05 percentage points. GDP grew 1.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IVQ2014 and 2.9 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IQ2015 and increased 4.1 percent relative to a year earlier partly because of low level during contraction of 0.3 percent in IQ2014. GDP grew 0.7 percent in IIQ2015 and 3.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.4 percent in IIIQ2015 and 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2015 and increased 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IQ2016 and increased 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.3 percent in IIQ2016 and increased 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.5 percent in IIIQ2016 and increased 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IVQ2016 and increased 2.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IQ2017 and increased 2.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.4 percent in IIQ2017 and 2.2
 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.7 percent in IIIQ2017 and increased 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 1.0 percent in IVQ2017 and 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IQ2018 and increased 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.7 percent in IIQ2018 and increased 3.3 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.5 percent in IIIQ2018 and increased 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.3 percent in IVQ2018 and increased 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.7 percent in IQ2019 and increased 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.4 percent in IIQ2019 and increased 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IIIQ2019 and increased 2.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 0.6 percent in IVQ2019 and increased 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP decreased 1.3 percent in IQ2020 and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP decreased 9.5 percent in IIQ2020 and decreased 9.5 percent relative to a year earlier (See Table 6 at https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/gdp2q20_adv.pdf and entire data in https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm), in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. Rates of a quarter relative to the prior quarter capture better deceleration of the economy than rates on a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier. The critical question for which there is not yet definitive solution is whether what lies ahead is continuing growth recession with the economy crawling and unemployment/underemployment at extremely high levels or another contraction or conventional recession. Forecasts of various sources continued to maintain high growth in 2011 without taking into consideration the continuous slowing of the economy in late 2010 and the first half of 2011. The sovereign debt crisis in the euro area and growth in China have been common sources of doubts on the rate and direction of economic growth in the US. There is weak internal demand in the US with almost recent higher growth of investment and spikes of consumption driven by burning saving because of financial repression in the form of low interest rates and bloated balance sheet of the Fed.
Table I-6, US, Real GDP and Percentage Change Relative to IVQ2007 and Prior Quarter, Billions Chained 2012 Dollars and ∆%

Real GDP, Billions Chained 2012 Dollars
∆% Relative to IVQ2007
∆% Relative to Prior Quarter
∆%
over
Year Earlier
IVQ2007
15,762.0
NA
0.6
2.0
IQ2008
15,671.4
-0.6
-0.6
1.1
IIQ2008
15,752.3
-0.1
0.5
1.1
IIIQ2008
15,667.0
-0.6
-0.5
0.0
IVQ2008
15,328.0
-2.8
-2.2
-2.8
IQ2009
15,155.9
-3.8
-1.1
-3.3
IIQ2009
15,134.1
-4.0
-0.1
-3.9
IIIQ2009
15,189.2
-3.6
0.4
-3.0
IV2009
15,356.1
-2.6
1.1
0.2
IQ2010
15,415.1
-2.2
0.4
1.7
IIQ2010
15,557.3
-1.3
0.9
2.8
IIIQ2010
15,672.0
-0.6
0.7
3.2
IVQ2010
15,750.6
-0.1
0.5
2.6
IQ2011
15,712.8
-0.3
-0.2
1.9
IIQ2011
15,825.1
0.4
0.7
1.7
IIIQ2011
15,820.7
0.4
0.0
0.9
IVQ2011
16,004.1
1.5
1.2
1.6
IQ2012
16,129.5
2.3
0.8
2.7
IIQ2012
16,198.8
2.8
0.4
2.4
IIIQ2012
16,220.7
2.9
0.1
2.5
IVQ2012
16,239.1
3.0
0.1
1.5
IQ2013
16,383.0
3.9
0.9
1.6
IIQ2013
16,403.2
4.1
0.1
1.3
IIIQ2013
16,531.7
4.9
0.8
1.9
IVQ2013
16,663.6
5.7
0.8
2.6
IQ2014
16,616.5
5.4
-0.3
1.4
IIQ2014
16,841.5
6.8
1.4
2.7
IIIQ2014
17,047.1
8.2
1.2
3.1
IVQ2014
17,143.0
8.8
0.6
2.9
IQ2015
17,305.8
9.8
0.9
4.1
IIQ2015
17,422.8
10.5
0.7
3.4
IIIQ2015
17,486.0
10.9
0.4
2.6
IVQ2015
17,514.1
11.1
0.2
2.2
IQ2016
17,613.3
11.7
0.6
1.8
IIQ2016
17,668.2
12.1
0.3
1.4
IIIQ2016
17,764.4
12.7
0.5
1.6
IVQ2016
17,876.2
13.4
0.6
2.1
IQ2017
17,977.3
14.1
0.6
2.1
IIQ2017
18,054.1
14.5
0.4
2.2
IIIQ2017
18,185.6
15.4
0.7
2.4
IVQ2017
18,359.4
16.5
1.0
2.7
IQ2018
18,530.5
17.6
0.9
3.1
IIQ2018
18,654.4
18.4
0.7
3.3
IIIQ2018
18,752.4
19.0
0.5
3.1
IVQ2018
18,813.9
19.4
0.3
2.5
IQ2019
18,950.3
20.2
0.7
2.3
IIQ2019
19,020.6
20.7
0.4
2.0
IIIQ2019
19,141.7
21.4
0.6
2.1
IVQ2019
19,254.0
22.2
0.6
2.3
IQ2020
19,010.8
20.6
-1.3
0.3
IIQ2020
17,205.8
9.2
-9.5
-9.5
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm
Chart I-10 provides the percentage change of real GDP from the same quarter a year earlier from 1980 to 1993. There were two contractions almost in succession in 1980 and from 1981 to 1983. The expansion was marked by initial high rates of growth as in other recession in the postwar US period during which employment lost in the contraction was recovered. Growth rates continued to be high after the initial phase of expansion. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm).

Chart I-10, Percentage Change of Real Gross Domestic Product from Quarter a Year Earlier 1980-1993
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
The experience of recovery after 2009 is not as complete as during the 1980s. Chart I-11 shows the much lower rates of growth in the early phase of the current expansion and sharp decline from an early peak. The US missed the initial high growth rates in cyclical expansions that eliminate unemployment and underemployment. There is sharp decrease of the rate of growth of GDP to 0.3 percent in IQ2020 and minus 9.5 percent in IIQ2020 relative to a year earlier (See Table 6 at https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/gdp2q20_adv.pdf and entire data in https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm) in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.

Chart I-11, Percentage Change of Real Gross Domestic Product from Quarter a Year Earlier 2007-2020
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Chart I-12 provides growth rates from a quarter relative to the prior quarter during the 1980s. There is the same strong initial growth followed by a long period of sustained growth. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm).
 
Chart I-12, Percentage Change of Real Gross Domestic Product from Prior Quarter 1980-1993
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Chart I-13 provides growth rates in a quarter relative to the prior quarter from 2007 to 2020. Growth in the current expansion after IIIQ2009 has not been as strong as in other postwar cyclical expansions. There is sharp contraction at SAAR of minus 5.0 percent in IQ2020 and minus 32.9 percent IIQ2020 in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.

Chart I-13, Percentage Change of Real Gross Domestic Product from Prior Quarter 2007-2020
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

Industrial production increased 1.4 percent in May 2020 and decreased 12.5 percent in Apr 2020 after decreasing 4.6 percent in Mar 2020, with all data seasonally adjusted. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System conducted the annual revision of industrial production released on Mar 27, 2019 (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):
The Federal Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related measures of capacity and capacity utilization.[1] On net, the revisions to the growth rates for total IP for recent years were small and positive, with the estimates for 2016 and 2017 a bit higher and the estimates for 2015 and 2018 slightly lower.[2] Total IP is still reported to have increased from the end of the recession in mid-2009 through late 2014 before declining in 2015 and rebounding in mid-2016. Subsequently, the index advanced around 7 1/2 percent over 2017 and 2018.
Capacity for total industry expanded modestly in each year from 2015 to 2017 before advancing 1 1/2 percent in 2018; it is expected to advance about 2 percent in 2019. Revisions for recent years were very small and showed slightly less expansion in most years relative to earlier reports.
In the fourth quarter of 2018, capacity utilization for total industry stood at 79.4 percent, about 3/4 percentage point above its previous estimate and about 1/2 percentage point below its long-run (1972–2018) average. The utilization rate in 2017 is also higher than its previous estimate.
The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/default.htm):
“Total industrial production rose 5.4 percent in June after increasing 1.4 percent in May; even so, it remained 10.9 percent below its pre-pandemic February level. For the second quarter as a whole, the index fell 42.6 percent at an annual rate, its largest quarterly decrease since the industrial sector retrenched after World War II. Manufacturing output climbed 7.2 percent in June, as all major industries posted increases. The largest gain—105.0 percent—was registered by motor vehicles and parts, while factory production elsewhere rose 3.9 percent. Mining production fell 2.9 percent, and the output of utilities increased 4.2 percent. At 97.5 percent of its 2012 average, the level of total industrial production was 10.8 percent lower in June than it was a year earlier. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 3.5 percentage points to 68.6 percent in June, a rate that is 11.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2019) average but 1.9 percentage points above its trough during the Great Recession.”  In the six months ending in Jun 2020, United States national industrial production accumulated change of minus 11.1 percent at the annual equivalent rate of minus 20.9 percent, which is lower than growth of minus 10.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Jun 2020. Excluding growth of 0.1 percent in Feb 2019, growth in the remaining five months from Jan 2019 to Jun 2020 accumulated to minus 11.2 percent or minus 24.7 percent annual equivalent. Industrial production increased 5.4 percent in one of the past six months, 1.4 percent in one month, 0.1 percent in one month, minus 12.7 percent in one month, minus 4.4 percent in one month and minus 0.4 in one month. Industrial production decreased at annual equivalent 24.2 percent in the most recent quarter from Apr 2020 to Jun 2020 and decreased at 17.5 percent annual equivalent in the prior quarter from Jan 2020 to Mar 2020. Business equipment accumulated change of minus 18.0 percent in the six months from Jan 2020 to Jun 2020, at the annual equivalent rate of minus 32.7 percent, which is lower than growth of minus 18.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Jun 2020. The Fed analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): ”Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 3.5 percentage points to 68.6 percent in June, a rate that is 11.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2019) average but 1.9 percentage points above its trough during the Great Recession.”  United States industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate followed by possible acceleration, weakening growth in past months and deep contraction in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.
Manufacturing decreased 22.3 percent from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased 18.3 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2019. Manufacturing increased 8.9 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Jun 2020. Manufacturing in Jun 2020 is lower by 15.3 percent relative to the peak in Jun 2007. The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. US economic growth has been at only 1.2 percent on average in the cyclical expansion in the 44 quarters from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. Boskin (2010Sep) measures that the US economy grew at 6.2 percent in the first four quarters and 4.5 percent in the first 12 quarters after the trough in the second quarter of 1975; and at 7.7 percent in the first four quarters and 5.8 percent in the first 12 quarters after the trough in the first quarter of 1983 (Professor Michael J. Boskin, Summer of Discontent, Wall Street Journal, Sep 2, 2010 http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703882304575465462926649950.html). There are new calculations using the revision of US GDP and personal income data since 1929 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) (http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm) and the first estimate of GDP for IIQ2020 (https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/gdp2q20_adv.pdf). The average of 7.7 percent in the first four quarters of major cyclical expansions is in contrast with the rate of growth in the first four quarters of the expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2010 of only 2.8 percent obtained by dividing GDP of $15,557.3 billion in IIQ2010 by GDP of $15,134.1 billion in IIQ2009 {[($15,557.3/$15,134.1) -1]100 = 2.8%], or accumulating the quarter on quarter growth rates (Section I and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/06/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html). The expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1986 was at the average annual  growth rate of 5.7 percent, 5.3 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1986, 5.1 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1986, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1989, 4.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1989, 4.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1989, 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1989. 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1990, 4.4 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1990, 4.3 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1990, 4.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1990, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ2019, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1993, 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1993, 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1993, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1993 and at 7.9 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983 (Section I and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/06/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html). The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm). The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire cycle from IVQ2007 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event would have accumulated to 44.7 percent. GDP in IIQ2020 would be $22,807.6 billion (in constant dollars of 2012) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $5601.8 billion than actual $17,205.8 billion. There are more than five trillion dollars of GDP less than at trend, explaining the 41.3 million unemployed or underemployed equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 23.9 percent of the effective labor force with the largest part originating in the global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/07/increase-of-total-nonfarm-payroll-jobs.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/06/creation-of-three-million-private.html). Unemployment is decreasing while employment is increasing in initial adjustment of the lockdown of economic activity in the global recession resulting from the COVID-19 event (https://www.bls.gov/cps/employment-situation-covid19-faq-june-2020.pdf). US GDP in IQ2020 is 24.6 percent lower than at trend. US GDP grew from $15,762.0 billion in IVQ2007 in constant dollars to $17,205.8 billion in IQ2020 or 9.2 percent at the average annual equivalent rate of 0.7 percent. Professor John H. Cochrane (2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. Cochrane (2016May02) measures GDP growth in the US at average 3.5 percent per year from 1950 to 2000 and only at 1.76 percent per year from 2000 to 2015 with only at 2.0 percent annual equivalent in the current expansion. Cochrane (2016May02) proposes drastic changes in regulation and legal obstacles to private economic activity. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for recovery of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas (2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9 percent per year from Jun 1919 to Jun 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 154.8159 in Jun 2020. The actual index NSA in Jun 2020 is 95.097 which is 38.6 percent below trend. The underperformance of manufacturing in Jun 2020 originates partly in the earlier global recession augmented by the current global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 162.5089 in Jun 2020. The actual index NSA in Jun 2020 is 95.0970, which is 41.5 percent below trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.6 percent between Dec 1986 and Jun 2020. Using trend growth of 1.6 percent per year, the index would increase to 132.0671 in Jun 2020. The output of manufacturing at 95.0970 in Jun 2020 is 28.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 96.1857 in Jun 2020 or 11.4 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5 percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 163.9940 in Jun 2020. The NAICS index at 96.1857 in Jun 2020 is 41.3 below trend. The NAICS manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999 to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 131.6999 in Jun 2020. The NAICS index at 96.1857 in Jun 2020 is 27.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Table I-13 provides national income by industry without capital consumption adjustment (WCCA). “Private industries” or economic activities have share of 87.2 percent in IIQ2020. Most of US national income is in the form of services. In Jun 2020, there were 138.513 million nonfarm jobs NSA in the US, according to estimates of the establishment survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm Table B-1). Total private jobs of 117.360 million NSA in Jun 2020 accounted for 84.7 percent of total nonfarm jobs of 138.513 million, of which 12.169 million, or 10.4 percent of total private jobs and 8.8 percent of total nonfarm jobs, were in manufacturing. Private service-providing jobs were 97.204 million NSA in Jun 2020, or 70.2 percent of total nonfarm jobs and 82.8 percent of total private-sector jobs. Manufacturing has share of 9.2 percent in US national income in IQ2020 and durable goods 5.5 percent, as shown in Table I-13. Most income in the US originates in services. Subsidies and similar measures designed to increase manufacturing jobs will not increase economic growth and employment and may actually reduce growth by diverting resources away from currently employment-creating activities because of the drain of taxation.
Table I-13, US, National Income without Capital Consumption Adjustment by Industry, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates, Billions of Dollars, % of Total
SAAR IVQ2019
% Total
SAAR IQ2020
% Total
National Income WCCA
18,173.6
100.0
18,096.0
100.0
Domestic Industries
17,892.6
98.5
17,852.8
98.7
Private Industries
15,815.8
87.0
15,770.9
87.2
Agriculture
145.3
0.8
147.4
0.8
Mining
176.3
1.0
155.4
0.9
Utilities
207.0
1.1
204.1
1.1
Construction
946.1
5.2
954.2
5.3
Manufacturing
1702.4
9.4
1672.1
9.2
Durable Goods
1007.7
5.5
995.6
5.5
Nondurable Goods
694.7
3.8
676.5
3.7
Wholesale Trade
1015.0
5.6
1011.0
5.6
Retail Trade
1210.6
6.7
1205.5
6.7
Transportation & WH
604.3
3.3
588.9
3.3
Information
686.5
3.8
692.4
3.8
Finance, Insurance, RE
3183.6
17.5
3193.6
17.6
Professional & Business Services
2716.9
14.9
2740.0
15.1
Education, Health Care
1864.2
10.3
1871.2
10.3
Arts, Entertainment
821.9
4.5
796.4
4.4
Other Services
535.5
2.9
538.7
3.0
Government
2076.8
11.4
2081.9
11.5
Rest of the World
281.1
1.5
243.2
1.3
Notes: SSAR: Seasonally-Adjusted Annual Rate; Percentages Calculates from Unrounded Data; WCCA: Without Capital Consumption Adjustment by Industry; WH: Warehousing; RE, includes rental and leasing: Real Estate; Art, Entertainment includes recreation, accommodation and food services; BS: business services
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.

No comments:

Post a Comment