Federal Open Market Committee Leaves Fed Funds Rate at 0 to ¼ Percent Per Year Probably Until 2023, Stable US Dollar With Revaluing Yuan, Growth of US Manufacturing at 1.0 Percent in Aug 2020, US Manufacturing 7.0 Lower Than A Year Earlier In the Global Recession, with Output in the US Reaching a High in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the Lockdown of Economic Activity in the COVID-19 Event, US Manufacturing Underperforming Below Trend in the Lost Economic Cycle of the Global Recession with Economic Growth Underperforming Below Trend Worldwide, Squeeze of Economic Activity by Carry Trades Induced by Zero Interest Rates, Continuing Recovery of US Economic Indicators, World Cyclical Slow Growth, and Government Intervention in Globalization: Part I
Carlos M. Pelaez
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009,
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.
I United States Industrial Production
IIB Squeeze of Economic Activity by Carry Trades Induced
by Zero Interest Rates
III World Financial Turbulence
IV Global Inflation
V World Economic
Slowdown
VA United States
VB Japan
VC China
VD Euro Area
VE Germany
VF France
VG Italy
VH United Kingdom
VI Valuation of Risk
Financial Assets
VII Economic
Indicators
VIII Interest Rates
IX Conclusion
References
Appendixes
Appendix I The Great Inflation
IIIB Appendix on Safe
Haven Currencies
IIIC Appendix on
Fiscal Compact
IIID Appendix on
European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort
IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the
Debt Crisis
I United States Industrial Production. Industrial production increased
0.4 percent in Aug 2020 and increased 3.5 percent in Jul 2020 after increasing 6.1
percent in Jun 2020, with all data seasonally adjusted, as shown in Table I-1. The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System conducted the annual revision of industrial production
released on Mar 27, 2019 (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):
“The Federal
Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related
measures of capacity and capacity utilization.[1] On net, the revisions to the growth
rates for total IP for recent years were small and positive, with the estimates
for 2016 and 2017 a bit higher and the estimates for 2015 and 2018 slightly
lower.[2] Total IP is still reported to have
increased from the end of the recession in mid-2009 through late 2014 before
declining in 2015 and rebounding in mid-2016. Subsequently, the index advanced
around 7 1/2 percent over 2017 and 2018.
Capacity for
total industry expanded modestly in each year from 2015 to 2017 before
advancing 1 1/2 percent in 2018; it is expected to advance about 2 percent in
2019. Revisions for recent years were very small and showed slightly less
expansion in most years relative to earlier reports.
In the fourth
quarter of 2018, capacity utilization for total industry stood at 79.4 percent,
about 3/4 percentage point above its previous estimate and about 1/2 percentage
point below its long-run (1972–2018) average. The utilization rate in 2017 is
also higher than its previous estimate.”
The report of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/default.htm):
“Industrial production rose 0.4 percent in August for its
fourth consecutive monthly increase. However, even after the recent gains, the
index in August was 7.3 percent below its pre-pandemic February level.
Manufacturing output continued to improve in August, rising 1.0 percent,
but the gains for most manufacturing industries have gradually slowed since
June. Mining production fell 2.5 percent in August, as Tropical Storm
Marco and Hurricane Laura caused sharp but temporary drops in oil and gas
extraction and well drilling. The output of utilities moved down
0.4 percent. At 101.4 percent of its 2012 average, the level of
total industrial production was 7.7 percent lower in August than it was a
year earlier. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased
0.3 percentage point in August to 71.4 percent, a rate that is
8.4 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2019) average but
7.3 percentage points above its low in April.” In the six months ending in Aug 2020, United
States national industrial production accumulated change of minus 7.3 percent
at the annual equivalent rate of minus 14.0 percent, which is lower than growth
of minus 7.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug 2020. Excluding decline of 4.4
percent in Mar 2019, growth in the remaining five months from Mar 2019 to Aug
2020 accumulated to minus 3.0 percent or minus 7.1 percent annual equivalent.
Industrial production increased 6.1 percent in one of the past six months, 3.5
percent in one month, 1.0 percent in one month, 0.4 percent in one month, minus
12.9 percent in one month and minus 4.4 percent in one month. Industrial
production increased at annual equivalent 47.8 percent in the most recent
quarter from Jun 2020 to Aug 2020 and decreased at 50.0 percent annual
equivalent in the prior quarter from Mar 2020 to May 2020. Business equipment
accumulated change of minus 8.0 percent in the six months from Mar 2020 to Aug
2020, at the annual equivalent rate of minus 15.4 percent, which is lower than
growth of minus 11.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug 2020. The Fed
analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): ” Capacity utilization for the industrial
sector increased 2.1 percentage points in July to 70.6 percent, a
rate that is 9.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2019) average
but 6.4 percentage points above its low in April.” United States industry apparently decelerated
to a lower growth rate followed by possible acceleration, weakening growth in
past months and deep contraction in the global recession, with output in the US
reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. There is recent and
current recovery.
Table I-1, US,
Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization, SA, ∆%
Aug 20 |
Jul 20 |
Jun 20 |
May 20 |
Apr 20 |
Mar 20 |
Aug 20/ Aug 19 |
|
Total |
0.4 |
3.5 |
6.1 |
1.0 |
-12.9 |
-4.4 |
-7.7 |
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final
Products |
0.7 |
5.1 |
8.5 |
4.5 |
-15.4 |
-5.8 |
-5.0 |
Consumer
Goods |
0.3 |
5.0 |
8.4 |
4.2 |
-12.9 |
-5.5 |
-1.8 |
Business
Equipment |
1.9 |
6.6 |
11.8 |
7.2 |
-23.2 |
-8.0 |
-11.3 |
Non |
1.2 |
1.8 |
3.3 |
2.2 |
-12.3 |
-4.8 |
-8.2 |
Construction |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2.3 |
3.5 |
-12.9 |
-3.8 |
-7.0 |
Materials |
-0.2 |
2.7 |
5.0 |
-2.2 |
-11.0 |
-3.0 |
-10.0 |
Industry
Groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
1.0 |
3.9 |
7.5 |
3.9 |
-16.1 |
-5.0 |
-6.9 |
Mining |
-2.5 |
1.4 |
3.0 |
-11.1 |
-7.3 |
-1.7 |
-17.9 |
Utilities |
-0.4 |
3.8 |
1.3 |
-0.5 |
1.9 |
-3.1 |
0.5 |
Capacity |
71.4 |
71.1 |
68.7 |
64.7 |
64.1 |
73.6 |
0.6 |
Sources: Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Manufacturing increased 1.0 percent in Aug 2020 and increased 3.9
percent in Jul 2020 after increasing 7.5 percent in Jun 2020, seasonally
adjusted, decreasing 7.0 percent not seasonally adjusted in the 12 months
ending in Aug 2020, as shown in Table I-2. Manufacturing changed cumulatively
minus 6.6 percent in the six months ending in Aug 2020 or at the annual equivalent
rate of minus 12.7 percent. Excluding the change of minus 5.0 percent in Mar
2020, manufacturing decreased 1.7 percent from Mar 2020 to Aug 2020 or at the
annual equivalent rate of minus 3.9 percent. Table I-2 provides a longer
perspective of manufacturing in the US. There has been evident deceleration of
manufacturing growth in the US from 2010 and the first three months of 2011
with recovery followed by renewed deterioration/improvement in more recent
months as shown by 12 months’ rates of growth. Growth rates appeared to be
increasing again closer to 5 percent in Apr-Jun 2012 but deteriorated. The
rates of decline of manufacturing in 2009 are quite high with a drop of 18.6
percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2009. Manufacturing recovered from this decline
and led the recovery from the recession. Rates of growth appeared to be
returning to the levels at 3 percent or higher in the annual rates before the
recession, but the pace of manufacturing fell steadily with some strength at
the margin. There is renewed deterioration and improvement. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
conducted the annual revision of industrial production released on Mar 27, 2019
(https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):
“The Federal
Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related
measures of capacity and capacity utilization.[1] On net,
the revisions to the growth rates for total IP for recent years were small and
positive, with the estimates for 2016 and 2017 a bit higher and the estimates
for 2015 and 2018 slightly lower.[2] Total IP
is still reported to have increased from the end of the recession in mid-2009
through late 2014 before declining in 2015 and rebounding in mid-2016.
Subsequently, the index advanced around 7 1/2 percent over 2017 and 2018.
Capacity for
total industry expanded modestly in each year from 2015 to 2017 before
advancing 1 1/2 percent in 2018; it is expected to advance about 2 percent in
2019. Revisions for recent years were very small and showed slightly less
expansion in most years relative to earlier reports.
In the fourth quarter of 2018, capacity utilization for total
industry stood at 79.4 percent, about 3/4 percentage point above its previous
estimate and about 1/2 percentage point below its long-run (1972–2018) average.
The utilization rate in 2017 is also higher than its previous estimate.”
Manufacturing decreased
22.3 percent from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased
18.3 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2019. Manufacturing increased 13.7
percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Aug 2020. Manufacturing in Aug
2020 is lower by 11.6 percent relative to the peak in Jun 2007. The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire
cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. US economic
growth has been at only 1.2 percent on average in the cyclical expansion in the
44 quarters from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in
the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. Boskin (2010Sep) measures
that the US economy grew at 6.2 percent in the first four quarters and 4.5
percent in the first 12 quarters after the trough in the second quarter of
1975; and at 7.7 percent in the first four quarters and 5.8 percent in the
first 12 quarters after the trough in the first quarter of 1983 (Professor
Michael J. Boskin, Summer of Discontent, Wall
Street Journal, Sep 2, 2010 http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703882304575465462926649950.html). There are
new calculations using the revision of US GDP and personal income data since
1929 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) (http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm) and the
second estimate of GDP for IIQ2020 (https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/gdp2q20_2nd.pdf). The
average of 7.7 percent in the first four quarters of major cyclical expansions
is in contrast with the rate of growth in the first four quarters of the
expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2010 of only 2.8 percent obtained by dividing GDP
of $15,557.3 billion in IIQ2010 by GDP of $15,134.1 billion in IIQ2009
{[($15,557.3/$15,134.1) -1]100 = 2.8%], or accumulating the quarter on quarter
growth rates (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/d-ollar-devaluation-and-yuan.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/contraction-of-united-states-gdp-at-32_57.html). The
expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1986 was at the average annual growth rate of 5.7 percent, 5.3 percent from
IQ1983 to IIIQ1986, 5.1 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1986, 5.0 percent from IQ1983
to IQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to
IIIQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to
IIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to
IVQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1989, 4.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1989,
4.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1989, 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1989. 4.5
percent from IQ1983 to IQ1990, 4.4 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1990, 4.3 percent
from IQ1983 to IIIQ1990, 4.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1990, 3.8 percent from
IQ1983 to IQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983
to IIIQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to
IQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ2019,
3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1993, 3.6
percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1993, 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1993, 3.7
percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1993 and at 7.9 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983 (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/d-ollar-devaluation-and-yuan.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/contraction-of-united-states-gdp-at-32_57.html). The
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from
IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The
expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP
contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of
chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm). The US
maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions
at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire
cycle from IVQ2007 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in the US
reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event would have accumulated to
44.7 percent. GDP in IIQ2020 would be $22,807.6 billion (in constant dollars of
2012) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $5525.4 billion than
actual $17,282.2 billion. There are more than five trillion dollars of GDP less
than at trend, explaining the 34.8 million unemployed or underemployed
equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 20.2 percent of the
effective labor force with the largest part originating in the global recession
with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/09/exchange-rate-fluctuations-1.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/thirty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html). Unemployment is decreasing while employment is increasing in
initial adjustment of the lockdown of economic activity in the global recession
resulting from the COVID-19 event (https://www.bls.gov/cps/employment-situation-covid19-faq-june-2020.pdf). US GDP in IIQ2020 is 24.2 percent lower than at trend. US GDP
grew from $15,762.0 billion in IVQ2007
in constant dollars to $17,282.5 billion in IIQ2020 or 9.6 percent at the
average annual equivalent rate of 0.7 percent. Professor John H. Cochrane
(2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. Cochrane
(2016May02) measures GDP growth in the US at average 3.5 percent per year from
1950 to 2000 and only at 1.76 percent per year from 2000 to 2015 with only at
2.0 percent annual equivalent in the current expansion. Cochrane (2016May02)
proposes drastic changes in regulation and legal obstacles to private economic
activity. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the
expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final
periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for
recovery of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of
expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not
required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic
growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas
(2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly
slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing.
There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for
example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The
long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9 percent per year from
Aug 1919 to Aug 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year would raise the NSA index
of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987
in Dec 2007 to 155.5554 in Aug 2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841
which is 36.2 percent below trend. The underperformance of manufacturing in Mar-Aug
2020 originates partly in the earlier global recession augmented by the current
global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the
average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3
percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC,
Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 163.3909 in Aug
2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841, which is 39.2 percent below
trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.7 percent between Dec 1986 and Aug
2020. Using trend growth of 1.7 percent per year, the index would increase to
134.0774 in Aug 2020. The output of manufacturing at 99.2841 in Aug 2020 is 26.0
percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification
System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the
low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index
increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 100.4257 in Aug 2020 or 16.3 percent. The
NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5
percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the
NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 164.9372 in Aug
2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 39.1 below trend. The NAICS
manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999
to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output
index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 132.0705 in Aug 2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257
in Aug 2020 is 24.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.
Table I-2, US,
Monthly and 12-Month Rates of Growth of Manufacturing ∆%
|
Month SA ∆% |
12-Month NSA
∆% |
Aug 2020 |
1.0 |
-7.0 |
Jul |
3.9 |
-7.6 |
Jun |
7.5 |
-11.1 |
May |
3.9 |
-16.8 |
Apr |
-16.1 |
-20.6 |
Mar |
-5.0 |
-5.4 |
Feb |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
Jan |
-0.1 |
-0.8 |
Dec 2019 |
0.2 |
-1.1 |
Nov |
0.9 |
-0.9 |
Oct |
-0.6 |
-1.7 |
Sep |
-0.6 |
-1.2 |
Aug |
0.6 |
-0.5 |
Jul |
-0.4 |
-0.7 |
Jun |
0.6 |
0.1 |
May |
0.1 |
0.2 |
Apr |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
Mar |
-0.1 |
0.8 |
Feb |
-0.5 |
0.9 |
Jan |
-0.6 |
2.3 |
Dec 2018 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
Nov |
0.2 |
1.7 |
Oct |
-0.1 |
1.9 |
Sep |
0.0 |
3.5 |
Aug |
0.4 |
3.3 |
Jul |
0.4 |
2.5 |
Jun |
0.7 |
1.8 |
May |
-0.8 |
1.3 |
Apr |
0.4 |
3.3 |
Mar |
0.0 |
2.5 |
Feb |
1.1 |
2.4 |
Jan |
-0.4 |
1.3 |
Dec 2017 |
-0.1 |
2.3 |
Nov |
0.3 |
2.7 |
Oct |
1.3 |
2.5 |
Sep |
-0.2 |
1.4 |
Aug |
-0.3 |
2.1 |
Jul |
-0.2 |
2.3 |
Jun |
0.1 |
2.4 |
May |
-0.2 |
2.7 |
Apr |
1.1 |
1.3 |
Mar |
-0.3 |
1.8 |
Feb |
-0.1 |
1.4 |
Jan |
0.6 |
0.7 |
Dec 2016 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
Nov |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Oct |
0.3 |
-0.1 |
Sep |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
Aug |
-0.4 |
-1.5 |
Jul |
0.3 |
-1.5 |
Jun |
0.3 |
-0.9 |
May |
0.0 |
-1.7 |
Apr |
-0.4 |
-1.0 |
Mar |
-0.2 |
-2.1 |
Feb |
-0.6 |
-0.8 |
Jan |
0.7 |
-0.9 |
Dec 2015 |
-0.3 |
-2.0 |
Nov |
-0.3 |
-1.8 |
Oct |
0.0 |
-0.8 |
Sep |
-0.4 |
-1.7 |
Aug |
-0.3 |
-0.6 |
Jul |
0.7 |
-0.4 |
Jun |
-0.4 |
-1.1 |
May |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
Apr |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
Mar |
0.3 |
0.0 |
Feb |
-0.7 |
0.5 |
Jan |
-0.4 |
2.0 |
Dec 2014 |
-0.3 |
1.6 |
Nov |
0.8 |
1.8 |
Oct |
-0.1 |
1.0 |
Sep |
0.0 |
1.1 |
Aug |
-0.5 |
1.3 |
Jul |
0.4 |
2.0 |
Jun |
0.4 |
1.4 |
May |
0.3 |
1.3 |
Apr |
-0.2 |
0.9 |
Mar |
0.8 |
1.5 |
Feb |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Jan |
-1.1 |
-0.6 |
Dec 2013 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Nov |
0.0 |
1.2 |
Oct |
0.1 |
1.9 |
Sep |
0.1 |
1.2 |
Aug |
0.9 |
1.3 |
Jul |
-0.9 |
0.3 |
Jun |
0.2 |
0.7 |
May |
0.3 |
0.9 |
Apr |
-0.4 |
1.0 |
Mar |
-0.1 |
0.6 |
Feb |
0.5 |
0.7 |
Jan |
-0.3 |
0.8 |
Dec 2012 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
Nov |
0.7 |
1.7 |
Oct |
-0.4 |
0.7 |
Sep |
-0.1 |
1.6 |
Aug |
-0.2 |
2.1 |
Jul |
-0.1 |
2.4 |
Jun |
0.2 |
3.4 |
May |
-0.4 |
3.4 |
Apr |
0.5 |
3.8 |
Mar |
-0.5 |
2.8 |
Feb |
0.3 |
4.2 |
Jan |
0.8 |
3.5 |
Dec 2011 |
0.7 |
3.1 |
Nov |
-0.3 |
2.7 |
Oct |
0.5 |
2.8 |
Sep |
0.3 |
2.6 |
Aug |
0.4 |
2.1 |
Jul |
0.6 |
2.3 |
Jun |
0.1 |
1.7 |
May |
0.1 |
1.5 |
Apr |
-0.6 |
2.7 |
Mar |
0.6 |
4.2 |
Feb |
0.1 |
4.8 |
Jan |
0.2 |
4.8 |
Dec 2010 |
0.5 |
5.5 |
Nov |
0.0 |
4.6 |
Oct |
0.1 |
5.8 |
Sep |
0.0 |
6.1 |
Aug |
0.1 |
6.8 |
Jul |
0.6 |
7.5 |
Jun |
-0.1 |
9.2 |
May |
1.4 |
8.9 |
Apr |
0.8 |
7.2 |
Mar |
1.2 |
5.1 |
Feb |
0.0 |
1.7 |
Jan |
1.1 |
1.6 |
Dec 2009 |
-0.2 |
-2.9 |
Nov |
1.0 |
-5.8 |
Oct |
0.2 |
-8.9 |
Sep |
0.9 |
-10.4 |
Aug |
1.1 |
-13.5 |
Jul |
1.5 |
-15.3 |
Jun |
-0.3 |
-17.9 |
May |
-1.1 |
-17.9 |
Apr |
-0.7 |
-18.6 |
Mar |
-1.9 |
-17.8 |
Feb |
-0.1 |
-16.7 |
Jan |
-3.0 |
-17.0 |
Dec 2008 |
-3.5 |
-14.5 |
Nov |
-2.4 |
-11.8 |
Oct |
-0.6 |
-9.2 |
Sep |
-3.5 |
-8.8 |
Aug |
-1.2 |
-5.2 |
Jul |
-1.2 |
-3.7 |
Jun |
-0.7 |
-3.2 |
May |
-0.5 |
-2.3 |
Apr |
-1.1 |
-1.0 |
Mar |
-0.3 |
-0.5 |
Feb |
-0.6 |
1.1 |
Jan |
-0.4 |
2.5 |
Dec 2007 |
0.1 |
2.1 |
Nov |
0.6 |
3.5 |
Oct |
-0.3 |
2.9 |
Sep |
0.5 |
2.9 |
Aug |
-0.3 |
2.7 |
Jul |
0.1 |
3.6 |
Jun |
0.3 |
3.1 |
May |
-0.1 |
3.2 |
Apr |
0.7 |
3.7 |
Mar |
0.9 |
2.6 |
Feb |
0.4 |
1.6 |
Jan |
-0.5 |
1.2 |
Dec 2006 |
|
2.7 |
Dec 2005 |
|
3.6 |
Dec 2004 |
|
4.1 |
Dec 2003 |
|
2.3 |
Dec 2002 |
|
2.4 |
Dec 2001 |
|
-5.3 |
Dec 2000 |
|
0.8 |
Dec 1999 |
|
5.2 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2019 |
|
1.9 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2018 |
|
2.0 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2017 |
|
2.0 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2016 |
|
2.0 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2015 |
|
2.0 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2014 |
|
2.2 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2013 |
|
2.2 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 1999 |
|
4.3 |
Average ∆% Dec 1999-Dec 2006 |
|
1.5 |
Average ∆% Dec 1986-Dec 2006 |
|
3.3 |
Average ∆% Dec 1999-Dec 2017 |
|
0.4 |
Average ∆% Dec 1999-Dec 2018 |
|
0.5 |
Average ∆% Dec 1999-Dec 2019 |
|
0.4 |
∆% Peak 112.3113 in 06/2007 to 103.3123 in 12/2019 |
|
-8.0 |
∆% Peak 112.3113 in 06/2007 to Trough 87.3028 in 4/2009 |
|
-22.3 |
∆% Trough 87.3028 in 04/2009 to 103.3123 in 12/2019 |
|
18.3 |
∆% Trough 87.3028 in 04/2009 to 99.2481 in 8/2020 |
|
13.7 |
∆% Peak 112.3113 in 06/2007 to 99.2481 in 8/2020 |
|
-11.6 |
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm
Chart
I-1 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System provides industrial
production, manufacturing and capacity since the 1970s. There was acceleration
of growth of industrial production, manufacturing and capacity in the 1990s
because of rapid growth of productivity in the US (Cobet and Wilson (2002); see
Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 135-44). The slopes
of the curves flatten in the 2000s. Production and capacity have not recovered
sufficiently above levels before the global recession, remaining like GDP below
historical trend. The final data point for Aug 2019. There is sharp contraction
of output in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a
high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event followed by
continuing recovery. There is cyclical
uncommonly slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar
behavior in manufacturing. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of
output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975,
Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at
average 2.9 percent per year from Aug 1919 to Aug 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent
per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard
Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 155.5554 in Aug 2020.
The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841 which is 36.2 percent below trend.
The underperformance of manufacturing in Mar-Aug 2020 originates partly in the
earlier global recession augmented by the current global recession with output
in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the
average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3
percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC,
Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 163.3909 in Aug
2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841, which is 39.2 percent below
trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.7 percent between Dec 1986 and Aug
2020. Using trend growth of 1.7 percent per year, the index would increase to
134.0774 in Aug 2020. The output of manufacturing at 99.2841 in Aug 2020 is 26.0
percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification
System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the
low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index
increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 100.4257 in Aug 2020 or 16.3 percent. The
NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5
percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the
NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 164.9372 in Aug
2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 39.1 below trend. The NAICS
manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999
to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output
index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 132.0705 in Aug 2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257
in Aug 2020 is 24.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.
Chart I-1, US, Industrial Production, Capacity and Utilization
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/ipg1.gif
Additional detail on industrial production and capacity
utilization is in Chart I-2 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. Production of consumer durable goods fell sharply during the global
recession by more than 30 percent and is oscillating above the level before the
contraction. Output of nondurable consumer goods fell around 10 percent and is
some 5 percent below the level before the contraction. Output of business
equipment fell sharply during the contraction of 2001 but began rapid growth
again after 2004. An important characteristic is rapid growth of output of
business equipment in the cyclical expansion after sharp contraction in the
global recession, stalling in the final segment followed by recovery. Output of
defense and space only suffered reduction in the rate of growth during the
global recession and surged ahead of the level before the contraction,
declining in the final segment. Output of construction supplies collapsed
during the global recession and is well below the level before the contraction.
Output of energy materials was stagnant before the contraction but recovered
sharply above the level before the contraction with alternating recent
decline/improvement. There are deep contractions in Mar-Apr 2020 in the global
recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event with recovery beginning in
May-Aug 2020.
Chart I-2, US, Industrial Production, Capacity and
Utilization
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/ipg3.gif
The modern industrial revolution of Jensen (1993) is captured
in Chart I-3 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (for the
literature on M&A and corporate control see Pelaez and Pelaez, Regulation
of Banks and Finance (2009a), 143-56, Globalization and the State, Vol.
I (2008a), 49-59, Government Intervention in Globalization (2008c),
46-49). The slope of the curve of total industrial production accelerates in
the 1990s to a much higher rate of growth than the curve excluding
high-technology industries. Growth rates decelerate into the 2000s and output
and capacity utilization have not recovered fully from the strong impact of the
global recession. Output of energy materials was stagnant before the
contraction but recovered sharply above the level before the contraction with
alternating recent decline/improvement followed by stability. Growth in the
current cyclical expansion has been more subdued than in the prior comparably
deep contractions in the 1970s and 1980s. Chart I-2 shows that the past
recessions after World War II are the relevant ones for comparison with the
recession after 2007 instead of common comparisons with the Great Depression (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/d-ollar-devaluation-and-yuan.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/contraction-of-united-states-gdp-at-32_57.html). The lower
part of Chart I-3 shows recent strong growth of energy compared with
non-energy. There are deep contractions in Mar-Apr 2020 in the global
recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event with recovery beginning in
May-Aug 2020.
Chart I-3, US, Industrial Production and Capacity
Utilization, Selected Industries
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/ipg2.gif
United States manufacturing output from 1919 to 2020 monthly
is in Chart I-4 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The
second industrial revolution of Jensen (1993) is quite evident in the
acceleration of the rate of growth of output given by the sharper slope in the
1980s and 1990s. Growth was robust after the shallow recession of 2001 but
dropped sharply during the global recession after IVQ2007. Manufacturing output
recovered sharply but has not reached earlier levels and is losing momentum at
the margin. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from
trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and
Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9
percent per year from Aug 1919 to Aug 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year
would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial
Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 155.5554 in Aug 2020. The actual
index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841 which is 36.2 percent below trend. The
underperformance of manufacturing in Mar-Aug 2020 originates partly in the
earlier global recession augmented by the current global recession with output
in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the
average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3
percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC,
Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 163.3909 in Aug
2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841, which is 39.2 percent below
trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.7 percent between Dec 1986 and Aug
2020. Using trend growth of 1.7 percent per year, the index would increase to
134.0774 in Aug 2020. The output of manufacturing at 99.2841 in Aug 2020 is 26.0
percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification
System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the
low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index
increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 100.4257 in Aug 2020 or 16.3 percent. The
NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5
percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the
NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 164.9372 in Aug
2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 39.1 below trend. The NAICS
manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999
to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output
index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 132.0705 in Aug 2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257
in Aug 2020 is 24.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.
Chart I-4, US, Manufacturing Output, 1919-2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Industrial production increased 0.4 percent in Aug 2020 and
increased 3.5 percent in Jul 2020 after increasing 6.1 percent in Jun 2020,
with all data seasonally adjusted, as shown in Table I-1. The Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System conducted the annual revision of
industrial production released on Mar 27, 2019 (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):
“The Federal
Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related
measures of capacity and capacity utilization.[1] On net,
the revisions to the growth rates for total IP for recent years were small and
positive, with the estimates for 2016 and 2017 a bit higher and the estimates
for 2015 and 2018 slightly lower.[2] Total IP
is still reported to have increased from the end of the recession in mid-2009
through late 2014 before declining in 2015 and rebounding in mid-2016.
Subsequently, the index advanced around 7 1/2 percent over 2017 and 2018.
Capacity for
total industry expanded modestly in each year from 2015 to 2017 before
advancing 1 1/2 percent in 2018; it is expected to advance about 2 percent in
2019. Revisions for recent years were very small and showed slightly less
expansion in most years relative to earlier reports.
In the fourth
quarter of 2018, capacity utilization for total industry stood at 79.4 percent,
about 3/4 percentage point above its previous estimate and about 1/2 percentage
point below its long-run (1972–2018) average. The utilization rate in 2017 is
also higher than its previous estimate.”
The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System states (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/default.htm):
“Industrial production rose
0.4 percent in August for its fourth consecutive monthly increase.
However, even after the recent gains, the index in August was 7.3 percent
below its pre-pandemic February level. Manufacturing output continued to
improve in August, rising 1.0 percent, but the gains for most
manufacturing industries have gradually slowed since June. Mining production
fell 2.5 percent in August, as Tropical Storm Marco and Hurricane Laura
caused sharp but temporary drops in oil and gas extraction and well drilling.
The output of utilities moved down 0.4 percent. At 101.4 percent of
its 2012 average, the level of total industrial production was
7.7 percent lower in August than it was a year earlier. Capacity
utilization for the industrial sector increased 0.3 percentage point in
August to 71.4 percent, a rate that is 8.4 percentage points below
its long-run (1972–2019) average but 7.3 percentage points above its low
in April.” United States
industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate followed by possible
acceleration, weakening growth in past months and deep contraction in the
global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.
Manufacturing decreased 22.3 percent from the peak in Jun 2007
to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased 18.3 percent from the trough in Apr
2009 to Dec 2019. Manufacturing increased 13.7 percent from the trough in Apr
2009 to Aug 2020. Manufacturing in Aug 2020 is lower by 11.6 percent relative
to the peak in Jun 2007. The
US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with
expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. US economic
growth has been at only 1.2 percent on average in the cyclical expansion in the
44 quarters from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in
the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. Boskin (2010Sep) measures
that the US economy grew at 6.2 percent in the first four quarters and 4.5
percent in the first 12 quarters after the trough in the second quarter of
1975; and at 7.7 percent in the first four quarters and 5.8 percent in the
first 12 quarters after the trough in the first quarter of 1983 (Professor
Michael J. Boskin, Summer of Discontent, Wall
Street Journal, Sep 2, 2010 http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703882304575465462926649950.html). There are
new calculations using the revision of US GDP and personal income data since
1929 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) (http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm) and the
second estimate of GDP for IIQ2020 (https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/gdp2q20_2nd.pdf). The
average of 7.7 percent in the first four quarters of major cyclical expansions
is in contrast with the rate of growth in the first four quarters of the
expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIQ2010 of only 2.8 percent obtained by dividing GDP
of $15,557.3 billion in IIQ2010 by GDP of $15,134.1 billion in IIQ2009
{[($15,557.3/$15,134.1) -1]100 = 2.8%], or accumulating the quarter on quarter
growth rates (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/d-ollar-devaluation-and-yuan.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/contraction-of-united-states-gdp-at-32_57.html). The
expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1986 was at the average annual growth rate of 5.7 percent, 5.3 percent from
IQ1983 to IIIQ1986, 5.1 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1986, 5.0 percent from IQ1983
to IQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to
IIIQ1987, 5.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1987, 4.9 percent from IQ1983 to
IIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to
IVQ1988, 4.8 percent from IQ1983 to IQ1989, 4.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1989,
4.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIIQ1989, 4.5 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1989. 4.5
percent from IQ1983 to IQ1990, 4.4 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1990, 4.3 percent
from IQ1983 to IIIQ1990, 4.0 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1990, 3.8 percent from
IQ1983 to IQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1991, 3.8 percent from IQ1983
to IIIQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1991, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to
IQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to
IIIQ2019, 3.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1992, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to
IQ1993, 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to IIQ1993, 3.6 percent from IQ1983 to
IIIQ1993, 3.7 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1993 and at 7.9 percent from IQ1983 to
IVQ1983 (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/d-ollar-devaluation-and-yuan.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/contraction-of-united-states-gdp-at-32_57.html). The
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates a contraction of the US from
IQ1990 (Jul) to IQ1991 (Mar) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html). The
expansion lasted until another contraction beginning in IQ2001 (Mar). US GDP
contracted 1.3 percent from the pre-recession peak of $8983.9 billion of
chained 2009 dollars in IIIQ1990 to the trough of $8865.6 billion in IQ1991 (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm). The US
maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions
at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire
cycle from IVQ2007 to IIQ2020 and in the global recession with output in the US
reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event would have accumulated to
44.7 percent. GDP in IIQ2020 would be $22,807.6 billion (in constant dollars of
2012) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $5525.4 billion than
actual $17,282.2 billion. There are more than five trillion dollars of GDP less
than at trend, explaining the 34.8 million unemployed or underemployed
equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 20.2 percent of the
effective labor force with the largest part originating in the global recession
with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event (https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/09/exchange-rate-fluctuations-1.html and earlier https://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2020/08/thirty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html). Unemployment is decreasing while employment is increasing in
initial adjustment of the lockdown of economic activity in the global recession
resulting from the COVID-19 event (https://www.bls.gov/cps/employment-situation-covid19-faq-june-2020.pdf). US GDP in IIQ2020 is 24.2 percent lower than at trend. US GDP
grew from $15,762.0 billion in IVQ2007
in constant dollars to $17,282.5 billion in IIQ2020 or 9.6 percent at the
average annual equivalent rate of 0.7 percent. Professor John H. Cochrane
(2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. Cochrane
(2016May02) measures GDP growth in the US at average 3.5 percent per year from
1950 to 2000 and only at 1.76 percent per year from 2000 to 2015 with only at
2.0 percent annual equivalent in the current expansion. Cochrane (2016May02)
proposes drastic changes in regulation and legal obstacles to private economic
activity. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the
expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final
periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for recovery
of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of
expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not
required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic
growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas
(2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly
slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing.
There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for
example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The
long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9 percent per year from
Aug 1919 to Aug 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year would raise the NSA index
of manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987
in Dec 2007 to 155.5554 in Aug 2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is
99.2841 which is 36.2 percent below trend. The underperformance of
manufacturing in Mar-Aug 2020 originates partly in the earlier global recession
augmented by the current global recession with output in the US reaching a high
in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the
average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3
percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC,
Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 163.3909 in
Aug 2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841, which is 39.2 percent
below trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.7 percent between Dec 1986
and Aug 2020. Using trend growth of 1.7 percent per year, the index would
increase to 134.0774 in Aug 2020. The output of manufacturing at 99.2841 in Aug
2020 is 26.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification
System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the
low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index
increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 100.4257 in Aug 2020 or 16.3 percent. The
NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5
percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the
NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 164.9372 in Aug
2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 39.1 below trend. The NAICS
manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999
to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output
index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 132.0705 in Aug 2020. The NAICS index at
100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 24.0 percent below trend under this alternative
calculation. Table I-13 provides national income by industry without capital
consumption adjustment (WCCA). “Private industries” or economic activities have
share of 87.1 percent in IIQ2020. Most of US national income is in the form of
services. In Aug 2020, there were 140.598 million nonfarm jobs NSA in the US,
according to estimates of the establishment survey of the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm Table B-1). Total private jobs of 119.713 million NSA in Aug 2020
accounted for 85.1 percent of total nonfarm jobs of 140.598 million, of which
12.211 million, or 10.2 percent of total private jobs and 8.7 percent of total
nonfarm jobs, were in manufacturing. Private service-providing jobs were 99.418
million NSA in Aug 2020, or 70.7 percent of total nonfarm jobs and 83.0 percent
of total private-sector jobs. Manufacturing
has share of 9.2 percent in US national income in IQ2020 and durable goods 5.5
percent, as shown in Table I-13. Most income in the US originates in services.
Subsidies and similar measures designed to increase manufacturing jobs will not
increase economic growth and employment and may actually reduce growth by
diverting resources away from currently employment-creating activities because
of the drain of taxation.
Table I-13, US, National Income without Capital Consumption
Adjustment by Industry, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates, Billions of Dollars,
% of Total
SAAR IQ2020 |
% Total |
SAAR IIQ2020 |
% Total |
|
National Income WCCA |
18,092.3 |
100.0 |
15,769.0 |
100.0 |
Domestic Industries |
17,849.1 |
98.7 |
15,638.6 |
99.2 |
Private Industries |
15,767.2 |
87.1 |
13,648.5 |
86.6 |
Agriculture |
147.5 |
0.8 |
|
|
Mining |
155.5 |
0.9 |
|
|
Utilities |
204.1 |
1.1 |
|
|
Construction |
954.2 |
5.3 |
|
|
Manufacturing |
1671.5 |
9.2 |
|
|
Durable Goods |
995.5 |
5.5 |
|
|
Nondurable Goods |
676.0 |
3.7 |
|
|
Wholesale Trade |
1010.9 |
5.6 |
|
|
Retail Trade |
1204.8 |
6.7 |
|
|
Transportation & WH |
589.2 |
3.3 |
|
|
Information |
692.0 |
3.8 |
|
|
Finance, Insurance, RE |
3192.4 |
17.6 |
|
|
Professional & Business Services |
2737.7 |
15.1 |
|
|
Education, Health Care |
1873.3 |
10.4 |
|
|
Arts, Entertainment |
795.8 |
4.4 |
|
|
Other Services |
538.4 |
3.0 |
|
|
Government |
2081.9 |
11.5 |
1990.1 |
12.6 |
Rest of the World |
243.2 |
1.3 |
130.3 |
0.8 |
Notes: SSAR: Seasonally-Adjusted Annual Rate; Percentages
Calculates from Unrounded Data; WCCA: Without Capital Consumption Adjustment by
Industry; WH: Warehousing; RE, includes rental and leasing: Real Estate; Art,
Entertainment includes recreation, accommodation and food services; BS:
business services
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm
Motor vehicle sales and production in the US have been in
long-term structural change. Table VA-1A provides the data on new motor vehicle
sales and domestic car production in the US from 1990 to 2010. New motor
vehicle sales grew from 14,137 thousand in 1990 to the peak of 17,806 thousand
in 2000 or 29.5 percent. In that same period, domestic car production fell from
6,231 thousand in 1990 to 5,542 thousand in 2000 or -11.1 percent. New motor
vehicle sales fell from 17,445 thousand in 2005 to 11,772 in 2010 or 32.5
percent while domestic car production fell from 4,321 thousand in 2005 to 2,840
thousand in 2010 or 34.3 percent. In IIQ2018, light vehicle sales accumulated
to 4,500,220, which is higher by 1.8 percent relative to 4,419,349 a year
earlier in IIQ2017 (http://www.motorintelligence.com/m_frameset.html). Total not seasonally adjusted light vehicle sales
reached 1325.1 thousands in Aug 2020, decreasing 19.1 percent from 1638.7
thousands in Aug 2019 (https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gap_hist.xlsx https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product#collapse86). The
seasonally adjusted annual rate of light vehicle sales in the US reached 15.2
million in Aug 2020, higher than 14.6 million in Jul 2020 and lower than 17.1
million in Aug 2019 (https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product#collapse86).
Table VA-1A, US, New Motor Vehicle Sales and Car Production,
Thousand Units 7
|
New Motor Vehicle Sales |
New Car Sales and Leases |
New Truck Sales and Leases |
Domestic Car Production |
1990 |
14,137 |
9,300 |
4,837 |
6,231 |
1991 |
12,725 |
8,589 |
4,136 |
5,454 |
1992 |
13,093 |
8,215 |
4,878 |
5,979 |
1993 |
14,172 |
8,518 |
5,654 |
5,979 |
1994 |
15,397 |
8,990 |
6,407 |
6,614 |
1995 |
15,106 |
8,536 |
6,470 |
6,340 |
1996 |
15,449 |
8,527 |
6,922 |
6,081 |
1997 |
15,490 |
8,273 |
7,218 |
5,934 |
1998 |
15,958 |
8,142 |
7,816 |
5,554 |
1999 |
17,401 |
8,697 |
8,704 |
5,638 |
2000 |
17,806 |
8,852 |
8,954 |
5,542 |
2001 |
17,468 |
8,422 |
9,046 |
4,878 |
2002 |
17,144 |
8,109 |
9,036 |
5,019 |
2003 |
16,968 |
7,611 |
9,357 |
4,510 |
2004 |
17,298 |
7,545 |
9,753 |
4,230 |
2005 |
17,445 |
7,720 |
9,725 |
4,321 |
2006 |
17,049 |
7,821 |
9,228 |
4,367 |
2007 |
16,460 |
7,618 |
8,683 |
3,924 |
2008 |
13,494 |
6,814 |
6.680 |
3,777 |
2009 |
10,601 |
5,456 |
5,154 |
2,247 |
2010 |
11,772 |
5,729 |
6,044 |
2,840 |
Source: US Census Bureau
https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gap_hist.xlsx
Table VA-1B provides the seasonally adjusted annual rate of total
vehicle sales in the United States. The rate decreased from 17.740 in Jun
2019 and 17.214 in Feb 2020 to 9.089 in Apr 2020 in the lockdown of economic
activity in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a
high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. The rate recovered to 12.440 in May
2020 and 13.359 in Jun 2020 and 15.006 in Jul 2020 in gradual return to
economic activity. The rate for Aug 2020 increased to 15.589 (https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product#collapse86).
Table VA-1B, United States, Annual Rate, Total Vehicle Sales,
Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate
January |
2019 |
17.305 |
|
February |
2019 |
17.098 |
|
March |
2019 |
17.830 |
|
April |
2019 |
17.155 |
|
May |
2019 |
17.862 |
|
June |
2019 |
17.740 |
|
July |
2019 |
17.527 |
|
August |
2019 |
17.600 |
|
September |
2019 |
17.643 |
|
October |
2019 |
17.272 |
|
November |
2019 |
17.437 |
|
December |
2019 |
17.289 |
|
January |
2020 |
17.311 |
|
February |
2020 |
17.214 |
|
March |
2020 |
11.809 |
|
April |
2020 |
9.089 |
|
May |
2020 |
12.440 |
|
June |
2020 |
13.359 |
|
July |
2020 |
15.006 |
|
August |
2020 |
15.589 |
Source: Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTALSA
Data for Aug 2020 and updates: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product#collapse86
Chart I-4 of the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis, provides the complete data set of SAAR of total car sales in
the US. The SAAR of 9.089 in Apr 2020 is lower than the lowest rate in the
global recession at 9.223 in Feb 2009.
Chart I-4, SA Annual Rate of Total Car Sales in the United
States, Jan 1976 to Jul 2020
Source: Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTALSA
Chart I-5 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
provides output of motor vehicles and parts in the United States from 1972 to 2020.
Output virtually stagnated since the late 1990s with recent increase followed
by the highest decrease in the data history in the lockdown of economic
activity in the COVID-19 event.
Chart 1-5, US, Motor Vehicles and Parts Output, 1972-2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart I-6 of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System provides output of
computers and electronic products in the United States from 1972 to 2020.
Output accelerated sharply in the 1990s and 2000s and surpassed the level
before the global recession beginning in IVQ2007. There is sharp contraction in
Mar-Apr 2020 in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in
Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. There is initial recovery in May-Aug 2020.
Chart I-6, US, Output of Computers and Electronic Products,
1972-2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart I-7 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System shows that output of durable manufacturing accelerated in the 1980s and
1990s with slower growth in the 2000s perhaps because processes matured. Growth
was robust after the major drop during the global recession but appears to
vacillate in the final segment. There is sharp contraction in Mar-Apr 2020 in
the global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. There is initial recovery
in May-Aug 2020.
Chart I-7, US, Output of Durable Manufacturing, 1972-2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart I-8 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System provides output of aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment
from 1972 to 2020. There is long-term upward trend with oscillations around the
trend and cycles of large amplitude. There is sharp contraction in Mar-Apr 2020
in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event.
Chart I-8, US, Output of Aerospace and Miscellaneous Transportation
Equipment, 1972-2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Manufacturing
is underperforming in the lost cycle of the global recession. Manufacturing
(NAICS) in Aug 2020 is lower by 9.1 percent relative to the peak in Jun 2007,
as shown in Chart V-3A. Manufacturing (SIC) in Aug 2020 at 99.2841 is lower by
11.6 percent relative to the peak at 112.3113 in Jun 2007. There is cyclical uncommonly slow growth in the
US instead of allegations of secular
stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing. There is classic
research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example
Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term
trend is growth of manufacturing at average 2.9 percent per year from Aug 1919
to Aug 2020. Growth at 2.9 percent per year would raise the NSA index of
manufacturing output (SIC, Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in
Dec 2007 to 155.5554 in Aug 2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841
which is 36.2 percent below trend. The underperformance of manufacturing in Mar-Aug
2020 originates partly in the earlier global recession augmented by the current
global recession with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19. Manufacturing grew at the
average annual rate of 3.3 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2006. Growth at 3.3
percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output (SIC,
Standard Industrial Classification) from 108.2987 in Dec 2007 to 163.3909 in Aug
2020. The actual index NSA in Aug 2020 is 99.2841, which is 39.2 percent below
trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 1.7 percent between Dec 1986 and Aug
2020. Using trend growth of 1.7 percent per year, the index would increase to
134.0774 in Aug 2020. The output of manufacturing at 99.2841 in Aug 2020 is 26.0
percent below trend under this alternative calculation. Using the NAICS (North American Industry Classification
System), manufacturing output fell from the high of 110.5147 in Jun 2007 to the
low of 86.3800 in Apr 2009 or 21.8 percent. The NAICS manufacturing index
increased from 86.3800 in Apr 2009 to 100.4257 in Aug 2020 or 16.3 percent. The
NAICS manufacturing index increased at the annual equivalent rate of 3.5
percent from Dec 1986 to Dec 2006. Growth at 3.5 percent would increase the
NAICS manufacturing output index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 164.9372 in Aug
2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257 in Aug 2020 is 39.1 below trend. The NAICS
manufacturing output index grew at 1.7 percent annual equivalent from Dec 1999
to Dec 2006. Growth at 1.7 percent would raise the NAICS manufacturing output
index from 106.6777 in Dec 2007 to 132.0705 in Aug 2020. The NAICS index at 100.4257
in Aug 2020 is 24.0 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.
Chart V-3A, United States Manufacturing NSA, Dec 2007 to Aug
2020
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart V-3A, United States Manufacturing (NAICS) NSA, Jun 2007
to Aug 2020
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart V-3B provides the civilian noninstitutional population
of the United States, or those available for work. The civilian
noninstitutional population increased from 231.713 million in Jun 2007 to 260.558
million in Aug 2020 or 28.845 million.
Chart V-3B, United States, Civilian Noninstitutional
Population, Million, NSA, Jan 2007 to Aug 2020
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Chart V-3C, United States, Payroll Manufacturing Jobs, NSA,
Jan 2007 to Aug 2020, Thousands
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Chart V-3D provides the index of US
manufacturing (NAICS) from Jan 1972 to Aug 2020. The index continued increasing
during the decline of manufacturing jobs after the early 1980s. There are
likely effects of changes in the composition of manufacturing with also changes
in productivity and trade. There is sharp decline in the
global recession, with output in the US reaching a high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. There is initial recovery
in May-Aug 2020.
Chart V-3D, United States Manufacturing (NAICS) NSA, Jan 1972
to Aug 2020
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Chart V-3E provides the US noninstitutional civilian
population, or those in condition of working, from Jan 1948, when first
available, to Aug 2020. The noninstitutional civilian population increased from
170.042 million in Jun 1981 to 260.558 million in Aug 2020, or 90.516 million.
Chart V-3E, United States, Civilian Noninstitutional
Population, Million, NSA, Jan 1948 to Aug 2020
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Chart V-3C, United States, Payroll Manufacturing Jobs, NSA,
Jan 1939 to Aug 2020, Thousands
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
The Empire State Manufacturing Survey Index
in Table VA-1 provides continuing deterioration that started in Jun 2012 well
before Hurricane Sandy in Oct 2012. The current general index has been in
negative contraction territory from minus 2.7 in Aug 2012 to minus 7.5 in Jan
2013 and minus 1.1 in May 2013. The current general index changed to 17.0 in Sep
2020. The index of current orders has also been in negative contraction
territory from minus 3.0 in Aug 2012 to minus 10.9 in Jan 2013 and minus 7.8 in
Jun 2013. The index of current new orders changed to 7.1 in Sep 2020. There is
strength in the general index for the next six months at 40.3 in Sep 2020 and
strength in new orders at 39.1.
Table VA-1, US,
New York Federal Reserve Bank Empire State Manufacturing Survey Index SA
Current
General Index |
Current New
Orders |
Future
General Index |
Future New
Orders |
|
10/31/2011 |
-5.7 |
1.7 |
14.5 |
19.4 |
11/30/2011 |
4.9 |
1.6 |
35.4 |
30.3 |
12/31/2011 |
11.7 |
10.1 |
45.4 |
43.2 |
1/31/2012 |
11.5 |
8.7 |
50.7 |
44.4 |
2/29/2012 |
17.5 |
7.1 |
46.3 |
37.6 |
3/31/2012 |
15.5 |
4.4 |
43.8 |
37.8 |
4/30/2012 |
7.8 |
4.1 |
40.5 |
38.4 |
5/31/2012 |
14.2 |
7.1 |
32.5 |
32 |
6/30/2012 |
1.6 |
3 |
27.9 |
28.4 |
7/31/2012 |
3.2 |
-3.3 |
24.4 |
21.8 |
8/31/2012 |
-2.7 |
-3 |
18.6 |
14.6 |
9/30/2012 |
-6.9 |
-10.3 |
27 |
28 |
10/31/2012 |
-4.6 |
-6.6 |
20.1 |
22.3 |
11/30/2012 |
-0.8 |
6.1 |
18.1 |
15.1 |
12/31/2012 |
-5.8 |
0.3 |
18.9 |
18.8 |
1/31/2013 |
-7.5 |
-10.9 |
21.7 |
23.7 |
2/28/2013 |
9.2 |
12.4 |
32 |
26.8 |
3/31/2013 |
4.9 |
4.7 |
34.7 |
33 |
4/30/2013 |
4.5 |
2.8 |
30.7 |
35.8 |
5/31/2013 |
-1.1 |
-3.1 |
26.6 |
30.3 |
6/30/2013 |
4.5 |
-7.8 |
27.8 |
22.4 |
7/31/2013 |
5.2 |
2.3 |
34.1 |
33.3 |
8/31/2013 |
9.7 |
2.8 |
35.7 |
30.8 |
9/30/2013 |
7.7 |
2.9 |
40.3 |
38.2 |
10/31/2013 |
3.6 |
9.5 |
41.3 |
36.9 |
11/30/2013 |
2.2 |
-2.5 |
38.1 |
39.4 |
12/31/2013 |
3.2 |
1.1 |
36.4 |
27.5 |
1/31/2014 |
12.8 |
8.1 |
35.8 |
37.5 |
2/28/2014 |
6.8 |
1.9 |
39.8 |
43.5 |
3/31/2014 |
2.8 |
0.8 |
34.6 |
36.4 |
4/30/2014 |
4.1 |
-0.4 |
39.1 |
35.2 |
5/31/2014 |
17.5 |
8.6 |
43.6 |
38.6 |
6/30/2014 |
15.8 |
13.1 |
41.2 |
44.3 |
7/31/2014 |
21 |
16.5 |
30.7 |
27.4 |
8/31/2014 |
16.1 |
15.6 |
45.5 |
50.2 |
9/30/2014 |
29.4 |
17.3 |
47 |
46.1 |
10/31/2014 |
6.2 |
1.8 |
42.3 |
42.2 |
11/30/2014 |
12 |
10.3 |
47.7 |
47.6 |
12/31/2014 |
-2.5 |
0.4 |
35.3 |
35.2 |
1/31/2015 |
12.5 |
6.9 |
46.6 |
41 |
2/28/2015 |
10.6 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
28.7 |
3/31/2015 |
3.7 |
-6.3 |
30.1 |
26.1 |
4/30/2015 |
0.1 |
-4.7 |
38.4 |
35.2 |
5/31/2015 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
31.2 |
35 |
6/30/2015 |
-4.8 |
-6.9 |
25.9 |
27 |
7/31/2015 |
1.7 |
-5 |
29.4 |
33.3 |
8/31/2015 |
-13.9 |
-14.6 |
32.4 |
30.5 |
9/30/2015 |
-12.7 |
-11.9 |
24.3 |
24.8 |
10/31/2015 |
-13.7 |
-15.3 |
22.8 |
22.9 |
11/30/2015 |
-9.7 |
-11.4 |
22.3 |
19.4 |
12/31/2015 |
-5.9 |
-6.1 |
33.1 |
23.7 |
1/31/2016 |
-16.6 |
-20.6 |
12.1 |
15.3 |
2/29/2016 |
-12.9 |
-10 |
13.6 |
19.5 |
3/31/2016 |
-2.5 |
3 |
24.2 |
36.8 |
4/30/2016 |
8.9 |
10.7 |
32 |
39.1 |
5/31/2016 |
-7.4 |
-2.8 |
29.2 |
24 |
6/30/2016 |
3.1 |
6.6 |
33.1 |
37.6 |
7/31/2016 |
1.4 |
-1.5 |
31 |
30.9 |
8/31/2016 |
-5.6 |
0.7 |
24.5 |
28.4 |
9/30/2016 |
-1.6 |
-6.4 |
35.8 |
33.5 |
10/31/2016 |
-9.5 |
-2.8 |
36.1 |
38.1 |
11/30/2016 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
29.9 |
26.8 |
12/31/2016 |
9.6 |
9.3 |
47.2 |
45 |
1/31/2017 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
49.5 |
40.3 |
2/28/2017 |
20.1 |
13.5 |
39.2 |
39.6 |
3/31/2017 |
15.6 |
17 |
36.4 |
33.9 |
4/30/2017 |
6.2 |
9.9 |
43.2 |
36.1 |
5/31/2017 |
0.7 |
-2.2 |
40.8 |
35.6 |
6/30/2017 |
18.8 |
16.1 |
41.3 |
42 |
7/31/2017 |
11.8 |
13.8 |
36.6 |
34.9 |
8/31/2017 |
22.7 |
20 |
43.3 |
40.9 |
9/30/2017 |
23.6 |
23.7 |
42.5 |
44.9 |
10/31/2017 |
26.6 |
19.4 |
45.8 |
45 |
11/30/2017 |
19.1 |
18.2 |
48.9 |
50.5 |
12/31/2017 |
20.1 |
17 |
43.7 |
39.4 |
1/31/2018 |
19.4 |
16.6 |
49.1 |
48.5 |
2/28/2018 |
17.5 |
14.9 |
48.4 |
45.4 |
3/31/2018 |
23.5 |
16.1 |
43.1 |
42.8 |
4/30/2018 |
17.4 |
11.7 |
23.5 |
22.8 |
5/31/2018 |
17 |
15.9 |
32.2 |
34.9 |
6/30/2018 |
25.8 |
21.5 |
38.5 |
35.5 |
7/31/2018 |
21.6 |
19.2 |
31 |
36.1 |
8/31/2018 |
24.1 |
15.8 |
33.8 |
35.6 |
9/30/2018 |
19 |
16.1 |
32.6 |
35.5 |
10/31/2018 |
19.4 |
20.5 |
30.3 |
35.6 |
11/30/2018 |
21.1 |
16.6 |
32.7 |
37 |
12/31/2018 |
11.1 |
12.4 |
27.1 |
30.3 |
1/31/2019 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
21.2 |
21.7 |
2/28/2019 |
10.3 |
8.1 |
30.9 |
34.4 |
3/31/2019 |
5.1 |
3.6 |
27.9 |
29 |
4/30/2019 |
9.4 |
7.4 |
17.4 |
24.3 |
5/31/2019 |
14.4 |
8.2 |
29.7 |
33 |
6/30/2019 |
-6.4 |
-9.7 |
25.5 |
28.4 |
7/31/2019 |
4.2 |
-0.4 |
29.3 |
34.2 |
8/31/2019 |
4.2 |
5.6 |
25.1 |
31.1 |
9/30/2019 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
15.5 |
23.4 |
10/31/2019 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
17.8 |
24 |
11/30/2019 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
19.8 |
25.2 |
12/31/2019 |
3.3 |
1.7 |
26.1 |
30.8 |
1/31/2020 |
4.8 |
6.6 |
23.6 |
31.4 |
2/29/2020 |
12.9 |
22.1 |
22.9 |
27.5 |
3/31/2020 |
-21.5 |
-9.3 |
1.2 |
17.6 |
4/30/2020 |
-78.2 |
-66.3 |
7 |
11.7 |
5/31/2020 |
-48.5 |
-42.4 |
29.1 |
35 |
6/30/2020 |
-0.2 |
-0.6 |
56.5 |
52.9 |
7/31/2020 |
17.2 |
13.9 |
38.4 |
41.9 |
8/31/2020 |
3.7 |
-1.7 |
34.3 |
37.2 |
9/30/2020 |
17 |
7.1 |
40.3 |
39.1 |
Source: Federal
Reserve Bank of New York
https://www.newyorkfed.org/survey/empire/empiresurvey_overview.html
Chart VA-1 of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York provides indexes of current and expected economic activity. There were
multiple contractions in current activity after the global recession shown in
shade. Current activity is weakening relative to strong recovery in the initial
expansion in 2010 and 2011 with recent oscillating recovery and weakness. There
is sharp improvement in the current index by strong positive reading with
strong improvement in the future index in positive reading. There is
improvement in Sep 2020.
Chart VA-1, US, US, Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
Diffusion Index of Current and Expected Activity, Seasonally Adjusted
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
https://www.newyorkfed.org/survey/empire/empiresurvey_overview.html
Table VA-2 shows improvement after prior
deterioration followed by current soft improvement of the Business Outlook
survey of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. There is sharp
deterioration in Mar-May 2020 in the global recession, with output in the US reaching a
high in Feb 2020 (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html), in the
lockdown of economic activity in the COVID-19 event. There is major
return to expansion in Jun 2020. The general index moved out of contraction of
5.3 in Feb 2013 to expansion at 15.0 in Sep 2020. New orders moved from 0.6 in
Feb 2013 to expansion at 25.5 in Sep 2020. There is expansion in the future
general index at 56.6 in Sep 2020 and in future new orders at 56.9 in Sep 2020.
Table VA-2, US,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Outlook Survey, SA
Current
General Index |
Current New
Orders |
Future
General Index |
Future New
Orders |
|
Jan-11 |
16.5 |
20.1 |
43.8 |
35.9 |
Feb-11 |
28.9 |
19.8 |
41.9 |
38.7 |
Mar-11 |
36.4 |
34.1 |
57.0 |
55.5 |
Apr-11 |
13.0 |
13.7 |
35.7 |
30.9 |
May-11 |
6.2 |
8.3 |
26.2 |
25.3 |
Jun-11 |
-0.5 |
-5.2 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Jul-11 |
7.1 |
4.1 |
28.6 |
32.2 |
Aug-11 |
-19.5 |
-17.5 |
12.6 |
26.6 |
Sep-11 |
-10.7 |
-5.6 |
18.1 |
19.6 |
Oct-11 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
26.1 |
28.6 |
Nov-11 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
36.4 |
36.2 |
Dec-11 |
2.4 |
4.4 |
33.7 |
38.6 |
Jan-12 |
7.5 |
10.7 |
43.4 |
43.5 |
Feb-12 |
10.4 |
11.6 |
30.3 |
32.2 |
Mar-12 |
8.8 |
-0.1 |
30.4 |
37.1 |
Apr-12 |
5.7 |
0.6 |
39.9 |
42.4 |
May-12 |
-0.8 |
2.3 |
24.9 |
35.5 |
Jun-12 |
-12.6 |
-17.8 |
25.4 |
34.3 |
Jul-12 |
-12.7 |
-3.6 |
21.5 |
25.6 |
Aug-12 |
-2.6 |
1.6 |
20 |
25.5 |
Sep-12 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
31.6 |
42.8 |
Oct-12 |
-1.1 |
-4.7 |
17.1 |
20.7 |
Nov-12 |
-10.6 |
-7.4 |
16.6 |
22.6 |
Dec-12 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
22.4 |
29 |
Jan-13 |
-1.4 |
-2 |
28.8 |
31.9 |
Feb-13 |
-5.3 |
0.6 |
32 |
39 |
Mar-13 |
2 |
0.1 |
35.5 |
38.1 |
Apr-13 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
30.6 |
34.4 |
May-13 |
0.2 |
-4 |
39.5 |
42.2 |
Jun-13 |
12.7 |
11.7 |
37.2 |
40 |
Jul-13 |
15.9 |
7.4 |
41.6 |
52.4 |
Aug-13 |
8.2 |
8.9 |
38.5 |
38.8 |
Sep-13 |
20.6 |
19.3 |
48.8 |
51.5 |
Oct-13 |
13.5 |
23.1 |
55.4 |
61.2 |
Nov-13 |
4.6 |
8.8 |
42 |
46 |
Dec-13 |
3.8 |
12 |
41.1 |
44.6 |
Jan-14 |
15.2 |
7.9 |
38 |
40.8 |
Feb-14 |
2.3 |
4.7 |
43.9 |
39.5 |
Mar-14 |
12.5 |
6.5 |
42.4 |
38.7 |
Apr-14 |
17 |
17.3 |
39.3 |
38.6 |
May-14 |
18.5 |
14.8 |
43.8 |
42.5 |
Jun-14 |
14.1 |
10.4 |
53.3 |
55.3 |
Jul-14 |
21.4 |
28.7 |
53.6 |
48.8 |
Aug-14 |
22.9 |
15.4 |
61.9 |
51.3 |
Sep-14 |
21.7 |
13.8 |
46.1 |
44.8 |
Oct-14 |
18.1 |
16.8 |
50.8 |
49 |
Nov-14 |
35.5 |
29.7 |
50.1 |
44.3 |
Dec-14 |
21.6 |
14.5 |
47.2 |
43.9 |
Jan-15 |
13.2 |
10.1 |
54 |
47 |
Feb-15 |
10.5 |
8.4 |
35 |
46.1 |
Mar-15 |
7.3 |
0.8 |
37.7 |
37.8 |
Apr-15 |
9.9 |
4.5 |
39.7 |
33.6 |
May-15 |
6.1 |
5.4 |
38.1 |
35.1 |
Jun-15 |
8.2 |
11.2 |
43.4 |
47.5 |
Jul-15 |
4.4 |
2.3 |
40.2 |
45.4 |
Aug-15 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
34.9 |
39.2 |
Sep-15 |
-3.8 |
10.5 |
36.8 |
41.7 |
Oct-15 |
-4.9 |
-6.4 |
34.8 |
36.4 |
Nov-15 |
-3.8 |
-7.6 |
37.5 |
44.3 |
Dec-15 |
-9 |
-8.9 |
18.6 |
29.7 |
Jan-16 |
-4 |
-3 |
18.3 |
21.3 |
Feb-16 |
-6.8 |
-6 |
15.8 |
20 |
Mar-16 |
9 |
5.5 |
26.9 |
35.6 |
Apr-16 |
-1 |
-0.5 |
39.9 |
43.6 |
May-16 |
-4.8 |
-1.7 |
39.7 |
40.3 |
Jun-16 |
4.4 |
-0.9 |
36.6 |
37.6 |
Jul-16 |
0.9 |
10.1 |
36 |
35.2 |
Aug-16 |
5.4 |
-1.5 |
41.9 |
42.8 |
Sep-16 |
12.1 |
2.8 |
37 |
38.3 |
Oct-16 |
10.5 |
19.4 |
36.2 |
40.2 |
Nov-16 |
9.4 |
19.4 |
29.8 |
35.1 |
Dec-16 |
22.6 |
15.5 |
45.5 |
44.8 |
Jan-17 |
24.8 |
24.9 |
54.7 |
52.3 |
Feb-17 |
39.7 |
35.1 |
50.3 |
49.2 |
Mar-17 |
32 |
31.4 |
56.4 |
59.1 |
Apr-17 |
23.7 |
28.5 |
46.2 |
55.5 |
May-17 |
34.3 |
25.2 |
40.2 |
49.5 |
Jun-17 |
28.2 |
27.3 |
38.3 |
39.6 |
Jul-17 |
20.4 |
5.3 |
38.5 |
44.6 |
Aug-17 |
20.7 |
22.9 |
42.4 |
50.2 |
Sep-17 |
24 |
26.7 |
54.1 |
58.6 |
Oct-17 |
27.2 |
21 |
46.4 |
43.6 |
Nov-17 |
23.1 |
26.5 |
47.9 |
49.1 |
Dec-17 |
29.3 |
29.3 |
50 |
54.6 |
Jan-18 |
23 |
9.6 |
45.4 |
48.2 |
Feb-18 |
30.7 |
29.5 |
40.1 |
49.7 |
Mar-18 |
23.8 |
30.3 |
46.8 |
50.2 |
Apr-18 |
25.3 |
22.2 |
43 |
41.1 |
May-18 |
32.2 |
41.3 |
41.5 |
43.7 |
Jun-18 |
21.7 |
21.2 |
38.3 |
41.2 |
Jul-18 |
20.8 |
24.9 |
26.8 |
29.8 |
Aug-18 |
10.1 |
12.1 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
Sep-18 |
21.3 |
18.5 |
36 |
35.9 |
Oct-18 |
20.5 |
15.5 |
31.9 |
39 |
Nov-18 |
10.6 |
12.2 |
26.4 |
39.1 |
Dec-18 |
10.9 |
14.8 |
29.1 |
36.3 |
Jan-19 |
14.8 |
16.7 |
29.7 |
31.8 |
Feb-19 |
-0.7 |
1.5 |
29 |
30.5 |
Mar-19 |
14.9 |
6.4 |
23.1 |
24.2 |
Apr-19 |
11 |
16 |
22.2 |
27 |
May-19 |
17.5 |
14.2 |
22.3 |
24.8 |
Jun-19 |
1.5 |
8 |
24.2 |
33.7 |
Jul-19 |
16.6 |
18.4 |
33.6 |
41.6 |
Aug-19 |
13.1 |
21.6 |
31.8 |
42 |
Sep-19 |
12.2 |
22.5 |
23.1 |
34.4 |
Oct-19 |
6.8 |
22.5 |
32.6 |
37.3 |
Nov-19 |
8.4 |
10.1 |
34.4 |
37.3 |
Dec-19 |
2.4 |
11.1 |
34.8 |
33.6 |
Jan-20 |
17 |
18.2 |
38.4 |
41.9 |
Feb-20 |
36.7 |
33.6 |
45.4 |
54 |
Mar-20 |
-12.7 |
-15.5 |
35.2 |
36.7 |
Apr-20 |
-56.6 |
-70.9 |
43 |
36.5 |
May-20 |
-43.1 |
-25.7 |
49.7 |
54.7 |
Jun-20 |
27.5 |
16.7 |
66.3 |
67.9 |
Jul-20 |
24.1 |
23 |
36 |
55.6 |
Aug-20 |
17.2 |
19 |
38.8 |
55.1 |
Sep-20 |
15 |
25.5 |
56.6 |
56.9 |
Source: Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
https://www.philadelphiafed.org
Chart VA-2 of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey provides the
current and future general activity indexes from Jan 2008 to Aug 2020. The
shaded areas are the recession cycle dates of the National Bureau of Economic
Research (NBER) (https://www.nber.org/cycles.html).
The Philadelphia Fed index dropped during the initial period of recession and
then led the recovery, as industry overall. There was a second decline of the
index into 2011 followed now by what appeared as renewed strength from late
2011 into Jan 2012. There is decline to negative territory of the current
activity index in Nov 2012 and return to positive territory in Dec 2012 with
decline of current conditions into contraction in Jan-Feb 2013 and rebound to
mild expansion in Mar-Apr 2013. The index of current activity moved into
expansion in Jun-Oct 2013 with weakness in Nov-Dec 2013, improving in Jan 2014.
There is renewed deterioration in Feb 2014 with rebound in Apr-Sep 2014 and
mild deterioration in Oct 2014 followed by improvement in Nov 2014. The index
deteriorated in Jan-Feb 2015, stabilizing in Mar-May 2015 and improving in Jun
2015. The index deteriorated in Jul 2015, improved in Aug 2015 and deteriorated
in Sep-Oct 2015. The index shows contraction in Nov 2015 to Feb 2016 with
recovery in Mar 2016. There is deterioration in Apr-May 2016 with improvement
in Jun 2016 and deterioration in Jul 2016. There is improvement in Aug-Sep 2016
with moderate weakening in Oct-Nov 2016. The indexes improved sharply in Dec
2016 and Jan-Feb 2017, softening in Mar-Apr 2017. The current index weakened in
Jun 2017 with stability in the six-month forecast. The current index
deteriorated in Jul 2017 with improvement in the six-month forecast. The current
index deteriorated in Aug 2017 with improvement in the six-month forecast. The
current index improved in Sep 2017 with improvement in the six-month forecast.
The current index improved and the future index deteriorated in Oct 2017. There
is deterioration in Nov 2017 of the current index and improvement of the future
index. Both the current and future indexes improved in Dec 2017, deteriorating
in Jan 2018. There is improvement of the current index in Feb 2018 with mild deterioration
in the future index. The current index improves in Apr 2018 while the future
index weakens. There is improvement in the current index in May 2018 with
weakening of the future index. There is weakening in the current index in Jun
2018 while the future index weakens. The current index improves in Jul 2018
while the future index weakens. There is weakening of the current index in Aug
2018 while the future index improves. The current index improves in Sep 2018
while the future index weakens. The current index weakens in Oct 2018 while the
future index weakens. The current index deteriorates in Nov 2018 while the
future index deteriorates. The current index deteriorates in Dec 2018 while the
future index improves. The current index improves in Jan 2019 while the future
index improves. The current index deteriorates in Feb 2019 while the
future index improves. The current index improves in Mar 2019 while the future
index deteriorates. The current index deteriorates in Apr 2019 while the future
index deteriorates. The current index improves in May 2019 while the future
index improves. The current index deteriorates in Jun 2019 while the future
index improves. The current index improves in Jul 2019 while the future index
improves. The current index deteriorates in Aug 2019 while the future index
deteriorates. The current index deteriorates in Sep 2019 while the future index
deteriorates. The current index deteriorates in Oct 2019 while the future index
improves. The current index improves in Nov 2019 while the future index
improves. The current index deteriorates in Dec 2019 while the future index
deteriorates. The current index improves in Jan 2020 while the future index
improves. The current index improves in Feb 2020 while the future index
improves. The current index contracts in Mar 2020 while the future index
deteriorates. The current index contracts in Apr 2020 while the future index
deteriorates. The current index improves in May 2020 while the future index
improves. The current index expands again in Jul 2020 while the future index
expands. The current index deteriorates in Aug 2020 while the future index
improves. The current index deteriorates in Sep 2020 while the future index
expands.
Chart VA-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business
Outlook Survey, Current and Future Activity Indexes
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/
The index of current new orders of the
Business Outlook Survey of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia in Chart
VA-2 illustrates the weakness of the cyclical expansion. The index weakened in
2006 and 2007 and then fell sharply into contraction during the global
recession. There have been twelve readings into contraction from Jan 2012 to
May 2013 and generally weak readings with some exceptions. The index of new
orders moved into expansion in Jun-Oct 2013 with moderation in Nov-Dec 2013 and
into Jan 2014. The index fell into contraction in Feb 2014, recovering in
Mar-Apr 2014 but weaker reading in May 2014. There is marked improvement in
Jun-Jul 2014 with slowing in Aug-Oct 2014 followed by acceleration in Nov 2014.
New orders deteriorated in Jan-Apr 2015, improving in May-Jun 2015. New orders
deteriorated in Jul-Aug 2015 and improved in Sep 2015. New orders deteriorated
in Oct-2015 to Dec 2015, contracting at slower pace in Jan 2016. There is
sharper contraction in Feb 2016 and an upward jump in Mar 2016 followed by
deterioration in Apr-Jun 2016. New orders improved in Jul 2016, deteriorating
in Aug 2016 and improving in Sep 2016. Improvement continued in Oct-Nov 2016
with mild deterioration in Dec 2016 followed by improvement in Jan-Feb 2017,
softening in Mar-Jul 2017, recovering in Aug-Sep 2017. There is deterioration
in Oct 2017 followed by improvement in Nov-Dec 2017. There is deterioration in
Jan 2018 followed by improvement in Feb 2018 and improvement in Mar 2018. The index
deteriorates in Apr 2018, improving in May 2018. The index deteriorates in Jun
2018, improving in Jul 2018 and deteriorating in Aug 2018. The index improves
in Sep 2018, deteriorating in Oct 2018. The index weakens in Nov 2018,
improving in Dec 2018. The index improves in Jan 2019, deteriorating in Feb
2019. The index improves in Mar 2019, improving in Apr 2019. The index
deteriorates in May-Jun 2019, improving in Jul 2019. The index improves in Aug
2019, improving in Sep 2019. The index stabilizes in Oct 2019, deteriorating in
Nov 2019. The index improves in Dec 2019 and Jan 2020. The index improves in
Feb 2020. The index contracts in Mar-Apr 2020. There is improvement in the
index to softer negative level in May 2020. The index improves to positive in
Jun-Sep 2020.
Chart VA-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business
Outlook Survey, Current New Orders Diffusion Index SA
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009,
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment