Sunday, November 15, 2015

Interest Rate Policy Conundrum, Recovery without Hiring, Ten Million Fewer Full Time Jobs, Youth and Middle Age Unemployment, United States Producer Prices, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, World Cyclical Slow Growth and Global Recession Risk: Part VI

 

Interest Rate Policy Conundrum, Recovery without Hiring, Ten Million Fewer Full Time Jobs, Youth and Middle Age Unemployment, United States Producer Prices, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, World Cyclical Slow Growth and Global Recession Risk

Carlos M. Pelaez

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

I Recovery without Hiring

IA1 Hiring Collapse

IA2 Labor Underutilization

ICA3 Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs

IA4 Theory and Reality of Cyclical Slow Growth Not Secular Stagnation: Youth and

Middle-Age Unemployment

II United States Producer Prices

IIA Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation

II United States Producer Prices

III World Financial Turbulence

IIIA Financial Risks

IIIE Appendix Euro Zone Survival Risk

IIIF Appendix on Sovereign Bond Valuation

IV Global Inflation

V World Economic Slowdown

VA United States

VB Japan

VC China

VD Euro Area

VE Germany

VF France

VG Italy

VH United Kingdom

VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets

VII Economic Indicators

VIII Interest Rates

IX Conclusion

References

Appendixes

Appendix I The Great Inflation

IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies

IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact

IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort

IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis

IIIGA Monetary Policy with Deficit Financing of Economic Growth

IIIGB Adjustment during the Debt Crisis of the 1980s

V World Economic Slowdown. Table I-1 is constructed with the database of the IMF (http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=29) to show GDP in dollars in 2014 and the growth rate of real GDP of the world and selected regional countries from 2014 to 2017. The data illustrate the concept often repeated of “two-speed recovery” of the world economy from the recession of 2007 to 2009. The IMF has changed its forecast of the world economy to 3.4 percent in 2014 and 3.1 percent in 2015 but accelerating to 3.6 percent in 2016 and 3.8 percent in 2017. Slow-speed recovery occurs in the “major advanced economies” of the G7 that account for $35,542 billion of world output of $77,269 billion, or 46.0 percent, but are projected to grow at much lower rates than world output, 2.0 percent on average from 2014 to 2017 in contrast with 3.5 percent for the world as a whole. While the world would grow 14.6 percent in the four years from 2014 to 2017, the G7 as a whole would grow 8.1 percent. The difference in dollars of 2014 is high: growing by 14.6 percent would add around $11.3 trillion of output to the world economy, or roughly, two times the output of the economy of Japan of $4,602 billion but growing by 8.1 percent would add $6.3 trillion of output to the world, or about the output of Japan in 2014. The “two speed” concept is in reference to the growth of the 150 countries labeled as emerging and developing economies (EMDE) with joint output in 2014 of $30,296 billion, or 39.2 percent of world output. The EMDEs would grow cumulatively 19.5 percent or at the average yearly rate of 4.5 percent, contributing $5.9 trillion from 2014 to 2017 or the equivalent of somewhat less than the GDP of $10,357 billion of China in 2014. The final four countries in Table I-1 often referred as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), are large, rapidly growing emerging economies. Their combined output in 2014 adds to $16,616 billion, or 21.5 percent of world output, which is equivalent to 46.8 percent of the combined output of the major advanced economies of the G7.

Table I-1, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Real GDP Growth

 

GDP USD 2014

Real GDP ∆%
2014

Real GDP ∆%
2015

Real GDP ∆%
2016

Real GDP ∆%
2017

World

77,269

3.4

3.1

3.6

3.8

G7

35,542

1.7

1.9

2.2

2.1

Canada

1,785

2.4

1.0

1.7

2.4

France

2,834

0.2

1.2

1.5

1.6

DE

3,874

1.6

1.5

1.6

1.5

Italy

2,148

-0.4

0.8

1.3

1.2

Japan

4,602

-0.1

0.6

1.0

0.4

UK

2,950

3.0

2.5

2.2

2.2

US

17,348

2.4

2.6

2.8

2.8

Euro Area

13,457

0.9

1.5

1.6

1.7

DE

3,874

1.6

1.5

1.6

1.5

France

2,834

0.2

1.2

1.5

1.6

Italy

2,148

-0.4

0.8

1.3

1.2

POT

230

0.9

1.6

1.5

1.4

Ireland

251

5.2

4.9

3.8

3.2

Greece

238

0.8

-2.3

-1.3

2.7

Spain

1,407

1.4

3.1

2.5

2.2

EMDE

30,296

4.6

4.0

4.5

5.1

Brazil

2,347

0.1

-3.0

-1.0

2.3

Russia

1,861

0.6

-3.8

-0.6

1.0

India

2,051

7.3

7.3

7.5

7.5

China

10,357

7.3

6.8

6.3

6.0

Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries); POT: Portugal

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/index.aspx

Continuing high rates of unemployment in advanced economies constitute another characteristic of the database of the WEO (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx ). Table I-2 is constructed with the WEO database to provide rates of unemployment from 2013 to 2017 for major countries and regions. In fact, unemployment rates for 2014 in Table I-2 are high for all countries: unusually high for countries with high rates most of the time and unusually high for countries with low rates most of the time. The rates of unemployment are particularly high in 2014 for the countries with sovereign debt difficulties in Europe: 13.9 percent for Portugal (POT), 11.3 percent for Ireland, 26.5 percent for Greece, 24.5 percent for Spain and 12.7 percent for Italy, which is lower but still high. The G7 rate of unemployment is 6.4 percent. Unemployment rates are not likely to decrease substantially if slow growth persists in advanced economies.

Table I-2, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Unemployment Rate as Percent of Labor Force

 

% Labor Force 2013

% Labor Force 2014

% Labor Force 2015

% Labor Force 2016

% Labor Force 2017

World

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

G7

7.1

6.4

5.9

5.6

5.6

Canada

7.1

6.9

6.8

6.8

6.6

France

10.3

10.3

10.2

9.9

9.7

DE

5.2

5.0

4.7

4.7

4.7

Italy

12.2

12.7

12.2

11.9

11.6

Japan

4.0

3.6

3.5

3.5

3.6

UK

7.6

6.2

5.6

5.5

5.4

US

7.4

6.2

5.3

4.9

4.8

Euro Area

12.0

11.6

11.0

10.5

10.1

DE

5.2

5.0

4.7

4.7

4.7

France

10.3

10.3

10.2

9.9

9.7

Italy

12.2

12.7

12.2

11.9

11.6

POT

16.2

13.9

12.3

11.3

10.9

Ireland

13.0

11.3

9.6

8.5

7.7

Greece

27.5

26.5

26.8

27.1

25.7

Spain

26.1

24.5

21.8

19.9

18.7

EMDE

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Brazil

5.4

4.8

6.6

8.6

8.9

Russia

5.5

5.2

6.0

6.5

6.0

India

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

China

4.1

4.1

4.1

4.1

4.1

Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries)

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/index.aspx

Table V-3 provides the latest available estimates of GDP for the regions and countries followed in this blog from IQ2012 to IQ2015 available now for all countries. There are preliminary estimates for several countries for IIIQ2015. Growth is weak throughout most of the world.

  •  Japan. The GDP of Japan increased 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 4.2 percent at SAAR (seasonally adjusted annual rate) and 3.5 percent relative to a year earlier but part of the jump could be the low level a year earlier because of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan is experiencing difficulties with the overvalued yen because of worldwide capital flight originating in zero interest rates with risk aversion in an environment of softer growth of world trade. Japan’s GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIQ2012 at the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of minus 2.1 percent, which is much lower than 4.2 percent in IQ2012. Growth of 3.5 percent in IIQ2012 in Japan relative to IIQ2011 has effects of the low level of output because of Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.4 percent in IIIQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 1.5 percent and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 0.6 percent and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan grew 1.3 percent in IQ2013 at the SAAR of 5.4 percent and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2013 at the SAAR of 2.3 percent and increased 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP grew 0.6 percent in IIIQ2013 at the SAAR of 2.5 percent and increased 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Japan’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent at the SAAR of minus 0.9 percent, increasing 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 1.1 percent in IQ2014 at the SAAR of 4.5 percent and increased 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, Japan’s GDP fell 2.0 percent at the SAAR of minus 7.6 percent and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.3 percent in IIIQ2014 at the SAAR of minus 1.1 percent and fell 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, Japan’s GDP grew 0.3 percent, at the SAAR of 1.3 percent, decreasing 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Japan increased 1.1 percent in IQ2015 at the SAAR of 4.5 percent and decreased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent in IIQ2015 at the SAAR of minus 1.2 percent and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier
  • China. China’s GDP grew 1.8 percent in IQ2012, annualizing to 7.4 percent, and 8.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew at 2.1 percent in IIQ2012, which annualizes to 8.7 percent and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 1.8 percent in IIIQ2012, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, China grew at 2.0 percent, which annualizes at 8.2 percent, and 8.0 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, China grew at 1.8 percent, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and 7.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, China grew at 1.8 percent, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.1 percent in IIIQ2013, which annualizes at 8.7 percent and 7.9 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 1.7 percent in IVQ2013, which annualized to 7.0 percent and 7.6 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.6 percent in IQ2014, which annualizes to 6.6 percent, and 7.3 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.8 percent in IIQ2014, which annualizes at 7.4 percent, and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.9 percent in IIIQ2014, which is equivalent to 7.8 percent in a year, and 7.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew 1.7 percent in IVQ2014, which annualizes at 7.0 percent, and 7.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew at 1.3 percent in IQ2015, which annualizes at 5.3 percent, and 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew 1.8 percent in IIQ2015, which annualizes at 7.4 percent, and increased 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2015, China’s GDP grew at 1.8 percent, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and increased 6.9 percent relative to a year earlier. There is decennial change in leadership in China (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/index.htm). Growth rates of GDP of China in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier have been declining from 2011 to 2015.
  • Euro Area. GDP fell 0.2 percent in the euro area in IQ2012 and decreased 0.4 in IQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP contracted 0.3 percent IIQ2012 and fell 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.1 percent and declined 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.4 percent relative to the prior quarter and fell 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, the GDP of the euro area fell 0.2 percent and decreased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, euro area GDP increased 0.2 percent and fell 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2013 and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, the GDP of the euro area increased 0.2 percent and 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.1 percent in IIQ2014 and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. The euro area’s GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.4 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP increased 0.5 percent in IQ2015 and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2015 and increased 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier.
  • Germany. The GDP of Germany increased 0.4 percent in IQ2012 and 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.1 percent and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier but 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier when adjusted for calendar (CA) effects. In IIIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP contracted 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and decreased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Germany’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent and fell 1.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.9 percent and 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.4 percent in IIIQ2013 and 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.7 percent in IQ2014 and 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, Germany’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP increased 0.6 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IQ2015 and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP increased 0.4 percent in IIQ2015 and 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier.
  • United States. Growth of US GDP in IQ2012 was 0.7 percent, at SAAR of 2.7 percent and higher by 2.8 percent relative to IQ2011. US GDP increased 0.5 percent in IIQ2012, 1.9 percent at SAAR and 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, US GDP grew 0.1 percent, 0.5 percent at SAAR and 2.4 percent relative to IIIQ2011. In IVQ2012, US GDP grew 0.0 percent, 0.1 percent at SAAR and 1.3 percent relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, US GDP grew at 1.9 percent SAAR, 0.5 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.1 percent relative to the same quarter in 2013. In IIQ2013, US GDP grew at 1.1 percent in SAAR, 0.3 percent relative to the prior quarter and 0.9 percent relative to IIQ2012. US GDP grew at 3.0 percent in SAAR in IIIQ2013, 0.7 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.5 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/monetary-policy-designed-on-measurable.html). In IVQ2013, US GDP grew 0.9 percent at 3.8 percent SAAR and 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, US GDP decreased 0.2 percent, increased 1.7 percent relative to a year earlier and fell 0.9 percent at SAAR. In IIQ2014, US GDP increased 1.1 percent at 4.6 percent SAAR and increased 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. US GDP increased 1.1 percent in IIIQ2014 at 4.3 percent SAAR and increased 2.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, US GDP increased 0.5 percent at SAAR of 2.1 percent and increased 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IQ2015 at SAAR of 0.6 percent and grew 2.9 percent relative to a year earlier. US GDP grew at SAAR 3.9 percent in IIQ2015, increasing 1.0 percent in the quarter and 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.4 percent in IIIQ2015 at SAAR of 1.5 percent and grew 2.0 percent in IIIQ2015 relative to a year earlier.
  • United Kingdom. In IQ2012, GDP increased 0.2 percent and increased 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2012, GDP fell 0.2 percent relative to IQ2012 and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, GDP increased 1.0 percent and increased 1.2 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier. In IVQ2012, GDP fell 0.1 percent and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Growth increased to 1.4 percent in IQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 0.7 percent in IQ2013 relative to IVQ2012. In IIQ2013, GDP increased 0.6 percent and 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IIIQ2013 and 2.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.6 percent in IVQ2013 and 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, GDP increased 0.6 percent and 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IIQ2014 and 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.6 percent in IIIQ2013 and 2.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, GDP increased 0.8 percent and 3.0 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015 and increased 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.7 percent in IIQ2015 and increased 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.5 percent in IIIQ2015 and increased 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier.
  • Italy. Italy has experienced decline of GDP in eight consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IIQ2013 and in IQ2014, IIQ2014 and IIIQ2014. Italy’s GDP fell 1.0 percent in IQ2012 and declined 2.4 percent relative to IQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell 0.7 percent in IIQ2012 and declined 3.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, Italy’s GDP fell 0.5 percent and declined 3.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy contracted 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and fell 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.8 percent and fell 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP contracted 0.2 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and declined 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2013 and decreased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, Italy’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent and fell 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy fell 0.2 percent in IIQ2014 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2014, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy changed 0.0 percent in IVQ20214 and declined 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2015, Italy’s GDP increased 0.4 percent and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2015 and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2015 and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier.
  • France. France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IQ2012 and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, France’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2012 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, France’s GDP increased 0.1 percent and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.8 percent in IIQ2013 and increased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and increased 0.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2013 and increased 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, France’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2014, France’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent and decreased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2014 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IQ2015 and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2015, France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent and increased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier.

Table V-3, Percentage Changes of GDP Quarter on Prior Quarter and on Same Quarter Year Earlier, ∆%

 

IQ2012/IVQ2011

IQ2012/IQ2011

United States

QOQ: 0.7       

SAAR: 2.7

2.8

Japan

QOQ: 1.0

SAAR: 4.2

3.5

China

1.8

8.0

Euro Area

-0.2

-0.4

Germany

0.4

1.5

France

0.0

0.4

Italy

-1.0

-2.4

United Kingdom

0.2

1.5

 

IIQ2012/IQ2012

IIQ2012/IIQ2011

United States

QOQ: 0.5        

SAAR: 1.9

2.5

Japan

QOQ: -0.5
SAAR: -2.1

3.5

China

2.1

7.5

Euro Area

-0.3

-0.8

Germany

0.1

0.3 0.8 CA

France

-0.3

0.2

Italy

-0.7

-3.2

United Kingdom

-0.2

1.0

 

IIIQ2012/ IIQ2012

IIIQ2012/ IIIQ2011

United States

QOQ: 0.1 
SAAR: 0.5

2.4

Japan

QOQ: –0.4
SAAR: –1.5

0.2

China

1.8

7.4

Euro Area

-0.1

-0.8

Germany

0.2

0.1

France

0.3

0.3

Italy

-0.5

-3.2

United Kingdom

1.0

1.2

 

IVQ2012/IIIQ2012

IVQ2012/IVQ2011

United States

QOQ: 0.0
SAAR: 0.1

1.3

Japan

QOQ: -0.1

SAAR: -0.6

0.0

China

2.0

8.0

Euro Area

-0.4

-1.0

Germany

-0.5

-0.3

France

0.0

0.0

Italy

-0.5

-2.7

United Kingdom

-0.1

1.0

 

IQ2013/IVQ2012

IQ2013/IQ2012

United States

QOQ: 0.5
SAAR: 1.9

1.1

Japan

QOQ: 1.3

SAAR: 5.4

0.4

China

1.8

7.8

Euro Area

-0.2

-1.1

Germany

-0.3

-1.7

France

0.1

0.1

Italy

-0.8

-2.5

UK

0.7

1.4

 

IIQ2013/IQ2013

IIQ2013/IIQ2012

United States

QOQ: 0.3

SAAR: 1.1

0.9

Japan

QOQ: 0.6

SAAR: 2.3

1.4

China

1.8

7.5

Euro Area

0.4

-0.4

Germany

0.9

0.7

France

0.8

1.1

Italy

-0.2

-2.0

UK

0.6

2.2

 

IIIQ2013/IIQ2013

III/Q2013/  IIIQ2012

USA

QOQ: 0.7
SAAR: 3.0

1.5

Japan

QOQ: 0.6

SAAR: 2.5

2.2

China

2.1

7.9

Euro Area

0.2

-0.1

Germany

0.4

1.0

France

-0.1

0.8

Italy

0.1

-1.4

UK

0.9

2.1

 

IVQ2013/IIIQ2013

IVQ2013/IVQ2012

USA

QOQ: 0.9

SAAR: 3.8

2.5

Japan

QOQ: -0.2

SAAR: -0.9

2.3

China

1.7

7.6

Euro Area

0.2

0.6

Germany

0.3

1.2

France

0.2

1.0

Italy

0.0

-1.0

UK

0.6

2.8

 

IQ2014/IVQ2013

IQ2014/IQ2013

USA

QOQ -0.2

SAAR -0.9

1.7

Japan

QOQ: 1.1

SAAR: 4.5

2.4

China

1.6

7.3

Euro Area

0.2

1.1

Germany

0.7

2.6

France

-0.2

0.7

Italy

-0.1

-0.3

UK

0.6

2.8

 

IIQ2014/IQ2014

IIQ2014/IIQ2013

USA

QOQ 1.1

SAAR 4.6

2.6

Japan

QOQ: -2.0

SAAR: -7.6

-0.4

China

1.8

7.4

Euro Area

0.1

0.7

Germany

-0.1

1.0

France

-0.1

-0.2

Italy

-0.2

-0.3

UK

0.9

3.1

 

IIIQ2014/IIQ2014

IIIQ2014/IIIQ2013

USA

QOQ: 1.1

SAAR: 4.3

2.9

Japan

QOQ: -0.3

SAAR: -1.1

-1.4

China

1.9

7.2

Euro Area

0.3

0.8

Germany

0.2

1.2

France

0.2

0.1

Italy

-0.1

-0.4

UK

0.6

2.9

 

IVQ2014/IIIQ2014

IVQ2014/IVQ2013

USA

QOQ: 0.5

SAAR: 2.1

2.5

Japan

QOQ: 0.3

SAAR: 1.3

-1.0

China

1.7

7.2

Euro Area

0.4

0.9

Germany

0.6

1.6

France

0.1

0.1

Italy

0.0

-0.4

UK

0.8

3.0

 

IQ2015/IVQ2014

IQ2015/IQ2014

USA

QOQ: 0.2

SAAR: 0.6

2.9

Japan

QOQ: 1.1

SAAR: 4.5

-0.8

China

1.3

7.0

Euro Area

0.5

1.2

Germany

0.3

1.2

France

0.7

0.9

Italy

0.4

0.1

UK

0.4

2.7

 

IIQ2015/IQ2015

IIQ2015/IIQ2014

USA

QOQ: 1.0

SAAR: 3.9

2.7

Japan

QOQ: -0.3

SAAR: -1.2

0.8

China

1.8

7.0

Euro Area

0.4

1.5

Germany

0.4

1.6

France

0.0

1.1

Italy

0.3

0.6

UK

0.7

2.4

 

IIIQ2015/IIQ2015

IIIQ2015/IVQ2014

USA

QOQ: 0.4

SAAR: 1.5

2.0

China

1.8

6.9

France

0.3

1.2

Italy

0.2

0.9

UK

0.5

2.3

QOQ: Quarter relative to prior quarter; SAAR: seasonally adjusted annual rate

Source: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/aboutus/stat_int.html

Table V-4 provides two types of data: growth of exports and imports in the latest available months and in the past 12 months; and contributions of net trade (exports less imports) to growth of real GDP.

  • China. In Sep 2015, China exports decreased 3.7 percent relative to a year earlier and imports decreased 20.4 percent.
  • Germany. Germany’s exports increased 2.4 percent in the month of Aug 2015 and increased 6.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug 2015. Germany’s imports increased 2.2 percent in the month of Aug 2015 and increased 6.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug. Net trade contributed 0.8 percentage points to growth of GDP in IQ2012, contributed 0.4 percentage points in IIQ2012, contributed 0.3 percentage points in IIIQ2012, deducted 0.5 percentage points in IVQ2012, deducted 0.3 percentage points in IQ2013 and added 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded deducted 0.5 percentage points from Germany’s GDP growth in IIIQ2013 and added 0.5 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2014. Net trade added 0.2 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2014 and added 0.4 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.3 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 0.2 percentage points in IQ2015.
  • United Kingdom. Net trade contributed 0.7 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.7 percentage points from UK growth. Net trade contributed 0.1 percentage points to UK value added in IVQ2013. Net trade contributed 0.2 percentage points to UK value added in IQ2014 and 1.3 percentage points in IIQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.7 percentage points to GDP growth in IIIQ2014 and added 0.2 percentage points in IVQ2014. Net traded deducted 0.2 percentage points from growth in IQ2015. Net trade added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2015 and deducted 0.7 percentage points in IIIQ2015
  • France. France’s exports decreased 0.6 percent in Sep 2015 while imports increased 0.5 percent. France’s exports increased 1.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015 and imports decreased 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. Net traded added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IIIQ2012 and 0.1 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IQ2013 and added 0.3 percentage points in IIQ2013, deducting 1.7 percentage points in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IVQ2013 and deducted 0.1 percentage points in IQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.2 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IIQ2014 and deducted 0.2 percentage points in IIIQ2014. Net trade added 0.3 percentage points to France’s GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 0.2 percentage points in IQ2015. Net trade added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2015
  • United States. US exports increased 1.6 percent in Sep 2015 and goods exports decreased 6.0 percent in Jan-Sep 2015 relative to a year earlier. Imports decreased 1.8 percent in Sep 2015 and goods imports decreased 3.9 percent in Jan-Sep 2015 relative to a year earlier. Net trade added 0.28 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2012 and added 0.16 percentage points in IIIQ2012 and 0.58 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.01 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2013 and deducted 0.24 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded added 0.16 percentage points to US GDP growth in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 1.26 percentage points to US GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.39 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2014 and deducted 0.24 percentage points in IIQ2014. Net trade added 0.39 percentage points to GDP growth in IIIQ2014. Net trade deducted 0.89 percentage points from GDP growth in IVQ2014 and deducted 1.92 percentage points from GDP growth in IQ2015. Net trade added 0.18 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2015. Net trade deducted 0.03 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2015. Industrial production decreased 0.2 percent in Sep 2015 and decreased 0.1 percent in Aug 2015, with all data seasonally adjusted. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System conducted the annual revision of industrial production released on Jul 21, 2015 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):

“The Federal Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related measures of capacity and capacity utilization. Total IP is now reported to have increased slightly less than 2 1/2 percent per year, on average, from 2011 through 2013 before advancing about 4 1/2 percent in 2014 and falling back somewhat in the first half of 2015. Relative to earlier reports, the current rates of change are lower---especially for 2012 and 2013. For the most recent recession, total IP still shows a peak-to-trough decline of about 17 percent, and the dates for the peak and trough are unaltered. However, the lower rates of change for recent years indicate that the recovery in the industrial sector since the trough has been slower than reported earlier. Total IP is now estimated to have returned to its pre-recession peak in May 2014, seven months later than previously estimated.”

The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm):

“Industrial production decreased 0.2 percent in September after edging down 0.1 percent in August. The decline in August is smaller than previously reported. In September, manufacturing output moved down 0.1 percent for a second consecutive monthly decrease; the index for mining fell 2.0 percent, while the index for utilities rose 1.3 percent. For the third quarter as a whole, total industrial production rose at an annual rate of 1.8 percent, and manufacturing output increased 2.5 percent. A strong gain for motor vehicles and parts contributed substantially to the quarterly increases. At 107.1 percent of its 2012 average, total industrial production in September was 0.4 percent above its year-earlier level. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector fell 0.3 percentage point in September to 77.5 percent, a rate that is 2.6 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2014) average.” In the six months ending in Sep 2015, United States national industrial production accumulated change of minus 0.1 percent at the annual equivalent rate of minus 0.2 percent, which is lower than growth of 0.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015. Excluding growth of 0.8 percent in Jul 2015, growth in the remaining five months from Apr 2014 to Sep 2015 accumulated to minus 0.9 percent or minus 2.1 percent annual equivalent. Industrial production declined in four of the past six months and changed 0.0 percent in one month. Industrial production expanded at annual equivalent 2.0 percent in the most recent quarter from Jul 2015 to Sep 2015 and contracted at 2.4 percent in the prior quarter Apr 2015 to Jun 2015. Business equipment accumulated increase of 1.5 percent in the six months from Apr 2015 to Sep 2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 3.0 percent, which is higher than growth of 1.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015. The Fed analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): “Capacity utilization for the industrial sector fell 0.3 percentage point in September to 77.5 percent, a rate that is 2.6 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2014) average.” United States industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate followed by possible acceleration and weakening growth in past months.

Manufacturing fell 22.2 from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased by 19.2 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2014. Manufacturing grew 22.2 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Sep 2015. Manufacturing output in Sep 2015 is 4.9 percent below the peak in Jun 2007. The US maintained growth at 3.0 percent on average over entire cycles with expansions at higher rates compensating for contractions. Growth at trend in the entire cycle from IVQ2007 to IIQ2015 would have accumulated to 24.8 percent. GDP in IIQ2015 would be $18,712.5 billion (in constant dollars of 2009) if the US had grown at trend, which is higher by $2,378.9 billion than actual $16,333.6 billion. There are about two trillion dollars of GDP less than at trend, explaining the 24.3 million unemployed or underemployed equivalent to actual unemployment/underemployment of 14.6 percent of the effective labor force (Section I and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html). US GDP in IIQ2015 is 12.7 percent lower than at trend. US GDP grew from $14,991.8 billion in IVQ2007 in constant dollars to $16,333.6 billion in IIQ2015 or 9.0 percent at the average annual equivalent rate of 1.2 percent. Cochrane (2014Jul2) estimates US GDP at more than 10 percent below trend. The US missed the opportunity to grow at higher rates during the expansion and it is difficult to catch up because growth rates in the final periods of expansions tend to decline. The US missed the opportunity for recovery of output and employment always afforded in the first four quarters of expansion from recessions. Zero interest rates and quantitative easing were not required or present in successful cyclical expansions and in secular economic growth at 3.0 percent per year and 2.0 percent per capita as measured by Lucas (2011May). There is cyclical uncommonly slow growth in the US instead of allegations of secular stagnation. There is similar behavior in manufacturing. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). The long-term trend is growth of manufacturing at average 3.2 percent per year from Sep 1919 to Sep 2015. Growth at 3.2 percent per year would raise the NSA index of manufacturing output from 107.6075 in Dec 2007 to 137.3600 in Sep 2015. The actual index NSA in Sep 2015 is 106.4202, which is 22.5 percent below trend. Manufacturing output grew at average 2.2 percent between Dec 1986 and Dec 2014. Using trend growth of 2.2 percent per year, the index would increase to 127.3758 in Sep 2015. The output of manufacturing at 106.4202 in Sep 2015 is 16.5 percent below trend under this alternative calculation.

Table V-4, Growth of Trade and Contributions of Net Trade to GDP Growth, ∆% and % Points

 

Exports
M ∆%

Exports 12 M ∆%

Imports
M ∆%

Imports 12 M ∆%

USA

1.6 Sep

-6.0

Jan-Sep

-1.8 Aug

-3.9

Jan-Sep

Japan

 

Sep 2015

0.6

Aug

3.1

Jul 2015

7.6

Jun 2015

9.5

May 2015

2.4

Apr

8.0

Mar

8.5

Feb

2.4

Jan

17.0

Dec

12.9

Nov

4.9

Oct

9.6

Sep

6.9

Aug

-1.3

Jul

3.9

Jun

-2.0

May 2014

-2.7

Apr 2014

5.1

Mar 2014

1.8

Feb 2014

9.5

Jan 2014

9.5

Dec 2013

15.3

Nov 2013

18.4

Oct 2013

18.6

Sep 2013

11.5

Aug 2013

14.7

Jul 2013

12.2

Jun 2013 7.4

May 2013

10.1

Apr 2013

3.8

Mar 2013

1.1

Feb 2013

-2.9

Jan 2013 6.4

Dec -5.8

Nov -4.1

Oct -6.5

Sep -10.3

Aug -5.8

Jul -8.1

 

Sep 2015

-11.1

Aug

-3.1

Jul 2015

-3.2

Jun 2015

-2.9

May 2015

-8.7

Apr

-4.2

Mar

-14.5

Feb

-3.6

Jan

-9.0

Dec

1.9

Nov

-1.7

Oct

2.7

Sep

6.2

Aug

-1.5

Jul

2.3

Jun

8.4

May 2014

-3.6

Apr 2013

3.4

Mar 2014

18.1

Feb 2014

9.0

Jan 2014

25.0

Dec 2013 24.7

Nov 2013

21.1

Oct 2013

26.1

Sep 2013

16.5

Aug 2013

16.0

Jul 2013

19.6

Jun 2013

11.8

May 2013

10.0

Apr 2013

9.4

Mar 2013

5.5

Feb 2013

7.3

Jan 2013 7.3

Dec 1.9

Nov 0.8

Oct -1.6

Sep 4.1

Aug -5.4

Jul 2.1

China

 

2015

-3.7 Sep

-5.5 Aug

-8.3 Jul

2.8 Jun

-2.5 May

-6.4 Apr

-15.0 Mar

48.3 Feb

-3.3 Jan

2014

9.7 Dec

4.7 Nov

11.6 Oct

15.3 Sep

9.4 Aug

14.5 Jul

7.2 Jun

7.0 May

0.9 Apr

-6.6 Mar

-18.1 Feb

10.6 Jan

2013

4.3 Dec

12.7 Nov

5.6 Oct

-0.3 Sep

7.2 Aug

5.1 Jul

-3.1 Jun

1.0 May

14.7 Apr

10.0 Mar

21.8 Feb

25.0 Jan

 

2015

-20.4

-13.8 Aug

-8.1 Jul

-6.1 Jun

-17.6 May

-12.7 Mar

-20.5 Feb

-19.9 Jan

2014

-2.4 Dec

-6.7 Nov

4.6 Oct

7.0 Sep

-2.4 Aug

-1.6 Jul

5.5 Jun

-1.6 May

-0.8 Apr

-11.3 Mar

10.1 Feb

10.0 Jan

2013

8.3 Dec

5.3 Nov

7.6 Oct

7.4 Sep

7.0 Aug

10.9 Jul

-0.7 Jun

-0.3 May

16.8 Apr

14.1 Mar

-15.2 Feb

28.8 Jan

Euro Area

0.9 12 M-Sep

6.1 Jan-Sep

-1.0 12-M Sep

2.1 Jan-Sep

Germany

2.6 Sep CSA

4.4 Sep

3.6 Sep CSA

3.9 Sep

France

Sep

-0.6

1.2

0.5

-1.8

Italy Aug

-3.6

1.0

-2.6

2.1

UK

1.3 Sep

-0.5 Jul 15- Sep 15 /Jul 14-Sep 14

-2.2 Sep

-1.0 Jul 15-Sep 15 /Jul 14-Sep 14

Net Trade % Points GDP Growth

Points

     

USA

IIIQ2015

-0.03

IIQ2015

0.18

IQ2015

-1.92

IVQ2014

-0.89

IIIQ2014

0.39

IIQ2014

-0.24

IQ2014

-1.39

IVQ2013

1.26

IIIQ2013

0.16

IIQ2013

-0.24

IQ2013

-0.01

IVQ2012 +0.58

IIIQ2012

0.16

IIQ2012 0.28

IQ2012 -0.02

     

Japan

0.3

IQ2012

-1.7 IIQ2012

-1.8 IIIQ2012

-0.5 IVQ2012

1.7

IQ2013

-0.3

IIQ2013

-1.3

IIIQ2013

-2.0

IVQ2013

-1.0

IQ2014

3.6

IIQ2014

0.5

IIIQ2014

1.3

IVQ2014

-0.3

IQ2015

-1.1

IIQ2015

     

Germany

IQ2012

0.8 IIQ2012 0.4 IIIQ2012 0.3 IVQ2012

-0.5

IQ2013

-0.3 IIQ2013

0.1

IIIQ2013

-0.5

IVQ2013

0.5

IQ2014

0.0

IIQ2014

0.2

IIIQ2014

0.5

IVQ2014

-0.3

IQ2015

-0.2

IIQ2015

0.7

     

France

0.1 IIIQ2012

0.1 IVQ2012

-0.1 IQ2013

0.3

IIQ2013 -1.7

IIIQ2013

0.1

IVQ2013

-0.1

IQ2014

-0.2

IIQ2014

-0.2

IIIQ2014

0.2

IVQ2014

-0.2

IQ2015

0.4

IIQ2015

-0.7

IIIQ2015

     

UK

0.7

IIQ2013

-1.7

IIIQ2013

0.1

IVQ2013

0.2

IQ2014

1.3

IIQ2014

-0.7

IIIQ2014

0.2

IVQ2014

-0.6

IQ2015

1.4

IIQ2015

     

Sources: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/

The geographical breakdown of exports and imports of Japan with selected regions and countries is in Table V-5 for Sep 2015. The share of Asia in Japan’s trade is close to one-half for 53.1 percent of exports and 52.2 percent of imports. Within Asia, exports to China are 17.4 percent of total exports and imports from China 28.2 percent of total imports. While exports to China decreased 3.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015, imports from China increased 0.9 percent. The largest export market for Japan in Sep 2015 is the US with share of 19.9 percent of total exports, which is close to that of China, and share of imports from the US of 9.4 percent in total imports. Japan’s exports to the US increased 10.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015 and imports from the US increased 9.4 percent. Western Europe has share of 10.6 percent in Japan’s exports and of 11.1 percent in imports. Rates of growth of exports of Japan in Sep 2015 are 10.4 percent for exports to the US, 5.6 percent for exports to Brazil and minus 2.3 percent for exports to Germany. Comparisons relative to 2011 may have some bias because of the effects of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Deceleration of growth in China and the US and threat of recession in Europe can reduce world trade and economic activity. Growth rates of imports in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015 are mixed. Imports from Asia decreased 1.0 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015 while imports from China increased 0.9 percent. Data are in millions of yen, which may have effects of recent depreciation of the yen relative to the United States dollar (USD).

Table V-5, Japan, Value and 12-Month Percentage Changes of Exports and Imports by Regions and Countries, ∆% and Millions of Yen

Sep 2015

Exports
Millions Yen

12 months ∆%

Imports Millions Yen

12 months ∆%

Total

6,417,356

0.6

6,531,833

-11.1

Asia

3,409,659

% Total 53.1

-0.9

3,412,346 % Total 52.2

-1.0

China

1,113,869

% Total 17.4

-3.5

1,843,921 % Total 28.2

0.9

USA

1,278,978

% Total 19.9

10.4

617,200 % Total

9.4

-0.1

Canada

76,919

2.5

84,289

-16.6

Brazil

40,941

5.6

64,351

-12.3

Mexico

116,530

13.0

48,493

37.7

Western Europe

683,220 % Total 10.6

5.2

724,855 % Total 11.1

-3.8

Germany

166,802

-2.3

203,178

-6.5

France

54,114

5.1

91,269

-13.4

UK

104,730

-4.5

75,521

29.8

Middle East

274,426

-1.8

742,450

-43.0

Australia

148,636

9.7

324,335

-22.8

Source: Japan, Ministry of Finance http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm

World trade projections of the IMF are in Table V-6. There is increasing growth of the volume of world trade of goods and services from 3.3 percent in 2014 to 4.1 percent in 2016 and 4.7 percent on average from 2017 to 2019. World trade would be slower for advanced economies while emerging and developing economies (EMDE) experience faster growth. World economic slowdown would be more challenging with lower growth of world trade.

Table I-10, IMF, Projections of World Trade, USD Billions, USD/Barrel and Annual ∆%

 

2014

2015

2016

Average ∆% 2017-2019

World Trade Volume (Goods and Services)

3.3

3.2

4.1

4.7

Exports Goods & Services

3.2

3.4

3.9

4.6

Imports Goods & Services

3.5

3.0

4.3

4.8

Average Oil Price USD/Barrel

96.25

51.62

50.36

Average ∆% 2007-2016

82.03

Average Annual ∆% Export Unit Value of Manufactures

-0.6

-4.1

-0.7

Average ∆% 2007-2016

0.8

Exports of Goods & Services

2014

2015

2016

Average ∆% 2007-2016

EMDE

2.9

3.9

4.8

4.6

G7

3.4

3.1

3.4

2.9

Imports Goods & Services

       

EMDE

3.6

1.3

4.4

6.0

G7

3.4

4.0

4.2

2.4

Terms of Trade of Goods & Services

       

EMDE

-0.5

-4.7

-1.0

0.1

G7

0.4

1.6

0.1

0.0

Terms of Trade of Goods

       

EMDE

-0.6

-4.3

-0.6

0.2

G7

0.2

1.4

0.0

-0.1

Notes: Commodity Price Index includes Fuel and Non-fuel Prices; Commodity Industrial Inputs Price includes agricultural raw materials and metal prices; Oil price is average of WTI, Brent and Dubai

Source: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook databank

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/index.aspx

The JP Morgan Global All-Industry Output Index of the JP Morgan Manufacturing and Services PMI, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, with high association with world GDP, increased to 53.4 in Oct from 52.8 in Sep, indicating expansion at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a903e72174024a78bf731053d96077e3). This index has remained above the contraction territory of 50.0 during 36 consecutive months. The employment index decreased from 52.0 in Sep to 51.5 in Oct with input prices rising at slower rate, new orders increasing at faster rate and output increasing at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a903e72174024a78bf731053d96077e3). David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan, finds slowing rate of global growth in the Sep survey with higher strength in advanced countries and weakness in developing economies (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/62646fa73ed14f37b66f2a3861b30fb1). The JP Morgan Global Manufacturing PMI, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, increased to 51.4 in Oct from 50.7 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/c6624ede6654407d8e5e46ddc8629e3b). New export orders increased changing from decrease. David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan, finds low growth in global manufacturing in the Sep report (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/8580ebed59a7402ba6cc0e93a1905c90). The Markit Brazil Composite Output Index did not change from 42.7 in Sep to 42.7 in Oct, indicating contraction in activity of Brazil’s private sector (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/83f1f3e07a5c44cabee213fa146d1b64). The Markit Brazil Services Business Activity index, compiled by Markit, increased from 41.7 in Sep to 43.0 in Oct, indicating contracting services activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/83f1f3e07a5c44cabee213fa146d1b64). Pollyana De Lima, Economist at Markit, finds challenging conditions (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/83f1f3e07a5c44cabee213fa146d1b64). The Markit Brazil Purchasing Managers’ IndexTM (PMI) decreased from 47.0 in Sep to 44.1 in Oct, indicating deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a0992aa8161f49c0be56597fa6f57250). Pollyanna De Lima, Economist at Markit, finds faster decline of output and new orders (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a0992aa8161f49c0be56597fa6f57250).

VA United States. The Markit Flash US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) seasonally adjusted increased to 54.0 in Oct from 53.1 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/d01a035e90fc4eb9a8bee3f20f918255). New export orders increased. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds increases in exports (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/d01a035e90fc4eb9a8bee3f20f918255). The Markit Flash US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index decreased from 55.1 in Sep to 54.4 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/8f6534b89b5a4308907cdb7b93d66e6f). The Markit Flash US Composite PMI™ Output Index decreased from 55.0 in Sep to 54.5 in Oct. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the surveys are consistent with slowing services and manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/8f6534b89b5a4308907cdb7b93d66e6f). The Markit US Composite PMI™ Output Index of Manufacturing and Services did not change to 55.0 in Oct from 55.0 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/958abec4e1af458883c8b67e6e698240). The Markit US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index decreased from 55.1 in Sep to 54.8 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/958abec4e1af458883c8b67e6e698240). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the indexes suggesting slowing growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/958abec4e1af458883c8b67e6e698240). The Markit US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) increased to 54.1 in Oct from 53.1 in Sep, which indicates expansion at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/ceaa3a1cac8546b8a019070492ec179b). New foreign orders increased. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the index suggests adjustment of companies to dollar appreciation (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/ceaa3a1cac8546b8a019070492ec179b). The purchasing managers’ index (PMI) of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Report on Business® decreased 0.1 percentage points from 50.2 in Sep to 50.1 in Oct, which indicates growth at slower rate (https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/ISMReport/MfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=30033). The index of new orders increased 2.8 percentage points from 50.1 in Sep to 52.9 in Oct. The index of new exports increased 1.0 percentage points from 46.5 in Sep to 47.5 in Oct, contracting at the same rate. The Non-Manufacturing ISM Report on Business® PMI increased 2.2 percentage points from 56.9 in Sep to 59.1 in Oct, indicating growth of business activity/production during 75 consecutive months, while the index of new orders increased 5.3 percentage points from 56.7 in Sep to 62.0 in Oct (https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/ISMReport/NonMfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=30036). Table USA provides the country economic indicators for the US.

Table USA, US Economic Indicators

Consumer Price Index

Sep 12 months NSA ∆%: 0.0; ex food and energy ∆%: 1.9 Sep month SA ∆%: -0.2; ex food and energy ∆%: 0.2
Blog 10/18/15

Producer Price Index

Finished Goods

Oct 12-month NSA ∆%: -4.1; ex food and energy ∆% 1.7
Oct month SA ∆% = -0.3; ex food and energy ∆%: -0.3

Final Demand

Oct 12-month NSA ∆%: -1.6; ex food and energy ∆% 0.1
Oct month SA ∆% = -0.4; ex food and energy ∆%: -0.3
Blog 11/15/15

PCE Inflation

Sep 12-month NSA ∆%: headline 0.2; ex food and energy ∆% 1.3
Blog 11/8/15

Employment Situation

Household Survey: Sep Unemployment Rate SA 5.1%
Blog calculation People in Job Stress Sep: 25.6 million NSA, 15.4% of Labor Force
Establishment Survey:
Sep Nonfarm Jobs +142; Private +118,000 jobs created 
Aug 12-month Average Hourly Earnings Inflation Adjusted ∆%: 2.7
Blog 10/4/15

Nonfarm Hiring

Nonfarm Hiring fell from 63.3 million in 2006 to 54.2 million in 2013 or by 9.1 million and to 58.7 million in 2014 or by 4.6 million
Private-Sector Hiring Sep 2015 4.780 million lower by 2.8 percent than 4.917 million in Sep 2006
Blog 11/15/15

GDP Growth

BEA Revised National Income Accounts
IQ2012/IQ2011 ∆%: 2.8

IIQ2012/IIQ2011 2.5

IIIQ2012/IIIQ2011 2.4

IVQ2012/IVQ2011 1.3

IQ2013/IQ2012 1.1

IIQ2013/IIQ2012 0.9

IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 1.5

IVQ2013/IVQ2012 2.5

IQ2014/IQ2013 1.7

IIQ2014/IIQ2013 2.6

IIIQ2014/IIIQ2013 2.9

IVQ2014/IVQ2013 2.5

IQ2015/IQ2014 2.9

IIQ2015/IIQ2014 2.7

IIIQ2015/IIIQ2014: 2.0

IQ2012 SAAR 2.7

IIQ2012 SAAR 1.9

IIIQ2012 SAAR 0.5

IVQ2012 SAAR 0.1

IQ2013 SAAR 1.9

IIQ2013 SAAR 1.1

IIIQ2013 SAAR 3.0

IVQ2013 SAAR 3.8

IQ2014 SAAR -0.9

IIQ2014 SAAR 4.6

IIIQ2014 SAAR 4.3

IVQ2014 SAAR 2.1

IQ2015 SAAR 0.6

IIQ2015 SAAR: 3.9

IIIQ2015: 1.5
Blog 11/1/2015

Real Private Fixed Investment

SAAR IIIQ2015 ∆% 2.9 IVQ2007 to IIIQ2015: 6.5% Blog 11/1/15

Corporate Profits

IIQ2015 SAAR: Corporate Profits 3.5; Undistributed Profits 6.2 Blog 9/27/15

Personal Income and Consumption

Sep month ∆% SA Real Disposable Personal Income (RDPI) SA ∆% 0.2
Real Personal Consumption Expenditures (RPCE): 0.2
12-month Sep NSA ∆%:
RDPI: 3.4; RPCE ∆%: 3.2
Blog 11/8/15

Quarterly Services Report

IIQ15/IIQ14 NSA ∆%:
Information 3.8

Financial & Insurance 3.0

Earlier Data:
Blog 3/22/15

Employment Cost Index

Compensation Private IIIQ2014 SA ∆%: 0.6
Sep 12 months ∆%: 1.9

Earlier Data:
Blog 2/1/15

Industrial Production

Sep month SA ∆%: -0.2
Sep 12 months SA ∆%: 0.4

Manufacturing Sep SA -0.1 ∆% Sep 12 months SA ∆% 1.4, NSA 0.8
Capacity Utilization: 77.5
Blog 10/18/15

Productivity and Costs

Nonfarm Business Productivity IIIQ2015∆% SAAE 1.6; IIIQ2015/IIIQ2014 ∆% 0.4; Unit Labor Costs SAAE IIIQ2015 ∆% 1.4; IIIQ2015/IIIQ2014 ∆%: 2.0

Blog 11/8/15

New York Fed Manufacturing Index

General Business Conditions From Sep -14.67 to Oct minus 11.36
New Orders: From Sep minus 12.91 to Oct -18.91
Blog 10/18/15

Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index

General Index from Sep -6.0 to Oct -4.5
New Orders from Sep 9.4 to Oct -10.6
Blog 10/18/15

Manufacturing Shipments and Orders

New Orders SA Sep ∆% -1.0 Ex Transport -0.6

Jan-Sep NSA New Orders ∆% minus 7.2 Ex transport minus 7.0

Earlier data:
Blog 4/5/15

Durable Goods

Sep New Orders SA ∆%: minus 1.2 ; ex transport ∆%: minus 0.4
Jan-Sep 15/Jan-Sep 14 New Orders NSA ∆%: -4.6; ex transport ∆% -2.6

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/26/15

Sales of New Motor Vehicles

Oct 2015 14,507,911; Oct 2014 13,712,618. Oct 15 SAAR 18.24 million, Sep 15 SAAR 18.17 million, Oct 2014 SAAR 16.58 million

Blog 11/8/15

Sales of Merchant Wholesalers

Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 NSA ∆%: Total -3.4; Durable Goods: 1.2; Nondurable
Goods: -7.4

EARLIER DATA:
Blog 4/12/15

Sales and Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers

Sep 15 12-M NSA ∆%: Sales Total Business -2.7; Manufacturers -5.0
Retailers 1.7; Merchant Wholesalers -3.6
Blog 11/15/15

Sales for Retail and Food Services

Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 ∆%: Retail and Food Services 2.1; Retail ∆% 1.3
Blog 11/15/15

Value of Construction Put in Place

SAAR month SA Sep ∆%: 0.6 Jan-Sep NSA: 10.5

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/5/15

Case-Shiller Home Prices

Aug 2015/ Aug 2014 ∆% NSA: 10 Cities 4.7; 20 Cities: 5.1; National: 4.7
∆% Aug SA: 10 Cities 0.1 ; 20 Cities: 0.1
Blog 11/1/15

FHFA House Price Index Purchases Only

Aug SA ∆% 0.3;
12 month NSA ∆%: 5.5
Blog 10/25/15

New House Sales

Sep 2015 month SAAR ∆%: minus 11.5
Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 NSA ∆%: 16.7
Blog 11/1/15

Housing Starts and Permits

Sep Starts month SA ∆% 6.5; Permits ∆%: -5.0
Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 NSA ∆% Starts 12.0; Permits  ∆% 13.0

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Rate of Homeownership

IIIQ2015: 63.7

Blog 11/1/15

Trade Balance

Balance Sep SA -$40,812 million versus Aug -$48,017 million
Exports Sep SA ∆%: 1.6 Imports Sep SA ∆%: -1.8
Goods Exports Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 NSA ∆%: minus 6.0
Goods Imports Jan-Aug 2015/Jan-Aug 2014 NSA ∆%: minus 3.9
Blog 11/8/15

Export and Import Prices

Oct 12-month NSA ∆%: Imports -10.5; Exports -6.7

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/12/15

Consumer Credit

Sep ∆% annual rate: Total 10.0; Revolving 8.7; Nonrevolving 10.5

Earlier Data:
Blog 5/10/15

Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term Treasury Securities

Aug Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term US Securities: $6.3 billion
Major Holders of Treasury Securities: China $1270.5 billion; Japan $1197.0 billion; Total Foreign US Treasury Holdings Jun $6098.7 billion
Blog 10/25/15

Treasury Budget

Fiscal Year 2016/2015 ∆% Oct: Receipts -0.8; Outlays 3.9; Individual Income Taxes 2.4
Deficit Fiscal Year 2011 $1,300 billion

Deficit Fiscal Year 2012 $1,087 billion

Deficit Fiscal Year 2013 $680 billion

Deficit Fiscal Year 2014 $483 billion

Deficit Fiscal Year 2015 $439 billion

Blog 11/15/2015

CBO Budget and Economic Outlook

2012 Deficit $1087 B 6.8% GDP Debt $11,281 B 70.4% GDP

2013 Deficit $680 B, 4.1% GDP Debt $11,983 B 72.3% GDP

2014 Deficit $483 B 2.8% GDP Debt $12,779 B 74.1% GDP

2025 Deficit $1,088B, 4.0% GDP Debt $21,605B 78.7% GDP

2040: Long-term Debt/GDP 103%

Blog 8/26/12 11/18/12 2/10/13 9/22/13 2/16/14 8/24/14 9/14/14 3/1/15 6/21/14

Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities

Sep 2015 SAAR ∆%: Securities -6.4 Loans 5.1 Cash Assets minus 44.7 Deposits minus 0.8

Blog 10/25/15

Flow of Funds Net Worth of Families and Nonprofits

IIQ2015 ∆ since 2007

Assets +$18,757.3 BN

Nonfinancial 2058.2 BN

Real estate $1269.1 BN

Financial +16,699.2 BN

Net Worth +$18,874.4 BN

Blog 9/27/15

Current Account Balance of Payments

IIQ2015 -117,258 MM

% GDP 2.5

Blog 9/27/15

Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation

Blog 11/15/15

IMF View

World Real Economic Growth 2015 ∆% 3.5 Blog 4/26/15

Income, Poverty and Health Insurance in the United States

46.657 Million Below Poverty in 2014, 14.8% of Population

Median Family Income CPI-2014 Adjusted $53,657 in 2014 back to 1996 Levels

Uncovered by Health Insurance 32.968 Million in 2014

Blog 10/11/15

Links to blog comments in Table USA: 11/8/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/live-possibility-of-interest-rates.html

11/01/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/25/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/impact-of-monetary-policy-on-exchange.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/11/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-uncertainty-imf.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/27/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/monetary-policy-designed-on-measurable.html

9/20/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-increase-on-hold-because.html

9/13/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what_13.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/30/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/fluctuations-of-global-financial.html

08/23/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/global-decline-of-values-of-financial.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/9/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/26/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/valuation-of-risk-financial-assets.html

7/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

7/12/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/oscillating-valuations-of-risk.html

6/21/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/fluctuating-financial-asset-valuations.html

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/10/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/quite-high-equity-valuations-and.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/22/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/impatience-with-monetary-policy-of.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html

9/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitics-monetary-policy-and.html

8/24/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/monetary-policy-world-inflation-waves.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

9/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

2/10/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/united-states-unsustainable-fiscal.html

Table VA-1 provides the value of total sales of US business (manufacturers, retailers and merchant wholesalers) and monthly and 12-month percentage changes. Sales of manufacturers fell 0.4 percent in Sep and decreased 0.9 percent in Aug, decreasing 5.0 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015. Sales of retailers changed 0.0 percent in Sep, changed 0.0 percent in Aug and increased 1.7 percent in 12 months. Sales of merchant wholesalers increased 0.5 percent in Sep, decreasing 0.9 percent in Aug and decreasing 3.6 percent in 12 months. Total business sales changed 0.0 percent in Sep and decreased 0.6 percent in Aug, decreasing 2.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2015.

Table VA-1, US, Percentage Changes for Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers

 

Sep 15/Aug 15
∆% SA

Sep 2015
Millions of Dollars NSA

Aug 15/ Jul 15  ∆% SA

Sep 15/ Sep 14
∆% NSA

Total Business

0.0

1,334,914

-0.6

-2.7

Manufacturers

-0.4

497,433

-0.9

-5.0

Retailers

0.0

379,840

0.0

1.7

Merchant Wholesalers

0.5

457,641

-0.9

-3.6

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-1 of the US Census Bureau provides total US sales of manufacturing, retailers and wholesalers seasonally adjusted (SA) in millions of dollars. The series with adjustment evens fluctuations following seasonal patterns. There is sharp recovery from the global recession in a robust trend, which is mixture of price and quantity effects because data are not adjusted for price changes. There is stability in the final segment with subdued prices with data not adjusted for price changes.

clip_image001

Chart VA-1, US, Total Business Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, SA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Sep 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-2 of the US Census Bureau provides total US sales of manufacturing, retailers and wholesalers not seasonally adjusted (NSA) in millions of dollars. The series without adjustment shows sharp jagged behavior because of monthly fluctuations following seasonal patterns. There is sharp recovery from the global recession in a robust trend, which is mixture of price and quantity effects because data are not adjusted for price changes. There is stability in the final segment with monthly marginal weakness in data without adjustment for price changes.

clip_image002

Chart VA-2, US, Total Business Sales of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, NSA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Sep 2015

US Census Bureau

http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Businesses added cautiously to inventories to replenish stocks. Retailers’ inventories increased 0.8 percent in Sep 2015 and increased 0.5 percent in Aug with growth of 5.1 percent in 12 months, as shown in Table VA-2. Total business increased inventories by 0.3 percent in Sep, 0.1 percent in Aug and increased 2.4 percent in 12 months. Inventories sales/ratios of total business continued at a level close to 1.30 under careful management to avoid costs and risks, increasing to 1.38 in Sep 2015. Inventory/sales ratios of manufacturers and retailers are higher than for merchant wholesalers. There is stability in inventory/sales ratios in individual months and relative to a year earlier with increase at the margin.

Table VA-2, US, Percentage Changes for Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers and Inventory/Sales Ratios

Inventory Change

Sep 15
Millions of Dollars NSA

Sep 15/ Aug 15 ∆% SA

Aug 15/  Jul 15 ∆% SA

Sep 15/Sep 14 ∆% NSA

Total Business

1,813,849

0.3

0.1

2.4

Manufacturers

644,138

-0.4

-0.4

-1.7

Retailers

586,925

0.8

0.5

5.1

Merchant
Wholesalers

582,786

0.5

0.3

4.5

Inventory/
Sales Ratio

Sep 15
Millions of Dollars NSA

Sep 2015 SA

Aug 2015 SA

Sep 2014 SA

Total Business

1,813,849

1.38

1.37

1.31

Manufacturers

644,138

1.35

1.35

1.30

Retailers

586,925

1.48

1.47

1.43

Merchant Wholesalers

582,786

1.31

1.31

1.20

US Census Bureau

http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-3 of the US Census Bureau provides total business inventories of manufacturers, retailers and merchant wholesalers seasonally adjusted (SA) in millions of dollars from Jan 1992 to Sep 2015. The impact of the two recessions of 2001 and IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 is evident in the form of sharp reductions in inventories. Inventories have surpassed the peak before the global recession. Data are not adjusted for price changes.

clip_image003

Chart VA-3, US, Total Business Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, SA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Sep 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Chart VA-4 provides total business inventories of manufacturers, retailers and merchant wholesalers not seasonally adjusted (NSA) from Jan 1992 to Sep 2015 in millions of dollars. The recessions of 2001 and IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 are evident in the form of sharp reductions of inventories. There is sharp upward trend of inventory accumulation after both recessions. Total business inventories are higher than in the peak before the global recession.

clip_image004

Chart VA-4, US, Total Business Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers, NSA, Millions of Dollars, Jan 1992-Sep 2015

US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/mtis/

Inventories follow business cycles. When recession hits sales inventories pile up, declining with expansion of the economy. In a fascinating classic opus, Lloyd Meltzer (1941, 129) concludes:

“The dynamic sequences (i) through (6) were intended to show what types of behavior are possible for a system containing a sales output lag. The following conclusions seem to be the most important:

(i) An economy in which business men attempt to recoup inventory losses will always undergo cyclical fluctuations when equilibrium is disturbed, provided the economy is stable.

This is the pure inventory cycle.

(2) The assumption of stability imposes severe limitations upon the possible size of the marginal propensity to consume, particularly if the coefficient of expectation is positive.

(3) The inventory accelerator is a more powerful de-stabilizer than the ordinary acceleration principle. The difference in stability conditions is due to the fact that the former allows for replacement demand whereas the usual analytical formulation of the latter does not. Thus, for inventories, replacement demand acts as a de-stabilizer. Whether it does so for all types of capital goods is a moot question, but I believe cases may occur in which it does not.

(4) Investment for inventory purposes cannot alter the equilibrium of income, which depends only upon the propensity to consume and the amount of non-induced investment.

(5) The apparent instability of a system containing both an accelerator and a coefficient of expectation makes further investigation of possible stabilizers highly desirable.”

Chart VA-5 shows the increase in the inventory/sales ratios during the recession of 2007-2009. The inventory/sales ratio fell during the expansions. The inventory/sales ratio declined to a trough in 2011, climbed and then stabilized at current levels in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 with increase into 2015.

clip_image006

Chart VA-5, Total Business Inventories/Sales Ratios 2006 to 2015

Source: US Census Bureau

http://www2.census.gov/mtis/historical/img/mtisbrf.gif

Sales of retail and food services increased 0.1 percent in Oct 2015 after changing 0.0 percent in Sep 2015 seasonally adjusted (SA), growing 2.1 percent in Jan-Oct 2015 relative to Jan-Oct 2014 not seasonally adjusted (NSA), as shown in Table VA-3. Excluding motor vehicles and parts, retail sales increased 0.2 percent in Oct 2015, decreasing 0.4 percent in Sep 2015 SA and increasing 0.8 percent NSA in Jan-Oct 2015 relative to a year earlier. Sales of motor vehicles and parts decreased 0.5 percent in Oct 2015 after increasing 1.4 percent in Sep 2015 SA and increasing 7.1 percent NSA in Jan-Oct 2015 relative to a year earlier. Gasoline station sales decreased 0.9 percent SA in Oct 2015 after decreasing 4.0 percent in Sep 2015 in oscillating prices of gasoline that are moderating, decreasing 19.8 percent in Jan-Oct 2015 relative to a year earlier.

Table VA-3, US, Percentage Change in Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services, ∆%

 

Oct/Sep ∆% SA

Sep/Aug ∆% SA

Jan-Oct 2015 Million Dollars NSA

Jan-Oct 2015 from Jan-Oct 2014 ∆% NSA

Retail and Food Services

0.1

0.0

4,360,708

2.1

Excluding Motor Vehicles and Parts

0.2

-0.4

3,433,395

0.8

Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers

-0.5

1.4

927,313

7.1

Retail

0.0

0.0

3,843,639

1.3

Building Materials

0.9

-0.3

279,322

3.9

Food and Beverage

-0.3

-0.1

562,392

3.0

Grocery

-0.1

-0.1

502,967

2.8

Health & Personal Care Stores

0.7

0.2

258,969

4.3

Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores

0.0

-0.1

198,653

2.8

Gasoline Stations

-0.9

-4.0

369,473

-19.8

General Merchandise Stores

-0.4

0.5

535,397

1.0

Food Services & Drinking Places

0.5

-0.2

517,069

8.2

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-6 provides monthly percentage changes of sales of retail and food services. There is significant monthly volatility that prevents identification of clear trends.

clip_image007

Chart VA-6, US, Monthly Percentage Change of Retail and Food Services Sales, Jan 1992-Oct 2015

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-7 of the US Census Bureau provides total sales of retail trade and food services seasonally adjusted (SA) from Jan 1992 to Oct 2015 in millions of dollars. The impact on sales of the shallow recession of 2001 was much milder than the sharp contraction in the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. There is flattening in the final segment of the series followed by another increase/decrease. Data are not adjusted for price changes.

clip_image008

Chart VA-7, US, Total Sales of Retail Trade and Food Services, SA, Jan 1992-Oct 2015, Millions of Dollars

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Chart VA-8 of the US Census Bureau provides total sales of retail trade and food services not seasonally adjusted (NSA) in millions of dollars from Jan 1992 to Oct 2015. Data are not adjusted for seasonality, which explains sharp jagged behavior, or price changes. There was contraction during the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 with strong rebound to a higher level and stability followed by strong increase in the final segment.

clip_image009

Chart VA-8, US, Total Sales of Retail Trade and Food Services, NSA, Jan 1992-Oct 2015, Millions of Dollars

Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/retail/

Table IIAI-2 provides additional information required for understanding the deficit/debt situation of the United States. The table is divided into four parts: Treasury budget in the 2016 fiscal year beginning on Oct 1, 2015 and ending on Sep 30, 2016; federal fiscal data for the years from 2009 to 2015; federal fiscal data for the years from 2005 to 2008; and Treasury debt held by the public from 2005 to 2014. Receipts decreased 0.8 percent in the cumulative fiscal year 2016 ending in Sep 2016 relative to the cumulative in fiscal year 2015. Individual income taxes increased 2.4 percent relative to the same fiscal period a year earlier. Outlays increased 3.9 percent relative to a year earlier. There are also receipts, outlays, deficit and debt for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. Total revenues of the US from 2009 to 2012 accumulate to $9021 billion, or $9.0 trillion, while expenditures or outlays accumulate to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, with the deficit accumulating to $5090 billion, or $5.1 trillion. Revenues decreased 6.5 percent from $9653 billion in the four years from 2005 to 2008 to $9021 billion in the years from 2009 to 2012. Decreasing revenues were caused by the global recession from IVQ2007 (Dec) to IIQ2009 (Jun) and also by growth of only 2.1 percent on average in the cyclical expansion from IIIQ2009 to IIIQ2015. In contrast, the expansion from IQ1983 to IQ1989 was at the average annual growth rate of 4.8 percent and at 7.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983 (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html). Because of mediocre GDP growth, there are 24.3 million unemployed or underemployed in the United States for an effective unemployment/underemployment rate of 14.6 percent (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/live-possibility-of-interest-rates.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html). Weakness of growth and employment creation is analyzed in II Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation (Section II and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-uncertainty-imf.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/oscillating-valuations-of-risk.html). In contrast with the decline of revenue, outlays or expenditures increased 30.2 percent from $10,839 billion, or $10.8 trillion, in the four years from 2005 to 2008, to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, in the four years from 2009 to 2012. Increase in expenditures by 30.2 percent while revenue declined by 6.5 percent caused the increase in the federal deficit from $1186 billion in 2005-2008 to $5090 billion in 2009-2012. Federal revenue was 14.9 percent of GDP on average in the years from 2009 to 2012, which is well below 17.4 percent of GDP on average from 1965 to 2014. Federal outlays were 23.3 percent of GDP on average from 2009 to 2012, which is well above 20.1 percent of GDP on average from 1965 to 2014. The lower part of Table IIA1-2 shows that debt held by the public swelled from $5803 billion in 2008 to $12,779 billion in 2014, by $6976 billion or 120.2 percent. Debt held by the public as percent of GDP or economic activity jumped from 39.3 percent in 2008 to 74.1 percent in 2014, which is well above the average of 38.2 percent from 1965 to 2014. The United States faces tough adjustment because growth is unlikely to recover, creating limits on what can be obtained by increasing revenues, while continuing stress of social programs restricts what can be obtained by reducing expenditures.

Table IIA1-2, US, Treasury Budget in Fiscal Year to Date Million Dollars

Oct

Fiscal Year 2016

Fiscal Year 2015

∆%

Receipts

211,046

212,719

-0.8

Outlays

347,578

334,432

3.9

Deficit

-136,532

-121,713

 

Individual Income Tax

109,220

106,661

2.4

Corporation Income Tax

4,256

10,228

-58.4

Social Insurance

55,112

52,255

5.5

 

Receipts

Outlays

Deficit (-), Surplus (+)

$ Billions

     

Fiscal Year 2015

3,249

3,688

-439

Fiscal Year 2014

3,021

3,504

-483

% GDP

17.5

20.3

2.8

Fiscal Year 2013

2,775

3,455

-680

% GDP

16.7

20.8

-4.1

Fiscal Year 2012

2,450

3,537

-1,087

% GDP

15.2

22.0

-6.8

Fiscal Year 2011

2,304

3,603

-1,300

% GDP

15.0

23.4

-8.4

Fiscal Year 2010

2,163

3,457

-1,294

% GDP

14.6

23.4

-8.8

Fiscal Year 2009

2,105

3,518

-1,413

% GDP

14.6

24.4

-9.8

Total 2009-2012

9,021

14,109

-5,090

Average % GDP 2009-2012

14.9

23.3

-8.4

Fiscal Year 2008

2,524

2,983

-459

% GDP

17.1

20.2

-3.1

Fiscal Year 2007

2,568

2,729

-161

% GDP

17.9

19.0

-1.1

Fiscal Year 2006

2,407

2,655

-248

% GDP

17.6

19.4

-1.8

Fiscal Year 2005

2,154

2,472

-318

% GDP

16.7

19.2

-2.5

Total 2005-2008

9,653

10,839

-1,186

Average % GDP 2005-2008

17.3

19.5

-2.1

Debt Held by the Public

Billions of Dollars

Percent of GDP

 

2005

4,592

35.6

 

2006

4,829

35.3

 

2007

5,035

35.1

 

2008

5,803

39.3

 

2009

7,545

52.3

 

2010

9,019

61.0

 

2011

10,128

65.8

 

2012

11,281

70.1

 

2013

11,982

72.0

 

2014

12,779

74.1

 

Source: http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/mthTreasStmt/mthTreasStmt_home.htm CBO (2012NovMBR). CBO (2011AugBEO); Office of Management and Budget 2011. Historical Tables. Budget of the US Government Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: OMB; CBO. 2011JanBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Jan. CBO. 2012AugBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Aug 22. CBO. 2012Jan31. Historical budget data. Washington, DC, Jan 31. CBO. 2012NovCDR. Choices for deficit reduction. Washington, DC. Nov. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO (2013Aug12). 2013AugHBD. Historical budget data—August 2013. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Aug. CBO, Historical Budget Data—February 2014, Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb. CBO, Historical budget data—April 2014 release. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Apr. Congressional Budget Office, August 2014 baseline: an update to the budget and economic outlook: 2014 to 2024. Washington, DC, CBO, Aug 27, 2014. CBO, Monthly budget review: summary of fiscal year 2014. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Nov 10, 2014. CBO, The budget and economic outlook: 2015 to 2025. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Jan 26, 2015.

VB Japan. The GDP of Japan grew at 1.0 percent per year on average from 1991 to 2002, with the GDP implicit deflator falling at 0.8 percent per year on average. The average growth rate of Japan’s GDP was 4 percent per year on average from the middle of the 1970s to 1992 (Ito 2004). Low growth in Japan in the 1990s is commonly labeled as “the lost decade” (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 81-115). Table VB-GDP provides yearly growth rates of Japan’s GDP from 1995 to 2014. Growth weakened from 1.9 per cent in 1995 and 2.6 percent in 1996 to contractions of 2.0 percent in 1998 and 0.2 percent in 1999. Growth rates were below 2 percent with exception of 2.3 percent in 2000, 2.4 percent in 2004 and 2.2 percent in 2007. Japan’s GDP contracted sharply by 1.0 percent in 2008 and 5.5 percent in 2009. As in most advanced economies, growth was robust at 4.7 percent in 2010 but mediocre at minus 0.5 percent in 2011 because of the tsunami and 1.7 percent in 2012. Japan’s GDP grew 1.6 percent in 2013 and stagnated in 2014 at minus 0.1. There is classic research on analyzing deviations of output from trend (see for example Schumpeter 1939, Hicks 1950, Lucas 1975, Sargent and Sims 1977). Japan’s real GDP in calendar year 2014 is 0.6 percent higher than in calendar year 2007 (http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html).

Table VB-GDP, Japan, Yearly Percentage Change of GDP  ∆%

Calendar Year

∆%

1995

1.9

1996

2.6

1997

1.6

1998

-2.0

1999

-0.2

2000

2.3

2001

0.4

2002

0.3

2003

1.7

2004

2.4

2005

1.3

2006

1.7

2007

2.2

2008

-1.0

2009

-5.5

2010

4.7

2011

-0.5

2012

1.7

2013

1.6

2014

-0.1

Source: Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html

http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html

Table VB-BOJF provides the forecasts of economic activity and inflation in Japan by the majority of members of the Policy Board of the Bank of Japan, which is part of their Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1504b.pdf) with changes on Jul 21, 2015 (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2015/k150121a.pdf). For fiscal 2015, the forecast is of growth of GDP between 1.5 to 2.1 percent, with the all items CPI less fresh food 0.2 to 1.2 to 3.3 percent (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1504b.pdf). The critical difference is forecast of the CPI excluding fresh food of 0.2 to 1.2 percent in 2015 and 1.2 to 2.2 percent in 2016 (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1504b.pdf). Consumer price inflation in Japan excluding fresh food was minus 0.4 percent in Mar 2014 and 2.2 percent in 12 months (http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/cpi/1581.htm), significantly because of the increase of the tax on value added of consumption in Apr 2014. The new monetary policy of the Bank of Japan aims to increase inflation to 2 percent. These forecasts are biannual in Apr and Oct. The Cabinet Office, Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan released on Jan 22, 2013, a “Joint Statement of the Government and the Bank of Japan on Overcoming Deflation and Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130122c.pdf) with the important change of increasing the inflation target of monetary policy from 1 percent to 2 percent:

“The Bank of Japan conducts monetary policy based on the principle that the policy shall be aimed at achieving price stability, thereby contributing to the sound development of the national economy, and is responsible for maintaining financial system stability. The Bank aims to achieve price stability on a sustainable basis, given that there are various factors that affect prices in the short run.

The Bank recognizes that the inflation rate consistent with price stability on a sustainable basis will rise as efforts by a wide range of entities toward strengthening competitiveness and growth potential of Japan's economy make progress. Based on this recognition, the Bank sets the price stability target at 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index.

Under the price stability target specified above, the Bank will pursue monetary easing and aim to achieve this target at the earliest possible time. Taking into consideration that it will take considerable time before the effects of monetary policy permeate the economy, the Bank will ascertain whether there is any significant risk to the sustainability of economic growth, including from the accumulation of financial imbalances.”

The Bank of Japan also provided explicit analysis of its view on price stability in a “Background note regarding the Bank’s thinking on price stability” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/data/rel130123a1.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130123a.htm/). The Bank of Japan also amended “Principal terms and conditions for the Asset Purchase Program” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130122a.pdf): “Asset purchases and loan provision shall be conducted up to the maximum outstanding amounts by the end of 2013. From January 2014, the Bank shall purchase financial assets and provide loans every month, the amount of which shall be determined pursuant to the relevant rules of the Bank.”

Financial markets in Japan and worldwide were shocked by new bold measures of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing” by the Bank of Japan (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The objective of policy is to “achieve the price stability target of 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index (CPI) at the earliest possible time, with a time horizon of about two years” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The main elements of the new policy are as follows:

  1. Monetary Base Control. Most central banks in the world pursue interest rates instead of monetary aggregates, injecting bank reserves to lower interest rates to desired levels. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has shifted back to monetary aggregates, conducting money market operations with the objective of increasing base money, or monetary liabilities of the government, at the annual rate of 60 to 70 trillion yen. The BOJ estimates base money outstanding at “138 trillion yen at end-2012) and plans to increase it to “200 trillion yen at end-2012 and 270 trillion yen at end 2014” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
  2. Maturity Extension of Purchases of Japanese Government Bonds. Purchases of bonds will be extended even up to bonds with maturity of 40 years with the guideline of extending the average maturity of BOJ bond purchases from three to seven years. The BOJ estimates the current average maturity of Japanese government bonds (JGB) at around seven years. The BOJ plans to purchase about 7.5 trillion yen per month (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130404d.pdf). Takashi Nakamichi, Tatsuo Ito and Phred Dvorak, wiring on “Bank of Japan mounts bid for revival,” on Apr 4, 2013, published in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323646604578401633067110420.html), find that the limit of maturities of three years on purchases of JGBs was designed to avoid views that the BOJ would finance uncontrolled government deficits.
  3. Seigniorage. The BOJ is pursuing coordination with the government that will take measures to establish “sustainable fiscal structure with a view to ensuring the credibility of fiscal management” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
  4. Diversification of Asset Purchases. The BOJ will engage in transactions of exchange traded funds (ETF) and real estate investment trusts (REITS) and not solely on purchases of JGBs. Purchases of ETFs will be at an annual rate of increase of one trillion yen and purchases of REITS at 30 billion yen.
  5. Bank Lending Facility and Growth Supporting Funding Facility. At the meeting on Feb 18, the Bank of Japan doubled the scale of these lending facilities to prevent their expiration in the near future (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2014/k140218a.pdf).

Table VB-BOJF provides the forecasts of economic activity and inflation in Japan by the majority of members of the Policy Board of the Bank of Japan, which is part of their Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1510b.pdf) with changes on Oct 31, 2015 (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1510b.pdf). On Jun 19, 2015, the Bank of Japan announced a “New Framework for Monetary Policy Meetings,” which provides for quarterly release of the forecasts of the economy and prices beginning in Jan 2016 (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2015/rel150619a.pdf). For fiscal 2014, the forecast is of growth of GDP between minus 0.7 to minus 0.3 percent, with the all items CPI less fresh food 2.9 to 3.3 percent (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2015/k150121a.pdf). The critical difference is forecast of the CPI excluding fresh food of 0.3 to 1.4 percent in 2015 and 0.9 to 2.3 percent in 2016 (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2015/k150121a.pdf). Consumer price inflation in Japan excluding fresh food was minus 0.2 percent in Dec 2014 and 2.5 percent in 12 months (http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/cpi/1581.htm), significantly because of the increase of the tax on value added of consumption in Apr 2014. The new monetary policy of the Bank of Japan aims to increase inflation to 2 percent. These forecasts are biannual in Apr and Oct. The Cabinet Office, Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan released on Jan 22, 2013, a “Joint Statement of the Government and the Bank of Japan on Overcoming Deflation and Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130122c.pdf) with the important change of increasing the inflation target of monetary policy from 1 percent to 2 percent:

“The Bank of Japan conducts monetary policy based on the principle that the policy shall be aimed at achieving price stability, thereby contributing to the sound development of the national economy, and is responsible for maintaining financial system stability. The Bank aims to achieve price stability on a sustainable basis, given that there are various factors that affect prices in the short run.

The Bank recognizes that the inflation rate consistent with price stability on a sustainable basis will rise as efforts by a wide range of entities toward strengthening competitiveness and growth potential of Japan's economy make progress. Based on this recognition, the Bank sets the price stability target at 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index.

Under the price stability target specified above, the Bank will pursue monetary easing and aim to achieve this target at the earliest possible time. Taking into consideration that it will take considerable time before the effects of monetary policy permeate the economy, the Bank will ascertain whether there is any significant risk to the sustainability of economic growth, including from the accumulation of financial imbalances.”

The Bank of Japan also provided explicit analysis of its view on price stability in a “Background note regarding the Bank’s thinking on price stability” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/data/rel130123a1.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130123a.htm/). The Bank of Japan also amended “Principal terms and conditions for the Asset Purchase Program” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130122a.pdf): “Asset purchases and loan provision shall be conducted up to the maximum outstanding amounts by the end of 2013. From January 2014, the Bank shall purchase financial assets and provide loans every month, the amount of which shall be determined pursuant to the relevant rules of the Bank.”

Financial markets in Japan and worldwide were shocked by new bold measures of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing” by the Bank of Japan (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The objective of policy is to “achieve the price stability target of 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index (CPI) at the earliest possible time, with a time horizon of about two years” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The main elements of the new policy are as follows:

  1. Monetary Base Control. Most central banks in the world pursue interest rates instead of monetary aggregates, injecting bank reserves to lower interest rates to desired levels. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has shifted back to monetary aggregates, conducting money market operations with the objective of increasing base money, or monetary liabilities of the government, at the annual rate of 60 to 70 trillion yen. The BOJ estimates base money outstanding at “138 trillion yen at end-2012) and plans to increase it to “200 trillion yen at end-2012 and 270 trillion yen at end 2014” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
  2. Maturity Extension of Purchases of Japanese Government Bonds. Purchases of bonds will be extended even up to bonds with maturity of 40 years with the guideline of extending the average maturity of BOJ bond purchases from three to seven years. The BOJ estimates the current average maturity of Japanese government bonds (JGB) at around seven years. The BOJ plans to purchase about 7.5 trillion yen per month (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130404d.pdf). Takashi Nakamichi, Tatsuo Ito and Phred Dvorak, wiring on “Bank of Japan mounts bid for revival,” on Apr 4, 2013, published in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323646604578401633067110420.html), find that the limit of maturities of three years on purchases of JGBs was designed to avoid views that the BOJ would finance uncontrolled government deficits.
  3. Seigniorage. The BOJ is pursuing coordination with the government that will take measures to establish “sustainable fiscal structure with a view to ensuring the credibility of fiscal management” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
  4. Diversification of Asset Purchases. The BOJ will engage in transactions of exchange traded funds (ETF) and real estate investment trusts (REITS) and not solely on purchases of JGBs. Purchases of ETFs will be at an annual rate of increase of one trillion yen and purchases of REITS at 30 billion yen.
  5. Bank Lending Facility and Growth Supporting Funding Facility. At the meeting on Feb 18, the Bank of Japan doubled the scale of these lending facilities to prevent their expiration in the near future (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2014/k140218a.pdf).

Table VB-BOJF, Bank of Japan, Forecasts of the Majority of Members of the Policy Board, % Year on Year

Fiscal Year
Date of Forecast

Real GDP

CPI All Items Less Fresh Food

Excluding Effects of Consumption Tax Hikes

2013

     

Apr 2014

+2.2 to +2.3
[+2.2]

+0.8

 

Jan 2014

+2.5 to +2.9

[+2.7]

+0.7 to +0.9

[+0.7]

 

Oct 2013

+2.6 to +3.0

[+2.7]

+0.6 to +1.0

[+0.7]

 

Jul 2013

+2.5 to +3.0

[+2.8]

+0.5 to +0.8

[+0.6]

 

2014

     

Apr 2015

-1.0 to -0.8

[-0.9]

+2.8

+0.8

Jan 2015

-0.6 to -0.4

[-0.5]

+2.9 to +3.2

[+2.9]

+0.9 to +1.2

[+0.9]

Oct 2014

+0.2 to +0.7

[+0.5]

+3.1 to +3.4

[+3.2]

+1.1 to +1.4

[+1.2]

Jul 2014

+0.6 to +1.3

[+1.0]

+3.2 to +3.5

[+3.3]

+1.2 to +1.5

[+1.3]

Apr 2014

+0.8 to +1.3
[+1.1]

+3.0 to +3.5
[+3.3]

+1.0 to +1.5
[+1.3]

Jan 2014

+0.9 to 1.5

[+1.4]

+2.9 to +3.6

[+3.3]

+0.9 to +1.6

[+1.3]

Oct 2013

+0.9 to +1.5

[+1.5]

+2.8 to +3.6

[+3.3]

+0.8 to +1.6

[+1.3]

Jul 2013

+0.8 to +1.5

[+1.3]

+2.7 to +3.6

[+3.3]

+0.7 to +1.6

[+1.3]

2015

     

Oct 2015

+0.8 to +1.4

[+1.2]

0.0 to +0.4

[+0.1

 

Jul 2015

+1.5 to +1.9

[+1.7]

+0.3 to +1.0

[+0.7]

 

Apr 2015

+1.5 to +2.1

[+2.0]

+0.2 to 1.2

[+0.8]

+0.2 to 1.2

[+0.8]

Jan 2015

+1.8 to +2.3

[+2.1]

+0.4 to +1.3

[+1.0]

+0.4 to +1.3

[+1.0]

Oct 2014

+1.2 to +1.7

[+1.5]

+1.8 to 2.6

[+2.4]

+1.1 to +1.9

[+1.7]

Jul 2014

+1.2 to +1.6

[+1.5]

+1.9 to +2.8

[+2.6]

+1.2 to +2.1

[+1.9]

Apr 2014

+1.2 to +1.5
[+1.5]

+1.9 to +2.8
[+2.6]

+1.2 to +2.1
[+1.9]

Jan 2014

+1.2 to +1.8

[+1.5]

+1.7 to +2.9

[+2.6]

+1.0 to +2.2

[+1.9]

Oct 2013

+1.3 to +1.8

[+1.5]

+1.6 to +2.9

[+2.6]

+0.9 to +2.2

[+1.9]

Jul 2013

+1.3 to +1.9 [+1.5]

+1.6 to +2.9 [+2.6]

+0.9 to +2.2 [+1.9]

2016

     

Oct 2015

+1.2 to +1.6

[+1.4]

+0.8 to +1.5

[+1.4]

 

Jul 2015

+1.5 to 1.7

[+1.5]

+1.2 to +2.1

[+1.9]

 

Apr 2015

+1.4 to +1.8

[+1.5]

+1.2 to +2.2

[+2.0]

+1.2 to +2.2

[+2.0]

Jan 2015

+1.5 to +1.7

[+1.6]

+1.5 to +2.3

[+2.2]

+1.5 to +2.3

[+2.2]

Oct 2014

+1.0 to +1.4

[+1.2]

+1.9 to 3.0

[+2.8]

+1.2 to 2.3

[+2.1]

Jul 2014

+1.0 to +1.5

[+1.3]

+2.0 to +3.0

[+2.8]

+1.3 to +2.3

[+2.1]

Apr 2014

+1.0 to +1.5
[+1.3]

+2.0 to +3.0
[+2.8]

+1.3 to +2.3
[+2.1]

2017

     

Oct 2015

+0.1 to +0.5

[+0.3]

+2.5 to +3.4

[+3.1]

+1.2 to 2.1

[+1.8]

Jul 2015

+0.1 to +0.5

[+0.2]

+2.7 to +3.4

[+3.1]

+1.4 to +2.1

[+1.8]

Apr 2015

+0.1 to +0.5

[+0.2]

+2.7 to +3.4

[+3.2]

+1.4 to +2.1

[+1.9]

Figures in brackets are the median of forecasts of Policy Board members

Source: Policy Board, Bank of Japan

Figures in brackets are the median of forecasts of Policy Board members

Source: Policy Board, Bank of Japan

https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2015/k150121a.pdf

https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2014/k140715a.pdf

https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1504b.pdf

https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1510b.pdf

The Nikkei Flash Japan Manufacturing PMI Index™ with the Flash Japan

Manufacturing PMI™ increased from 51.0 in Sep to 52.5 in Oct and the Flash Japan

Manufacturing Output Index™ increased from 50.7 in Sep to 52.2 in Oct

(http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/06cf494e776e439fa499b7dcd79fddc8). New export orders increased in change of direction. Amy Brownbill, Economist at

Markit, finds improving conditions in Japan’s manufacturing

(http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/06cf494e776e439fa499b7dcd79fddc8).The Nikkei Composite Output PMI Index increased from 51.2 in Sep to 52.3 in Oct, indicating increase of business activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/aeee51ba44d94fb08cd268c982872f05). The Nikkei Business Activity Index of Services increased to 52.2 in Oct from 51.4 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/aeee51ba44d94fb08cd268c982872f05). Amy Brownbill, Ecoomist at Markit and author of the report, finds slowing services (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/aeee51ba44d94fb08cd268c982872f05). The Nikkei Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI™), seasonally adjusted, increased from 51.0 in Sep to 52.4 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/4c754c28217f4543b9aa5c8b62ac7a6e). New orders increased from home and abroad. Amy Brownbill, Economist at Markit, finds restrained confidence (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/4c754c28217f4543b9aa5c8b62ac7a6e).Table JPY provides the country data table for Japan.

Table JPY, Japan, Economic Indicators

Historical GDP and CPI

1981-2010 Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation 1981-2010
Blog 8/9/11 Table 26

Corporate Goods Prices

Sep ∆% -0.6
12 months ∆% -3.8
Blog 11/15/15

Consumer Price Index

Sep NSA ∆% 0.1; Sep 12 months NSA ∆% 0.0
Blog 11/1/15

Real GDP Growth

IIQ2015 ∆%: -0.3 on IQ2015;  IQ2015 SAAR minus 1.2;
∆% from quarter a year earlier: 0.8 %
Blog 6/16/13 8/18/13 9/15/13 11/17/13 12/15/13 2/23/14 3/16/14 5/18/14 6/15/14 8/17/14 9/14/14 11/23/14 12/14/14 2/22/15 3/15/15 5/24/15 6/14/15 8/23/15 9/13/15

Employment Report

Sep Unemployed 2.27 million

Change in unemployed since last year: minus 60 thousand
Unemployment rate: 3.4 %
Blog 11/1/15

All Industry Indices

Jul month SA ∆% 0.2
12-month NSA ∆% 1.7

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/26/15

Industrial Production

Sep SA month ∆%: 1.0 Aug minus 1.2
Sep 12-month NSA ∆% -0.9 Aug -0.9

Earlier Data:
Blog 3/29/15

Machine Orders

Total Sep ∆% 9.5

Private ∆%: 2.2 Sep ∆% Excluding Volatile Orders minus 7.5

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Tertiary Index

Sep month SA ∆% -0.4
Sep 12 months NSA ∆% 0.6

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/26/15

Wholesale and Retail Sales

Sep 12 months:
Total ∆%: -2.2
Wholesale ∆%: -3.0
Retail ∆%: -0.2

Earlier Data:
Blog 3/29/15

Family Income and Expenditure Survey

Sep 12-month ∆% total nominal consumption -0.3, real -0.4

Earlier Data:

Blog 3/29/15

Trade Balance

Exports Aug 12 months ∆%: 0.6 Imports Aug 12 months ∆% -11.1

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/26/15

Links to blog comments in Table JPY: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/27/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/monetary-policy-designed-on-measurable.html

9/13/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what_13.html

08/30/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/fluctuations-of-global-financial.html

08/23/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/global-decline-of-values-of-financial.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/12/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/oscillating-valuations-of-risk.html

6/14/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/volatility-of-financial-asset.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

3/29/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

2/22/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/world-financial-turbulence-squeeze-of.html

12/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/global-financial-and-economic-risk.html

11/23/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.htm

9/14/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitics-monetary-policy-and.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html

2/23/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.html

12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

VC China. China estimates an index of nonmanufacturing purchasing managers based on a sample of 1200 nonmanufacturing enterprises across the country (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Table CIPMNM provides this index and components. The total index increased from 55.7 in Jan 2011 to 58.0 in Mar 2012, decreasing to 53.9 in Aug 2013. The index decreased from 56.0 in Nov 2013 to 54.6 in Dec 2013, easing to 53.4 in Jan 2014. The index moved to 53.1 in Oct 2015. The index of new orders increased from 52.2 in Jan 2012 to 54.3 in Dec 2012 but fell to 50.1 in May 2013, barely above the neutral frontier of 50.0. The index of new orders stabilized at 51.0 in Nov-Dec 2013, easing to 50.9 in Jan 2014. The index of new orders moved to 51.2 in Oct 2015.

Table CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted

 

Total Index

New Orders

Interm.
Input Prices

Subs Prices

Exp

Oct 2015

53.1

51.2

51.2

48.8

61.1

Sep

53.4

50.2

50.8

47.9

60.0

Aug

53.4

49.6

49.6

47.8

59.7

Jul

53.9

50.1

48.9

47.4

60.0

Jun

53.8

51.3

50.6

48.7

59.7

May

53.2

49.5

52.8

50.4

60.1

Apr

53.4

49.1

50.8

48.9

60.0

Mar

53.7

50.3

50.0

48.4

58.8

Feb

53.9

51.2

52.5

51.2

58.7

Jan

53.7

50.2

47.6

46.9

59.6

Dec 2014

54.1

50.5

50.1

47.3

59.5

Nov

53.9

50.1

50.6

47.7

59.7

Oct

53.8

51.0

52.0

48.8

59.9

Sep

54.0

49.5

49.8

47.3

60.9

Aug

54.4

50.0

52.2

48.3

61.2

Jul

54.2

50.7

53.4

49.5

61.5

Jun

55.0

50.7

56.0

50.8

60.4

May

55.5

52.7

54.5

49.0

60.7

Apr

54.8

50.8

52.4

49.4

61.5

Mar

54.5

50.8

52.8

49.5

61.5

Feb

55.0

51.4

52.1

49.0

59.9

Jan

53.4

50.9

54.5

50.1

58.1

Dec 2013

54.6

51.0

56.9

52.0

58.7

Nov

56.0

51.0

54.8

49.5

61.3

Oct

56.3

51.6

56.1

51.4

60.5

Sep

55.4

53.4

56.7

50.6

60.1

Aug

53.9

50.9

57.1

51.2

62.9

Jul

54.1

50.3

58.2

52.4

63.9

Jun

53.9

50.3

55.0

50.6

61.8

May

54.3

50.1

54.4

50.7

62.9

Apr

54.5

50.9

51.1

47.6

62.5

Mar

55.6

52.0

55.3

50.0

62.4

Feb

54.5

51.8

56.2

51.1

62.7

Jan

56.2

53.7

58.2

50.9

61.4

Dec 2012

56.1

54.3

53.8

50.0

64.6

Nov

55.6

53.2

52.5

48.4

64.6

Oct

55.5

51.6

58.1

50.5

63.4

Sep

53.7

51.8

57.5

51.3

60.9

Aug

56.3

52.7

57.6

51.2

63.2

Jul

55.6

53.2

49.7

48.7

63.9

Jun

56.7

53.7

52.1

48.6

65.5

May

55.2

52.5

53.6

48.5

65.4

Apr

56.1

52.7

57.9

50.3

66.1

Mar

58.0

53.5

60.2

52.0

66.6

Feb

57.3

52.7

59.0

51.2

63.8

Jan

55.7

52.2

58.2

51.1

65.3

Notes: Interm.: Intermediate; Subs: Subscription; Exp: Business Expectations

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart CIPMNM provides China’s nonmanufacturing purchasing managers’ index. The index fell from 56.0 in Oct 2013 to 53.1 in Oct 2015.

Chart CIPMNMW020151102606514868245_r75

Chart CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

Table CIPMMFG provides the index of purchasing managers of manufacturing seasonally adjusted of the National Bureau of Statistics of China. The general index (IPM) rose from 50.5 in Jan 2012 to 53.3 in Apr 2012, falling to 49.2 in Aug 2012, rebounding to 50.6 in Dec 2012. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013, barely above the neutral frontier at 50.0, recovering to 51.4 in Nov 2013 but falling to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.5 in Jan 2014, 50.1 in Dec 2014 and 49.8 in Oct 2015. The index of new orders fell from 54.5 in Apr 2012 to 51.2 in Dec 2012. The index of new orders fell from 52.3 in Nov 2013 to 52.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.9 in Jan 2014 and moved to 50.4 in Dec 2014. The index moved to 50.3 in Oct 2015.

Table CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted

 

IPM

PI

NOI

INV

EMP

SDEL

2015

           

Oct

49.8

52.2

50.3

47.2

47.8

50.6

Sep

49.8

52.3

50.2

47.5

47.9

50.8

Aug

49.7

51.7

49.7

48.3

47.9

50.6

Jul

50.0

52.4

49.9

48.4

48.0

50.4

Jun

50.2

52.9

50.1

48.7

48.1

50.3

May

50.2

52.9

50.6

48.2

48.2

50.9

Apr

50.1

52.6

50.2

48.2

48.0

50.4

Mar

50.1

52.1

50.2

48.0

48.4

50.1

Feb

49.9

51.4

50.4

48.2

47.8

49.9

Jan

49.8

51.7

50.2

47.3

47.9

50.2

2014

           

Dec

50.1

52.2

50.4

47.5

48.1

49.9

Nov

50.3

52.5

50.9

47.7

48.2

50.3

Oct

50.8

53.1

51.6

48.4

48.4

50.1

Sep

51.1

53.6

52.2

48.8

48.2

50.1

Aug

51.1

53.2

52.5

48.6

48.2

50.0

Jul

51.7

54.2

53.6

49.0

48.3

50.2

Jun

51.0

53.0

52.8

48.0

48.6

50.5

May

50.8

52.8

52.3

48.0

48.2

50.3

Apr

50.4

52.5

51.2

48.1

48.3

50.1

Mar

50.3

52.7

50.6

47.8

48.3

49.8

Feb

50.2

52.6

50.5

47.4

48.0

49.9

Jan

50.5

53.0

50.9

47.8

48.2

49.8

Dec 2013

51.0

53.9

52.0

47.6

48.7

50.5

Nov

51.4

54.5

52.3

47.8

49.6

50.6

Oct

51.4

54.4

52.5

48.6

49.2

50.8

Sep

51.1

52.9

52.8

48.5

49.1

50.8

Aug

51.0

52.6

52.4

48.0

49.3

50.4

Jul

50.3

52.4

50.6

47.6

49.1

50.1

Jun

50.1

52.0

50.4

47.4

48.7

50.3

May

50.8

53.3

51.8

47.6

48.8

50.8

Apr

50.6

52.6

51.7

47.5

49.0

50.8

Mar

50.9

52.7

52.3

47.5

49.8

51.1

Feb

50.1

51.2

50.1

49.5

47.6

48.3

Jan

50.4

51.3

51.6

50.1

47.8

50.0

Dec 2012

50.6

52.0

51.2

47.3

49.0

48.8

Nov

50.6

52.5

51.2

47.9

48.7

49.9

Oct

50.2

52.1

50.4

47.3

49.2

50.1

Sep

49.8

51.3

49.8

47.0

48.9

49.5

Aug

49.2

50.9

48.7

45.1

49.1

50.0

Jul

50.1

51.8

49.0

48.5

49.5

49.0

Jun

50.2

52.0

49.2

48.2

49.7

49.1

May

50.4

52.9

49.8

45.1

50.5

49.0

Apr

53.3

57.2

54.5

48.5

51.0

49.6

Mar

53.1

55.2

55.1

49.5

51.0

48.9

Feb

51.0

53.8

51.0

48.8

49.5

50.3

Jan

50.5

53.6

50.4

49.7

47.1

49.7

IPM: Index of Purchasing Managers; PI: Production Index; NOI: New Orders Index; EMP: Employed Person Index; SDEL: Supplier Delivery Time Index

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

China estimates the manufacturing index of purchasing managers on the basis of a sample of 820 enterprises (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Chart CIPMMFG provides the manufacturing index of purchasing managers. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013. The index decreased from 51.4 in Nov 2013 to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index moved to 49.8 in Oct 2015.

Chart CIPMMFGW020151102605972084080_r75

Chart CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Growth of China’s GDP in IIIQ2015 relative to the same period in 2014 was 6.9 percent and cumulative growth to IIIQ2015 was 6.9 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDP. Secondary industry accounts for 40.6 percent of cumulative GDP in IIIQ2015. In cumulative IIIQ2015, industry accounts for 34.3 percent of GDP and construction for 6.4 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 51.4 percent of cumulative GDP in IIIQ2015 and primary industry for 8.0 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is shifting to lower growth rates with improvement in living standards. The bottom block of Table VC-GDP provides quarter-on-quarter growth rates of GDP and their annual equivalent. China’s GDP growth decelerated significantly from annual equivalent 10.4 percent in IQ2011 to 6.1 percent in IVQ2011 and 7.4 percent in IQ2012, rebounding to 8.7 percent in IIQ2012, 7.4 percent in IIIQ2012 and 8.2 percent in IVQ2012. Annual equivalent growth in IQ2013 eased to 7.4 percent and to 7.4 percent in IIQ2013, rebounding to 8.7 percent in IIIQ2013. Annual equivalent growth was 7.0 percent in IVQ2013, declining to 6.6 percent in IQ2014 and increasing to 7.4 percent in IIQ2014. Annual equivalent growth slowed to 7.8 percent in IIIQ2014 and 7.0 percent in IVQ2014. Growth slowed to annual equivalent 5.3 percent in IQ2015, increasing to 7.4 percent in IIQ2015 and 7.4 percent in IIIQ2015.

Table VC-GDP China, Quarterly Growth of GDP, Current CNY 100 Million and Inflation Adjusted ∆%

Cumulative GDP IIQ2015

Value Current CNY Billion IIIQ2015

Value Current CNY Billion IQ2015 to IIIQ2015

IIIQ2015 Year-on-Year Constant Prices ∆%

Cumulative to IIIQ2015

∆%

GDP

17,359.5

48,777.4

6.9

6.9

Primary Industry

1,808.5

3,919.5

4.1

3.8

Farming

1,864.4

4,050.5

4.3

3.9

Secondary Industry

6,980.1

19,779.9

5.8

6.0

Industry

5,756.0

16,713.4

5.8

5.9

Construction

1,253.1

3,132.7

5.8

6.5

Tertiary Industry

8,570.9

25,077.9

8.6

8.4

Transport, Storage, Post

794.5

2,247.5

4.7

4.7

Wholesale, Retail Trades

1,654.1

4,769.0

6.1

6.0

Accommodation and Restaurants

311.9

876.2

6.5

6.0

Finance

1,409.1

4,260.7

16.1

17.0

Real Estate

1,040.9

2,984.8

4.9

3.6

Other

3,275.5

9,724.7

9.5

9.0

Growth in Quarter Relative to Prior Quarter

∆% on Prior Quarter

 

∆% Annual Equivalent

 

2015

       

IIIQ2015

1.8

 

7.4

 

IIQ2015

1.8

 

7.4

 

IQ2015

1.3

 

5.3

 

2014

       

IVQ2014

1.7

 

7.0

 

IIIQ2014

1.9

 

7.8

 

IIQ2014

1.8

 

7.4

 

IQ2014

1.6

 

6.6

 

2013

       

IVQ2013

1.7

 

7.0

 

IIIQ2013

2.1

 

8.7

 

IIQ2013

1.8

 

7.4

 

IQ2013

1.8

 

7.4

 

2012

       

IVQ2012

2.0

 

8.2

 

IIIQ2012

1.8

 

7.4

 

IIQ2012

2.1

 

8.7

 

IQ2012

1.8

 

7.4

 

2011

       

IVQ2011

1.5

 

6.1

 

IIIQ2011

1.9

 

7.8

 

IIQ2011

2.4

 

10.0

 

IQ2011

2.5

 

10.4

 

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Cumulative growth of China’s GDP in IIIQ2015 relative to the same period in 2014 was 6.9 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDPA. Secondary industry accounts for 40.6 percent of cumulative GDP in IIIQ2015. In cumulative IIIQ2015, industry accounts for 34.3 percent of GDP and construction for 6.4 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 51.4 percent of cumulative GDP in IIIQ2015 and primary industry for 8.0 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is shifting to lower growth rates with improvement in living standards. GDP growth decelerated from 12.1 percent in IQ2010 and 11.2 percent in IIQ2010 to 7.8 percent in IQ2013, 7.5 percent in IIQ2013 and 7.9 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP grew 7.6 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 1.7 percent relative to IIIQ2013, which is equivalent to 7.0 percent per year. GDP grew 7.3 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 1.6 percent in IQ2014 that is equivalent to 6.6 percent per year. GP grew 7.4 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 1.8 percent relative to the prior quarter, which is annual equivalent 7.4 percent. In IIIQ2014, GDP grew 7.2 percent relative to a year earlier and 1.9 percent relative to the prior quarter, which is 7.8 percent in annual equivalent. GDP grew 1.7 percent in IVQ2014, which is 7.0 percent in annual equivalent and 7.2 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2015, GDP grew 1.3 percent, which is equivalent to 5.3 in a year and 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew 1.8 percent in IIQ2015, which is equivalent to 7.4 percent in a year, and grew 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP grew at 1.8 percent in IIIQ2015, which is equivalent to 7.4 percent in a year, and grew 6.9 percent relative to a year earlier.

Table VC-GDPA China, Growth Rate of GDP, ∆% Relative to a Year Earlier and ∆% Relative to Prior Quarter

 

IQ2015

IIQQ2015

IIIQ2015

         

GDP

7.0

7.0

6.9

         

Primary Industry

3.2

3.5

3.8

         

Secondary Industry

6.4

6.1

6.0

         

Tertiary Industry

7.9

8.4

8.4

         

GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter

1.3

1.8

1.8

         
 

IQ 2013

IIQ 2013

IIIQ 2013

IVQ 2013

IQ

2014

IIQ 2014

IIIQ 2014

IVQ

2014

GDP

7.8

7.5

7.9

7.6

7.3

7.4

7.2

7.2

Primary Industry

3.4

3.0

3.4

4.0

3.5

3.9

4.2

4.1

Secondary Industry

7.8

7.6

7.8

7.8

7.3

7.4

7.4

7.3

Tertiary Industry

8.3

8.3

8.4

8.3

7.1

8.0

7.9

8.1

GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter

1.8

1.8

2.1

1.7

1.6

1.8

1.9

1.7

 

IQ 2011

IIQ 2011

IIIQ 2011

IVQ 2011

IQ 

2012

IIQ 2012

IIIQ 2012

IVQ 2012

GDP

10.2

9.9

9.4

8.7

8.0

7.5

7.4

8.0

Primary Industry

3.5

3.2

3.8

4.5

3.8

4.3

4.2

4.5

Secondary Industry

11.1

11.0

10.8

10.6

9.1

8.3

8.1

8.1

Tertiary Industry

9.1

9.2

9.0

8.9

7.5

7.7

7.9

8.1

GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter

2.5

2.4

1.9

1.5

1.8

2.1

1.8

2.0

 

IQ 2010

IIQ 2010

IIIQ 2010

IVQ 2010

       

GDP

12.1

11.2

10.7

12.1

       

Primary Industry

3.8

3.6

4.0

3.8

       

Secondary Industry

14.5

13.3

12.6

14.5

       

Tertiary Industry

10.5

9.9

9.7

10.5

       

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart VC-GDP of the National Bureau of Statistics of China provides annual value and growth rates of GDP. China’s GDP growth in 2013 is still high at 7.7 percent but at the lowest rhythm in five years.

ChVC-GDPW020140224376367229279

Chart VC-GDP, China, Gross Domestic Product, Million Yuan and ∆%, 2009-2013

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/

Chart VC-FXR provides China’s foreign exchange reserves. FX reserves grew from $2399.2 billion in 2009 to $3821.3 billion in 2013 driven by high growth of China’s trade surplus.

ChVC-FXRW020140224376367389226

Chart VC-FXR, China, Foreign Exchange Reserves, 2009-2013

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

Chart VC-Trade provides China’s imports and exports. Exports exceeded imports with resulting large trade balance surpluses that increased foreign exchange reserves.

ChVC-TradeW020140224376367380700

Chart VC-Trade, China, Imports and Exports of Goods, 2009-2013, $100 Million US Dollars

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english

The Caixin Flash China General Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) compiled by Markit (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/883014a121534f51bc42e5060845f727) is mixed. The overall Flash Caixin China General Manufacturing PMI decreased from 47.3 in Aug to 47.0 in Sep, while the Flash Caixin China General Manufacturing Output Index decreased from 46.4 in Aug to 45.7 in Aug, indicating weaker conditions. He Fan, Chief Economist at Caixin Insight Group finds need of fiscal and monetary policy (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/883014a121534f51bc42e5060845f727). The Caixin China General Services PMI, compiled by Markit, shows the Caixin Composite Output, combining manufacturing and services, increasing from 48.0 in Sep to 49.9 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/76166d88c7c94dcdbdcfee17f9eb7cbd). He Fan, Chief Economist at Caixin Insight Group, finds growing stabilizing conditions (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/76166d88c7c94dcdbdcfee17f9eb7cbd). The Caixin General Manufacturing PMI increased to 48.3 in Oct from 47.2 in Sep, indicating moderate deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/f9468709913e49739e93eedfd87bc9ed). He Fan, Chief Economist at Caixin Insight Group, finds slower weakness (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/f9468709913e49739e93eedfd87bc9ed). Table CNY provides the country data table for China.

Table CNY, China, Economic Indicators

Price Indexes for Industry

Oct 12-month ∆%: minus 5.9

Sep month ∆%: -0.4
Blog 11/15/15

Consumer Price Index

Oct 12-month ∆%: 1.3 Sep month ∆%: -0.3
Blog 11/15/15

Value Added of Industry

Oct month ∆%: 0.46

Jan-Oct 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 ∆%: 6.1

Earlier Data
Blog 4/19/15

GDP Growth Rate

Year IIIQ2015 ∆%: 6.9

Third Quarter 2015 ∆%: 1.8
Quarter IIIQ2015 AE ∆%: 7.4
Blog 10/25/15

Investment in Fixed Assets

Total Jan-Oct 2015 ∆%: 10.2

Real estate development: 2.0

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Retail Sales

Oct month ∆%: 0.83
Jan-Oct 12 month ∆%: NA : 10.6

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Trade Balance

Sep balance $60.34 billion
Exports 12M ∆% -3.7
Imports 12M ∆% -20.4

Cumulative Sep 2015: $427.31 billion

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table CNY: 10/25/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/impact-of-monetary-policy-on-exchange.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

9/13/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what_13.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

7/26/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/valuation-of-risk-financial-assets.html

7/12/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/oscillating-valuations-of-risk.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

VD Euro Area. Using calendar and seasonally adjusted data (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of the euro area (18 countries) fell 5.8 percent from the high pre-recession date on IQ2008 to the trough in IIQ2009 while the GDP of the euro area (19 countries) fell 5.8 percent. The GDP of the euro area (18 countries) increased 4.5 percent from IIIQ2009 to IQ2015 at the annual equivalent rate of 0.8 percent while that of the euro area (19 countries) increased 4.5 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 0.8 percent. The GDP of the euro area (18) countries in IQ2015 is lower by 1.5 percent relative to the pre-recession peak in IQ2008 and that of the euro area (19 countries) is lower by 1.5 percent relative to the pre-recession peak in IQ2008. The GDP of the euro area (18) countries increased at the average yearly rate of 2.3 percent from IQ1999 to IQ2008 while that of the euro area (19 countries) increased at 2.3 percent. Table VD-EUR provides yearly growth rates of the combined GDP of the members of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro area since 1999. Growth was very strong at 3.3 percent in 2006 and 3.1 percent in 2007. The global recession had strong impact with growth of only 0.5 percent in 2008 and decline of 4.5 percent in 2009. Recovery was at lower growth rates of 2.0 percent in 2010 and 1.6 percent in 2011. EUROSTAT estimates growth of GDP of the euro area of minus 0.8 percent in 2012 and minus 0.4 percent in 2013 but 0.9 percent in 2014.

Table VD-EUR, Euro Area, Yearly Percentage Change of Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices, Unemployment and GDP ∆%

Year

HICP ∆%

Unemployment
%

GDP ∆%

1999

1.2

9.7

2.9

2000

2.2

8.9

3.8

2001

2.4

8.3

2.1

2002

2.3

8.6

0.9

2003

2.1

9.1

0.7

2004

2.2

9.3

2.2

2005

2.2

9.1

1.7

2006

2.2

8.4

3.3

2007

2.2

7.5

3.1

2008

3.3

7.6

0.5

2009

0.3

9.6

-4.5

2010

1.6

10.2

2.0

2011

2.7

10.2

1.6

2012

2.5

11.4

-0.8

2013

1.3

12.0

-0.4

2014

0.4

11.6

0.9

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

The GDP of the euro area in 2013 in current US dollars in the dataset of the World Economic Outlook (WEO) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is $12,753.7 billion or 17.1 percent of world GDP of $74,699.3 billion (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx). The sum of the GDP of France $2807.3 billion with the GDP of Germany of $3635.9 billion, Italy of $2071.9 billion and Spain $1358.7 billion is $9873.8 billion or 77.4 percent of total euro area GDP and 13.2 percent of World GDP. The four largest economies account for slightly more than three quarters of economic activity of the euro area. Table VD-EUR1 is constructed with the dataset of EUROSTAT, providing growth rates of the euro area as a whole and of the largest four economies of Germany, France, Italy and Spain annually from 1996 to 2014. The impact of the global recession on the overall euro area economy and on the four largest economies was quite strong. There was sharp contraction in 2009 and growth rates have not rebounded to earlier growth with exception of Germany in 2010 and 2011.

Table VD-EUR1, Euro Area, Real GDP Growth Rate, ∆%

 

Euro Area

Germany

France

Italy

Spain

2014

0.8

1.6

0.2

-0.4

1.4

2013

-0.4

0.1

0.7

-1.7

-1.2

2012

-0.8

0.4

0.2

-2.8

-2.1

2011

1.6

3.6

2.1

0.6

-0.6

2010

2.0

4.1

2.0

1.7

0.0

2009

-4.5

-5.6

-2.9

-5.5

-3.6

2008

0.5

1.1

0.2

-1.0

1.1

2007

3.1

3.3

2.4

1.5

3.8

2006

3.3

3.7

2.4

2.0

4.2

2005

1.7

0.7

1.6

0.9

3.7

2004

2.2

1.2

2.8

1.6

3.2

2003

0.7

-0.7

0.8

0.2

3.2

2002

0.9

0.0

1.1

0.3

2.9

2001

2.1

1.7

2.0

1.8

4.0

2000

3.8

3.0

3.9

3.7

5.3

1999

2.9

2.0

3.4

1.6

4.5

1998

2.9

2.0

3.6

1.4

4.3

Average 1999-2014

1.1

1.2

1.6

1.3

2.4

1997

2.6

1.8

2.3

1.8

3.7

1996

1.6

0.8

1.4

1.3

2.7

Source: EUROSTAT

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

The Flash Eurozone PMI Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI®, combining activity in manufacturing and services, increased from 53.6 in Sep to 54.0 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/15625dacfd3049aab66acd889bce4b89). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI index suggests GDP quarterly growth at around 0.4 percent and 1.5 percent in the year (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/15625dacfd3049aab66acd889bce4b89). The Markit Eurozone PMI® Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing activity with close association with GDP increased from 53.6 in Sep to 53.9 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/e49c7891e1be4f2c878816721482b7a5). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds potential for growth of 0.4 percent in IVQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/e49c7891e1be4f2c878816721482b7a5). The Markit Eurozone Services Business Activity Index increased from 53.7 in Sep to 54.1 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/e49c7891e1be4f2c878816721482b7a5). The Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® increased from 52.0 in Sep to 52.3 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a718f036d92d4f1d8a7092baf137474f). New export orders increased. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds weak industrial growth in the euro area (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a718f036d92d4f1d8a7092baf137474f). Table EUR provides the data table for the euro area.

Table EUR, Euro Area Economic Indicators

GDP

IIQ2015 ∆% 0.4; IIQ2015/IIQ2014 ∆% 1.5 Blog 9/13/15

Unemployment 

Sep 2015: 10.8 % unemployment rate; Sep 2015: 17.323 million unemployed

Blog 11/1/15

HICP

Sep month ∆%: 0.2

12 months Sep ∆%: -0.1
Blog 10/18/15

Producer Prices

Euro Zone industrial producer prices Sep ∆%: -0.3
Sep 12-month ∆%: -3.1
Blog 11/8/15

Industrial Production

Sep Month ∆%: -0.3; 12 months ∆%: 0.9

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Retail Sales

Sep month ∆%: -0.1
Sep 12 months ∆%: 1.7

Earlier Data:
Blog 3/15/15

Confidence and Economic Sentiment Indicator

Sentiment 105.9 Oct 2015

Consumer minus 7.7 Oct 2015

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/5/15

Trade

Jan-Sep 2015/Jan-Sep 2014 Exports ∆%: 6.1
Imports ∆%: 2.1

Sep 2015 12-month Exports ∆% 0.9 Imports ∆% -1.0

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table EUR: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/20/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-increase-on-hold-because.html

9/13/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what_13.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/9/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

6/14/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/volatility-of-financial-asset.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

VE Germany. Table VE-DE provides yearly growth rates of the German economy from 1971 to 2014, price adjusted chain-linked and price and calendar-adjusted chain-linked. Germany’s GDP fell 5.6 percent in 2009 after growing below trend at 1.1 percent in 2008. Recovery has been robust in contrast with other advanced economies. The German economy grew at 4.1 percent in 2010, 3.6 percent in 2011 and 0.4 percent in 2012. Growth decelerated to 0.1 percent in 2013, increasing to 1.6 percent in 2014.

The Federal Statistical Agency of Germany analyzes the fall and recovery of the German economy (http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/EN/Content/Statistics/VolkswirtschaftlicheGesamtrechnungen/Inlandsprodukt/Aktuell,templateId=renderPrint.psml):

“The German economy again grew strongly in 2011. The price-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 3.0% compared with the previous year. Accordingly, the catching-up process of the German economy continued during the second year after the economic crisis. In the course of 2011, the price-adjusted GDP again exceeded its pre-crisis level. The economic recovery occurred mainly in the first half of 2011. In 2009, Germany experienced the most serious post-war recession, when GDP suffered a historic decline of 5.1%. The year 2010 was characterised by a rapid economic recovery (+3.7%).”

Table VE-DE, Germany, GDP ∆% on Prior Year

 

Price Adjusted Chain-Linked

Price- and Calendar-Adjusted Chain Linked

Average ∆% 1991-2014

1.3

 

Average ∆% 1991-1999

1.5

 

Average ∆% 2000-2007

1.4

 

Average ∆% 2003-2007

2.2

 

Average ∆% 2007-2014

0.7

 

Average ∆% 2009-2014

2.0

 

2014

1.6

1.6

2013

0.3

0.4

2012

0.4

0.6

2011

3.7

3.7

2010

4.1

3.9

2009

-5.6

-5.6

2008

1.1

0.8

2007

3.3

3.4

2006

3.7

3.9

2005

0.7

0.9

2004

1.2

0.7

2003

-0.7

-0.7

2002

0.0

0.0

2001

1.7

1.8

2000

3.0

3.2

1999

2.0

1.9

1998

2.0

1.8

1997

1.8

1.9

1996

0.8

0.9

1995

1.7

1.8

1994

2.5

2.5

1993

-1.0

-1.0

1992

1.9

1.5

1991

5.1

5.2

1990

5.3

5.5

1989

3.9

4.0

1988

3.7

3.4

1987

1.4

1.3

1986

2.3

2.3

1985

2.3

2.6

1984

2.8

2.9

1983

1.6

1.5

1982

-0.4

-0.5

1981

0.5

0.6

1980

1.4

1.3

1979

4.2

4.3

1978

3.0

3.1

1977

3.3

3.5

1976

4.9

4.5

1975

-0.9

-0.9

1974

0.9

1.0

1973

4.8

5.0

1972

4.3

4.3

1971

3.1

3.0

1970

NA

NA

Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/NationalAccounts.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/DomesticProduct/CurrentRevision.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/Methods/NationalAccountRevision/Revision2014_BackgroundPaper.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/02/PE14_048_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/08/PE13_278_811.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/11/PE13_381_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/01/PE14_016_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressekonferenzen/2014/BIP2013/Pressebroschuere_BIP2013.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/05/PE14_167_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/09/PE14_306_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/11/PE14_401_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/02/PE15_048_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/02/PE15_61_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/05/PE15_173_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/05/PE15_187_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/08/PE15_293_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2015/08/PE15_305_811.html

https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/NationalEconomyEnvironment/NationalAccounts/DomesticProduct/DomesticProduct.html

The Flash Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Germany PMI®, combining manufacturing and services, increased from 54.1 in Sep to 54.5 in Oct. The index of manufacturing output reached 53.2 in Oct, decreasing from 54.0 in Sep, while the index of services increased to 55.2 in Oct from 54.1 in Sep. The overall Flash Germany Manufacturing PMI® decreased from 52.3 in Sep to 51.6 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/7411230c04a244f6bce7b3b883930899). New orders in manufacturing softened. Oliver Kolodseike, Economist at Markit, finds continuing improvement of the services sector of Germany (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/7411230c04a244f6bce7b3b883930899). The Markit Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Germany Services PMI®, combining manufacturing and services with close association with Germany’s GDP, increased from 54.1 in Sep to 54.2 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a3b3ef30eab34504aa1075e366640ce4). Oliver Kolodseike, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds continuing growth of the private sector of Germany (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a3b3ef30eab34504aa1075e366640ce4). The Germany Services Business Activity Index increased from 54.1 in Sep to 54.2 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/a3b3ef30eab34504aa1075e366640ce4). The Markit/BME Germany Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), showing close association with Germany’s manufacturing conditions, decreased from 52.3 in Sep to 52.1 in

Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/64bd3bb4d7f3407a8706f8a8474261f3). New export orders increased. Oliver Kolodseike, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds moderate improvement of manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/64bd3bb4d7f3407a8706f8a8474261f3).Table DE provides the country data table for Germany.

Table DE, Germany, Economic Indicators

GDP

IIQ2015 0.4 ∆%; IIQ2015/IIQ2014 ∆% 1.6

2014/2013: 1.6%

GDP ∆% 1970-2014

Blog 8/26/12 5/27/12 11/25/12 2/24/13 5/19/13 5/26/13 8/18/13 8/25/13 11/17/13 11/24/13 1/26/14 2/16/14 3/2/14 5/18/14 5/25/14 8/17/14 9/7/14 11/16/14 11/30/14 2/15/15 3/1/15 5/17/15 5/24/15 8/16/15 8/30/15

Consumer Price Index

Oct month NSA ∆%: 0.0
Oct 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.3
Blog 11/15/15

Producer Price Index

Sep month ∆%: -0.4 NSA, minus 0.4 CSA
12-month NSA ∆%: -2.1
Blog 10/25/15

Industrial Production

MFG Sep month CSA ∆%: minus 1.3
12-month NSA: -0.4

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/12/15

Machine Orders

MFG Sep month ∆%: -1.7
Sep 12-month ∆%: -1.0

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/12/15

Retail Sales

Sep Month ∆% -0.1 Aug -0.5

12-Month Sep % 3.2 Aug 2.1

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/5/15

Employment Report

Unemployment Rate SA Sep 4.5%
Blog 11/1/15

Trade Balance

Exports Sep 12-month NSA ∆%: 4.4
Imports Sep 12 months NSA ∆%: 3.9
Exports Sep month CSA ∆%: minus 2.6; Imports Sep month CSA 3.6

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/12/15

Links to blog comments in Table DE: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/25/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/impact-of-monetary-policy-on-exchange.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/27/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/monetary-policy-designed-on-measurable.html

9/13/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what_13.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/30/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/fluctuations-of-global-financial.html

08/23/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/global-decline-of-values-of-financial.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/26/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/valuation-of-risk-financial-assets.html

7/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

5/24/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/interest-rate-policy-and-dollar.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

11/30/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

9/7/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/competitive-monetary-policy-and.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

1/26/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/capital-flows-exchange-rates-and.html

11/24/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html

8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html

VF France. Table VF-FR provides growth rates of GDP of France with the estimates of Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE). The long-term rate of GDP growth of France from IVQ1949 to IVQ2014 is quite high at 3.2 percent. France’s growth rates were quite high in the four decades of the 1950s, 1960, 1970s and 1980s with an average growth rate of 4.0 percent compounding the average rates in the decades and discounting to one decade. The growth impulse diminished with 2.0 percent in the 1990s and 1.8 percent from 2000 to 2007. The average growth rate from 2000 to 2014, using fourth quarter data, is 1.0 percent because of the sharp impact of the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. Cobet and Wilson (2002) provide estimates of output per hour and unit labor costs in national currency and US dollars for the US, Japan and Germany from 1950 to 2000 (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 137-44). The average yearly rate of productivity change from 1950 to 2000 was 2.9 percent in the US, 6.3 percent for Japan and 4.7 percent for Germany while unit labor costs in USD increased at 2.6 percent in the US, 4.7 percent in Japan and 4.3 percent in Germany. From 1995 to 2000, output per hour increased at the average yearly rate of 4.6 percent in the US, 3.9 percent in Japan and 2.6 percent in Germany while unit labor costs in US fell at minus 0.7 percent in the US, 4.3 percent in Japan and 7.5 percent in Germany. There was increase in productivity growth in the G7 in Japan and France in the second half of the 1990s but significantly lower than the acceleration of 1.3 percentage points per year in the US. Lucas (2011May) compares growth of the G7 economies (US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada) and Spain, finding that catch-up growth with earlier rates for the US and UK stalled in the 1970s.

Table VF-FR, France, Average Growth Rates of GDP Fourth Quarter, 1949-2014

Period

Average ∆%

1949-2014

3.2

2007-2015*

0.4

2007-2014

0.3

2000-2014

1.0

2000-2013

1.1

2000-2007

1.8

1990-1999

2.0

1980-1989

2.6

1970-1979

3.7

1960-1969

5.7

1950-1959

4.2

*IVQ2007 to IIIQ2015

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

The Markit Flash France Composite Output Index increased from 51.9 in Sep to 52.3 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/bf249dafd15843c0809ddb3951df60e4) Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds moderate growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/bf249dafd15843c0809ddb3951df60e4). The Markit France Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing with close association with French GDP, increased from 51.9 in Sep to 52.6 in Oct, indicating expansion at faster pace (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/f6b92ec79f244206b9b5266b972f22bd). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Services PMI®, finds improving data on business activity but below trend (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/f6b92ec79f244206b9b5266b972f22bd). The Markit France Services Activity index increased from 51.9 in Sep to 52.7 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/f6b92ec79f244206b9b5266b972f22bd). The Markit France Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® did not change to 50.6 in Oct from 50.6 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/d5137f39db214af5bc3c9b4749f91347). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Manufacturing PMI®, finds improving manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/d5137f39db214af5bc3c9b4749f91347). Table FR provides the country data table for France.

Table FR, France, Economic Indicators

CPI

Oct month ∆% 0.1
12 months ∆%: 0.1
11/15/15

PPI

Sep month ∆%: 0.1
Sep 12 months ∆%: -2.4

Blog 11/1/15

GDP Growth

IIIQ2015/IIQ2015 ∆%: 0.3
IIIQ2015/IIIQ2014 ∆%: 1.2
Blog 3/31/13 5/19/12 6/30/13 9/29/13 11/17/13 12/29/13 2/16/14 4/6/14 5/18/14 6/29/14 8/17/14 9/28/14 11/16/14 12/28/14 2/15/15 3/29/15 5/17/15 6/28/15 8/16/15 9/27/15 11/15/15

Industrial Production

Sep ∆%:
Manufacturing 0.0 12-Month ∆%: 0.6

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/12/15

Consumer Spending

Manufactured Goods
Sep ∆%: -0.1 Sep 12-Month Manufactured Goods
∆%: 2.9

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/5/15

Employment

Unemployment Rate: IIQ2015 10.0%
Blog 9/6/15

Trade Balance

Sep Exports ∆%: month -0.6, 12 months 1.2

Imports ∆%: month 0.5, 12 months -1.8

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/12/15

Confidence Indicators

Historical average 100

Oct Mfg Business Climate 103.0

Earlier Data:

Blog 3/29/15

Links to blog comments in Table FR: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/27/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/monetary-policy-designed-on-measurable.html

9/20/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-increase-on-hold-because.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

6/28/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/international-valuations-of-financial.html

6/7/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/higher-volatility-of-asset-prices-at.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/29/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/dollar-revaluation-and-financial-risk.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

12/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

9/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

6/30/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/tapering-quantitative-easing-policy-and.html

5/19/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/word-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

Growth of GDP in a quarter relative to the prior quarter is provided for France in Table VF-1. GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2012 and increased 0.1 percent in IQ2013, rebounding with growth of 0.8 percent in IIQ2013. GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2013. GDP decreased 0.2 percent in IQ2014. GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IIQ2014. GDP increased 0.2 percent in IIIQ2014 and increased 0.1 in IVQ2014. GDP increased 0.7 percent in IQ2015 and changed 0.0 percent in IIQ2015. GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIIQ2015. The French economy grew 0.2 percent in IVQ2011, 0.0 percent in IQ2012, contracting 0.3 percent in IIQ2012 and growing 0.3 percent in IIIQ2012. In the four quarters of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, France’s GDP contracted in one quarter and stagnated in two quarters. Growth in the ten quarters of expansion from IIIQ2009 to IVQ2011 accumulated 4.4 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 1.7 percent. Recovery has been much weaker than the cumulative 2.5 percent in the four quarters of 2006. Weak recoveries in advanced economies have prevented full utilization of labor, capital and productive resources.

Table VF-1, France, Quarterly Real GDP Growth, Quarter on Prior Quarter ∆%

 

IQ

IIQ

IIIQ

IVQ

2015

0.7

0.0

0.3

 

2014

-0.2

-0.1

0.2

0.1

2013

0.1

0.8

-0.1

0.2

2012

0.0

-0.3

0.3

0.0

2011

1.1

-0.1

0.2

0.2

2010

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.5

2009

-1.6

-0.1

0.1

0.7

2008

0.5

-0.5

-0.3

-1.6

2007

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.3

2006

0.6

1.1

0.0

0.8

2005

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.8

2004

0.6

0.8

0.4

0.7

2003

0.0

0.0

0.7

0.9

2002

0.6

0.6

0.3

-0.1

2001

0.7

0.0

0.3

-0.2

2000

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.8

1999

0.6

0.9

1.1

1.2

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

Growth rates of France’s real GDP in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier are in Table VF-2. France has not recovered the rates of growth in excess of 2 percent prior to the global recession. GDP fell 4.0 percent in IQ2009, 3.5 percent in IIQ2009, 3.1 percent in IIIQ2009 and 0.9 percent in IVQ2009. Growth in IVQ2011 relative to IVQ2010 was 1.5 percent and GDP growth declined to 0.4 percent in IQ2012, 0.2 percent in IIQ2012 relative to the same quarter a year earlier, 0.3 percent in IIIQ2012 relative to a year earlier and 0.0 percent in IVQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Growth in IQ2013 relative to a year earlier was 0.1 percent. France’s GDP increased 1.1 percent in IIQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 0.8 percent in IIIQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 1.0 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.2 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier and increased 1.1 percent in IIQ2015 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 1.2 percent in IIIQ2015 relative to a year earlier.

Table VF-2, France, Real GDP Growth Current Quarter Relative to Same Quarter Year Earlier ∆%

 

IQ

IIQ

IIIQ

IVQ

2015

0.9

1.1

1.2

 

2014

0.7

-0.2

0.1

0.1

2013

0.1

1.1

0.8

1.0

2012

0.4

0.2

0.3

0.0

2011

2.9

2.2

1.8

1.5

2010

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.2

2009

-4.0

-3.5

-3.1

-0.9

2008

1.8

0.6

-0.1

-1.9

2007

2.5

2.1

2.5

2.0

2006

2.2

3.0

2.5

2.5

2005

1.9

1.4

1.5

1.6

2004

2.2

3.0

2.7

2.5

2003

0.8

0.2

0.6

1.6

2002

0.7

1.3

1.2

1.3

2001

2.9

2.2

1.8

0.8

2000

4.5

4.3

3.8

3.5

1999

3.1

3.0

3.4

3.8

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

Chart VF-1 of the Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques provides France’s quarterly real GDP from IQ1949 to IIIQ2015. France’s economy has grown dynamically over decades. Recovery from the global recession in 2008-2009 has flattened with marginal increase.

clip_image015

Chart VF-1, France, Quarterly Real GDP, Seasonally and Working Day Adjusted, IQ1949-IIIQ2015

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

Percentage changes and contributions of segments of GDP in France are in Table VF-3. Internal demand added 0.2 percentage points to growth in IVQ2014. Internal demand added 0.6 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2015. Internal demand added 0.1 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2015 and added 0.3 percentage points to growth in IIIQ2015. Net trade added 0.2 percentage points in IVQ2014 and deducted 0.2 percentage points in IQ2015. Net trade added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IIQ2015 and deducted 0.7 percentage points in IIIQ2015.

Table VF-3, France, Contributions to GDP Growth, Calendar and Seasonally Adjusted, %

∆% from Prior Period

IVQ
2014

IQ
2015

IIQ 2015

IIIQ 2015

2014

2015

GDP

0.1

0.7

0.0

0.3

0.2

1.1

Imports

1.8

1.9

0.5

1.7

3.9

5.5

Household Consump.

0.2

0.8

0.0

0.3

0.6

1.4

Govt.
Consump.

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.4

1.5

1.5

GFCF

-0.2

0.2

-0.1

0.1

-1.2

-0.4

General Government

-1.0

-0.3

-0.8

-1.0

-6.9

-3.9

Exports

2.7

1.5

1.9

-0.6

2.4

5.3

% Point
Contribs
.

           

Internal Demand ex Inventory Changes

0.2

0.6

0.1

0.3

0.5

1.1

Inventory Changes

-0.3

0.3

-0.4

0.7

0.2

0.2

Net Foreign Trade

0.2

-0.2

0.4

-0.7

-0.5

-0.2

Notes: Consump.: Consumption; Gvt.: Government; GFCF: Gross Fixed Capital Formation; Contribus.: Contributions; OVHG: “annual growth rate carried over at the mid-year point.”

Source:  Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

Chart VF-2 of France’s Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques provides percentage point contributions to GDP growth. The economy was driven in IQ2013 by consumption with net trade and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) deducting from growth. Final consumption drove the economy in IIQ2013 together with contribution by net trade and capital formation. Gross fixed capital formation and net trade constrained the economy in IIIQ2013. Inventory changed deducted from growth in IVQ2013 with contributions by consumption and net trade. Inventory change contributed to growth in IQ2014 with deductions by consumption, GFCF and net foreign trade. Consumption contributed to growth in IIQ2014 with deductions by GFCF, inventory change and net trade. Consumption and inventory change drove the economy in IIIQ2014 with deductions by net trade and gross fixed capital formation. Consumption and net trade drove the economy in IVQ2014 with deductions by GFCF and inventory change. Consumption and inventory change drove the economy in IQ2015 with net trade deducting from growth. Net trade and consumption drove the economy in IIQ2015 with inventory change and GFCF deducting from growth. Consumption and inventory change drove the economy in IIIQ2015 with minor contribution by GFCF and significant deduction by net trade.

clip_image016

Chart VF-2, France, Percentage Point Contributions to GDP Growth

Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques

http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=26&date=20151113

VG Italy. Table VG-IT provides revised percentage changes of GDP in Italy of quarter on prior quarter and quarter on same quarter a year earlier. In IIIQ2015, GDP increased 0.2 percent and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2015 and 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2014 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIIQ2014 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.2 percent in IIQ2014 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy decreased 0.1 percent in IQ2014 and fell 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2013 and fell 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and fell 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent in IIQ2013, continuing eight consecutive quarterly declines, and fell 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.8 percent in IQ2013 and declined 2.5 percent relative to IQ2012. GDP had been growing during six consecutive quarters but at very low rates from IQ2010 to IIQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell in eight consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IIQ2013 at increasingly higher rates of contraction from 0.5 percent in IIIQ2011 to 1.0 percent in IVQ2011, 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 0.7 percent in IIQ2012 and 0.5 percent in IIIQ2012. The pace of decline accelerated to minus 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and minus 0.8 percent in IQ2013. GDP contracted cumulatively 5.1 percent in eight consecutive quarterly contractions from IIIQ2011 to IIQ2013 at the annual equivalent rate of minus 2.6 percent. The total contraction in the 12 quarters including IQ2014, IIQ2014 and IIIQ2014 accumulates to 5.5 percent. The yearly rate has fallen from 2.3 percent in IVQ2010 to minus 2.7 percent in IVQ2012, minus 2.5 percent in IQ2013, minus 2.0 percent in IIQ2013 and minus 1.4 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP fell 1.0 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.3 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.4 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.4 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.1 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2015 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IIIQ2015 relative to a year earlier. Using seasonally and calendar adjusted chained volumes in the dataset of EUROSTAT (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of Italy in IIIQ2015 is lower by 8.9 percent relative to IQ2008. The fiscal adjustment of Italy is significantly more difficult with the economy not growing especially on the prospects of increasing government revenue. The strategy is for reforms to improve productivity, facilitating future fiscal consolidation.

Table VG-IT, Italy, GDP ∆%

 

Quarter ∆% Relative to Preceding Quarter

Quarter ∆% Relative to Same Quarter Year Earlier

IIIQ2015

0.2

0.9

IIQ2015

0.3

0.6

IQ2015

0.4

0.1

IVQ2014

0.0

-0.4

IIIQ2014

-0.1

-0.4

IIQ2014

-0.2

-0.3

IQ2014

-0.1

-0.3

IVQ2013

0.0

-1.0

IIIQ2013

0.1

-1.4

IIQ2013

-0.2

-2.0

IQ2013

-0.8

-2.5

IVQ2012

-0.5

-2.7

IIIQ2012

-0.5

-3.2

IIQ2012

-0.7

-3.2

IQ2012

-1.0

-2.4

IVQ2011

-1.0

-1.0

IIIQ2011

-0.5

0.4

IIQ2011

0.2

1.4

IQ2011

0.3

2.1

IVQ2010

0.4

2.3

IIIQ2010

0.5

1.8

IIQ2010

0.7

1.9

IQ2010

0.5

0.7

IVQ2009

-0.1

-3.5

IIIQ2009

0.4

-5.0

IIQ2009

-0.3

-6.6

IQ2009

-3.5

-6.9

IVQ2008

-1.6

-3.0

IIIQ2008

-1.3

-1.9

IIQ2008

-0.5

-0.2

IQ2008

0.5

0.5

IV2007

-0.4

0.1

IIIQ2007

0.3

1.7

IIQ2007

0.2

2.0

IQ2007

0.0

2.4

Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica

http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/173470

The Markit/ADACI Business Activity Index increased from 53.3 in Sep to 53.4 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/b7f23fff97244699a209d42a429b1c73). Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italy Services PMI®, finds expansion of private sector activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/b7f23fff97244699a209d42a429b1c73). The Markit/ADACI Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), increased from 52.7 in Sep to 54.1 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/1544023f206645c083c2c12133512f08). New export orders continued to increase. Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italian Manufacturing PMI®, finds growth in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/1544023f206645c083c2c12133512f08). Table IT provides the country data table for Italy.

Table IT, Italy, Economic Indicators

Consumer Price Index

Oct month ∆%: 0.2
Oct 12-month ∆%: 0.3
Blog 11/15/15

Producer Price Index

Sep month ∆%: -0.2
Sep 12-month ∆%: -3.8

Blog 11/1/15

GDP Growth

IIIQ2015/IIQ2015 SA ∆%: 0.2
IIIQ2015/IIIQ2014 NSA ∆%: 0.9
Blog 3/17/13 6/16/13 8/11/13 9/15/13 11/17/13 12/15/13 2/16/14 3/16/14 5/18/14 6/15/14 8/10/14 8/31/14 10/19/14 11/16/14 12/7/14 2/15/15 3/15/15 5/17/15 5/31/15 8/16/15 9/6/15 11/15/15

Labor Report

Sep 2015

Participation rate 64.2%

Employment ratio 56.5%

Unemployment rate 11.8%

Youth Unemployment 40.5%

Blog 11/1/15

Industrial Production

Sep month ∆%: 0.2
12 months CA ∆%: 1.7

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Retail Sales

Aug month ∆%: 0.3

Aug 12-month ∆%: 1.3

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/26/15

Business Confidence

Mfg Oct 105.9, Jun 104.0

Construction Oct 119.8, Jun 119.7

Earlier Data:

Blog 4/5/15

Trade Balance

Balance Aug SA €3255 million
Exports Aug month SA ∆%: -3.6; Imports month ∆%: -2.6
Exports 12 months Aug NSA ∆%: 1.0 Imports 12 months NSA ∆%: 2.1

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/19/15

Links to blog comments in Table IT: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/20/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-increase-on-hold-because.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/16/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/exchange-rate-and-financial-asset.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/global-portfolio-reallocations-squeeze.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/global-exchange-rate-struggle-recovery.html

2/15/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/g20-monetary-policy-recovery-without.html

12/7/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/financial-risks-twenty-six-million.html

11/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/fluctuating-financial-variables.html

10/19/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/imf-view-squeeze-of-economic-activity.html

8/31/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/geopolitical-and-financial-risks.html

8/10/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/volatility-of-valuations-of-risk_10.html

6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html

5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html

3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html

2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html

12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html

11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html

9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

8/11/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/recovery-without-hiring-loss-of-full.html

6/16/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/recovery-without-hiring-seven-million.html

3/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html

Table VG-1 provides revised percentage changes of GDP in Italy of quarter on prior quarter and quarter on same quarter a year earlier. In IIIQ2015, GDP increased 0.2 percent and increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2015 and 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.4 percent in IQ2015 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2014 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.1 percent in IIIQ2014 and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.2 percent in IIQ2014 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy decreased 0.1 percent in IQ2014 and fell 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IVQ2013 and fell 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy increased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and fell 1.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP decreased 0.2 percent in IIQ2013, continuing eight consecutive quarterly declines, and fell 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.8 percent in IQ2013 and declined 2.5 percent relative to IQ2012. GDP had been growing during six consecutive quarters but at very low rates from IQ2010 to IIQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell in eight consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IIQ2013 at increasingly higher rates of contraction from 0.5 percent in IIIQ2011 to 1.0 percent in IVQ2011, 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 0.7 percent in IIQ2012 and 0.5 percent in IIIQ2012. The pace of decline accelerated to minus 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and minus 0.8 percent in IQ2013. GDP contracted cumulatively 5.1 percent in eight consecutive quarterly contractions from IIIQ2011 to IIQ2013 at the annual equivalent rate of minus 2.6 percent. The total contraction in the 12 quarters including IQ2014, IIQ2014 and IIIQ2014 accumulates to 5.5 percent. The yearly rate has fallen from 2.3 percent in IVQ2010 to minus 2.7 percent in IVQ2012, minus 2.5 percent in IQ2013, minus 2.0 percent in IIQ2013 and minus 1.4 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP fell 1.0 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.3 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.4 percent in IIIQ2014 relative to a year earlier and fell 0.4 percent in IVQ2014 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.1 percent in IQ2015 relative to a year earlier and increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2015 relative to a year earlier. GDP increased 0.9 percent in IIIQ2015 relative to a year earlier. Using seasonally and calendar adjusted chained volumes in the dataset of EUROSTAT (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), the GDP of Italy in IIIQ2015 is lower by 8.9 percent relative to IQ2008. The fiscal adjustment of Italy is significantly more difficult with the economy not growing especially on the prospects of increasing government revenue. The strategy is for reforms to improve productivity, facilitating future fiscal consolidation.

Table VG-1, Italy, GDP ∆%

 

Quarter ∆% Relative to Preceding Quarter

Quarter ∆% Relative to Same Quarter Year Earlier

IIIQ2015

0.2

0.9

IIQ2015

0.3

0.6

IQ2015

0.4

0.1

IVQ2014

0.0

-0.4

IIIQ2014

-0.1

-0.4

IIQ2014

-0.2

-0.3

IQ2014

-0.1

-0.3

IVQ2013

0.0

-1.0

IIIQ2013

0.1

-1.4

IIQ2013

-0.2

-2.0

IQ2013

-0.8

-2.5

IVQ2012

-0.5

-2.7

IIIQ2012

-0.5

-3.2

IIQ2012

-0.7

-3.2

IQ2012

-1.0

-2.4

IVQ2011

-1.0

-1.0

IIIQ2011

-0.5

0.4

IIQ2011

0.2

1.4

IQ2011

0.3

2.1

IVQ2010

0.4

2.3

IIIQ2010

0.5

1.8

IIQ2010

0.7

1.9

IQ2010

0.5

0.7

IVQ2009

-0.1

-3.5

IIIQ2009

0.4

-5.0

IIQ2009

-0.3

-6.6

IQ2009

-3.5

-6.9

IVQ2008

-1.6

-3.0

IIIQ2008

-1.3

-1.9

IIQ2008

-0.5

-0.2

IQ2008

0.5

0.5

IV2007

-0.4

0.1

IIIQ2007

0.3

1.7

IIQ2007

0.2

2.0

IQ2007

0.0

2.4

Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica

http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/173470

Chart VG-1 of the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) provides growth of GDP of Italy at market prices. The year on year rate of growth pulled strongly out of the contraction. There is evident trend of deceleration with increasingly sharper contraction and mild moderation in 2013 and 2014. GDP increased in IQ2015, IIQ2015 and IIIQ2015.

clip_image017

Chart VG-1, Italy, GDP at Market Prices, ∆% on Same Quarter Year Earlier

Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica

http://www.istat.it/it/

VH United Kingdom. Annual data in Table VH-UK show the strong impact of the global recession in the UK with decline of GDP of 4.2 percent in 2009 after dropping 0.5 percent in 2008. Recovery of 1.5 percent in 2010 is relatively low in comparison with annual growth rates in 2007 and earlier years. Growth was only 2.0 percent in 2011 and 1.2 percent in 2012. Growth increased to 2.2 percent in 2013 and 2.9 percent in 2014. The bottom part of Table VH-UK provides average growth rates of UK GDP since 1948. The UK economy grew at 2.6 percent per year on average between 1948 and 2014, which is relatively high for an advanced economy. The growth rate of GDP between 2000 and 2007 is higher at 2.8 percent. Growth in the current cyclical expansion from 2010 to 2014 has been only at 2.1 percent as advanced economies struggle with weak internal demand and world trade. GDP in 2014 higher by 5.1 percent relative to 2007 while it would have been 21.3 higher at trend of 2.8 percent as from 2000 to 2007.

Table VH-UK, UK, Gross Domestic Product, ∆%

 

∆% on Prior Year

1998

3.4

1999

3.1

2000

3.8

2001

2.8

2002

2.5

2003

3.3

2004

2.5

2005

3.0

2006

2.7

2007

2.6

2008

-0.5

2009

-4.2

2010

1.5

2011

2.0

2012

1.2

2013

2.2

2014

2.9

Average Growth Rates ∆% per Year

 

1948-2014

2.6

1950-1959

3.1

1960-1969

3.1

1970-1979

2.6

1980-1989

3.2

1990-1999

2.3

2000-2007

2.8

2007-2013*

2.1

2007-2014*

5.1

2000-2014

1.7

*Absolute change from 2007 to 2013 and from 2007 to 2014

Source: UK Office for National Statistics

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/gva/gross-domestic-product--preliminary-estimate/q3-2015/index.html

The Business Activity Index of the Markit/CIPS UK Services PMI® increased from 53.3 in Sep to 54.9 in Oct (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/463b85964a4f47699fcedc3b27d97201). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the combined indices consistent with the UK economy growing at around 0.6 percent in IVQ2015 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/463b85964a4f47699fcedc3b27d97201). The Markit/CIPS UK Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®) increased to 55.5 in Oct from 51.8 in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/948a8bb1407d44c1a37574774ea3f633). New export orders increased. Rob Dobson, Senior Economist at Markit that compiles the Markit/CIPS Manufacturing PMI®, finds improving manufacturing conditions (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey//PressRelease.mvc/948a8bb1407d44c1a37574774ea3f633). Table UK provides the economic indicators for the United Kingdom.

Table UK, UK Economic Indicators

CPI

Sep month ∆%: -0.1
Sep 12-month ∆%: -0.1
Blog 10/18/15

Output/Input Prices

Output Prices: Sep 12-month NSA ∆%: -1.8; excluding food, petroleum ∆%: 0.2
Input Prices: Sep 12-month NSA
∆%: -13.3
Excluding ∆%: -5.4
Blog 10/18/15

GDP Growth

IIIQ2015 prior quarter ∆% 0.5; year earlier same quarter ∆%: 2.3
Blog 3/31/13 4/28/13 5/26/13 7/28/13 8/25/13 9/29/13 10/27/13 12/1/13 12/22/13 2/2/14 3/2/14 4/6/14 5/4/14 5/25/14 6/29/14 7/27/14 8/17/14 10/5/14 10/26/14 11/30/14 12/28/14 2/1/15 3/1/15 4/5/15 5/3/15 5/31/15 7/5/15 8/2/15 9/6/15 10/4/15 11/1/15

Industrial Production

Sep 2015/Sep 2014 ∆%: Production Industries 1.1; Manufacturing -0.6

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/12/15

Retail Sales

Sep month ∆%: 1.9
Sep 12-month ∆%: 6.5

Earlier Data:
Blog 4/26/15

Labor Market

Jul-Sep Unemployment Rate: 5.3%
Blog 11/15/15 LMGDP 5/17/15

GDP and the Labor Market

IQ2015 Employment 104.8

IQ2008 =100

GDP IQ15=104.0 IQ2008=100

Blog 5/17/14

Trade Balance

Balance SA Sep minus ₤1353 million
Exports Sep ∆%: 1.3; Jul-Sep ∆%: -0.5
Imports Aug ∆%: -2.2 Jul-Sep ∆%: -1.0

EARLIER DATA:
Blog 4/12/15

Links to blog comments in Table UK: 11/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/11/interest-rate-increase-considered.html

10/18/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/interest-rate-policy-quagmire-world.html

10/4/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/10/labor-market-uncertainty-and-interest.html

9/20/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-increase-on-hold-because.html

9/6/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/interest-rate-policy-dependent-on-what.html

08/23/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/global-decline-of-values-of-financial.html

08/02/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/turbulence-of-valuations-of-financial.html

7/19/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/fluctuating-risk-financial-assets.html

7/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/turbulence-of-financial-asset.html

5/31/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/dollar-revaluation-squeezing-corporate.html

5/17/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluctuating-valuations-of-financial.html

5/3/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/dollar-devaluation-and-carry-trade.html

4/26/2015 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/imf-view-of-economy-and-finance-united.html

4/12/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/dollar-revaluation-recovery-without.html

4/5/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/volatility-of-valuations-of-financial.html

3/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/irrational-exuberance-mediocre-cyclical.html

2/1/15 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2015/02/financial-and-international.html

12/28/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

11/30/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/valuations-of-risk-financial-assets.html

10/26/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/financial-oscillations-world-inflation.html

10/5/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/world-financial-turbulence-twenty-seven.html

8/17/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/08/weakening-world-economic-growth.html

7/27/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html

6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html

5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

5/4/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html

4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html

3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html

2/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html

12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html

12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html

10/27/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html

9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html

7/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html

5/26/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html

4/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_28.html

03/31/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html

Table VH-L3 provides indicators of the labor force survey of the UK for Jul-Sep 2015 and earlier quarters. There has been improvement in UK labor markets with the rate of unemployment decreasing from 6.0 percent in Jul-Sep 2014 to 5.3 percent in Jul-Sep 2015.

Table VH-L3, UK, Labor Force Survey Indicators, Thousands, SA

 

LFHP

EMP

PART

UNE

RATE

Jul-Sep 2013

40,558

30,098

71.6

2,488

7.6

Jul-Sep 2014

40,641

30,793

73.0

1,959

6.0

Oct-Dec 2014

40,665

30,896

73.2

1,862

5.7

Jan-Mar 2015

40,690

31,098

73.5

1,827

5.5

Apr-Jun 2015

40,713

31,035

73.4

1,852

5.6

Jul-Sep 2015

40,740

31,211

73.7

1,749

5.3

∆ on Quarter

26

177

0.3

-103

-0.3

∆%

0.1

0.6

 

-5.5

 

∆ on Year

98

419

0.7

-210

-0.7

∆%

0.2

1.4

 

-10.7

 

Notes: LFHP: Labor Force Household Population Ages 16 to 64 in thousands; EMP: Employed Ages 16 and over in thousands; PART: Employment as % of Population Ages 16 to 64; UNE: Unemployed Ages 16 and over in thousands; Rate: Number Unemployed Ages 16 and over as % of Employed plus Unemployed

Source: UK Office for National Statistics

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lms/labour-market-statistics/november-2015/index.html

© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment