Financial Risk, Recovery without Hiring, Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, World Cyclical Slow Growth and Global Recession Risk
Carlos M. Pelaez
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
Executive Summary
References
I Recovery without Hiring
IA1 Hiring Collapse
IA2 Labor Underutilization
ICA3 Ten Million Fewer Full-time Jobs
IA4 Theory and Reality of Cyclical Slow Growth Not Secular Stagnation: Youth and
Middle-Age Unemployment
II Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation
III World Financial Turbulence
IIIA Financial Risks
IIIE Appendix Euro Zone Survival Risk
IIIF Appendix on Sovereign Bond Valuation
IV Global Inflation
V World Economic Slowdown
VA United States
VB Japan
VC China
VD Euro Area
VE Germany
VF France
VG Italy
VH United Kingdom
VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets
VII Economic Indicators
VIII Interest Rates
IX Conclusion
References
Appendixes
Appendix I The Great Inflation
IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies
IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact
IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort
IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis
IIIGA Monetary Policy with Deficit Financing of Economic Growth
IIIGB Adjustment during the Debt Crisis of the 1980s
V World Economic Slowdown. Table V-1 is constructed with the database of the IMF (http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28) to show GDP in dollars in 2012 and the growth rate of real GDP of the world and selected regional countries from 2013 to 2016. The data illustrate the concept often repeated of “two-speed recovery” of the world economy from the recession of 2007 to 2009. The IMF has changed its forecast of the world economy to 3.0 percent in 2013 but accelerating to 3.6 percent in 2014, 3.9 percent in 2015 and 3.9 percent in 2016. Slow-speed recovery occurs in the “major advanced economies” of the G7 that account for $34,543 billion of world output of $72,106 billion, or 47.9 percent, but are projected to grow at much lower rates than world output, 2.0 percent on average from 2013 to 2016 in contrast with 3.6 percent for the world as a whole. While the world would grow 15.2 percent in the four years from 2013 to 2016, the G7 as a whole would grow 8.5 percent. The difference in dollars of 2012 is rather high: growing by 15.2 percent would add around $11.0 trillion of output to the world economy, or roughly, two times the output of the economy of Japan of $5,938 billion but growing by 8.5 percent would add $6.1 trillion of output to the world, or about the output of Japan in 2012. The “two speed” concept is in reference to the growth of the 150 countries labeled as emerging and developing economies (EMDE) with joint output in 2012 of $27,080 billion, or 37.6 percent of world output. The EMDEs would grow cumulatively 21.9 percent or at the average yearly rate of 5.1 percent, contributing $5.9 trillion from 2013 to 2016 or the equivalent of somewhat less than the GDP of $8,229 billion of China in 2012. The final four countries in Table V-1 often referred as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), are large, rapidly growing emerging economies. Their combined output in 2012 adds to $14,340 billion, or 19.9 percent of world output, which is equivalent to 41.5 percent of the combined output of the major advanced economies of the G7.
Table V-1, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Real GDP Growth
GDP USD 2012 | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | |
World | 72,106 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
G7 | 34,543 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
Canada | 1,821 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
France | 2,613 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
DE | 3,428 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
Italy | 2,014 | -1.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
Japan | 5,938 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
UK | 2,484 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
US | 16,245 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Euro Area | 12,192 | -0.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
DE | 3,428 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
France | 2,613 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Italy | 2,014 | -1.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
POT | 212 | -1.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Ireland | 211 | -0.3 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Greece | 249 | -3.9 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 3.7 |
Spain | 1,323 | -1.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
EMDE | 27,080 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 5.4 |
Brazil | 2,248 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
Russia | 2,004 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 |
India | 1,859 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
China | 8,229 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.0 |
Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries); POT: Portugal
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28
Continuing high rates of unemployment in advanced economies constitute another characteristic of the database of the WEO (http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28). Table V-2 is constructed with the WEO database to provide rates of unemployment from 2012 to 2016 for major countries and regions. In fact, unemployment rates for 2013 in Table V-2 are high for all countries: unusually high for countries with high rates most of the time and unusually high for countries with low rates most of the time. The rates of unemployment are particularly high in 2013 for the countries with sovereign debt difficulties in Europe: 16.3 percent for Portugal (POT), 13.1 percent for Ireland, 27.3 percent for Greece, 26.4 percent for Spain and 12.2 percent for Italy, which is lower but still high. The G7 rate of unemployment is 7.1 percent. Unemployment rates are not likely to decrease substantially if slow growth persists in advanced economies.
Table V-2, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Unemployment Rate as Percent of Labor Force
% Labor Force 2012 | % Labor Force 2013 | % Labor Force 2014 | % Labor Force 2015 | % Labor Force 2016 | |
World | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
G7 | 7.4 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 6.3 |
Canada | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 6.8 |
France | 10.2 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.3 |
DE | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Italy | 10.7 | 12.2 | 12.4 | 11.9 | 11.1 |
Japan | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
UK | 8.0 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 6.3 |
US | 8.1 | 7.4 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Euro Area | 11.4 | 12.1 | 11.9 | 11.6 | 11.1 |
DE | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
France | 10.2 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.3 |
Italy | 10.7 | 12.2 | 12.4 | 11.9 | 11.1 |
POT | 15.7 | 16.3 | 15.7 | 15.1 | 14.5 |
Ireland | 14.7 | 13.1 | 11.2 | 10.5 | 10.1 |
Greece | 24.2 | 27.3 | 26.3 | 24.4 | 21.4 |
Spain | 25.0 | 26.4 | 25.5 | 24.9 | 24.2 |
EMDE | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Brazil | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Russia | 5.5 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.0 |
India | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
China | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries)
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28
Table V-3 provides the latest available estimates of GDP for the regions and countries followed in this blog from IQ2012 to IVQ2013 available now for all countries. There are preliminary estimates for all countries for IQ2014. Growth is weak throughout most of the world.
- Japan. The GDP of Japan increased 1.0 percent in IQ2012, 4.1 percent at SAAR (seasonally adjusted annual rate) and 3.2 percent relative to a year earlier but part of the jump could be the low level a year earlier because of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan is experiencing difficulties with the overvalued yen because of worldwide capital flight originating in zero interest rates with risk aversion in an environment of softer growth of world trade. Japan’s GDP fell 0.6 percent in IIQ2012 at the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of minus 2.5 percent, which is much lower than 4.1 percent in IQ2012. Growth of 3.2 percent in IIQ2012 in Japan relative to IIQ2011 has effects of the low level of output because of Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.8 percent in IIIQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 3.0 percent and decreased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 at the SAAR of 0.2 percent and decreased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan grew 1.3 percent in IQ2013 at the SAAR of 5.3 percent and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IIQ2013 at the SAAR of 2.9 percent and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP grew 0.3 percent in IIIQ2013 at the SAAR of 1.3 percent and increased 2.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Japan’s GDP increased 0.1 percent at the SAAR of 0.3 percent, increasing 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 1.6 percent in IQ2014 at the SAAR of 6.7 percent and increased 3.0 percent relative to a year earlier.
- China. China’s GDP grew 1.4 percent in IQ2012, annualizing to 5.7 percent, and 8.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of China grew at 2.1 percent in IIQ2012, which annualizes to 8.7 percent and 7.6 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.0 percent in IIIQ2012, which annualizes at 8.2 percent and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, China grew at 1.9 percent, which annualizes at 7.8 percent, and 7.9 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, China grew at 1.5 percent, which annualizes at 6.1 percent and 7.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, China grew at 1.8 percent, which annualizes at 7.4 percent and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.3 percent in IIIQ2013, which annualizes at 9.5 percent and 7.8 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 1.7 percent in IVQ2013, which annualized to 7.0 percent and 7.7 percent relative to a year earlier. China’s GDP grew 1.4 percent in IQ2014, which annualizes to 5.7 percent, and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. There is decennial change in leadership in China (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/index.htm). Growth rates of GDP of China in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier have been declining from 2011 to 2014.
- Euro Area. GDP fell 0.1 percent in the euro area in IQ2012 and decreased 0.2 in IQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP contracted 0.3 percent IIQ2012 and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.2 percent and declined 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.5 percent relative to the prior quarter and fell 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, the GDP of the euro area fell 0.2 percent and decreased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, euro area GDP increased 0.1 percent and fell 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.3 percent in IVQ2013 and increased 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, the GDP of the euro area increased 0.2 percent and 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier.
- Germany. The GDP of Germany increased 0.7 percent in IQ2012 and 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2012, Germany’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier but 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier when adjusted for calendar (CA) effects. In IIIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.2 percent and 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP contracted 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Germany’s GDP changed 0.0 percent and fell 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.7 percent and 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IIIQ2013 and 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.4 percent and 1.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.8 percent in IQ2014 and 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier.
- United States. Growth of US GDP in IQ2012 was 0.9 percent, at SAAR of 3.7 percent and higher by 3.3 percent relative to IQ2011. US GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012, 1.2 percent at SAAR and 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, US GDP grew 0.7 percent, 2.8 percent at SAAR and 3.1 percent relative to IIIQ2011. In IVQ2012, US GDP grew 0.0 percent, 0.1 percent at SAAR and 2.0 percent relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, US GDP grew at 1.1 percent SAAR, 0.3 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.3 percent relative to the same quarter in 2013. In IIQ2013, US GDP grew at 2.5 percent in SAAR, 0.6 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.6 percent relative to IIQ2012. US GDP grew at 4.1 percent in SAAR in IIIQ2013, 1.0 percent relative to the prior quarter and 2.0 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html and earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-instability-mediocre-cyclical.html) with weak hiring (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/rules-discretionary-authorities-and.html). In IVQ2013, US GDP grew 0.7 percent at 2.6 percent SAAR and 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, US GDP decreased 0.7 percent, increased 1.5 percent relative to a year earlier and fell 2.9 percent at SAAR.
- United Kingdom. In IQ2012, UK GDP changed 0.0 percent, increasing 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.4 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIIQ2012 and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.2 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IIIQ2012 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.5 percent in IQ2013 and 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.7 percent in IIQ2013 and 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, UK GDP increased 0.8 percent and 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.7 percent in IVQ2013 and 2.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, UK GDP increased 0.8 percent and 3.0 percent relative to a year earlier.
- Italy. Italy has experienced decline of GDP in nine consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IIIQ2013. Italy’s GDP fell 1.1 percent in IQ2012 and declined 1.7 percent relative to IQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIQ2012 and declined 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, Italy’s GDP fell 0.4 percent and declined 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy contracted 0.9 percent in IVQ2012 and fell 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.6 percent and fell 2.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2013 and 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy decreased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and declined 1.9 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP increased 0.1 percent in IVQ2013 and decreased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2014, Italy’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier.
- France. France’s GDP increased 0.2 percent in IQ2012 and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, France’s GDP increased 0.3 percent and increased 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP fell 0.3 percent in IVQ2012 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, France GDP changed 0.0 percent and declined 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2013 and 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and increased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.2 percent in IVQ2013 and 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2014, France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent and increased 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier.
Table V-3, Percentage Changes of GDP Quarter on Prior Quarter and on Same Quarter Year Earlier, ∆%
IQ2012/IVQ2011 | IQ2012/IQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.9 SAAR: 3.7 | 3.3 |
Japan | QOQ: 1.0 SAAR: 4.1 | 3.2 |
China | 1.4 | 8.1 |
Euro Area | -0.1 | -0.2 |
Germany | 0.7 | 1.8 |
France | 0.2 | 0.6 |
Italy | -1.1 | -1.7 |
United Kingdom | 0.0 | 0.6 |
IIQ2012/IQ2012 | IIQ2012/IIQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.3 SAAR: 1.2 | 2.8 |
Japan | QOQ: -0.6 | 3.2 |
China | 2.1 | 7.6 |
Euro Area | -0.3 | -0.5 |
Germany | -0.1 | 0.6 1.1 CA |
France | -0.3 | 0.4 |
Italy | -0.5 | -2.4 |
United Kingdom | -0.4 | 0.1 |
IIIQ2012/ IIQ2012 | IIIQ2012/ IIIQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.7 | 3.1 |
Japan | QOQ: –0.8 | -0.2 |
China | 2.0 | 7.4 |
Euro Area | -0.2 | -0.7 |
Germany | 0.2 | 0.4 |
France | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Italy | -0.4 | -2.6 |
United Kingdom | 0.8 | 0.3 |
IVQ2012/IIIQ2012 | IVQ2012/IVQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.0 | 2.0 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.1 SAAR: 0.2 | -0.3 |
China | 1.9 | 7.9 |
Euro Area | -0.5 | -1.0 |
Germany | -0.5 | 0.0 |
France | -0.3 | 0.0 |
Italy | -0.9 | -2.8 |
United Kingdom | -0.2 | 0.2 |
IQ2013/IVQ2012 | IQ2013/IQ2012 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.3 | 1.3 |
Japan | QOQ: 1.3 SAAR: 5.3 | 0.1 |
China | 1.5 | 7.7 |
Euro Area | -0.2 | -1.1 |
Germany | 0.0 | -1.6 |
France | 0.0 | -0.2 |
Italy | -0.6 | -2.4 |
UK | 0.5 | 0.7 |
IIQ2013/IQ2013 | IIQ2013/IIQ2012 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.6 SAAR: 2.5 | 1.6 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.7 SAAR: 2.9 | 1.2 |
China | 1.8 | 7.5 |
Euro Area | 0.3 | -0.6 |
Germany | 0.7 | 0.9 |
France | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Italy | -0.3 | -2.2 |
UK | 0.7 | 1.8 |
IIIQ2013/IIQ2013 | III/Q2013/ IIIQ2012 | |
USA | QOQ: 1.0 | 2.0 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.3 SAAR: 1.3 | 2.3 |
China | 2.3 | 7.8 |
Euro Area | 0.1 | -0.3 |
Germany | 0.3 | 1.1 |
France | -0.1 | 0.3 |
Italy | -0.1 | -1.9 |
UK | 0.8 | 1.8 |
IVQ2013/IIIQ2013 | IVQ2013/IVQ2012 | |
USA | QOQ: 0.7 SAAR: 2.6 | 2.6 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.1 SAAR: 0.3 | 2.5 |
China | 1.7 | 7.7 |
Euro Area | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Germany | 0.4 | 1.3 |
France | 0.2 | 0.7 |
Italy | 0.1 | -0.9 |
UK | 0.7 | 2.7 |
IQ2014/IVQ2013 | IQ2014/IQ2013 | |
USA | QOQ -0.7 SAAR -2.9 | 1.5 |
Japan | QOQ: 1.6 SAAR: 6.7 | 3.0 |
China | 1.4 | 7.4 |
Euro Area | 0.2 | 0.9 |
Germany | 0.8 | 2.5 |
France | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Italy | -0.1 | -0.5 |
UK | 0.8 | 3.0 |
QOQ: Quarter relative to prior quarter; SAAR: seasonally adjusted annual rate
Source: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/aboutus/stat_int.html
Table V-4 provides two types of data: growth of exports and imports in the latest available months and in the past 12 months; and contributions of net trade (exports less imports) to growth of real GDP.
- Japan. Japan provides the most worrisome data (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/interest-rate-risks-world-inflation.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/global-financial-risk-world-inflation.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations_8763.html http://cmpass ocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/paring-quantitative-easing-policy-and_4699.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/thirty-one-million-unemployed-or.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_24.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/contraction-of-united-states-real_25.html and for GDP http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html and earlier http://cmpassocreulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/recovery-without-hiring-united-states.html). In May 2014, Japan’s exports fell 2.7 percent in 12 months while imports decreased 3.6 percent. The second part of Table V-4 shows that net trade deducted 1.3 percentage points from Japan’s growth of GDP in IIQ2012, deducted 2.2 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 and deducted 0.5 percentage points from GDP growth in IVQ2012. Net trade added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2012, 1.7 percentage points in IQ2013 and 0.5 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 2.0 percentage points from GDP growth in Japan. Net trade ducted 2.2 percentage points from GDP growth in Japan in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.1 percentage point from GDP growth of Japan in IQ2014.
- China. In May 2014, China exports increased 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier and imports decreased 1.6 percent.
- Germany. Germany’s exports decreased 1.1 percent in the month of May 2014 and increased 4.3 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Germany’s imports decreased 3.4 percent in the month of May and decreased 0.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr. Net trade contributed 0.8 percentage points to growth of GDP in IQ2012, contributed 0.3 percentage points in IIQ2012, contributed 0.3 percentage points in IIIQ2012, deducted 0.5 percentage points in IVQ2012, deducted 0.3 percentage points in IQ2013 and added 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded deducted 0.5 percentage points from Germany’s GDP growth in IIIQ2013 and added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade added 0.1 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2014.
- United Kingdom. Net trade deducted 0.7 percentage points from UK value added in IQ2012, deducted 0.8 percentage points in IIQ2012, added 0.9 percentage points in IIIQ2012 and subtracted 0.4 percentage points in IVQ2012. In IQ2013, net trade added 0.6 percentage points to UK’s growth of value added and contributed 0.0 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.2 percentage points from UK growth. Net trade contributed 0.7 percentage points to UK value added in IVQ2013. Net trade contributed 0.3 percentage points to UK value added in IQ2014.
- France. France’s exports increased 0.3 percent in May 2014 while imports increased 2.2 percent. Net traded added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IIIQ2012 and 0.1 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IQ2013 and added 0.3 percentage points in IIQ2013, deducting 0.5 percentage points in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 0.3 percentage points to France’s GDP in IVQ2013 and deducted 0.1 percentage points in IQ2014.
- United States. US exports increased 1.0 percent in May 2014 and goods exports increased 3.0 percent in Jan-May 2014 relative to a year earlier. Net trade deducted 0.03 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 and added 0.68 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.28 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2013 and deducted 0.07 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded added 0.14 percentage points to US GDP growth in IIIQ2013. Net trade added 0.99 percentage points to US GDP growth in IVQ2013. Net trade deducted 1.53 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2014. United States national industrial production increased 0.6 percent in May 2014 after decreasing 0.3 percent in Apr 2014 and increasing 0.8 percent in Mar 2014 with all data seasonally adjusted. The Federal Reserve completed its annual revision of industrial production and capacity utilization on Mar 28, 2014 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm). The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm):
“Industrial production rose 0.6 percent in May after having declined 0.3 percent in April. The decrease in April was previously reported to have been 0.6 percent. Manufacturing output increased 0.6 percent in May after having moved down 0.1 percent in the previous month. In May, the output of mines gained 1.3 percent and the production of utilities decreased 0.8 percent. At 103.7 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production in May was 4.3 percent above its level of a year earlier. The capacity utilization rate for total industry increased 0.2 percentage point in May to 79.1 percent, a rate that is 1.0 percentage point below its long-run (1972–2013) average.”
In the six months ending in May 2014, United States national industrial production accumulated increase of 2.2 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 4.5 percent, which is higher than growth of 4.3 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Excluding growth of 1.1 percent in Feb 2014, growth in the remaining five months from Dec to May 2014 accumulated to 1.1 percent or 2.7 percent annual equivalent. Industrial production fell in two of the past six months. Business equipment accumulated growth of 3.7 percent in the six months from Dec 2013 to May 2014 at the annual equivalent rate of 7.6 percent, which is higher than growth of 5.3 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. The Fed analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): “The capacity utilization rate for total industry increased 0.2 percentage point in May to 79.1 percent, a rate that is 1.0 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2013) average.” United States industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate with possible acceleration in past months.
Manufacturing increased 0.6 percent in May 2014 after decreasing 0.1 percent in Feb 2014 and increasing 0.8 percent in Mar 2014 seasonally adjusted, increasing 3.6 percent not seasonally adjusted in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Manufacturing grew cumulatively 2.0 percent in the six months ending in May 2014 or at the annual equivalent rate of 4.0 percent. Excluding the increase of 1.4 percent in Feb 2014, manufacturing accumulated growth of 0.6 percent from Dec 2013 to May 2014 or at the annual equivalent rate of 1.2 percent. Table I-2 provides a longer perspective of manufacturing in the US. There has been evident deceleration of manufacturing growth in the US from 2010 and the first three months of 2011 into more recent months as shown by 12 months rates of growth. Growth rates appeared to be increasing again closer to 5 percent in Apr-Jun 2012 but deteriorated. The rates of decline of manufacturing in 2009 are quite high with a drop of 18.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2009. Manufacturing recovered from this decline and led the recovery from the recession. Rates of growth appeared to be returning to the levels at 3 percent or higher in the annual rates before the recession but the pace of manufacturing fell steadily in the past six months with some strength at the margin. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System conducted the annual revision of industrial production released on Mar 28, 2014 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Current/DefaultRev.htm):
“The Federal Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related measures of capacity and capacity utilization. The annual revision for 2014 was more limited than in recent years because the source data required to extend the annual benchmark indexes of production into 2012 were mostly unavailable. Consequently, the IP indexes published with this revision are very little changed from previous estimates. Measured from fourth quarter to fourth quarter, total IP is now reported to have increased about 3 1/3 percent in each year from 2011 to 2013. Relative to the rates of change for total IP published earlier, the new rates are 1/2 percentage point higher in 2012 and little changed in any other year. Total IP still shows a peak-to-trough decline of about 17 percent for the most recent recession, and it still returned to its pre-recession peak in the fourth quarter of 2013.”
Manufacturing fell 21.9 from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increased by 19.9 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2013. Manufacturing grew 23.8 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to May 2014. Manufacturing output in May 2014 is 3.3 percent below the peak in Jun 2007.
Table V-4, Growth of Trade and Contributions of Net Trade to GDP Growth, ∆% and % Points
Exports | Exports 12 M ∆% | Imports | Imports 12 M ∆% | |
USA | 1.0 May | 3.0 Jan-May | -0.3 May | 2.6 Jan-May |
Japan | May 2014 -2.7 Apr 2014 5.1 Mar 2014 1.8 Feb 2014 9.5 Jan 2014 9.5 Dec 2013 15.3 Nov 2013 18.4 Oct 2013 18.6 Sep 2013 11.5 Aug 2013 14.7 Jul 2013 12.2 Jun 2013 7.4 May 2013 10.1 Apr 2013 3.8 Mar 2013 1.1 Feb 2013 -2.9 Jan 2013 6.4 Dec -5.8 Nov -4.1 Oct -6.5 Sep -10.3 Aug -5.8 Jul -8.1 | May 2014 -3.6 Apr 2013 3.4 Mar 2014 18.1 Feb 2014 9.0 Jan 2014 25.0 Dec 2013 24.7 Nov 2013 21.1 Oct 2013 26.1 Sep 2013 16.5 Aug 2013 16.0 Jul 2013 19.6 Jun 2013 11.8 May 2013 10.0 Apr 2013 9.4 Mar 2013 5.5 Feb 2013 7.3 Jan 2013 7.3 Dec 1.9 Nov 0.8 Oct -1.6 Sep 4.1 Aug -5.4 Jul 2.1 | ||
China | 2014 7.0 May 0.9 Apr -6.6 Mar -18.1 Feb 10.6 Jan 2013 4.3 Dec 12.7 Nov 5.6 Oct -0.3 Sep 7.2 Aug 5.1 Jul -3.1 Jun 1.0 May 14.7 Apr 10.0 Mar 21.8 Feb 25.0 Jan | 2014 -1.6 May -0.8 Apr -11.3 Mar 10.1 Feb 10.0 Jan 2013 8.3 Dec 5.3 Nov 7.6 Oct 7.4 Sep 7.0 Aug 10.9 Jul -0.7 Jun -0.3 May 16.8 Apr 14.1 Mar -15.2 Feb 28.8 Jan | ||
Euro Area | -1.5 12-M Apr | 0.5 Jan-Apr | -2.8 12-M Apr | -0.6 Jan-Apr |
Germany | -1.1 May CSA | 4.3 May | -3.4 May CSA | -0.4 May |
France May | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.2 | -1.5 |
Italy Apr | 0.4 | 2.0 | -0.6 | -2.9 |
UK | -2.9 Apr | -2.9 Feb-Apr 14 /Feb-Apr 13 | 0.6 Apr | -3.7 Feb-Apr 14 13/Feb-Apr 13 |
Net Trade % Points GDP Growth | % Points | |||
USA | IQ2014 -1.53 IVQ2013 0.99 IIIQ2013 0.14 IIQ2013 -0.07 IQ2013 -0.28 IVQ2012 +0.68 IIIQ2012 -0.03 IIQ2012 +0.10 IQ2012 +0.44 | |||
Japan | 0.4 IQ2012 -1.3 IIQ2012 -2.2 IIIQ2012 -0.5 IVQ2012 1.7 IQ2013 0.5 IIQ2013 -2.0 IIIQ2013 -2.2 IVQ2013 -1.1 IQ2014 | |||
Germany | IQ2012 0.8 IIQ2012 0.4 IIIQ2012 0.3 IVQ2012 -0.5 IQ2013 -0.3 IIQ2013 0.1 IIIQ2013 -0.5 IVQ2013 0.4 IQ2014 0.1 | |||
France | 0.1 IIIQ2012 0.1 IVQ2012 -0.1 IQ2013 0.3 IIQ2013 -0.5 IIIQ2013 0.3 IVQ2013 -0.1 IQ2014 | |||
UK | -0.7 IQ2012 -0.8 IIQ2012 +0.9 IIIQ2012 -0.4 IVQ2012 0.6 IQ2013 0.0 IIQ2013 -1.2 IIIQ2013 0.7 IVQ2013 0.3 IQ2014 |
Sources: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/ http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm
The geographical breakdown of exports and imports of Japan with selected regions and countries is provided in Table V-4 for May 2014. The share of Asia in Japan’s trade is more than one-half for 55.1 percent of exports and 45.2 percent of imports. Within Asia, exports to China are 18.7 percent of total exports and imports from China 21.8 percent of total imports. While exports to China increased 0.4 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014, imports from China decreased 0.5 percent. The second largest export market for Japan in May 2014 is the US with share of 18.0 percent of total exports, which is close to that of China, and share of imports from the US of 9.4 percent in total imports. Japan’s exports to the US fell 2.8 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014 and imports from the US fell 0.5 percent. Western Europe has share of 11.1 percent in Japan’s exports and of 10.9 percent in imports. Rates of growth of exports of Japan in May 2014 are minus 2.8 percent for exports to the US, minus 10.7 percent for exports to Brazil and 22.5 percent for exports to Germany. Comparisons relative to 2011 may have some bias because of the effects of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Deceleration of growth in China and the US and threat of recession in Europe can reduce world trade and economic activity. Growth rates of imports in the 12 months ending in May 2014 are mixed. Imports from Asia decreased 1.2 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014 while imports from China decreased 2.7 percent. Data are in millions of yen, which may have effects of recent depreciation of the yen relative to the United States dollar (USD).
Table V-4, Japan, Value and 12-Month Percentage Changes of Exports and Imports by Regions and Countries, ∆% and Millions of Yen
May 2014 | Exports | 12 months ∆% | Imports Millions Yen | 12 months ∆% |
Total | 5,607,581 | -2.7 | 6,516,544 | -3.6 |
Asia | 3,087,914 % Total 55.1 | -3.4 | 2,945,032 % Total 45.2 | -1.2 |
China | 1,049,696 % Total 18.7 | 0.4 | 1,419,105 % Total 21.8 | -2.7 |
USA | 1,010,694 % Total 18.0 | -2.8 | 611,193 % Total 9.4 | -0.5 |
Canada | 59,414 | -14.2 | 101,133 | -9.3 |
Brazil | 41,339 | -10.7 | 75,075 | -28.9 |
Mexico | 81,962 | 3.3 | 47,485 | 22.4 |
Western Europe | 622,770 % Total 11.1 | 15.2 | 709,880 % Total 10.9 | 6.1 |
Germany | 165,641 | 22.5 | 192,516 | 7.1 |
France | 47,659 | -1.7 | 88,854 | 1.2 |
UK | 92,016 | 3.6 | 52,249 | -13.6 |
Middle East | 215,002 | 10.9 | 1,102,296 | -10.5 |
Australia | 104,308 | -30.4 | 391,700 | -12.8 |
Source: Japan, Ministry of Finance http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm
World trade projections of the IMF are in Table V-6. There is increasing growth of the volume of world trade of goods and services from 3.0 percent in 2013 to 5.3 percent in 2015 and 5.7 percent on average from 2016 to 2019. World trade would be slower for advanced economies while emerging and developing economies (EMDE) experience faster growth. World economic slowdown would be more challenging with lower growth of world trade.
Table V-6, IMF, Projections of World Trade, USD Billions, USD/Barrel and Annual ∆%
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Average ∆% 2016-2019 | |
World Trade Volume (Goods and Services) | 3.0 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 5.7 |
Exports Goods & Services | 3.1 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 5.7 |
Imports Goods & Services | 2.9 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 5.7 |
World Trade Value of Exports Goods & Services USD Billion | 23,083 | 23,990 | 25,123 | Average ∆% 2006-2015 20,390 |
Value of Exports of Goods USD Billion | 18,591 | 19,281 | 20,132 | Average ∆% 2006-2015 16,396 |
Average Oil Price USD/Barrel | 104.07 | 104.17 | 97.92 | Average ∆% 2006-2015 88.84 |
Average Annual ∆% Export Unit Value of Manufactures | -1.1 | -0.3 | -0.4 | Average ∆% 2006-2015 1.4 |
Exports of Goods & Services | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Average ∆% 2016-2019 |
Euro Area | 1.4 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.7 |
EMDE | 4.4 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
G7 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Imports Goods & Services | ||||
Euro Area | 0.3 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 4.7 |
EMDE | 5.6 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 |
G7 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Terms of Trade of Goods & Services | ||||
Euro Area | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.7 | -0.1 |
EMDE | 0.7 | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.4 |
G7 | 0.7 | -0.044 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Terms of Trade of Goods | ||||
Euro Area | 0.8 | -0.044 | 0.1 | -0.2 |
EMDE | -0.6 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -0.8 |
G7 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -0.9 | -0.7 |
Notes: Commodity Price Index includes Fuel and Non-fuel Prices; Commodity Industrial Inputs Price includes agricultural raw materials and metal prices; Oil price is average of WTI, Brent and Dubai
Source: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook databank
http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28
The JP Morgan Global All-Industry Output Index of the JP Morgan Manufacturing and Services PMI™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, with high association with world GDP, increased to 55.4 in Jun from 54.2 in May, indicating expansion at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f4caa5bd611d4a568ab1a28c8f2816a5). This index has remained above the contraction territory of 50.0 during 59 consecutive months. The employment index increased from 51.6 in May to 52.7 in Jun with input prices rising at faster rate, new orders increasing at faster rate and output increasing at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f4caa5bd611d4a568ab1a28c8f2816a5). David Hensley, Director of Global Economics Coordination at JP Morgan finds possible higher growth than trend in the second half of the year (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f4caa5bd611d4a568ab1a28c8f2816a5). The JP Morgan Global Manufacturing PMI™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, increased to 52.7 in Jun from 52.1 in Mat (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/ce22ed75fd824bb2a6de0856a5049151). New export orders expanded for the twelfth consecutive month (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/ce22ed75fd824bb2a6de0856a5049151). David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan finds improvement of the index with above-trend growth at 4.5 percent annual equivalent (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/ce22ed75fd824bb2a6de0856a5049151). The HSBC Brazil Composite Output Index, compiled by Markit, increased from 49.9 in Apr to 49.9 in Jun, indicating unchanged activity of Brazil’s private sector (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/eb41cd65ef7342758ff5e778a4548620). The HSBC Brazil Services Business Activity index, compiled by Markit, increased from 50.6 in May to 51.4 in Jun, indicating expanding services activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/1b1eac66368b4c93b0488de12835096a). André Loes, Chief Economist, Brazil, at HSBC, finds risks of weak economic activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/1b1eac66368b4c93b0488de12835096a). The HSBC Brazil Purchasing Managers’ IndexTM (PMI™) decreased marginally from 48.8 in May to 48.7 in Jun, indicating moderate deterioration in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/35d4c5e2b0af4e9b9d535d5979613a1b). André Loes, Chief Economist, Brazil at HSBC, finds weakening industrial activity in Brazil (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/35d4c5e2b0af4e9b9d535d5979613a1b).
VA United States. The Markit Flash US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) seasonally adjusted increased to 57.5 in Jun from 56.4 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/eaa9c08442964117981ead1ac971a652). New export orders registered 50.9 in Jun, decreasing from 52.2 in May, indicating expansion at a slower rate. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that manufacturing hiring is growing with creation of about 12,000 jobs, 200.000 new nonfarm payroll jobs and 3.0 percent GDP growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/eaa9c08442964117981ead1ac971a652). The Markit Flash US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index increased from 58.1 in May to 61.2 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f1b973b6faa84a18bfb1ce9eb4538725). Chris Williamson, Senior Economist at Markit, finds that the surveys are consistent with the highest rate of economic activity since before the global recession (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f1b973b6faa84a18bfb1ce9eb4538725). The Markit US Composite PMI™ Output Index of Manufacturing and Services increased to 61.0 in Jun from 58.4 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a0ce20b0b3d544f1b2e1c97acbc94e0d). The Markit US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index increased from 58.1 in May to 61.0 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a0ce20b0b3d544f1b2e1c97acbc94e0d). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the indexes consistent with US growth at annual rate of 4.0 percent in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a0ce20b0b3d544f1b2e1c97acbc94e0d). The Markit US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) increased to 57.3 in Jun from 56.4 in May, which indicates expansion at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a5254670de854235b620ac5824418514). The index of new exports orders decreased from 52.2 in May to 50.6 in Jun while total new orders increased from 58.8 in May to 61.2 in Jun. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the index suggests output growth at aroun the fastest pace since the Global Recession (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a5254670de854235b620ac5824418514). The purchasing managers’ index (PMI) of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Report on Business® decreased 0.1 percentage points from 55.4 in May to 55.3 in Jun, which indicates growth at almost unchaged rate (http://www.ism.ws/ISMReport/MfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=12942). The index of new orders increased 2.0 percentage points from 56.9 in May to 58.9 in Jun. The index of exports decreased 2.0 percentage point from 56.5 in May to 54.5 in Jun, growing at a slower rate. The Non-Manufacturing ISM Report on Business® PMI decreased 0.3 percentage points from 56.3 in May to 56.0 in Jun, indicating growth of business activity/production during 59 consecutive months, while the index of new orders increased 0.7 percentage points from 60.5 in May to 61.2 in Jun (http://www.ism.ws/ISMReport/NonMfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=12943). Table USA provides the country economic indicators for the US.
Table USA, US Economic Indicators
Consumer Price Index | May 12 months NSA ∆%: 2.0; ex food and energy ∆%: 2.0 May month SA ∆%: 0.4; ex food and energy ∆%: 0.3 |
Producer Price Index | Finished Goods May 12-month NSA ∆%: 2.4; ex food and energy ∆% 1.8 Final Demand May 12-month NSA ∆%: 2.0; ex food and energy ∆% 2.0 |
PCE Inflation | May 12-month NSA ∆%: headline 1.8; ex food and energy ∆% 1.5 |
Employment Situation | Household Survey: Jun Unemployment Rate SA 6.1% |
Nonfarm Hiring | Nonfarm Hiring fell from 63.3 million in 2006 to 54.2 million in 2013 or by 9.1 million |
GDP Growth | BEA Revised National Income Accounts IIQ2012/IIQ2011 2.8 IIIQ2012/IIIQ2011 3.1 IVQ2012/IVQ2011 2.0 IQ2013/IQ2012 1.3 IIQ2013/IIQ2012 1.6 IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 2.0 IVQ2013/IVQ2012 2.6 IQ2014/IQ2013 1.5 IQ2012 SAAR 3.7 IIQ2012 SAAR 1.2 IIIQ2012 SAAR 2.8 IVQ2012 SAAR 0.1 IQ2013 SAAR 1.1 IIQ2013 SAAR 2.5 IIIQ2013 SAAR 4.1 IVQ2013 SAAR 2.6 IQ2014 SAAR -2.9 |
Real Private Fixed Investment | SAAR IQ2014 minus 1.8 ∆% IVQ2007 to IQ2014: minus 3.3% Blog 6/29/14 |
Corporate Profits | IQ2014 SAAR: Corporate Profits -9.1; Undistributed Profits -17.5 Blog 6/29/14 |
Personal Income and Consumption | May month ∆% SA Real Disposable Personal Income (RDPI) SA ∆% 0.2 |
Quarterly Services Report | IQ14/IQ13 NSA ∆%: Financial & Insurance 5.3 |
Employment Cost Index | Compensation Private IQ2014 SA ∆%: 0.3 |
Industrial Production | May month SA ∆%: 0.6 Manufacturing May SA ∆% 0.6 May 12 months SA ∆% 3.6, NSA 3.6 |
Productivity and Costs | Nonfarm Business Productivity IQ2014∆% SAAE -3.2; IQ2014/IQ2013 ∆% 1.0; Unit Labor Costs SAAE IQ2014 ∆% 5.7; IQ2014/IQ2013 ∆%: 1.2 Blog 6/8/2014 |
New York Fed Manufacturing Index | General Business Conditions From May 19.01 to Jun 19.28 |
Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index | General Index from May 15.4 to Jun 17.8 |
Manufacturing Shipments and Orders | New Orders SA May ∆% -0.5 Ex Transport -0.1 Jan-May NSA New Orders ∆% 2.5 Ex transport 1.9 |
Durable Goods | May New Orders SA ∆%: minus 1.0; ex transport ∆%: minus 0.1 |
Sales of New Motor Vehicles | Jan-Jun 2014 8,163,942; Jan-Jun 2013 7,829,141. Jun 14 SAAR 16.98 million, May 14 SAAR 16.77 million, Jun 2013 SAAR 15.88 million Blog 7/6/14 |
Sales of Merchant Wholesalers | Jan-May 2014/Jan-May 2013 NSA ∆%: Total 4.9; Durable Goods: 3.8; Nondurable |
Sales and Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers | Apr 14 12-M NSA ∆%: Sales Total Business 5.6; Manufacturers 3.8 |
Sales for Retail and Food Services | Jan-May 2014/Jan-May 2013 ∆%: Retail and Food Services 3.4; Retail ∆% 3.3 |
Value of Construction Put in Place | May SAAR month SA ∆%: 0.1 May 12-month NSA: 5.7 |
Case-Shiller Home Prices | Apr 2014/Apr 2013 ∆% NSA: 10 Cities 10.8; 20 Cities: 10.8 |
FHFA House Price Index Purchases Only | Apr SA ∆% 0.0; |
New House Sales | May 2014 month SAAR ∆%: 18.6 |
Housing Starts and Permits | May Starts month SA ∆% minus 6.5; Permits ∆%: minus 6.4 |
Trade Balance | Balance May SA -$44,392 million versus Apr -$47,037 million |
Export and Import Prices | May 12-month NSA ∆%: Imports 0.4; Exports 0.5 |
Consumer Credit | May ∆% annual rate: Total 7/4; Revolving 2.5; Nonrevolving 9.3 |
Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term Treasury Securities | Apr Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term US Securities: minus $24.2 billion |
Treasury Budget | Fiscal Year 2014/2013 ∆% Jun: Receipts 8.2; Outlays 1.1; Individual Income Taxes 5.4 Deficit Fiscal Year 2012 $1,087 billion Deficit Fiscal Year 2013 $680 billion Blog 7/13/2014 |
CBO Budget and Economic Outlook | 2012 Deficit $1087 B 6.8% GDP Debt 11,281 B 70.1% GDP 2013 Deficit $680 B, 4.1% GDP Debt 11,982 B 72.1% GDP Blog 8/26/12 11/18/12 2/10/13 9/22/13 2/16/14 |
Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities | May 2014 SAAR ∆%: Securities 10.4 Loans 7.6 Cash Assets 1.6 Deposits 7.6 Blog 6/29/14 |
Flow of Funds | IQ2014 ∆ since 2007 Assets +$13,322.5 BN Nonfinancial $120.8 BN Real estate -$565.4 BN Financial +13,201.7 BN Net Worth +$13,931.7 BN Blog 6/29/14 |
Current Account Balance of Payments | IQ2014 -86,131 MM % GDP 2.6 Blog 6/22/14 |
Links to blog comments in Table USA:
7/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/financial-valuations-twenty-seven.html
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
6/8/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-risks-rules-discretionary.html
5/4/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html
2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html
9/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
2/10/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/united-states-unsustainable-fiscal.html
Sales and inventories of merchant wholesalers except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices are shown in Table VA-1 for Jan-May 2014 NSA and percentage changes from the prior month SA and for Jan-May 2014 relative to Jan-May 2013. These data are volatile, aggregating diverse categories of durable and nondurable goods without adjustment for price changes. Total sales for the US rose 4.9 percent in Jan-May 2014 relative to Jan-May 2013 and increased 0.7 percent in May 2014 relative to Apr 2014. The value of total sales is quite high at $2193.4 billion, approaching five trillion dollars in a year. Value in the breakdown is useful in identifying relative importance of individual categories. Sales of durable goods in Jan-May 2014 reached $989.5 billion, over two trillion dollars for a year, increasing 0.2 percent in May 2014 relative to Apr 2014 and increasing 3.8 percent in Jan-May 2014 relative to Jan-May 2013. Sales of automotive products reached $164.9 billion in Jan-May 2014, increasing 1.1 percent in the month and also increasing 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. There is strong performance of 10.7 percent in machinery but lower of 3.9 percent in electrical products. Sales of nondurable goods rose 5.8 percent over a year earlier. The influence of commodity prices returned as suggested by increase of 6.6 percent in May 2014 and decrease of 0.8 percent in Jan-May 2014 relative to a year earlier in farm products with change of 0.0 percent in petroleum products in May 2014 and increase of 10.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The final three columns in Table VA-1 provide the value of inventories and percentage changes from the prior month and relative to the same month a year earlier. US total inventories of wholesalers increased 1.0 percent in May 2014 and increased 8.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Inventories of durable goods of $327.7 billion are 62.1 percent of total inventories of $527.7 billion and rose 8.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Automotive inventories increased 10.7 percent relative to a year earlier. Machinery inventories of $96.3 billion rose 13.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Inventories of nondurable goods of $200.1billion are 37.9 percent of the total and increased 6.8 percent relative to a year earlier. Inventories of farm products decreased 3.2 percent in May relative to Apr and increased 4.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Inventories of petroleum products increased 2.0 percent in May and decreased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier.
Table VA-1, US, Sales and Inventories of Merchant Wholesalers except Manufacturers’ Sales Branches and Offices, Month ∆%
2014 | Sales $ Billions Jan-May 2014 | Sales May ∆% SA | Sales∆% Jan-May 2014 from Jan-May 2013 NSA | INV $ Billions May 2014 NSA | INV May ∆% SA | INV ∆% May 2014 from May 2013 NSA |
US Total | 2193.4 | 0.7 | 4.9 | 527.7 | 0.5 | 7.8 |
Durable | 989.5 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 327.7 | 1.0 | 8.5 |
Automotive | 164.9 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 54.5 | 1.9 | 10.7 |
Prof. Equip. | 183.5 | -0.9 | 3.0 | 40.7 | 0.3 | 7.1 |
Computer Equipment | 102.7 | -1.6 | 3.9 | 17.9 | -1.9 | 6.5 |
Electrical | 171.0 | -1.1 | 3.9 | 36.8 | 0.9 | 5.6 |
Machinery | 189.8 | 1.0 | 10.7 | 96.3 | 1.1 | 13.2 |
Not Durable | 1203.9 | 1.1 | 5.8 | 200.1 | -0.3 | 6.8 |
Drugs | 195.5 | 0.7 | 9.3 | 43.1 | 1.5 | 21.8 |
Apparel | 59.4 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 23.9 | 0.0 | 7.2 |
Groceries | 255.9 | -0.3 | 6.3 | 32.8 | -1.9 | 2.5 |
Farm Products | 107.1 | 6.6 | -0.8 | 18.9 | -3.2 | 4.4 |
Petroleum | 334.1 | 0.0 | 10.8 | 21.3 | 2.0 | -1.2 |
Note: INV: inventories
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Chart VA-1 of the US Census Bureau provides sales of wholesale trade NSA from Jan 1992 to May 2014. The jagged curve of wholesale trade sales without adjustment shows strong seasonal variations. There is a strong long-term trend interrupted by sharp drop during the global recession. Growth resumed along a stronger upward trend and the level surpasses the peak before the global recession with stability in the final segment.
Chart VA-1, US, Wholesale Trade Sales, Monthly, NSA, Jan 1992- May 2014, Millions of Dollars
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Chart VA-2 of the US Census Bureau provides US wholesale trade sales with seasonal adjustment from Jan 1992 to May 2014. The elimination of seasonality permits enhanced comparison of adjacent sales. The final segment identifies another drop followed by increase to a higher level with stability.
Chart VA-2, US, Wholesale Trade Sales, Monthly, SA, Jan 1992-May 2014, Millions of Dollars
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Inventory/sales ratios of merchant wholesalers except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices are shown in Table VA-2. The total for the US has remained almost without change at 1.18 in May 2014, 1.18 in Apr 2014 and 1.16 in May 2013. Inventory/sales ratios are higher in durable goods industries but remain relatively stable with 1.59 in May 2014, 1.57 in Apr 2014 and 1.55 in May 2013. Computer equipment operates with low inventory/sales ratios of 0.80 in May 2014, 0.81 in Apr 2014 and 0.80 in May 2013 because of the capacity to fill orders on demand. As expected because of perishable nature, nondurable inventory/sales ratios are quite low with 0.83 in May 2014 and 0.84 in Apr 2014, which are close to 0.83 in May 2013. There are exceptions such as 1.95 in May 2014 in apparel that is close to 1.99 in Apr 2014 and close to 2.02 in May 2013.
Table VA-2, Inventory/Sales Ratios of Merchant Wholesalers except Manufacturers’ Sales Branches and Offices, % SA
May 2014 | Apr 2014 | May 2013 | |
US Total | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.16 |
Durable | 1.59 | 1.57 | 1.55 |
Automotive | 1.59 | 1.58 | 1.50 |
Prof. Equip. | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.03 |
Comp. Equip. | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
Electrical | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
Machinery | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.42 |
Not Durable | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
Drugs | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.99 |
Apparel | 1.95 | 1.99 | 2.02 |
Groceries | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
Farm Products | 0.98 | 1.08 | 0.99 |
Petroleum | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.36 |
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Inventories of merchant wholesalers except manufacturers’ sales branches in millions of dollars NSA are provided in Chart VA-3 of the US Census Bureau. There is evident acceleration in inventory building in the final segment at a sharper slope than before the global recession with recent downward turn followed by increase.
Chart VA-3, US, Inventories of Merchant Wholesalers, Millions of Dollars, NSA, Jan 1992-May 2014
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Inventories of merchant wholesalers except manufacturers’ sales branches in millions of dollars SA are provided in Chart VA-4 of the US Census Bureau. There is evident acceleration in inventory building in the final segment at a sharper slope than before the global recession with recent downward turn followed by increase.
Chart VA-4, US, Inventories of Merchant Wholesalers, Millions of Dollars, SA, Jan 1992-May 2014
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/wholesale/index.html
Chart VA-5 provides the chart of the US Census Bureau with inventories/sales ratios of merchant wholesalers from 2004 to 2014 seasonally adjusted. Inventory/sales ratios rise during contractions as merchants are caught with increasing inventories because of weak sales and fall during expansions as merchants attempt to fill sales with existing stocks. There is an increase in the inventory/sales ratio in 2012 but not yet significantly higher with declining trend in the final segment followed by an increase and new decline/stability.
Chart VA-5, US, Monthly Inventories/Sales Ratios of Merchant Wholesalers, SA, 2005-2014
Source: US Census Bureau
http://www2.census.gov/wholesale/img/mwtsbrf.jpg
The report of consumer credit outstanding of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is provided in Table VA-3. The data are in seasonally adjusted annual rates both percentage changes and billions of dollars. The estimate of consumer credit “covers most short- and intermediate-term credit extended to individuals, excluding loans secured by real estate (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/current/default.htm). Consumer credit is divided into two categories. (1) Revolving consumer credit (REV in Table VA-3) consists mainly of unsecured credit cards. (2) Non-revolving consumer credit (NREV in Table VA-6) “includes automobile loans and all other loans not included in revolving credit, such as loans for mobile homes, education, boats, trailers or vacations” (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/current/default.htm). In May 2014, revolving credit was $872 billion, or 27.3 percent of total consumer credit of $3194 billion, and non-revolving credit was $2322 billion, or 72.7 percent of total consumer credit outstanding. Consumer credit grew at relatively high rates before the recession beginning in IVQ2007 (Dec) and extending to IIQ2009 (Jun) as dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research or NBER (http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html). Percentage changes of consumer credit outstanding fell already in 2009. Rates were still negative in 2010 with decline of 1.0 percent in annual data and sharp decline of 7.6 percent in revolving credit. In IVQ 2013, total consumer credit grew at 5.4 percent with increase of revolving credit at 2.0 percent and increase of non-revolving credit at 6.7 percent. Growth continued in May 2014 with total credit at 7.4 percent, revolving at 2.5 percent and non-revolving at 9.3 percent.
Table VA-3, US, Consumer Credit Outstanding, SA, Annual Rate and Billions of Dollars
Total ∆% | REV ∆% | NRV ∆% | Total $B | REV $B | NREV $B | |
2014 | ||||||
May | 7.4 | 2.5 | 9.3 | 3194 | 872 | 2322 |
Apr | 10.0 | 12.3 | 9.1 | 3175 | 870 | 2305 |
Mar | 7.5 | 3.1 | 9.2 | 3149 | 862 | 2287 |
IQ | 6.6 | 1.8 | 8.4 | 3149 | 862 | 2287 |
2013 | ||||||
IVQ | 5.4 | 2.0 | 6.7 | 3097 | 857 | 2240 |
IIIQ | 6.3 | 0.9 | 8.5 | 3056 | 853 | 2203 |
IIQ | 5.5 | 1.0 | 7.3 | 3009 | 851 | 2158 |
IQ | 6.1 | 1.3 | 8.1 | 2968 | 849 | 2119 |
2013 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 7.9 | 3097 | 857 | 2240 |
2012 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 2924 | 847 | 2077 |
2011 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 5.9 | 2756 | 842 | 1914 |
2010 | -1.0 | -7.6 | 2.7 | 2647 | 840 | 1807 |
2009 | -3.9 | -8.8 | -1.0 | 2553 | 917 | 1636 |
2008 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2651 | 1005 | 1646 |
2007 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 4.3 | 2529 | 1008 | 1521 |
Note: REV: Revolving; NREV: Non-revolving; ∆%: simple annual rate from unrounded data; Total may not add exactly because of rounding
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/current/default.htm
Chart VA-6 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System total consumer credit outstanding in millions of dollars measured in the right axis and the finance rate on 24-month personal loans at commercial banks, not seasonally adjusted, measured on the left axis. There was sharp decline of total consumer loans outstanding during the global recession followed by strong recovery. There is long-term decline of the financing rate.
Chart VA-6, US, Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized NSA and Financing Rate on 24-month Personal Loans at Commercial Banks NSA, Millions of Dollars and Percent, Feb 1972-May 2014
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/current/default.htm
Chart VA-7 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System provides percentage changes of total consumer credit outstanding in the US and the financing rate on 24-month personal consumer loans at commercial banks, since 1972. The shaded bars are the cyclical contraction dates of the National Bureau of Economic Research (http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html). Consumer credit is cyclical, declining during contractions as shown by negative percentage changes during economic contractions. There is clear upward trend in 2012-2013 but with significant fluctuations and vacillation in the final segment.
Chart VA-7, US, Percent Change of Total Consumer Credit, Seasonally Adjusted at an Annual Rate and Finance Rate on 24-month Personal Loans at Commercial Banks NSA, Feb 1972-May 2014
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Table VA-4 provides additional information required for understanding the deficit/debt situation of the United States. The table is divided into four parts: Treasury budget in the 2014 fiscal year beginning on Oct 1, 2013 and ending on Sep 30, 2014; federal fiscal data for the years from 2009 to 2013; federal fiscal data for the years from 2005 to 2008; and Treasury debt held by the public from 2005 to 2013. Receipts increased 8.2 percent in the cumulative fiscal year 2014 ending in Jun 2014 relative to the cumulative in fiscal year 2013. Individual income taxes increased 5.4 percent relative to the same fiscal period a year earlier. Outlays decreased 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. There are also receipts, outlays, deficit and debt for fiscal year 2013. Total revenues of the US from 2009 to 2012 accumulate to $9021 billion, or $9.0 trillion, while expenditures or outlays accumulate to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, with the deficit accumulating to $5090 billion, or $5.1 trillion. Revenues decreased 6.5 percent from $9653 billion in the four years from 2005 to 2008 to $9021 billion in the years from 2009 to 2012. Decreasing revenues were caused by the global recession from IVQ2007 (Dec) to IIQ2009 (Jun) and also by growth of only 2.1 percent on average in the cyclical expansion from IIIQ2009 to IQ2014. In contrast, the expansion from IQ1983 to IIIQ1987 was at the average annual growth rate of 4.9 percent and at 7.8 percent from IQ1983 to IVQ1983 (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html). Because of mediocre GDP growth, there are 26.8 million unemployed or underemployed in the United States for an effective unemployment rate of 16.3 percent (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/financial-valuations-twenty-seven.html). Weakness of growth and employment creation is analyzed in II Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/financial-fluctuations-united-states.html). In contrast with the decline of revenue, outlays or expenditures increased 30.2 percent from $10,839 billion, or $10.8 trillion, in the four years from 2005 to 2008, to $14,109 billion, or $14.1 trillion, in the four years from 2009 to 2012. Increase in expenditures by 30.2 percent while revenue declined by 6.5 percent caused the increase in the federal deficit from $1186 billion in 2005-2008 to $5090 billion in 2009-2012. Federal revenue was 14.9 percent of GDP on average in the years from 2009 to 2012, which is well below 17.4 percent of GDP on average from 1973 to 2012. Federal outlays were 23.3 percent of GDP on average from 2009 to 2012, which is well above 20.4 percent of GDP on average from 1973 to 2012. The lower part of Table VI-7C shows that debt held by the public swelled from $5803 billion in 2008 to $11,982 billion in 2013, by $5478 billion or 106.5 percent. Debt held by the public as percent of GDP or economic activity jumped from 39.3 percent in 2008 to 72.1 percent in 2013, which is well above the average of 38.0 percent from 1973 to 2012. The United States faces tough adjustment because growth is unlikely to recover, creating limits on what can be obtained by increasing revenues, while continuing stress of social programs restricts what can be obtained by reducing expenditures.
Table VA-4, US, Treasury Budget in Fiscal Year to Date Million Dollars
Jun 2014 | Fiscal Year 2014 | Fiscal Year 2013 | ∆% |
Receipts | 2,258,565 | 2,087,143 | 8.2 |
Outlays | 2,624,420 | 2,596,966 | 1.1 |
Deficit | -365,855 | -509,823 | |
Individual Income Tax | 1,045,759 | 992,168 | 5.4 |
Corporation Income Tax | 235,018 | 205,591 | 14.3 |
Social Insurance | 562,041 | 505,474 | 11.2 |
Receipts | Outlays | Deficit (-), Surplus (+) | |
$ Billions | |||
Fiscal Year 2013 | 2,775 | 3,455 | -680 |
% GDP | 16.7 | 20.8 | -4.1 |
Fiscal Year 2012 | 2,450 | 3,537 | -1,087 |
% GDP | 15.2 | 22.0 | -6.8 |
Fiscal Year 2011 | 2,304 | 3,603 | -1,300 |
% GDP | 15.0 | 23.4 | -8.4 |
Fiscal Year 2010 | 2,163 | 3,457 | -1,294 |
% GDP | 14.6 | 23.4 | -8.8 |
Fiscal Year 2009 | 2,105 | 3,518 | -1,413 |
% GDP | 14.6 | 24.4 | -9.8 |
Total 2009-2012 | 9,021 | 14,109 | -5,090 |
Average % GDP 2009-2012 | 14.9 | 23.3 | -8.4 |
Fiscal Year 2008 | 2,524 | 2,983 | -459 |
% GDP | 17.1 | 20.2 | -3.1 |
Fiscal Year 2007 | 2,568 | 2,729 | -161 |
% GDP | 17.9 | 19.0 | -1.1 |
Fiscal Year 2006 | 2,407 | 2,655 | -248 |
% GDP | 17.6 | 19.4 | -1.8 |
Fiscal Year 2005 | 2,154 | 2,472 | -318 |
% GDP | 16.7 | 19.2 | -2.5 |
Total 2005-2008 | 9,653 | 10,839 | -1,186 |
Average % GDP 2005-2008 | 17.3 | 19.5 | -2.1 |
Debt Held by the Public | Billions of Dollars | Percent of GDP | |
2005 | 4,592 | 35.6 | |
2006 | 4,829 | 35.3 | |
2007 | 5,035 | 35.1 | |
2008 | 5,803 | 39.3 | |
2009 | 7,545 | 52.3 | |
2010 | 9,019 | 61.0 | |
2011 | 10,128 | 65.8 | |
2012 | 11,281 | 70.1 | |
2013 | 11,982 | 72.1 |
Source: http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/index.html CBO (2012NovMBR). CBO (2011AugBEO); Office of Management and Budget 2011. Historical Tables. Budget of the US Government Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: OMB; CBO. 2011JanBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Jan. CBO. 2012AugBEO. Budget and Economic Outlook. Washington, DC, Aug 22. CBO. 2012Jan31. Historical budget data. Washington, DC, Jan 31. CBO. 2012NovCDR. Choices for deficit reduction. Washington, DC. Nov. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO. 2013HBDFeb5. Historical budget data—February 2013 baseline projections. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb 5. CBO (2013Aug12). 2013AugHBD. Historical budget data—August 2013. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Aug. CBO, Historical Budget Data—February 2014, Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Feb. CBO, Historical budget data—April 2014 release. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office, Apr.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/current/default.htm
VB Japan. The GDP of Japan grew at 1.0 percent per year on average from 1991 to 2002, with the GDP implicit deflator falling at 0.8 percent per year on average. The average growth rate of Japan’s GDP was 4 percent per year on average from the middle of the 1970s to 1992 (Ito 2004). Low growth in Japan in the 1990s is commonly labeled as “the lost decade” (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 81-115). Table VB-GDP provides yearly growth rates of Japan’s GDP from 1995 to 2013. Growth weakened from 2.7 per cent in 1995 and 1996 to contractions of 1.5 percent in 1999 and 0.4 percent in 2001 and growth rates below 2 percent with exception of 2.3 percent in 2003. Japan’s GDP contracted sharply by 3.7 percent in 2006 and 2.0 percent in 2009. As in most advanced economies, growth was robust at 3.4 percent in 2010 but mediocre at 0.3 percent in 2011 and 0.7 percent in 2013. Japan’s GDP grew 2.3 percent in 2013.
Table VB-GDP, Japan, Yearly Percentage Change of GDP ∆%
Calendar Year | ∆% |
1995 | 2.7 |
1996 | 2.7 |
1997 | 0.1 |
1998 | -1.5 |
1999 | 0.5 |
2000 | 2.0 |
2001 | -0.4 |
2002 | 1.1 |
2003 | 2.3 |
2004 | 1.5 |
2005 | 1.9 |
2006 | 1.8 |
2007 | 1.8 |
2008 | -3.7 |
2009 | -2.0 |
2010 | 3.4 |
2011 | 0.3 |
2012 | 0.7 |
2013 | 2.3 |
Source: Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office
http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html
http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/sna/sokuhou/sokuhou_top.html
Table VB-BOJF provides the forecasts of economic activity and inflation in Japan by the majority of members of the Policy Board of the Bank of Japan, which is part of their Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1404b.pdf). For fiscal 2013, the forecast is of growth of GDP between 2.2 and 2.3 percent, with the all items CPI less fresh food of 0.8 percent (https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1404b.pdf). The critical difference is forecast of the CPI excluding fresh food of 3.0 to 3.5 percent in 2014, 1.9 to 2.8 percent in 2015 and 2.0 to 3.0 in 2016. Consumer price inflation in Japan excluding fresh food was 0.3 percent in Mar 2013 and 1.3 percent in 12 months (http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/cpi/1581.htm). The new monetary policy of the Bank of Japan aims to increase inflation to 2 percent. These forecasts are biannual in Apr and Oct. The Cabinet Office, Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan released on Jan 22, 2013, a “Joint Statement of the Government and the Bank of Japan on Overcoming Deflation and Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130122c.pdf) with the important change of increasing the inflation target of monetary policy from 1 percent to 2 percent:
“The Bank of Japan conducts monetary policy based on the principle that the policy shall be aimed at achieving price stability, thereby contributing to the sound development of the national economy, and is responsible for maintaining financial system stability. The Bank aims to achieve price stability on a sustainable basis, given that there are various factors that affect prices in the short run.
The Bank recognizes that the inflation rate consistent with price stability on a sustainable basis will rise as efforts by a wide range of entities toward strengthening competitiveness and growth potential of Japan's economy make progress. Based on this recognition, the Bank sets the price stability target at 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index.
Under the price stability target specified above, the Bank will pursue monetary easing and aim to achieve this target at the earliest possible time. Taking into consideration that it will take considerable time before the effects of monetary policy permeate the economy, the Bank will ascertain whether there is any significant risk to the sustainability of economic growth, including from the accumulation of financial imbalances.”
The Bank of Japan also provided explicit analysis of its view on price stability in a “Background note regarding the Bank’s thinking on price stability” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/data/rel130123a1.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130123a.htm/). The Bank of Japan also amended “Principal terms and conditions for the Asset Purchase Program” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130122a.pdf): “Asset purchases and loan provision shall be conducted up to the maximum outstanding amounts by the end of 2013. From January 2014, the Bank shall purchase financial assets and provide loans every month, the amount of which shall be determined pursuant to the relevant rules of the Bank.”
Financial markets in Japan and worldwide were shocked by new bold measures of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing” by the Bank of Japan (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The objective of policy is to “achieve the price stability target of 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index (CPI) at the earliest possible time, with a time horizon of about two years” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The main elements of the new policy are as follows:
- Monetary Base Control. Most central banks in the world pursue interest rates instead of monetary aggregates, injecting bank reserves to lower interest rates to desired levels. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has shifted back to monetary aggregates, conducting money market operations with the objective of increasing base money, or monetary liabilities of the government, at the annual rate of 60 to 70 trillion yen. The BOJ estimates base money outstanding at “138 trillion yen at end-2012) and plans to increase it to “200 trillion yen at end-2012 and 270 trillion yen at end 2014” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
- Maturity Extension of Purchases of Japanese Government Bonds. Purchases of bonds will be extended even up to bonds with maturity of 40 years with the guideline of extending the average maturity of BOJ bond purchases from three to seven years. The BOJ estimates the current average maturity of Japanese government bonds (JGB) at around seven years. The BOJ plans to purchase about 7.5 trillion yen per month (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130404d.pdf). Takashi Nakamichi, Tatsuo Ito and Phred Dvorak, wiring on “Bank of Japan mounts bid for revival,” on Apr 4, 2013, published in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323646604578401633067110420.html), find that the limit of maturities of three years on purchases of JGBs was designed to avoid views that the BOJ would finance uncontrolled government deficits.
- Seigniorage. The BOJ is pursuing coordination with the government that will take measures to establish “sustainable fiscal structure with a view to ensuring the credibility of fiscal management” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
- Diversification of Asset Purchases. The BOJ will engage in transactions of exchange traded funds (ETF) and real estate investment trusts (REITS) and not solely on purchases of JGBs. Purchases of ETFs will be at an annual rate of increase of one trillion yen and purchases of REITS at 30 billion yen.
- Bank Lending Facility and Growth Supporting Funding Facility. At the meeting on Feb 18, the Bank of Japan doubled the scale of these lending facilities to prevent their expiration in the near future (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2014/k140218a.pdf).
Table VB-BOJF, Bank of Japan, Forecasts of the Majority of Members of the Policy Board, % Year on Year
Fiscal Year | Real GDP | CPI All Items Less Fresh Food | Excluding Effects of Consumption Tax Hikes |
2013 | |||
Apr 2014 | +2.2 to +2.3 | +0.8 | |
Jan 2014 | +2.5 to +2.9 [+2.7] | +0.7 to +0.9 [+0.7] | |
Oct 2013 | +2.6 to +3.0 [+2.7] | +0.6 to +1.0 [+0.7] | |
Jul 2013 | +2.5 to +3.0 [+2.8] | +0.5 to +0.8 [+0.6] | |
2014 | |||
Apr 2014 | +0.8 to +1.3 | +3.0 to +3.5 | +1.0 to +1.5 |
Jan 2014 | +0.9 to 1.5 [+1.4] | +2.9 to +3.6 [+3.3] | +0.9 to +1.6 [+1.3] |
Oct 2013 | +0.9 to +1.5 [+1.5] | +2.8 to +3.6 [+3.3] | +0.8 to +1.6 [+1.3] |
Jul 2013 | +0.8 to +1.5 [+1.3] | +2.7 to +3.6 [+3.3] | +0.7 to +1.6 [+1.3] |
2015 | |||
Apr 2014 | +1.2 to +1.5 | +1.9 to +2.8 | +1.2 to +2.1 |
Jan 2014 | +1.2 to +1.8 [+1.5] | +1.7 to +2.9 [+2.6] | +1.0 to +2.2 [+1.9] |
Oct 2013 | +1.3 to +1.8 [+1.5] | +1.6 to +2.9 [+2.6] | +0.9 to +2.2 [+1.9] |
Jul 2013 | +1.3 to +1.9 [+1.5] | +1.6 to +2.9 [+2.6] | +0.9 to +2.2 [+1.9] |
2016 | |||
Apr 2014 | +1.0 to +1.5 | +2.0 to +3.0 | +1.3 to +2.3 |
Figures in brackets are the median of forecasts of Policy Board members
Source: Policy Board, Bank of Japan
https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1404b.pdf
The Markit/JMMA Flash Japan Manufacturing PMI Index™ improved with the Flash Japan Manufacturing PMI™ increasing from 49.9 in May to 51.1 in Jun and the Flash Japan Manufacturing Output Index™ increasing from 48.9 in May to 51.8 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3e2cd94bc4564eba933efdcec0db2e5f). New export orders decreased at an unchanged rate. Amy Brownbill, Economist at Markit, finds improving conditions with return to growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3e2cd94bc4564eba933efdcec0db2e5f). Private-sector activity in Japan was in standstill with the Markit Composite Output PMI Index increasing from 49.2 in May to 50.0 in Jun, indicating no change (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e540626b804c494389853be6beefc0f6). The Markit Business Activity Index of Services decreased to 49.0 in Jun from 49.3 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e540626b804c494389853be6beefc0f6). Amy Brownbill, Ecoomist at Markit and author of the report, finds strengthening new orders in services with potential growth ahead (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e540626b804c494389853be6beefc0f6). The Markit/JMMA Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™), seasonally adjusted, increased from 49.9 in May to 51.5 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e5b24eff8cfd489abf44c7f8cb545876). New orders and output increased. Amy Brownbill, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds growth on strengthening demand (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/e5b24eff8cfd489abf44c7f8cb545876).Table JPY provides the country data table for Japan.
Table JPY, Japan, Economic Indicators
Historical GDP and CPI | 1981-2010 Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation 1981-2010 |
Corporate Goods Prices | Jun ∆% 0.2 |
Consumer Price Index | May NSA ∆% 0.4; May 12 months NSA ∆% 3.7 |
Real GDP Growth | IQ2014 ∆%: 1.6 on IVQ2013; IQ2014 SAAR 6.7; |
Employment Report | May Unemployed 2.42 million Change in unemployed since last year: minus 370 thousand |
All Industry Indices | Apr month SA ∆% -4.3 Blog 6/22/14 |
Industrial Production | May SA month ∆%: 0.5 |
Machine Orders | Total May ∆% -30.5 Private ∆%: -19.6 May ∆% Excluding Volatile Orders -19.5 |
Tertiary Index | May month SA ∆% 0.9 |
Wholesale and Retail Sales | May 12 months: |
Family Income and Expenditure Survey | May 12-month ∆% total nominal consumption -3.9, real -8.0 Blog 6/29/14 |
Trade Balance | Exports May 12 months ∆%: minus 2.7 Imports May 12 months ∆% -3.6 Blog 6/22/14 |
Links to blog comments in Table JPY:
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
4/27/14
3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html
2/23/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/squeeze-of-economic-activity-by-carry.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
Japan’s total machinery orders seasonally adjusted in Table VB-1 decreased 30.5 percent seasonally adjusted in May 2014. Private sector orders decreased 19.1 percent and decreased 19.5 percent excluding volatile orders. Orders from overseas decreased 45.9 percent and manufacturing orders decreased 18.6 percent. Government orders increased 22.4 percent.
Table VB-1, Japan, Machinery Orders, Month ∆%, SA
2014 | May 14 | Apr 14 | Mar 14 | Feb 14 |
Total | -30.5 | 34.8 | 4.0 | -3.3 |
Private Sector | -19.6 | -2.1 | 17.3 | -13.7 |
Excluding Volatile Orders | -19.5 | -9.1 | 19.1 | -4.6 |
Manufacturing | -18.6 | -9.4 | 23.7 | -4.6 |
Non-Manufacturing ex Volatile | -17.8 | 0.9 | 8.5 | -5.1 |
Government | 22.4 | 40.5 | -18.5 | 4.4 |
From Overseas | -45.9 | 71.3 | 3.2 | 2.3 |
Through Agencies | 2.2 | 27.3 | -22.0 | -6.5 |
Note: Mfg: manufacturing
Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office
http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html
Total orders for machinery and total private-sector orders excluding volatile orders for Japan are shown in Chart VB-1 of Japan’s Economic and Social Research Institute at the Cabinet Office. The trend of private-sector orders excluding volatile orders was showing recovery from the drop after Mar 2011 because of the earthquake/tsunami. There was reversal of the trend of increase in total orders with recent decreases and an upward movement in the final data point. Fluctuations still prevent detecting longer-term trends but recovery is still evident from the global recession. There was a major setback by the declines in May 2012 shown in the final segment of Chart VB-1 with partial recovery in Jun 2012, decline again in Jul and Aug 2012 and rebound in total orders in Nov reversed in Dec but decline in orders excluding volatile segments with increase in Nov-Dec 2012. The final segment shows growth in Feb-Mar 2013 interrupted by decline in Apr 2013 followed by increase in May 2013. Orders fell again in Jun 2013, rebounding in Jul-Sep 2013 followed by another fall in Oct 2013. Orders recovered in Nov 2013 but declined in Dec 2013. Orders increased in Jan 2014 and decreased in Feb 2014. Orders increased in Mar-Apr 2014, decreasing in May 2014.
Chart VB-1, Japan, Machinery Orders
Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office
http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html
Table VB-2 provides values and percentage changes from a year earlier of Japan’s machinery orders without seasonal adjustment. Total orders of JPY 1,836,142 million in May 2014 are divided between JPY 799,916 million overseas orders, or 43.6 percent of the total, and domestic orders of JPY 944,998 million, or 51.5 percent of the total, with orders through agencies of JPY 91,228 million, or 5.0 percent of the total. Orders through agencies are not in Table VB-2 because of the minor value and appear only in the note to the table. Twelve-month percentages changes in May 2014 deteriorated with decreases of 2.6 percent for total orders and 5.5 percent for domestic orders with decrease of 14.3 percent for orders excluding volatile components. Overseas orders decreased 0.2 percent in 12 months.
able VB-2, Japan, Machinery Orders, 12 Months ∆% and Million Yen, Original Series
Total | Overseas | Domestic | Private ex Volatile | |
Value May 2014 | 1,836,142 | 799,916 | 944,998 | 641,358 |
% Total | 100.0 | 43.6 | 51.5 | 34.9 |
Value May 2013 | 1,885,691 | 801,890 | 1,000,112 | 748,164 |
% Total | 100.0 | 42.5 | 53.0 | 39.7 |
12-month ∆% | -2.6 | -0.2 | -5.5 | -14.3 |
May 2014 | -2.6 | -0.2 | -5.5 | -14.3 |
Apr 2014 | 53.6 | 101.7 | 21.5 | 17.6 |
Mar 2014 | -0.3 | -4.3 | 4.1 | 16.1 |
Feb 2014 | 20.0 | 31.9 | 12.4 | 10.8 |
Jan 2014 | 28.8 | 29.8 | 29.0 | 23.6 |
Dec 2013 | 15.1 | 25.0 | 8.3 | 6.7 |
Nov 2013 | 8.9 | 1.3 | 14.4 | 16.6 |
Oct 2013 | 24.6 | 29.7 | 21.4 | 17.8 |
Sep 2013 | 30.3 | 57.4 | 18.4 | 11.4 |
Aug 2013 | 25.9 | 41.8 | 17.1 | 10.3 |
Jul 2013 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 6.9 | 6.5 |
Jun 2013 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 4.1 | 4.9 |
May 2013 | 18.1 | 17.1 | 20.8 | 16.5 |
Apr 2013 | -4.3 | 6.7 | -9.9 | -1.1 |
Mar 2013 | 11.5 | 27.5 | 3.3 | 2.4 |
Feb 2013 | -14.8 | -21.0 | -10.7 | -11.3 |
Jan 2013 | -24.8 | -36.7 | -11.8 | -9.7 |
Dec 2012 | -12.5 | -24.1 | -3.3 | -3.4 |
Nov 2012 | -8.6 | -9.6 | -8.5 | 0.3 |
Oct 2012 | -6.9 | -12.8 | -2.6 | 1.2 |
Sep 2012 | -7.8 | -18.4 | -1.8 | -7.8 |
Aug 2012 | -18.6 | -31.1 | -10.2 | -6.1 |
Jul 2012 | 2.6 | -1.9 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
Jun 2012 | -10.9 | -11.3 | -12.4 | -9.9 |
May 2012 | -6.8 | -7.0 | -8.6 | 1.0 |
Apr 2012 | 7.5 | -9.6 | 23.0 | 6.6 |
Mar 2012 | 8.1 | -10.0 | 19.0 | -1.1 |
Feb 2012 | -9.3 | -8.9 | -11.2 | 8.9 |
Jan 2012 | 9.8 | 18.3 | 0.5 | 5.7 |
Dec 2011 | 0.8 | 12.6 | -8.5 | 6.3 |
Nov 2011 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 13.5 | 12.5 |
Oct 2011 | -6.8 | -15.6 | -1.0 | 1.5 |
Dec 2010 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 14.1 | -0.6 |
Dec 2009 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 3.6 | -1.9 |
Dec 2008 | -23.3 | -29.4 | -17.4 | -24.7 |
Dec 2007 | 1.3 | 9.8 | -4.3 | -6.4 |
Dec 2006 | 0.8 | 0.9 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
Note: Total machinery orders = overseas + domestic demand + orders through agencies. Orders through agencies in May 2014 were JPY 91,228 million or 5.0 percent of the total and JPY 83,689 or 4.4 percent of the total in May 2013, and are not shown in the table. The data are the original numbers without any adjustments and differ from the seasonally adjusted data.
Source: Japan Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office
http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/index-e.html
The tertiary activity index of Japan increased 0.9 percent SA in May 2014 and decreased 2.5 percent NSA in the 12 months ending in May 2014, as shown in Table VB-3, because of the increase in the tax on value added of consumption in May 2014. The index is showing significant volatility with increases of 0.5 percent in Feb 2013 and 0.5 percent in May 2013 but decreases in multiple months. The indexed increased 2.6 percent in Mar 2014 largely because of anticipation of expenditures to avoid the increase in the tax on consumption in Apr 2014. The index fell 5.7 percent in Apr 2014 because of the increases in the tax on consumption. The tertiary activity index fell 5.2 percent in 2009, growing 1.3 percent in 2010, 0.1 percent in 2011 and 1.4 percent in 2012. The tertiary activity index increased 0.7 percent in 2013.
Table VB-3, Japan, Tertiary Activity Index, ∆%
Month ∆% SA | 12 Months ∆% NSA | |
May 2014 | 0.9 | -2.5 |
Apr | -5.7 | -2.6 |
Mar | 2.6 | 3.2 |
Feb | -0.9 | 0.9 |
Jan | 1.5 | 2.0 |
Dec 2013 | -0.1 | 0.8 |
Nov | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Oct | -0.5 | 0.1 |
Sep | 0.1 | 1.4 |
Aug | 0.2 | 0.8 |
Jul | -0.1 | 1.5 |
Jun | -0.3 | 0.6 |
May | 0.5 | 1.8 |
Apr | -0.1 | 1.5 |
Mar | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Feb | 0.5 | -1.5 |
Jan | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Dec 2012 | 0.2 | -0.1 |
Nov | -0.1 | 1.0 |
Oct | 0.2 | 1.3 |
Sep | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Aug | 0.2 | 0.6 |
Jul | -0.3 | 0.8 |
Jun | 0.0 | 0.8 |
May | 0.5 | 3.1 |
Apr | -0.2 | 2.4 |
Mar | -0.3 | 4.2 |
Feb | 0.2 | 2.4 |
Jan | -0.8 | 0.3 |
Calendar Year | ||
2013 | 0.7 | |
2012 | 1.4 | |
2011 | 0.1 | |
2010 | 1.3 | |
2009 | -5.2 | |
2008 | -1.0 | |
2007 | 1.0 | |
2006 | 1.8 | |
2005 | 1.9 | |
2004 | 1.8 |
Source: Japan, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/index.html
Month and 12-month rates of growth of the tertiary activity index of Japan and components in May 2014 are provided in Table VB-4. Electricity, gas, heat supply and water increased 0.2 percent in May 2014 and decreased 1.8 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Wholesale and retail trade increased 3.7 percent in May 2014, rebounding from decline of 14.6 percent in the month of Apr because of the increase in the tax on value added of consumption. The index of wholesale and retail trade decreased 4.2 percent in 12 months ending in May 2014. Information and communications increased 0.8 percent in May and increased 0.2 percent in 12 months.
Table VB-4, Japan, Tertiary Index and Components, Month and 12-Month Percentage Changes ∆%
May 2014 | Weight | Month ∆% SA | 12 Months ∆% NSA |
Tertiary Index | 10,000.0 | 0.9 | -2.5 |
Electricity, Gas, Heat Supply & Water | 372.9 | 0.2 | -1.8 |
Information & Communications | 951.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
Wholesale & Retail Trade | 2,641.2 | 3.7 | -4.2 |
Finance & Insurance | 971.1 | -0.3 | -8.8 |
Real Estate & Goods Rental & Leasing | 903.4 | 0.6 | -1.5 |
Scientific Research, Professional & Technical Services | 551.3 | -6.7 | -8.4 |
Accommodations, Eating, Drinking | 496.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
Living-Related, Personal, Amusement Services | 552.7 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
Learning Support | 116.9 | 0.1 | -0.6 |
Medical, Health Care, Welfare | 921.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
Miscellaneous ex Government | 626.7 | 2.2 | -3.7 |
Source: Japan, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)
http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/index.html
VC China. China estimates an index of nonmanufacturing purchasing managers based on a sample of 1200 nonmanufacturing enterprises across the country (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Table CIPMNM provides this index and components. The total index increased from 55.7 in Jan 2011 to 58.0 in Mar 2012, decreasing to 53.9 in Aug 2013. The index decreased from 56.0 in Nov 2013 to 54.6 in Dec 2013, easing to 53.4 in Jan 2014. The index decreased to 55.0 in Jun 2014. The index of new orders increased from 52.2 in Jan 2012 to 54.3 in Dec 2012 but fell to 50.1 in May 2013, barely above the neutral frontier of 50.0. The index of new orders stabilized at 51.0 in Nov-Dec 2013, easing to 50.9 in Jan 2014. The index of new orders decreased to 50.7 in Jun 2014.
Table CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted
Total Index | New Orders | Interm. | Subs Prices | Exp | |
Jun 2014 | 55.0 | 50.7 | 56.0 | 50.8 | 60.4 |
May | 55.5 | 52.7 | 54.5 | 49.0 | 60.7 |
Apr | 54.8 | 50.8 | 52.4 | 49.4 | 61.5 |
Mar | 54.5 | 50.8 | 52.8 | 49.5 | 61.5 |
Feb | 55.0 | 51.4 | 52.1 | 49.0 | 59.9 |
Jan | 53.4 | 50.9 | 54.5 | 50.1 | 58.1 |
Dec 2013 | 54.6 | 51.0 | 56.9 | 52.0 | 58.7 |
Nov | 56.0 | 51.0 | 54.8 | 49.5 | 61.3 |
Oct | 56.3 | 51.6 | 56.1 | 51.4 | 60.5 |
Sep | 55.4 | 53.4 | 56.7 | 50.6 | 60.1 |
Aug | 53.9 | 50.9 | 57.1 | 51.2 | 62.9 |
Jul | 54.1 | 50.3 | 58.2 | 52.4 | 63.9 |
Jun | 53.9 | 50.3 | 55.0 | 50.6 | 61.8 |
May | 54.3 | 50.1 | 54.4 | 50.7 | 62.9 |
Apr | 54.5 | 50.9 | 51.1 | 47.6 | 62.5 |
Mar | 55.6 | 52.0 | 55.3 | 50.0 | 62.4 |
Feb | 54.5 | 51.8 | 56.2 | 51.1 | 62.7 |
Jan | 56.2 | 53.7 | 58.2 | 50.9 | 61.4 |
Dec 2012 | 56.1 | 54.3 | 53.8 | 50.0 | 64.6 |
Nov | 55.6 | 53.2 | 52.5 | 48.4 | 64.6 |
Oct | 55.5 | 51.6 | 58.1 | 50.5 | 63.4 |
Sep | 53.7 | 51.8 | 57.5 | 51.3 | 60.9 |
Aug | 56.3 | 52.7 | 57.6 | 51.2 | 63.2 |
Jul | 55.6 | 53.2 | 49.7 | 48.7 | 63.9 |
Jun | 56.7 | 53.7 | 52.1 | 48.6 | 65.5 |
May | 55.2 | 52.5 | 53.6 | 48.5 | 65.4 |
Apr | 56.1 | 52.7 | 57.9 | 50.3 | 66.1 |
Mar | 58.0 | 53.5 | 60.2 | 52.0 | 66.6 |
Feb | 57.3 | 52.7 | 59.0 | 51.2 | 63.8 |
Jan | 55.7 | 52.2 | 58.2 | 51.1 | 65.3 |
Notes: Interm.: Intermediate; Subs: Subscription; Exp: Business Expectations
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Chart CIPMNM provides China’s nonmanufacturing purchasing managers’ index. The index fell from 56.1 in Dec 2012 to 53.9 in Jun 2013. The index recovered to 56.3 in Oct 2013, decreasing marginally to 54.6 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 53.4 in Jan 2014, easing to 55.0 in Jun 2014.
Chart CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Table CIPMMFG provides the index of purchasing managers of manufacturing seasonally adjusted of the National Bureau of Statistics of China. The general index (IPM) rose from 50.5 in Jan 2012 to 53.3 in Apr 2012, falling to 49.2 in Aug 2012, rebounding to 50.6 in Dec 2012. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013, barely above the neutral frontier at 50.0, recovering to 51.4 in Nov 2013 but falling to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.5 in Jan 2014 and 51.0 in Jun 2014. The index of new orders fell from 54.5 in Apr 2012 to 51.2 in Dec 2012. The index of new orders fell from 52.3 in Nov 2013 to 52.0 in Dec 2013. The index fell to 50.9 in Jan 2014 and 52.8 in Jun 2014.
Table CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted
IPM | PI | NOI | INV | EMP | SDEL | |
Jun 2014 | 51.0 | 53.0 | 52.8 | 48.0 | 48.6 | 50.5 |
May | 50.8 | 52.8 | 52.3 | 48.0 | 48.2 | 50.3 |
Apr | 50.4 | 52.5 | 51.2 | 48.1 | 48.3 | 50.1 |
Mar | 50.3 | 52.7 | 50.6 | 47.8 | 48.3 | 49.8 |
Feb | 50.2 | 52.6 | 50.5 | 47.4 | 48.0 | 49.9 |
Jan | 50.5 | 53.0 | 50.9 | 47.8 | 48.2 | 49.8 |
Dec 2013 | 51.0 | 53.9 | 52.0 | 47.6 | 48.7 | 50.5 |
Nov | 51.4 | 54.5 | 52.3 | 47.8 | 49.6 | 50.6 |
Oct | 51.4 | 54.4 | 52.5 | 48.6 | 49.2 | 50.8 |
Sep | 51.1 | 52.9 | 52.8 | 48.5 | 49.1 | 50.8 |
Aug | 51.0 | 52.6 | 52.4 | 48.0 | 49.3 | 50.4 |
Jul | 50.3 | 52.4 | 50.6 | 47.6 | 49.1 | 50.1 |
Jun | 50.1 | 52.0 | 50.4 | 47.4 | 48.7 | 50.3 |
May | 50.8 | 53.3 | 51.8 | 47.6 | 48.8 | 50.8 |
Apr | 50.6 | 52.6 | 51.7 | 47.5 | 49.0 | 50.8 |
Mar | 50.9 | 52.7 | 52.3 | 47.5 | 49.8 | 51.1 |
Feb | 50.1 | 51.2 | 50.1 | 49.5 | 47.6 | 48.3 |
Jan | 50.4 | 51.3 | 51.6 | 50.1 | 47.8 | 50.0 |
Dec 2012 | 50.6 | 52.0 | 51.2 | 47.3 | 49.0 | 48.8 |
Nov | 50.6 | 52.5 | 51.2 | 47.9 | 48.7 | 49.9 |
Oct | 50.2 | 52.1 | 50.4 | 47.3 | 49.2 | 50.1 |
Sep | 49.8 | 51.3 | 49.8 | 47.0 | 48.9 | 49.5 |
Aug | 49.2 | 50.9 | 48.7 | 45.1 | 49.1 | 50.0 |
Jul | 50.1 | 51.8 | 49.0 | 48.5 | 49.5 | 49.0 |
Jun | 50.2 | 52.0 | 49.2 | 48.2 | 49.7 | 49.1 |
May | 50.4 | 52.9 | 49.8 | 45.1 | 50.5 | 49.0 |
Apr | 53.3 | 57.2 | 54.5 | 48.5 | 51.0 | 49.6 |
Mar | 53.1 | 55.2 | 55.1 | 49.5 | 51.0 | 48.9 |
Feb | 51.0 | 53.8 | 51.0 | 48.8 | 49.5 | 50.3 |
Jan | 50.5 | 53.6 | 50.4 | 49.7 | 47.1 | 49.7 |
IPM: Index of Purchasing Managers; PI: Production Index; NOI: New Orders Index; EMP: Employed Person Index; SDEL: Supplier Delivery Time Index
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
China estimates the manufacturing index of purchasing managers on the basis of a sample of 820 enterprises (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Chart CIPMMFG provides the manufacturing index of purchasing managers. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013. The index decreased from 51.4 in Nov 2013 to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index increased to 51.0 in Jun 2014.
Chart CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Cumulative growth of China’s GDP in IQ2014 relative to the same period in 2013 was 7.4 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDP. Secondary industry accounts for 44.9 percent of GDP in IQ2014. In IQ2014, industry alone accounts for 39.9 percent of GDP and construction with the remaining 5.0 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 49.0 percent of cumulative GDP in IQ2014 and primary industry for 6.1 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is shifting to lower growth rates with improvement in living standards. The bottom block of Table VC-GDP provides quarter-on-quarter growth rates of GDP and their annual equivalent. China’s GDP growth decelerated significantly from annual equivalent 10.4 percent in IIQ2011 to 7.4 percent in IVQ2011 and 5.7 percent in IQ2012, rebounding to 8.7 percent in IIQ2012, 8.2 percent in IIIQ2012 and 7.8 percent in IVQ2012. Annual equivalent growth in IQ2013 fell to 6.1 percent and to 7.4 percent in IIQ2013, rebounding to 9.5 percent in IIIQ2013. Annual equivalent growth was 7.0 percent in IVQ2013, declining to 5.7 percent in IQ2014.
Table VC-GDP, China, Quarterly Growth of GDP, Current CNY 100 Million and Inflation Adjusted ∆%
Cumulative GDP IQ2014 | Value Current CNY Billion | 2014 Year-on-Year Constant Prices ∆% |
GDP | 12,821.3 | 7.4 |
Primary Industry | 777.6 | 3.5 |
Farming | 777.6 | 3.5 |
Secondary Industry | 5,758.7 | 7.3 |
Industry | 5,121.7 | 7.1 |
Construction | 637.0 | 9.3 |
Tertiary Industry | 6,285.0 | 7.8 |
Transport, Storage, Post | 691.7 | 5.7 |
Wholesale, Retail Trades | 1,298.2 | 9.8 |
Hotel & Catering Services | 266.8 | 5.9 |
Financial Intermediation | 929.1 | 9.5 |
Real Estate | 880.5 | 3.0 |
Other | 2,218.7 | 8.9 |
Growth in Quarter Relative to Prior Quarter | ∆% on Prior Quarter | ∆% Annual Equivalent |
2014 | ||
IQ2014 | 1.4 | 5.7 |
2013 | ||
IVQ2013 | 1.7 | 7.0 |
IIIQ2013 | 2.3 | 9.5 |
IIQ2013 | 1.8 | 7.4 |
IQ2013 | 1.5 | 6.1 |
2012 | ||
IVQ2012 | 1.9 | 7.8 |
IIIQ2012 | 2.0 | 8.2 |
IIQ2012 | 2.1 | 8.7 |
IQ2012 | 1.4 | 5.7 |
2011 | ||
IVQ2011 | 1.8 | 7.4 |
IIIQ2011 | 2.2 | 9.1 |
IIQ2011 | 2.5 | 10.4 |
IQ2011 | 2.3 | 9.5 |
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Growth of China’s GDP in IQ2014 relative to the same period in 2013 was 7.4 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDPA. Secondary industry accounts for 44.9 percent of GDP of which industry alone for 39.9 percent in cumulative IQ2014 and construction with the remaining 5.0 percent. Tertiary industry accounts for 49.0 percent of GDP in cumulative IQ2014 and primary industry for 6.1 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The strategy is changing to lower growth rates while improving living standards. GDP growth decelerated from 12.1 percent in IQ2010 and 11.2 percent in IIQ2010 to 7.7 percent in IQ2013, 7.5 percent in IIQ2013 and 7.8 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP grew 7.4 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier and 1.7 percent relative to IIIQ2013, which is equivalent to 7.0 percent per year. GDP grew 7.4 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier and 1.4 percent in IQ2014 that is equivalent to 5.7 percent per year.
Table VC-GDPA, China, Growth Rate of GDP, ∆% Relative to a Year Earlier and ∆% Relative to Prior Quarter
IQ 2013 | IIQ 2013 | IIIQ 2013 | IVQ 2013 | IQ 2014 | ||||
GDP | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.4 | |||
Primary Industry | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | |||
Secondary Industry | 7.8 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.3 | |||
Tertiary Industry | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 7.1 | |||
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | |||
IQ 2011 | IIQ 2011 | IIIQ 2011 | IVQ 2011 | IQ 2012 | IIQ 2012 | IIIQ 2012 | IVQ 2012 | |
GDP | 9.7 | 9.5 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.9 |
Primary Industry | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Secondary Industry | 11.1 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 8.1 |
Tertiary Industry | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8.1 |
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
IQ 2010 | IIQ 2010 | IIIQ 2010 | IVQ 2010 | |||||
GDP | 12.1 | 11.2 | 10.7 | 12.1 | ||||
Primary Industry | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 | ||||
Secondary Industry | 14.5 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 14.5 | ||||
Tertiary Industry | 10.5 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 10.5 |
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Chart VC-GDP of the National Bureau of Statistics of China provides annual value and growth rates of GDP. China’s GDP growth in 2013 is still high at 7.7 percent but at the lowest rhythm in five years.
Chart VC-GDP, China, Gross Domestic Product, Million Yuan and ∆%, 2009-2013
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Chart VC-FXR provides China’s foreign exchange reserves. FX reserves grew from $2399.2 billion in 2009 to $3821.3 billion in 2013 driven by high growth of China’s trade surplus.
Chart VC-FXR, China, Foreign Exchange Reserves, 2009-2013
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english
Chart VC-Trade provides China’s imports and exports. Exports exceeded imports with resulting large trade balance surpluses that increased foreign exchange reserves.
Chart VC-Trade, China, Imports and Exports of Goods, 2009-2013, $100 Million US Dollars
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english
The HSBC Flash China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) compiled by Markit (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/66db1e58cfc3406d9d959c694960354d) is improving. The overall Flash HSBC China Manufacturing PMI™ increased from 49.4 in May to 50.8 in Jun, while the Flash HSBC China Manufacturing Output Index increased from 49.8 in May to 51.8 in Jun, indicating moderate expansion. Exports orders changed direction to expansion at slower rate. Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds that the index is consistent with manufacturing improving (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/66db1e58cfc3406d9d959c694960354d). The HSBC China Services PMI™, compiled by Markit, shows improvement in business activity in China with the HSBC Composite Output, combining manufacturing and services, increasing from 50.2 in May to 52.4 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3d11adec59894b0cb77b2455a702ee13). Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds need of policies in consolidating growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3d11adec59894b0cb77b2455a702ee13). The HSBC China Services Business Activity index increased from 50.7 in May to 53.1 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3d11adec59894b0cb77b2455a702ee13). Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China & Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds that services continue improving (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3d11adec59894b0cb77b2455a702ee13). The HSBC Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™), compiled by Markit, increased to 50.7 in Jun from 49.4 in May, indicating marginally improving manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/2b0421f80f994ed2ad934d837d29db03). New export orders and total new orders increased. Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds strengthening demand in China with possible need of policy enhancement (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/2b0421f80f994ed2ad934d837d29db03). Table CNY provides the country data table for China.
Table CNY, China, Economic Indicators
Price Indexes for Industry | Jun 12-month ∆%: minus 1.1 Jun month ∆%: -0.2 |
Consumer Price Index | Jun month ∆%: -0.1 Jun 12 months ∆%: 2.3 |
Value Added of Industry | May month ∆%: 0.71 Jan-May 2014/Jan-Apr 2013 ∆%: 8.7 |
GDP Growth Rate | Year IQ2014 ∆%: 7.4 |
Investment in Fixed Assets | Total Jan-May 2013 ∆%: 17.2 Real estate development: 14.7 |
Retail Sales | May month ∆%: 1.16 Jan-May ∆%: 12.1 |
Trade Balance | Jun balance $31.6 billion Cumulative Jan-Jun: $102.7 billion |
Links to blog comments in Table CNY:
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
4/20/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/imf-view-world-inflation-waves-squeeze.html
Table VC-7 provides China’s exports, imports, trade balance and 12-month percentage changes from Dec 2010 to Jun 2014. China’s trade surplus decreased to $31.6 billion in Jun 2014 with growth of exports of 7.2 percent and of 5.5 percent of imports. The trade surplus of China increased to $35.92 billion in May 2014 with growth of exports of 7.0 percent relative to a year earlier and decline of imports by 1.6 percent. The trade surplus of China increased to $18.45 billion in Apr 2014 with growth of exports of 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier and of imports of 0.8 percent. China had a trade surplus of $7.71 billion in Mar 2014 with exports declining 6.6 percent in 12 months and imports decreasing 11.3 percent. China had a rare trade deficit of $22.99 billion in Feb 2014 with exports decreasing 18.1 percent in 12 months while imports increased 10.1 percent. Exports increased 10.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 2014 and imports 10.0 percent for trade surplus of $31.87 billion. Exports increased 4.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013 while imports increased 8.3 percent for trade surplus of $25.64 billion. Exports surged 12.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013 while imports increased 5.3 percent for trade surplus of $33.8 billion. Exports rebounded with growth of 5.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013 while imports increased 7.6 percent for trade surplus of $31.11 billion. Exports fell 0.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2013 while imports increased 7.4 for reduction of the trade surplus to $15.2 billion. Markets reacted positively to China’s trade data in Aug 2013 with exports growing 7.2 percent relative to a year earlier and imports 7.0 percent for increasing trade surplus of $28.52. Exports increased 5.1 in Jul 2013 and imports 10.9 percent for trade surplus of $17.82 billion. Exports fell 3.1 percent in Jun 2013 and imports declined 0.7 percent. The trade surplus reached $27.12 billion. Exports increased 1.0 percent in May 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports fell 0.3 percent with trade surplus of $20.43 billion. Exports increased 14.7 percent in Apr 2013 relative to a year earlier and imports 16.8 percent for trade surplus of $18.16 billion. Exports increased 10.0 percent in Mar 2013 relative to a year earlier and imports increased 14.1 percent for trade deficit of $0.88 billion. Exports increased 21.8 percent in Feb 2013 relative to a year earlier and imports fell 15.2 percent for trade surplus of $15.25 billion. China’s trade growth was stronger in Jan 2013 with growth of exports of 25.0 percent in 12 months and of imports of 28.8 percent for trade surplus of $29.15 billion. China’s trade growth strengthened in Dec 2012 with growth in 12 months of exports of 14.1 percent and of imports of 6.0 percent. China’s trade growth weakened again in Nov 2012 with growth of exports of 2.9 percent and no change in imports. China’s trade growth rebounded with growth of exports in 12 months of 11.6 percent in Oct 2012 and 9.9 percent in Sep 2012 after 2.7 percent in Aug 2012 and 1.0 percent in Jul 2012 while imports grew 2.4 percent in both Sep and Oct 2012, stagnating in Nov 2012. As a result, the monthly trade surplus increased from $25.2 billion in Jul 2012 to $31.9 billion in Oct 2012, declining to $19.6 billion in Nov 2012 but increasing to $31.62 billion in Dec 2012. China’s trade growth rebounded in Oct 2012 with growth of exports of 11.6 percent in 12 months and 2.4 percent for imports and trade surplus of $31.9 billion. The number that caught attention in financial markets was growth of 1.0 percent in exports in the 12 months ending in Jul 2012. Imports were also weak, growing 4.7 percent in 12 months ending in Jul 2012. Exports increased 11.3 percent in Jun 2012 relative to a year earlier while imports grew 6.3 percent. The rate of growth of exports fell to 4.9 percent in Apr 2012 relative to a year earlier and imports increased 0.3 percent but export growth was 15.3 percent in May and imports increased 12.7 percent. China reversed the large trade deficit of USD 31.48 billion in Feb 2012 with a surplus of $5.35 billion in Mar 2012, $18.42 billion in Apr 2012, $18.7 billion in May 2012, $31.7 billion in Jun 2012, $25.2 billion in Jul 2012, $26.7 billion in Aug 2012, $27.7 billion in Sep 2012, $31.9 billion in Oct 2012 and $19.6 billion in Nov 2012. Exports fell 0.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 2012 while imports fell 15.3 percent for a still sizeable trade surplus of $27.3 billion. In Feb 2012, exports increased 18.4 percent while imports jumped 39.6 percent for a sizeable deficit of $31.48 billion. There are distortions from the Lunar New Year holidays.
Table VC-1, China, Exports, Imports and Trade Balance USD Billion and ∆%
Exports | ∆% Relative | Imports USD | ∆% Relative | Balance | |
Jun 2014 | 186.8 | 7.2 | 155.2 | 5.5 | 31.6 |
May | 195.47 | 7.0 | 159.55 | -1.6 | 35.92 |
Apr | 188.54 | 0.9 | 170.09 | 0.8 | 18.45 |
Mar | 170.11 | -6.6 | 162.40 | -11.3 | 7.71 |
Feb | 114.09 | -18.1 | 137.08 | 10.1 | -22.99 |
Jan | 207.13 | 10.6 | 175.26 | 10.0 | 31.87 |
Dec 2013 | 207.74 | 4.3 | 182.10 | 8.3 | 25.64 |
Nov | 202.20 | 12.7 | 168.40 | 5.3 | 33.8 |
Oct | 185.41 | 5.6 | 154.30 | 7.6 | 31.11 |
Sep | 185.64 | -0.3 | 170.44 | 7.4 | 15.21 |
Aug | 190.61 | 7.2 | 162.09 | 7.0 | 28.52 |
Jul | 185.99 | 5.1 | 168.17 | 10.9 | 17.82 |
Jun | 174.32 | -3.1 | 147.19 | -0.7 | 27.12 |
May | 182.77 | 1.0 | 162.34 | -0.3 | 20.43 |
Apr | 187.06 | 14.7 | 168.90 | 16.8 | 18.16 |
Mar | 182.19 | 10.0 | 183.07 | 14.1 | -0.88 |
Feb | 139.37 | 21.8 | 124.12 | -15.2 | 15.25 |
Jan | 187.37 | 25.0 | 158.22 | 28.8 | 29.15 |
Dec 2012 | 199.23 | 14.1 | 167.61 | 6.0 | 31.62 |
Nov | 179.38 | 2.9 | 159.75 | 0.0 | 19.63 |
Oct | 175.57 | 11.6 | 143.58 | 2.4 | 31.99 |
Sep | 186.35 | 9.9 | 158.68 | 2.4 | 27.67 |
Aug | 177.97 | 2.7 | 151.31 | -2.6 | 26.66 |
Jul | 176.94 | 1.0 | 151.79 | 4.7 | 25.15 |
Jun | 180.20 | 11.3 | 148.48 | 6.3 | 31.72 |
May | 181.14 | 15.3 | 162.44 | 12.7 | 18.70 |
Apr | 163.25 | 4.9 | 144.83 | 0.3 | 18.42 |
Mar | 165.66 | 8.9 | 160.31 | 5.3 | 5.35 |
Feb | 114.47 | 18.4 | 145.95 | 39.6 | -31.48 |
Jan | 149.94 | -0.5 | 122.66 | -15.3 | 27.28 |
Dec 2011 | 174.72 | 13.4 | 158.20 | 11.8 | 16.52 |
Nov | 174.46 | 13.8 | 159.94 | 22.1 | 14.53 |
Oct | 157.49 | 15.9 | 140.46 | 28.7 | 17.03 |
Sep | 169.67 | 17.1 | 155.16 | 20.9 | 14.51 |
Aug | 173.32 | 24.5 | 155.56 | 30.2 | 17.76 |
Jul | 175.13 | 20.4 | 143.64 | 22.9 | 31.48 |
Jun | 161.98 | 17.9 | 139.71 | 19.3 | 22.27 |
May | 157.16 | 19.4 | 144.11 | 28.4 | 13.05 |
Apr | 155.69 | 29.9 | 144.26 | 21.8 | 11.42 |
Mar | 152.20 | 35.8 | 152.06 | 27.3 | 0.14 |
Feb | 96.74 | 2.4 | 104.04 | 19.4 | -7.31 |
Jan | 150.73 | 37.7 | 144.27 | 51.0 | 6.46 |
Dec 2010 | 154.15 | 17.9 | 141.07 | 25.6 | 13.08 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China
http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/statistic/BriefStatistics/
Table VC-8 provides cumulative exports, imports and the trade balance of China together with percentage growth of exports and imports relative to a year earlier. Exports increased 0.9 percent in Jan-Jun 2014 relative to a year earlier and imports increased 1.5 percent for cumulative surplus of $102.7 billion. Exports fell 0.4 percent in Jan-May 2014 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 0.8 percent for cumulative surplus of $71.11 billion. Exports fell 2.3 percent in Jan-Apr 2014 relative to the same period a year earlier and imports increased 1.5 percent for cumulative trade surplus of $35.19 billion.
Exports fell 3.4 percent in Jan-Mar 2014 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 1.6 percent for cumulative surplus of $16.74 billion. Exports fell 1.6 percent and imports increased 10.0 percent for cumulative surplus of $8.88 billion in Jan-Feb 2014. Exports increased 10.6 percent in Jan 2014 and imports 10.0 percent for cumulative surplus of $31.87 billion. Exports increased 7.9 percent in Jan-Dec 2013 relative to the same period a year earlier while imports increased 7.3 percent for cumulative surplus of $259.75 billion. Exports grew 8.3 percent in Jan-Nov 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 7.1 percent for cumulative surplus of $234.15 billion. Exports grew 7.8 percent in Jan-Oct 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports grew 7.3 percent for cumulative trade surplus of $200.46 billion. Exports increased 8.0 percent in Jan-Sep 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 7.3 percent for cumulative surplus of $169.36 billion. Exports increased 9.2 percent in in Jan-Aug 2013 relative to a year earlier and imports 7.3 percent for trade surplus of $154.21 billion. Exports grew 9.5 percent in Jul 2013 relative to a year earlier and imports 7.3 percent with cumulative surplus of $125.71 billion. Exports increased 10.4 percent cumulatively in Jun 2013 and imports 6.7 for cumulative surplus of $107.95 billion. Exports increased 13.5 percent in Jan-May 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 8.2 percent for cumulative surplus of $80.87 billion. Exports increased 17.4 percent in Jan-Apr 2012 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 10.6 percent for cumulative surplus of $60.98 billion. Exports increased 18.4 percent in Jan-Mar 2013 relative to a year earlier while imports increased 8.4 percent for cumulative surplus of $43.07 billion. Cumulative exports in Jan-Feb 2013 grew 23.6 percent relative to a year earlier and imports 5.0 percent for trade surplus of $44.15 billion. There is strong beginning of 2013 with trade surplus of $29.15 in Jan 2013 and growth of exports of 25.0 percent and imports of 28.8 percent. The trade balance of $231.1 billion in 2012 is stronger than the trade balance of $155.14 billion in 2011. The trade balance in 2011 of $155.14 billion is lower than those from 2008 to 2010. China’s trade balance reached $231.1 billion in Jan-Dec 2012 with cumulative growth of exports of 7.9 percent and 4.3 percent of imports, which is much lower than 20.3 percent for exports and 24.9 percent for imports in 2011 and 31.3 percent for exports and 38.7 percent for imports in 2010. There is a rare cumulative deficit of $4.2 billion in Feb 2012 reversed to a small surplus in Mar 2012 and a higher surplus of $19.3 billion in Apr 2012, increasing to $37.9 billion in May, $68.9 billion in Jun 2012, $94.1 billion in Jul 2012, $120.6 billion in Aug 2012, $148.3 billion in Sep 2012, $180.24 billion in Oct 2012, $199.54 billion in Nov 2012 and $231.1 billion in Dec 2012. More observations are required to detect trends of Chinese trade.
Table VC-2, China, Year to Date Exports, Imports and Trade Balance USD Billion and ∆%
Exports | ∆% Relative | Imports USD | ∆% Relative | Balance | |
Jun 2014 | 1062.1 | 0.9 | 959.4 | 1.5 | 102.7 |
May | 875.32 | -0.4 | 804.21 | 0.8 | 71.11 |
Apr | 679.85 | -2.3 | 644.66 | 1.5 | 35.19 |
Mar | 491.31 | -3.4 | 474.57 | 1.6 | 16.74 |
Feb | 321.23 | -1.6 | 312.35 | 10.0 | 8.88 |
Jan | 207.13 | 10.6 | 175.26 | 10.0 | 31.87 |
Dec 2013 | 2210.04 | 7.9 | 1950.29 | 7.3 | 259.75 |
Nov | 2002.32 | 8.3 | 1768.17 | 7.1 | 234.15 |
Oct | 1800.21 | 7.8 | 1599.75 | 7.3 | 200.46 |
Sep | 1614.86 | 8.0 | 1445.50 | 7.3 | 169.36 |
Aug | 1429.26 | 9.2 | 1275.05 | 7.3 | 154.21 |
Jul | 1238.73 | 9.5 | 1113.02 | 7.3 | 125.71 |
Jun | 1052.82 | 10.4 | 944.87 | 6.7 | 107.95 |
May | 878.56 | 13.5 | 797.69 | 8.2 | 80.87 |
Apr | 695.87 | 17.4 | 634.88 | 10.6 | 60.98 |
Mar | 508.87 | 18.4 | 465.80 | 8.4 | 43.07 |
Feb | 326.73 | 23.6 | 282.58 | 5.0 | 44.15 |
Jan | 187.37 | 25.0 | 158.22 | 28.8 | 29.15 |
Dec 2012 | 2048.93 | 7.9 | 1817.83 | 4.3 | 231.11 |
Nov | 1849.91 | 7.3 | 1650.37 | 4.1 | 199.54 |
Oct | 1670.90 | 7.8 | 1490.67 | 4.6 | 180.24 |
Sep | 1495.39 | 7.4 | 1347.08 | 4.8 | 148.31 |
Aug | 1309.11 | 7.1 | 1188.51 | 5.1 | 120.61 |
Jul | 1131.24 | 7.8 | 1037.14 | 6.4 | 94.10 |
Jun | 954.38 | 9.2 | 885.46 | 6.7 | 68.91 |
May | 774.40 | 8.7 | 736.49 | 6.7 | 37.92 |
Apr | 593.24 | 6.9 | 573.94 | 5.1 | 19.3 |
Mar | 430.02 | 7.6 | 429.36 | 6.6 | 0.66 |
Feb | 264.40 | 6.9 | 268.64 | 7.7 | -4.24 |
Jan | 149.94 | -0.5 | 122.66 | -15.3 | 27.28 |
Dec 2011 | 1,898.60 | 20.3 | 1,743.46 | 24.9 | 155.14 |
Nov | 1,724.01 | 21.1 | 1585.61 | 26.4 | 138.40 |
Oct | 1,549.71 | 22.0 | 1,425.68 | 26.9 | 124.03 |
Sep | 1,392.27 | 22.7 | 1,285.17 | 26.7 | 107.10 |
Aug | 1,222.63 | 23.6 | 1,129.90 | 27.5 | 92.73 |
Jul | 1,049.38 | 23.4 | 973.17 | 26.9 | 76.21 |
Jun | 874.3 | 24.0 | 829.37 | 27.6 | 44.93 |
May | 712.37 | 25.5 | 689.41 | 29.4 | 22.96 |
Apr | 555.30 | 27.4 | 545.02 | 29.6 | 10.28 |
Mar | 399.64 | 26.5 | 400.66 | 32.6 | -1.02 |
Feb | 247.47 | 21.3 | 248.36 | 36.0 | -0.89 |
Jan | 150.7 | 37.7 | 144.27 | 51.0 | 6.46 |
Dec 2010 | 1577.93 | 31.3 | 1394.83 | 38.7 | 183.10 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China
http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/statistic/BriefStatistics/
VD Euro Area. Table VD-EUR provides yearly growth rates of the combined GDP of the members of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro area since 1996. Growth was very strong at 3.3 percent in 2006 and 3.0 percent in 2007. The global recession had strong impact with growth of only 0.4 percent in 2008 and decline of 4.4 percent in 2009. Recovery was at lower growth rates of 2.0 percent in 2010 and 1.6 percent in 2011. EUROSTAT estimates growth of GDP of the euro area of minus 0.7 percent in 2012 and minus 0.4 percent in 2013 but 1.1 percent in 2014 and 1.7 percent in 2015.
Table VD-EUR, Euro Area, Yearly Percentage Change of Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices, Unemployment and GDP ∆%
Year | HICP ∆% | Unemployment | GDP ∆% |
1999 | 1.2 | 9.6 | 2.9 |
2000 | 2.2 | 8.8 | 3.8 |
2001 | 2.4 | 8.2 | 2.0 |
2002 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 0.9 |
2003 | 2.1 | 9.0 | 0.7 |
2004 | 2.2 | 9.2 | 2.2 |
2005 | 2.2 | 9.1 | 1.7 |
2006 | 2.2 | 8.4 | 3.3 |
2007 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 3.0 |
2008 | 3.3 | 7.6 | 0.4 |
2009 | 0.3 | 9.6 | -4.5 |
2010 | 1.6 | 10.1 | 1.9 |
2011 | 2.7 | 10.1 | 1.6 |
2012 | 2.5 | 11.3 | -0.7 |
2013* | 1.3 | 12.0 | -0.4 |
2014* | 1.1 | ||
2015* | 1.7 |
*EUROSTAT forecast Source: EUROSTAT
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
The GDP of the euro area in 2012 in current US dollars in the dataset of the World Economic Outlook (WEO) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is $12,199.1 billion or 16.9 percent of world GDP of $72,216.4 billion (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx). The sum of the GDP of France $2613.9 billion with the GDP of Germany of $3429.5 billion, Italy of $2014.1 billion and Spain $1323.5 billion is $9381.0 billion or 76.9 percent of total euro area GDP and 13.0 percent of World GDP. The four largest economies account for slightly more than three quarters of economic activity of the euro area. Table VD-EUR1 is constructed with the dataset of EUROSTAT, providing growth rates of the euro area as a whole and of the largest four economies of Germany, France, Italy and Spain annually from 1996 to 2011 with the estimate of 2012 and forecasts for 2013, 2014 and 2015 by EUROSTAT. The impact of the global recession on the overall euro area economy and on the four largest economies was quite strong. There was sharp contraction in 2009 and growth rates have not rebounded to earlier growth with exception of Germany in 2010 and 2011.
Table VD-EUR1, Euro Area, Real GDP Growth Rate, ∆%
Euro Area | Germany | France | Italy | Spain | |
2015* | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
2014* | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
2013* | -0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | -1.9 | -1.2 |
2012 | -0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | -2.4 | -1.6 |
2011 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
2010 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | -0.2 |
2009 | -4.5 | -5.1 | -3.1 | -5.5 | -3.8 |
2008 | 0.4 | 1.1 | -0.1 | -1.2 | 0.9 |
2007 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 3.5 |
2006 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4.1 |
2005 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 3.6 |
2004 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 3.3 |
2003 | 0.7 | -0.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 3.1 |
2002 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.7 |
2001 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 3.7 |
2000 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 |
1999 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 4.7 |
1998 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.5 |
1997 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.9 |
1996 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.5 |
Source: EUROSTAT
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
The Flash Eurozone PMI Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI®, combining activity in manufacturing and services, decreased from 53.5 in May to 52.8 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d01cb6468d804425ad8c4e0470e9b51e). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI index suggests that the index is consistent with growth of GDP as high as 0.4 percent in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d01cb6468d804425ad8c4e0470e9b51e). The Markit Eurozone PMI® Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing activity with close association with GDP decreased from 53.5 in May, to 52.8 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f6673c9bc1a3475eb40c87b42f7f5ae7). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds growth of GDP at close to 0.4 percent in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f6673c9bc1a3475eb40c87b42f7f5ae7). The Markit Eurozone Services Business Activity Index decreased from 53.2 in May to 52.8 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f6673c9bc1a3475eb40c87b42f7f5ae7). The Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® decreased to 51.8 in Jun from 52.2 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d5693f89c80d4c249248adbe9f5bf744). New orders and export orders increased for the twelfth consecutive month. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds slowing industrial growth in the euro area (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d5693f89c80d4c249248adbe9f5bf744). Table EUR provides the data table for the euro area.
Table EUR, Euro Area Economic Indicators
GDP | IQ2014 ∆% 0.2; IQ2014/IQ2013 ∆% 0.9 Blog 7/6/14 |
Unemployment | May 2014: 11.6 % unemployment rate; Apr 2014: 18.552 million unemployed Blog 7/6/14 |
HICP | May month ∆%: -0.1 12 months May ∆%: 0.5 |
Producer Prices | Euro Zone industrial producer prices May ∆%: -0.1 |
Industrial Production | Apr month ∆%: 0.8; Apr 12 months ∆%: 1.4 |
Retail Sales | May month ∆%: 0.0 |
Confidence and Economic Sentiment Indicator | Sentiment 102.0 Jun 2014 Consumer minus 7.5 Jun 2014 Blog 6/29/14 |
Trade | Jan-Apr 2014/Jan-Apr 2013 Exports ∆%: 0.5 Apr 2014 12-month Exports ∆% 1.5 Imports ∆% -2.8 |
Links to blog comments in Table EUR:
7/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/financial-valuations-twenty-seven.html
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
VE Germany. Table VE-DE provides yearly growth rates of the German economy from 1971 to 2013, price adjusted chain-linked and price and calendar-adjusted chain-linked. Germany’s GDP fell 5.1 percent in 2009 after growing below trend at 1.1 percent in 2008. Recovery has been robust in contrast with other advanced economies. The German economy grew at 4.0 percent in 2010, 3.3 percent in 2011 and 0.7 percent in 2012. Growth decelerated to 0.4 percent in 2013.
The Federal Statistical Agency of Germany analyzes the fall and recovery of the German economy (http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/EN/Content/Statistics/VolkswirtschaftlicheGesamtrechnungen/Inlandsprodukt/Aktuell,templateId=renderPrint.psml):
“The German economy again grew strongly in 2011. The price-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 3.0% compared with the previous year. Accordingly, the catching-up process of the German economy continued during the second year after the economic crisis. In the course of 2011, the price-adjusted GDP again exceeded its pre-crisis level. The economic recovery occurred mainly in the first half of 2011. In 2009, Germany experienced the most serious post-war recession, when GDP suffered a historic decline of 5.1%. The year 2010 was characterised by a rapid economic recovery (+3.7%).”
Table VE-DE, Germany, GDP ∆% on Prior Year
Price Adjusted Chain-Linked | Price- and Calendar-Adjusted Chain Linked | |
2013 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
2012 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
2011 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
2010 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
2009 | -5.1 | -5.1 |
2008 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
2007 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
2006 | 3.7 | 3.9 |
2005 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
2004 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
2003 | -0.4 | -0.4 |
2002 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2001 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
2000 | 3.1 | 3.3 |
1999 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
1998 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
1997 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
1996 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
1995 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
1994 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
1993 | -1.0 | -1.0 |
1992 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
1991 | 5.1 | 5.2 |
1990 | 5.3 | 5.5 |
1989 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
1988 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
1987 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
1986 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
1985 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
1984 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
1983 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
1982 | -0.4 | -0.5 |
1981 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
1980 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
1979 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
1978 | 3.0 | 3.1 |
1977 | 3.3 | 3.5 |
1976 | 4.9 | 4.5 |
1975 | -0.9 | -0.9 |
1974 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
1973 | 4.8 | 5.0 |
1972 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
1971 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
1970 | NA | NA |
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)
https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/02/PE14_048_811.html
https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/08/PE13_278_811.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/11/PE13_381_811.html
https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/01/PE14_016_811.html
https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/05/PE14_167_811.html
The Flash Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Germany PMI®, combining manufacturing and services, decreased from 55.6 in May to 54.2 in Jun. The index of manufacturing output reached 52.9 in Jun, decreasing from 54.7 in May, while the index of services decreased to 54.8 in Jun from 56.0 in May. The overall Flash Germany Manufacturing PMI® increased from 52.3 in May to 52.4 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4406526053dd42d884314b32acff5bd0). New export work volumes increased for an eleventh consecutive month with business originating in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Pollyanna De Lima, Economist at Markit, finds continuing expansion of Germany’s private sector with strength in new orders and activity (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/4406526053dd42d884314b32acff5bd0). The Markit Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Germany Services PMI®, combining manufacturing and services with close association with Germany’s GDP, decreased from 55.6 in May to 54.0 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/07f2a0cf3d044923876a48316c6b23ee). Oliver Kolodseike, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds prospects of growth of GDP at 0.7 percent in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/07f2a0cf3d044923876a48316c6b23ee). The Germany Services Business Activity Index decreased from 56.0 in May to 54.6 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/07f2a0cf3d044923876a48316c6b23ee). The Markit/BME Germany Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), showing close association with Germany’s manufacturing conditions, decreased from 52.3 in May to 52.0 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/aa6656c83d664be7ba533b342bcaa733). New export orders increased for the eleventh consecutive month. Oliver Kolodseike, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds slowing manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/aa6656c83d664be7ba533b342bcaa733).Table DE provides the country data table for Germany.
Table DE, Germany, Economic Indicators
GDP | IQ2014 0.8 ∆%; I/Q2014/IQ2013 ∆% 2.5 2013/2012: 0.4% GDP ∆% 1970-2013 Blog 8/26/12 5/27/12 11/25/12 2/24/13 5/19/13 5/26/13 8/18/13 8/25/13 11/17/13 11/24/13 1/26/14 2/16/14 3/2/14 5/18/14 5/25/14 |
Consumer Price Index | Jun month NSA ∆%: 0.3 |
Producer Price Index | May month ∆%: -0.2 NSA, 0.0 CSA |
Industrial Production | MFG May month CSA ∆%: minus 1.7 |
Machine Orders | MFG May month ∆%: -1.7 |
Retail Sales | May Month ∆% -0.6 12-Month ∆% 1.9 Blog 7/6/14 |
Employment Report | Unemployment Rate SA May 5.0% |
Trade Balance | Exports May 12-month NSA ∆%: 4.3 Blog 6/8/14 |
Links to blog comments in Table DE:
7/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/financial-valuations-twenty-seven.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/8/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-risks-rules-discretionary.html
5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html
5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html
2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html
1/26/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/capital-flows-exchange-rates-and.html
11/24/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html
8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
There is significantly stronger performance of production in Germany with wide monthly fluctuations. The production industries index of Germany in Table VE-1 shows increase of 0.2 percent in Dec 2012 and decrease of 9.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2012. The index decreased 0.5 percent in Jan 2013 and 1.3 percent in 12 months and increased 0.7 percent in Feb 2013, declining 4.9 percent in 12 months. In Mar 2013, the production index of Germany increased 1.0 percent and fell 8.5 percent in 12 months. The production index jumped 1.1 percent in Apr 2013 and 7.5 percent in 12 months. In May 2013, the production index fell 1.6 percent and 4.4 percent in 12 months. The production index of Germany increased 2.0 percent in Jun 2013 and fell 0.4 percent in 12 months. In Jul 2013, the production industries index fell 0.8 percent and increased 1.9 percent in 12 months. The production industries index increased 1.3 percent in Aug 2013 and fell 2.8 percent in 12 months. In Sep 2013, the production index fell 0.5 percent and increased 4.2 percent in 12 months. In Oct 2013, the production index of Germany fell 0.7 percent and increased 1.3 percent in 12 months. The index of production industries increased 1.7 percent in Nov 2013 and 0.4 percent in 12 months. The index of production industries increased 0.2 percent in Dec 2013 and increased 5.9 percent in 12 months. The production industries index increased 0.6 percent in Jan 2014 and 3.4 percent in 12 months. In Feb 2014, the production industries index increased 0.5 percent and 6.1 percent in 12 months. The production industries index fell 0.8 percent in Mar 2014 and increased 4.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The production industries index of Germany decreased 0.3 percent in Apr 2014 and fell 1.9 percent in 12 months. The production index fell 1.8 percent in May 2014, increasing 3.5 percent in 12 months. Germany’s production industries suffered decline of 7.3 percent in Dec 2008 relative to Dec 2007 and decline of 2.3 percent in 2009. Recovery was vigorous with 17.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2010. The first quarter of 2011 was quite strong when the German economy outperformed the other advanced economies. The performance of Germany’s production industries from 2002 to 2006 was vigorous with average rate of 4.5 percent. Data for the production industries index of Germany fluctuate sharply from month to month and in 12-month rates.
Table VE-1, Germany, Production Industries, Month and 12-Month ∆%
12-Month ∆% NSA | Month ∆% Calendar SA | |
May 2014 | 3.5 | -1.8 |
Apr | -1.9 | -0.3 |
Mar | 4.8 | -0.8 |
Feb | 6.1 | 0.5 |
Jan | 3.4 | 0.6 |
Dec 2013 | 5.9 | 0.2 |
Nov | 0.4 | 1.7 |
Oct | 1.3 | -0.7 |
Sep | 4.2 | -0.5 |
Aug | -2.8 | 1.3 |
Jul | 1.9 | -0.8 |
Jun | -0.4 | 2.0 |
May | -4.4 | -1.6 |
Apr | 7.5 | 1.1 |
Mar | -8.5 | 1.0 |
Feb | -4.9 | 0.7 |
Jan | -1.3 | -0.5 |
Dec 2012 | -9.4 | 0.2 |
Nov | -2.9 | -0.7 |
Oct | 4.1 | -1.3 |
Sep | -6.7 | -1.0 |
Aug | -0.6 | -0.5 |
Jul | 2.4 | 1.3 |
Jun | 4.2 | -0.9 |
May | -6.3 | 1.2 |
Apr | -0.6 | -2.0 |
Mar | -0.1 | 2.2 |
Feb | 2.4 | -0.4 |
Jan | 4.8 | 0.9 |
Dec 2011 | 2.0 | -1.7 |
Nov | 3.9 | -0.4 |
Oct | 0.1 | 1.3 |
Sep | 4.5 | -1.6 |
Aug | 10.2 | -0.9 |
Jul | 5.8 | 3.2 |
Jun | -0.8 | -1.5 |
May | 18.2 | 0.5 |
Apr | 5.3 | 0.3 |
Mar | 9.8 | 0.6 |
Feb | 15.8 | 1.1 |
Jan | 15.1 | 1.3 |
Dec 2010 | 17.1 | |
Dec 2009 | -2.3 | |
Dec 2008 | -7.3 | |
Dec 2007 | -0.1 | |
Dec 2006 | 2.5 | |
Dec 2005 | 4.9 | |
Dec 2004 | 5.3 | |
Dec 2003 | 5.1 | |
Dec 2002 | 2.0 | |
Dec 2001 | -8.8 | |
Dec 2000 | 0.2 | |
Dec 1999 | 6.4 | |
Average ∆% per Year | ||
Dec 1995 to Dec 2013 | 1.5 | |
Dec 1995 to Dec 2000 | 2.7 | |
Dec 1995 to Dec 2006 | 2.2 | |
Dec 2002 to Dec 2006 | 4.5 |
Source: Statistiche Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Table VE-2 provides monthly percentage changes of the German production industries index by components from Oct 2013 to May 2014. The index decreased 1.8 percent in May 2014 with increase of 0.3 percent in capital goods and decrease of 1.5 percent in durable goods. There were decreases of 1.7 percent in manufacturing and 3.0 percent in intermediate goods. The index increased 1.7 percent in Nov 2013 with increases in all segments except decline of 1.6 percent in energy. The index fell 0.7 percent in Oct 2013 with all segments declining with exception of 0.8 percent for intermediate goods and 0.8 percent for nondurable goods.
Table VE-2, Germany, Production Industries, Industry and Components, Month ∆%
May 2014 | Apr | Mar | Feb | Jan | Dec 2013 | Nov | Oct | |
Production | -1.8 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | -0.7 |
Industry | -1.6 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.2 | -0.6 |
Mfg | -1.7 | 0.1 | -0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.2 | -0.6 |
Intermediate Goods | -3.0 | -0.3 | -0.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
Capital | 0.3 | -0.3 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | -0.7 | 4.0 | -1.9 |
Durable Goods | -1.2 | -2.2 | 1.0 | 2.7 | -1.4 | 0.4 | 2.7 | -3.9 |
Nondurable Goods | -4.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
Energy | 1.0 | -0.1 | -1.1 | -1.3 | 0.9 | -2.3 | -1.6 | -1.8 |
Seasonally Calendar Adjusted
Source: Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Table VE-3 provides 12-month unadjusted percentage changes of industry and components in Germany. There were percentage declines of 12-month rates in the production index of Germany and all segments in the four months from Dec 2012 to Mar 2013 with exception of nondurables in Jan 2013 and energy in Jan and Mar 2013. There is sharp recovery in Apr 2013 with growth of manufacturing by 7.9 percent and capital goods by 11.1 percent. All segments show declines in 12 months in May 2013. There are increases in the 12 months ending in Jun of 1.2 percent in capital goods and 2.8 percent in durable goods. All segments increased in Jul 2013. All segments fell in Aug 2013 with sharp declines. There is strong recovery in Sep with high rates of increase. Many segments increased in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013 with 1.7 percent growth in manufacturing and 2.0 percent in capital goods. Most segments increased in Nov 2013 with 1.1 percent in manufacturing and 1.9 percent in capital goods. All segments increased in Dec 2013 with exception of energy. Most segments increased in Jan 2014 with exception of declines for durable goods and energy. All segments increased in Feb 2014 with exception of energy. All segments increased in Mar 2014 with exception of energy. All segments decreased in Apr 2014 with exception of intermediate goods and nondurable goods. All segments increased in May 2014 with exception of energy. Percentage declines in 12 months are quite sharp in Dec 2012 with many percentage changes negative around two-digits. Although there are sharp fluctuations in the data, there is suggestion of deceleration that would be expected from much higher earlier rates. The deceleration is quite evident in single-digit percentage changes from Sep 2011 to Dec 2012 relative to high double-digit percentage changes in Jan-Mar 2011. There are multiple negative 12-month percentage changes across many segments. Growth rates in the recovery from the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009 were initially very vigorous in comparison with the growth rates before the contraction that are shown in the bottom part of Table VE-3.
Table VE-3, Germany, Industry and Components, 12-Month ∆% Unadjusted
IND | MFG | INTG | CG | DG | NDG | EN | |
2014 | |||||||
May | 4.7 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 7.7 | 6.5 | 1.9 | -1.9 |
Apr | -1.4 | -1.1 | 0.4 | -3.6 | -4.2 | 2.0 | -6.4 |
Mar | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 4.8 | -9.0 |
Feb | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 | -2.8 |
Jan | 3.5 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 5.5 | -1.3 | 1.2 | -2.2 |
2013 | |||||||
Dec | 6.2 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 4.2 | -0.1 |
Nov | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | -0.4 | 0.5 | -1.6 |
Oct | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.3 |
Sep | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 0.8 |
Aug | -2.9 | -3.0 | -4.0 | -1.8 | -7.5 | -2.4 | -3.1 |
Jul | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 0.7 |
Jun | -0.1 | 0.0 | -1.6 | 1.2 | 2.8 | -1.1 | -1.6 |
May | -4.5 | -4.4 | -3.6 | -5.9 | -10.2 | -0.9 | -4.6 |
Apr | 8.1 | 7.9 | 4.3 | 11.1 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 0.4 |
Mar | -8.4 | -8.3 | -7.3 | -9.6 | -9.0 | -7.0 | 2.4 |
Feb | -5.1 | -5.2 | -5.7 | -5.4 | -6.1 | -2.3 | -8.9 |
Jan | -1.2 | -1.1 | -1.3 | -2.7 | -2.8 | 3.8 | 0.1 |
2012 | |||||||
Dec | -9.6 | -9.4 | -11.8 | -8.5 | -12.5 | -7.0 | -2.4 |
Nov | -3.1 | -3.1 | -3.9 | -2.7 | -7.6 | -1.2 | 0.7 |
Oct | 3.9 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 7.0 | 3.2 |
Sep | -7.6 | -7.5 | -8.8 | -7.1 | -11.2 | -5.2 | 4.0 |
Aug | -1.1 | -1.0 | -3.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 4.5 |
Jul | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 4.6 | -2.4 | -0.7 | 2.2 |
Jun | 3.8 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 0.3 | 6.7 |
May | -7.0 | -6.8 | -7.5 | -6.1 | -10.6 | -7.7 | 4.0 |
Apr | -1.1 | -1.1 | -2.0 | 1.9 | -5.3 | -5.9 | 3.7 |
Mar | -0.5 | -0.4 | -3.1 | 2.8 | -6.2 | -2.3 | -0.8 |
Feb | 3.2 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 7.3 | -0.1 | -2.3 | 5.9 |
Jan | 5.6 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 10.4 | 4.7 | 0.1 | -3.3 |
2011 | |||||||
Dec | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.4 | -9.2 |
Nov | 4.6 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 8.1 | 2.3 | -1.0 | -5.8 |
Oct | 0.6 | 0.7 | -0.3 | 3.2 | -2.3 | -3.4 | -6.1 |
Sep | 5.7 | 5.7 | 4.6 | 9.2 | 3.4 | -0.8 | -6.1 |
Aug | 12.4 | 12.2 | 9.3 | 20.4 | 4.8 | 1.4 | -3.0 |
Jul | 7.9 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 13.7 | 6.8 | 0.1 | -5.7 |
Jun | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.3 | -10.2 | -2.1 | -4.7 |
May | 21.5 | 21.2 | 17.9 | 28.3 | 20.8 | 12.8 | -7.3 |
Apr | 7.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 11.1 | 4.6 | 1.6 | -5.5 |
Mar | 11.2 | 11.2 | 10.8 | 15.0 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 2.8 |
Feb | 17.3 | 17.1 | 16.3 | 23.1 | 10.1 | 6.3 | -0.4 |
Jan | 17.2 | 16.9 | 17.5 | 23.1 | 9.9 | 3.6 | -2.6 |
2010 | |||||||
Dec | 17.6 | 17.6 | 14.8 | 25.9 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
Nov | 13.9 | 13.9 | 12.9 | 19.2 | 7.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Oct | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 14.0 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 2.5 |
Sep | 9.8 | 9.5 | 12.2 | 10.1 | 8.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
Aug | 16.9 | 17.0 | 19.3 | 19.9 | 18.3 | 6.9 | 1.3 |
Jul | 9.0 | 8.9 | 13.2 | 8.7 | 7.4 | 0.8 | 1.9 |
Jun | 16.4 | 16.2 | 20.8 | 16.1 | 19.7 | 5.1 | -2.8 |
May | 13.1 | 13.3 | 20.0 | 12.0 | 11.2 | 1.4 | 11.1 |
Apr | 14.9 | 14.9 | 21.7 | 15.5 | 8.8 | 0.2 | 9.4 |
Mar | 14.3 | 14.5 | 20.4 | 12.3 | 11.8 | 5.8 | 4.2 |
Feb | 6.8 | 7.4 | 10.6 | 6.5 | 7.9 | -1.0 | 3.7 |
Jan | 0.4 | 0.9 | 6.3 | -3.8 | 0.8 | -3.0 | 0.8 |
Dec 2010 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 14.8 | 25.9 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
Dec 2009 | -3.2 | -3.1 | 3.3 | -9.9 | -0.1 | 1.1 | 3.7 |
Dec 2008 | -7.6 | -7.4 | -14.3 | -5.4 | -11.2 | 3.7 | -9.0 |
Dec 2007 | 0.0 | -0.3 | -0.6 | 2.5 | -10.0 | -2.7 | 1.6 |
Dec 2006 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 2.3 | 8.6 | -0.9 | -5.3 |
Dec 2005 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 9.0 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 0.6 |
Dec 2004 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 7.7 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 5.7 | 9.6 |
Dec 2003 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 6.4 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 0.3 |
Dec 2002 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 3.4 | -5.9 | 2.3 | -2.6 |
Note: IND: Industry; MFG: Manufacturing; INTG: Intermediate Goods; CG: Capital Goods; DG: Durable Goods; NDG: Nondurable Goods; EN: Energy
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Broader perspective since 2005 is provided by Chart VE-1 of the Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland, Federal Statistical Agency of Germany. The index of production industries not seasonally adjusted rises by more than one third between 2003 and 2008 with sharp fluctuations and then collapses during the global recession in 2008. Recovery has been in a steep upward trajectory that has recovered at the more recent peaks the losses during the contraction. Recovery stalled recently.
Chart VE-1, Germany, Production Industries, Not Adjusted, 2010=100
Source: Statistiche Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
More detail is provided by Chart VE-2 of the Statistiche Bundesamt Deutschland, or Federal Statistical Agency of Germany, with the unadjusted production industries index and trend from 2010 to 2014. There could be some flattening in recent months probably leading into stagnation, mild downturn and recent recovery as depicted by trend.
Chart VE-2, Germany, Production Industries, Not Adjusted, 2010=100
Source: Statistiche Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Table VE-4 provides month and 12-month rates of growth of manufacturing in Germany from Dec 2010 to May 2014. There are fluctuations in both monthly rates and in the past 12 months. In Jan 2013, manufacturing fell 1.1 percent and decreased 1.1 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing increased 1.0 percent in Feb 2013, declining 5.2 percent in 12 months. In Mar 2013, manufacturing increased 1.0 percent but fell 8.3 percent in 12 months. There is strong recovery in Apr 2013 with growth of 0.7 percent and 7.9 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing fell 1.5 percent in May 2013 and declined 4.4 percent in 12 months. Recovery is strong in Jun 2013 with growth of 2.0 percent in the month but change of 0.0 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing fell 1.4 percent in Jul 2013 and increased 1.6 percent in 12 months. In Aug 2013, manufacturing increased 1.9 percent and fell 3.0 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing fell 0.7 percent in Sep 2013 and increased 4.6 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing increased 2.2 percent in Nov 2013 and 1.1 percent in 12 months. In Dec 2013, manufacturing increased 0.2 percent and increased 6.1 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing increased 0.1 percent in Jan 2014 and 3.4 percent in 12 months. In Feb 2014, manufacturing increased 0.5 percent and 6.0 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing fell 0.3 percent in Mar 2014 and increased 5.3 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing increased 0.1 percent in Apr 2014 and fell 1.1 percent in 12 months. Manufacturing fell 1.7 percent in May, increasing 4.7 percent in 12 months.
Table VE-4, Germany, Manufacturing Month and 12-Month ∆%
12-Month ∆% NSA | Month ∆% SA and Calendar Adjusted | |
May 2014 | 4.7 | -1.7 |
Apr | -1.1 | 0.1 |
Mar | 5.3 | -0.3 |
Feb | 6.0 | 0.5 |
Jan | 3.4 | 0.1 |
Dec 2013 | 6.1 | 0.2 |
Nov | 1.1 | 2.2 |
Oct | 1.7 | -0.6 |
Sep | 4.6 | -0.7 |
Aug | -3.0 | 1.9 |
Jul | 1.6 | -1.4 |
Jun | 0.0 | 2.0 |
May | -4.4 | -1.5 |
Apr | 7.9 | 0.7 |
Mar | -8.3 | 1.0 |
Feb | -5.2 | 1.0 |
Jan | -1.1 | -1.1 |
Dec 2012 | -9.4 | 1.0 |
Nov | -3.1 | -0.7 |
Oct | 3.8 | -1.3 |
Sep | -7.5 | -1.4 |
Aug | -1.0 | -0.5 |
Jul | 2.0 | 1.7 |
Jun | 3.7 | -1.3 |
May | -6.8 | 1.6 |
Apr | -1.1 | -1.7 |
Mar | -0.4 | 1.0 |
Feb | 3.3 | 0.3 |
Jan | 5.6 | 0.7 |
Dec 2011 | 1.4 | -1.5 |
Nov | 4.5 | -0.8 |
Oct | 0.7 | 1.2 |
Sep | 5.7 | -1.7 |
Aug | 12.2 | -0.9 |
Jul | 7.8 | 3.5 |
Jun | 0.5 | -1.7 |
May | 21.2 | 0.8 |
Apr | 7.5 | 0.7 |
Mar | 11.2 | 0.7 |
Feb | 17.1 | 1.4 |
Jan | 16.9 | -0.1 |
Dec 2010 | 17.6 | 1.4 |
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis)
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Chart VE-3 of the Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland, or Federal Statistical Office of Germany, provides the manufacturing index of Germany from 2010 to 2014. Manufacturing was already flattening in 2007 and fell sharply in 2008 to the beginning of 2010. Manufacturing grew sharply in the initial phase of recovery but has flattened in recent months as revealed by the trend that may be turning upward.
Chart VE-3, Germany, Production Index, Manufacturing, Not Adjusted Index and Trend, 2010=100
Source: Statistiche Bundesamt Deutschland https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Twelve-month rates of growth Germany’s exports and imports are shown in Table VE-5. There was sharp decline in the rates in Jun and Jul 2011 to single-digit levels especially for exports. In the 12 months ending in Aug 2011, exports rose 14.6 percent and imports 13.2 percent. In Sep 2011, exports grew 10.4 percent relative to a year earlier and imports grew 11.7 percent. Growth rates in 12 months ending in Oct 2011 fell significantly to 3.5 percent for exports and 9.2 percent for imports. Lower prices may explain part of the decline in nominal values. Exports fell 3.8 percent in 12 months ending in Sep 2012, rebounding to growth of 10.5 percent in Oct 2012 and minus 0.5 percent in Nov 2012 but sharp decline of 7.3 percent in Dec 2012 followed by rebound of 2.4 percent in Jan 2013. Exports fell 3.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2013 and declined 4.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Mar 2013. In Apr 2013, exports increased 7.7 percent relative to a year earlier. Exports fell 4.8 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2013. Exports fell 5.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug 2013 and imports fell 2.3 percent. In the 12 months ending in Sep 2013, exports increased 3.5 percent and imports fell 0.3 percent. Exports increased 0.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013 while imports fell 1.5 percent. Exports increased 1.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013 and imports fell 0.4 percent. Exports increased 4.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013 while imports increased 2.4 percent. Exports increased 2.9 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 2014 while imports increased 1.5 percent. Exports increased 4.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2014 and imports increased 6.5 percent. Exports increased 1.9 percent in the 12 months ending in Mar 2014 and imports 5.3 percent. Exports fell 0.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2014 while imports increased 0.7 percent. In May 2014, exports increased 4.3 percent in 12 months. Imports decreased 4.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Sep 2012, rebounding to growth of 5.7 percent in Oct 2012, decreasing 1.5 percent in Nov 2012 and 7.8 percent in Dec 2012 and rebounding 2.7 percent in Jan 2013. Imports fell 5.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2013 and declined 7.5 percent in Mar 2013. In Apr 2013, imports increased 4.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In May 2013, imports fell 3.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Imports fell 1.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Jun 2013. In Jul 2013, imports increased 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. Imports fell 2.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Aug 2013. In the 12 months ending in Sep 2013, exports declined 0.3 percent. Imports fell 1.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013. Imports fell 0.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013 and increased 2.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013. Imports increased 1.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 2014 and 6.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2014. Imports increased 5.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Mar 2014 and 0.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2014. Imports fell 0.4 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Growth was much stronger in the recovery during 2010 and 2011 from the fall from 2007 to 2009. Germany’s trade grew at high rates in 2006 and 2005.
Table VE-5, Germany, Exports and Imports NSA Euro Billions and 12-Month ∆%
Exports EURO Billions | 12- Month | Imports | 12-Month | |
May 2014 | 92.0 | 4.3 | 74.3 | -0.4 |
Apr | 93.7 | -0.3 | 76.5 | 0.7 |
Mar | 96.0 | 1.9 | 79.4 | 5.3 |
Feb | 92.4 | 4.6 | 76.2 | 6.5 |
Jan | 90.7 | 2.9 | 75.7 | 1.5 |
Dec 2013 | 82.1 | 4.5 | 68.2 | 2.4 |
Nov | 94.7 | 1.1 | 76.5 | -0.4 |
Oct | 99.1 | 0.7 | 81.3 | -1.5 |
Sep | 94.6 | 3.5 | 74.3 | -0.3 |
Aug | 85.0 | -5.7 | 71.7 | -2.3 |
Jul | 93.1 | -0.3 | 76.8 | 0.9 |
Jun | 92.4 | -2.0 | 75.4 | -1.2 |
May | 88.2 | -4.8 | 74.6 | -3.1 |
Apr | 94.0 | 7.7 | 76.0 | 4.3 |
Mar | 94.2 | -4.6 | 75.4 | -7.5 |
Feb | 88.3 | -3.2 | 71.5 | -5.7 |
Jan | 88.2 | 2.4 | 74.6 | 2.7 |
Dec 2012 | 78.6 | -7.3 | 66.6 | -7.8 |
Nov | 93.7 | -0.5 | 76.8 | -1.5 |
Oct | 98.4 | 10.5 | 82.5 | 5.7 |
Sep | 91.4 | -3.8 | 74.5 | -4.1 |
Aug | 90.2 | 5.7 | 73.4 | -0.1 |
Jul | 93.3 | 9.1 | 76.2 | 1.5 |
Jun | 94.3 | 7.0 | 76.3 | 1.4 |
May | 92.7 | 0.3 | 77.0 | -0.7 |
Apr | 87.2 | 3.2 | 72.9 | -1.1 |
Mar | 98.7 | 0.1 | 81.5 | 2.1 |
Feb | 91.2 | 7.9 | 75.8 | 4.6 |
Jan | 86.1 | 8.6 | 72.6 | 4.6 |
Dec 2011 | 84.8 | 4.7 | 72.3 | 5.6 |
Nov | 94.1 | 7.4 | 78.0 | 5.8 |
Oct | 89.1 | 3.5 | 78.1 | 9.2 |
Sep | 95.0 | 10.4 | 77.7 | 11.7 |
Aug | 85.3 | 14.6 | 73.5 | 13.2 |
Jul | 85.6 | 5.2 | 75.0 | 9.7 |
Jun | 88.1 | 3.3 | 75.2 | 5.6 |
May | 92.4 | 21.2 | 77.5 | 17.4 |
Apr | 84.5 | 12.4 | 73.7 | 18.5 |
Mar | 98.7 | 15.3 | 79.8 | 15.1 |
Feb | 84.5 | 20.8 | 72.5 | 27.6 |
Jan | 79.3 | 25.2 | 69.4 | 26.0 |
Dec 2010 | 81.0 | 20.0 | 68.4 | 24.4 |
Nov | 87.6 | 21.2 | 73.7 | 30.9 |
Oct | 86.0 | 18.7 | 71.5 | 19.2 |
Sep | 86.0 | 21.2 | 69.5 | 17.0 |
Aug | 74.4 | 23.8 | 64.9 | 27.1 |
Jul | 81.4 | 15.3 | 68.4 | 24.4 |
Jun | 85.3 | 27.5 | 71.2 | 33.9 |
May | 76.2 | 25.6 | 66.1 | 31.3 |
Apr | 75.2 | 16.8 | 62.2 | 14.4 |
Mar | 85.6 | 22.0 | 69.3 | 18.0 |
Feb | 70.0 | 9.7 | 56.8 | 3.2 |
Jan | 63.4 | -0.3 | 55.1 | -1.9 |
Dec 2009 | 67.5 | 1.2 | 55.0 | -7.3 |
Dec 2008 | 66.7 | -8.6 | 59.4 | -5.1 |
Dec 2007 | 73.0 | -0.6 | 62.5 | -0.1 |
Dec 2006 | 73.4 | 10.2 | 62.6 | 8.5 |
Dec 2005 | 66.6 | 11.5 | 57.7 | 18.1 |
Dec 2004 | 59.7 | 9.2 | 48.9 | 10.8 |
Dec 2003 | 54.7 | 7.6 | 44.1 | 3.9 |
Dec 2002 | 50.8 | 5.5 | 42.5 | 6.4 |
Dec 2001 | 48.2 | -3.7 | 39.9 | -17.5 |
Dec 2000 | 50.0 | 48.4 |
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Chart VE-4 of the Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland shows exports and trend of German exports. Growth has been with fluctuations around a strong upward trend that is milder than earlier in the recovery but could be moving upwardly after flattening.
Chart VE-4, Germany, Exports Original Value and Trend 2010-2014
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Imports in Chart VE-5 also fell sharply and have been recovering with fluctuations around a strong upward trend that could be flattening. There could be new upward trend.
Chart VE-5, Germany, Imports Original Value and Trend 2010-2014
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Chart VE-6 of the Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland shows the trade balance of Germany since 2010. There was sharp decline during the global recession and fluctuations around a mild upward trend during the recovery with stabilization followed by stronger trend in recent months and flattening/declining recently. The final segment could be an upward movement again.
Chart VE-6, Germany, Trade Balance Original and Trend 2010-2014
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
Table VE-6 provides monthly rates of growth of exports and imports of Germany. Exports decreased 1.1 percent calendar and seasonally adjusted (CSA) in May 2014 while imports decreased 3.4 percent. Export growth had been relatively strong from Dec 2012 to Apr 2013 with only one monthly decline of 1.0 percent in Feb 2013. Exports fell 1.1 percent in May 2013 and 0.8 percent in Jul 2013. Exports grew in four consecutive months from Aug to Nov 2013. Exports fell in Dec 2013, Feb-Mar 2014 and May 2014, increasing in Jan and Apr 2014. Export growth and import growth were vigorous in Jan-Mar 2011 when Germany’s economy outperformed most advanced economies but less dynamic and consistent in following months as world trade weakens.
Table VE-6, Germany, Exports and Imports Month ∆% Calendar and Seasonally Adjusted
Exports | Imports | |
May 2014 | -1.1 | -3.4 |
Apr | 2.6 | 0.2 |
Mar | -1.8 | -1.1 |
Feb | -1.3 | 0.4 |
Jan | 2.3 | 3.2 |
Dec 2013 | -1.0 | -1.0 |
Nov | 0.6 | -0.6 |
Oct | 0.2 | 2.3 |
Sep | 1.4 | -1.5 |
Aug | 1.0 | 0.2 |
Jul | -0.8 | 0.2 |
Jun | 0.4 | -0.6 |
May | -1.1 | 0.9 |
Apr | 0.4 | 1.7 |
Mar | 1.4 | 0.4 |
Feb | -1.0 | -2.8 |
Jan | 0.8 | 2.0 |
Dec 2012 | 0.5 | -0.9 |
Nov | -2.4 | -3.4 |
Oct | 0.3 | 2.0 |
Sep | -2.7 | -0.1 |
Aug | 1.7 | -0.1 |
Jul | 0.6 | 0.3 |
Jun | -1.5 | -2.1 |
May | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Apr | -1.9 | -4.0 |
Mar | 0.2 | 1.1 |
Feb | 1.4 | 3.3 |
Jan | 2.1 | -0.8 |
Dec 2011 | -2.7 | -1.4 |
Nov | 3.0 | 0.1 |
Oct | -3.5 | -0.9 |
Sep | 1.4 | 0.4 |
Aug | 2.6 | -0.1 |
Jul | -1.2 | 0.3 |
Jun | -0.5 | 0.5 |
May | 2.9 | 0.8 |
Apr | -3.9 | -0.3 |
Mar | 4.9 | 1.8 |
Feb | 1.6 | 2.5 |
Jan | 0.4 | 2.6 |
Dec 2010 | 0.1 | -1.7 |
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/Indicators/ShortTermIndicators/ShortTermIndicators.html
There is extremely important information in Table VE-7 for the current sovereign risk crisis in the euro zone. Table VE-7 provides the structure of regional and country relations of Germany’s exports and imports with newly available data for May 2014. German exports to other European Union (EU) members are 57.7 percent of total exports in May 2014 and 58.6 percent in cumulative Jan-May 2014. Exports to the euro area are 36.6 percent of the total in May and 37.4 percent cumulative in Jan-May. Exports to third countries are 42.3 percent of the total in May and 41.4 percent cumulative in Jan-May. There is similar distribution for imports. Exports to non-euro countries are increasing 7.0 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014, increasing 7.3 percent cumulative in Jan-May 2014 while exports to the euro area are increasing 4.2 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014 and increasing 2.7 percent cumulative in Jan-May 2014. Exports to third countries, accounting for 42.3 percent of the total in May 2014, are increasing 2.1 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014 and decreasing 0.6 percent cumulative in Jan-May 2014, accounting for 41.4 percent of the cumulative total in Jan-May 2014. Price competitiveness through devaluation could improve export performance and growth. Economic performance in Germany is closely related to Germany’s high competitiveness in world markets. Weakness in the euro zone and the European Union in general could affect the German economy. This may be the major reason for choosing the “fiscal abuse” of the European Central Bank considered by Buiter (2011Oct31) over the breakdown of the euro zone. There is a tough analytical, empirical and forecasting doubt of growth and trade in the euro zone and the world with or without maintenance of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro zone. Germany could benefit from depreciation of the euro because of high share in its exports to countries not in the euro zone but breakdown of the euro zone raises doubts on the region’s economic growth that could affect German exports to other member states.
Table VE-7, Germany, Structure of Exports and Imports by Region, € Billions and ∆%
May 2014 | May 12-Month | Cumulative Jan-May 2014 € Billions | Cumulative Jan-May 2014/ | |
Total | 92.0 | 4.3 | 464.9 | 2.6 |
A. EU | 53.1 % 57.7 | 6.1 | 272.5 % 58.6 | 5.1 |
Euro Area | 33.7 % 36.6 | 4.2 | 173.8 % 37.4 | 2.7 |
Non-euro Area | 19.4 % 21.1 | 9.4 | 98.7 % 21.2 | 9.6 |
B. Third Countries | 38.9 % 42.3 | 2.1 | 192.4 % 41.4 | -0.6 |
Total Imports | 74.3 | -0.4 | 382.0 | 2.7 |
C EU Members | 48.5 % 65.3 | -0.2 | 250.0 % 65.4 | 4.0 |
Euro Area | 33.1 % 44.5 | -3.2 | 172.1 % 45.0 | 2.6 |
Non-euro Area | 15.4 % 20.7 | 7.0 | 77.9 % 20.4 | 7.3 |
C Third Countries | 25.8 % 34.7 | -0.8 | 132.0 % 34.6 | 0.3 |
Notes: Total Exports = A+B; Total Imports = C+D
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland
https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2014/07/PE14_244_51.html
VF France. Table VF-FR provides growth rates of GDP of France with the estimates of Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE). The long-term rate of GDP growth of France from IVQ1949 to IVQ2012 is quite high at 3.2 percent. France’s growth rates were quite high in the four decades of the 1950s, 1960, 1970s and 1980s with an average growth rate of 4.0 percent compounding the average rates in the decades and discounting to one decade. The growth impulse diminished with 2.0 percent in the 1990s and 1.8 percent from 2000 to 2007. The average growth rate from 2000 to 2012, using fourth quarter data, is 1.1 percent because of the sharp impact of the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. The growth rate from 2000 to 2012 is 1.1 percent. Cobet and Wilson (2002) provide estimates of output per hour and unit labor costs in national currency and US dollars for the US, Japan and Germany from 1950 to 2000 (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 137-44). The average yearly rate of productivity change from 1950 to 2000 was 2.9 percent in the US, 6.3 percent for Japan and 4.7 percent for Germany while unit labor costs in USD increased at 2.6 percent in the US, 4.7 percent in Japan and 4.3 percent in Germany. From 1995 to 2000, output per hour increased at the average yearly rate of 4.6 percent in the US, 3.9 percent in Japan and 2.6 percent in Germany while unit labor costs in US fell at minus 0.7 percent in the US, 4.3 percent in Japan and 7.5 percent in Germany. There was increase in productivity growth in the G7 in Japan and France in the second half of the 1990s but significantly lower than the acceleration of 1.3 percentage points per year in the US. Lucas (2011May) compares growth of the G7 economies (US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada) and Spain, finding that catch-up growth with earlier rates for the US and UK stalled in the 1970s.
Table VF-FR, France, Average Growth Rates of GDP Fourth Quarter, 1949-2012
Period | Average ∆% |
1949-2013 | 3.2 |
2000-2013 | 1.1 |
2000-2012 | 1.1 |
2000-2007 | 1.8 |
1990-1999 | 2.0 |
1980-1989 | 2.6 |
1970-1979 | 3.7 |
1960-1969 | 5.7 |
1950-1959 | 4.2 |
Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques
http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=28&date=20140627
The Markit Flash France Composite Output Index decreased from 49.3 in May to 48.0 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/91598c31441e4996ba754ac072e02409). Paul Smith, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds continuing weak performance in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/91598c31441e4996ba754ac072e02409). The Markit France Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing with close association with French GDP, decreased from 49.3 in May to 48.2 in Jun, indicating marginal contraction (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/65d5095957304a4a8bf7f06b20669310). Duncan Head, Economist at Markit and author of the France Services PMI®, finds weak demand (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/65d5095957304a4a8bf7f06b20669310). The Markit France Services Activity index decreased from 49.1 in May to 48.2 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/65d5095957304a4a8bf7f06b20669310). The Markit France Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® decreased to 48.2 in Jun from 49.6 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/302bc48aeb1145f7ab60d5a7bb831100). Tim Moore, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Manufacturing PMI®, finds deteriorating conditions because of weakness in new orders (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/302bc48aeb1145f7ab60d5a7bb831100). Table FR provides the country data table for France.
Table FR, France, Economic Indicators
CPI | Jun month ∆% 0.0 |
PPI | May month ∆%: -0.6 Blog 6/1/14 |
GDP Growth | IQ2014/IVQ2013 ∆%:0.0 |
Industrial Production | May ∆%: |
Consumer Spending | Manufactured Goods |
Employment | Unemployment Rate: IQ2014 9.7% |
Trade Balance | May Exports ∆%: month 0.3, 12 months 0.3 May Imports ∆%: month 2.2, 12 months minus 1.5 Blog 7/13/14 |
Confidence Indicators | Historical average 100 Jun Mfg Business Climate 98.0 Blog 6/29/14 |
Links to blog comments in Table FR:
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/8/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-risks-rules-discretionary.html
6/1/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-instability-mediocre-cyclical.html
5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html
2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html
12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
6/30/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/tapering-quantitative-easing-policy-and.html
5/19/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/word-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
Table VF-1 provides longer historical perspective of manufacturing in France. Output of manufacturing decreased 2.3 percent in May 2014 and decreased 3.0 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Manufacturing in France fell 14.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2008 and 4.2 percent in Dec 2009. Manufacturing recovered with growth of 5.9 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2010. Manufacturing fell 0.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2011 and 3.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2012. Manufacturing increased 0.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013.
Table VF-1, France, Manufacturing, Month and 12-Month ∆%
Month ∆% | 12-Month ∆% | |
May 2014 | -2.3 | -3.0 |
Apr | 0.0 | -0.7 |
Mar | -0.4 | 1.5 |
Feb | 0.3 | 1.2 |
Jan | 0.2 | 1.5 |
Dec 2013 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Nov | 0.1 | 1.4 |
Oct | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Sep | -0.7 | -1.4 |
Aug | 1.0 | -3.2 |
Jul | -0.8 | -2.2 |
Jun | -0.9 | -0.3 |
May | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Apr | 2.2 | 0.1 |
Mar | -0.7 | -3.8 |
Feb | 0.6 | -1.3 |
Jan | -0.6 | -4.0 |
Dec 2012 | 0.8 | -3.5 |
Nov | -0.9 | -6.1 |
Oct | -1.4 | -3.3 |
Sep | -2.5 | -2.2 |
Aug | 2.1 | -0.7 |
Jul | 1.1 | -2.6 |
Jun | -0.4 | -3.3 |
May | -0.1 | -5.1 |
Apr | -1.8 | -3.2 |
Mar | 1.9 | -2.3 |
Feb | -2.2 | -5.4 |
Jan | -0.1 | -2.8 |
Dec 2011 | -1.9 | -0.5 |
Nov | 2.1 | 1.9 |
Oct | -0.3 | 2.0 |
Sep | -1.0 | 1.4 |
Aug | 0.1 | 3.7 |
Jul | 0.4 | 3.4 |
Jun | -2.3 | 3.3 |
May | 1.9 | 5.0 |
Apr | -0.9 | 4.0 |
Mar | -1.3 | 5.3 |
Feb | 0.6 | 9.1 |
Jan | 2.2 | 8.5 |
Dec 2013 | 0.7 | |
Dec 2012 | -3.5 | |
Dec 2011 | -0.5 | |
Dec 2010 | 5.9 | |
Dec 2009 | -4.2 | |
Dec 2008 | -14.1 | |
Dec 2007 | -0.9 | |
Dec 2006 | 2.6 | |
Dec 2005 | 0.7 | |
Dec 2004 | 0.9 | |
Dec 2003 | 0.3 | |
Dec 2002 | -1.1 | |
Dec 2001 | -5.4 | |
Dec 2000 | 4.6 |
Source:
Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques
http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=10&date=20140710
Chart VF-1 of the Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques provides France’s index of manufacturing, adjusted for working days and seasonal effects, from Jan 1990 to May 2014. Growth was robust in the 1990s and in recovery from the 2001 recession. Manufacturing output fell sharply during the global recession followed by recovery and another trend of decline followed by increase and new decline.
Chart VF-1, France, Index of Manufacturing 2010=100, Jan 1990-May 2014, Seasonal and Working-Day Adjusted
Source:
Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques
http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=10&date=20140710
Chart VF-2 of France’s Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques shows indices of manufacturing in France from 2010 to 2014. Manufacturing, which is CZ in Chart VF-2, fell deeply in 2008 and part of 2009. All curves of industrial indices tend to flatten recently with oscillations and declines and marginal improvement followed by renewed decline/stability in the final segment with jump in Mar-Apr 2013. Manufacturing fell in May-Jul 2013 with mild recovery in Aug 2013 and decline in Sep 2013. Manufacturing increased in Oct-Nov 2013 and fell in Dec 2013. Manufacturing rebounded in Jan-Feb 2014, decreasing in Mar 2014. Manufacturing increased in Apr 2014 and contracted in May 2014.
Chart VF-2, France, Industrial Production Indices 2010-2014 Legend: CZ : Manufacturing – (C1) : Manufacture of food products and beverages – (C3) : Electrical and electronic equipment; machine equipment – (C4) : Manufacture of transport equipment – (C5) : Other manufacturing
Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques
http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=10&date=20140710
France has been running a trade deficit fluctuating around €5,000 million as shown in Table VF-2. Exports increased 0.3 percent in May 2014 while imports increased 2.2 percent. The trade deficit increased from revised €4101 million in Apr 2014 to €4866 million in May 2014.
Table VF-2, France, Exports, Imports and Trade Balance, € Millions
Exports | Imports | Trade Balance | |
May 2014 | 36,063 | 40,929 | -4,866 |
Apr | 35,955 | 40,056 | -4,101 |
Mar | 36,275 | 41,186 | -4,911 |
Feb | 36,302 | 39,719 | -3,417 |
Jan | 36,052 | 41,858 | -5,806 |
Dec 2013 | 36,801 | 42,048 | -5,247 |
Nov | 35,576 | 41,168 | -5,592 |
Oct | 36,373 | 41,155 | -4,782 |
Sep | 36,521 | 42,221 | -5,700 |
Aug | 35,980 | 41,128 | -5,148 |
Jul | 36,564 | 42,093 | -5,529 |
Jun | 36,087 | 40,949 | -4,862 |
May | 35,956 | 41,571 | -5,615 |
Apr | 38,507 | 42,362 | -3,855 |
Mar | 36,157 | 40,733 | -4,576 |
Feb | 35,468 | 41,546 | -6,078 |
Jan | 36,558 | 41,788 | -5,230 |
Dec 2012 | 37,066 | 42,428 | -5,362 |
Dec 2011 | 35,851 | 41,043 | -5,192 |
Dec 2010 | 33,705 | 39,167 | -5,462 |
Source: France, Direction générale des douanes et droits indirects
http://lekiosque.finances.gouv.fr/AppChiffre/Portail_default.asp
Table VF-3 provides month and 12-month percentage changes of France’s exports and imports. Exports increased 0.3 percent in May 2014 and increased 0.3 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Imports increased 2.2 percent in May 2014 and decreased 1.5 percent in 12 months. Growth of exports and imports has fluctuated in 2011, 2012 and 2013-2014 because of price surges of commodities and raw materials. Weak economic conditions worldwide also influence trade performance.
Table VF-3, France, Exports and Imports, Month and 12-Month ∆%
Exports | Exports | Imports | Imports 12-Month ∆% | |
May 2014 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.2 | -1.5 |
Jan 2014 | -2.0 | -1.4 | -0.5 | 0.2 |
Dec 2013 | 3.4 | -0.7 | 2.1 | -0.9 |
Dec 2012 | 3.4 | 3.4 | ||
Dec 2011 | 6.4 | 4.8 | ||
Dec 2010 | 13.1 | 14.0 | ||
Dec 2009 | -9.5 | -1.9 | ||
Dec 2008 | -6.9 | -10.9 | ||
Dec 2007 | 5.8 | 7.9 | ||
Dec 2006 | 6.2 | 6.5 | ||
Dec 2005 | 11.8 | 15.6 | ||
Dec 2004 | -3.7 | 5.8 | ||
Dec 2003 | 7.1 | 1.6 |
Source: France, Direction générale des douanes et droits indirects
http://lekiosque.finances.gouv.fr/AppChiffre/Portail_default.asp
Annual data for France’s exports, imports and trade balance are provided in Table VF-4. France’s trade balance deteriorated sharply from 2007 to 2011 with the deficit increasing from €42,494 million in 2007 to €74,574 million in 2011. Annual growth rates of exports have not been sufficiently high to compensate for growth of imports driven in part by commodity price increases. In 2012, the trade deficit declined to €67,585 million with growth of exports of 3.1 percent and of imports of 1.2 percent. The trade deficit declined to €61,360 million in 2013 with declines of exports of 1.3 percent and of 2.4 percent for imports.
Table VF-4, France, Exports, Imports and Balance Year € Millions and ∆%
Exports € Millions | ∆% | Imports € Millions | ∆% | Balance € Millions | |
May 2014 12 Months | 432,862 | 492,029 | -59,167 | ||
Year | |||||
2013 | 435,725 | -1.3 | 497,085 | -2.4 | -61,360 |
2012 | 441,571 | 3.1 | 509,156 | 1.2 | -67,585 |
2011 | 428,361 | 8.4 | 502,935 | 12.4 | -74,574 |
2010 | 395,039 | 14.0 | 447,483 | 14.2 | -52,444 |
2009 | 346,481 | -17.0 | 391,872 | -17.3 | -45,391 |
2008 | 417,636 | 2.7 | 473,853 | 5.5 | -56,217 |
2007 | 406,487 | 3.0 | 448,981 | 5.8 | -42,494 |
2006 | 394,621 | 9.5 | 424,549 | 10.4 | -29,928 |
2005 | 360,376 | 4.4 | 384,588 | 9.6 | -24,212 |
2004 | 345,256 | 5.4 | 350,996 | 7.0 | -5,740 |
2003 | 327,653 | 327,884 | -231 |
Source: France, Direction générale des douanes et droits indirects
http://lekiosque.finances.gouv.fr/AppChiffre/Portail_default.asp
VG Italy. Table VG-IT provides percentage changes in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier of Italy’s expenditure components in chained volume measures. GDP has been declining at sharper rates from minus 0.6 percent in IVQ2011 to minus 2.8 percent in IVQ2012, minus 2.4 percent in IQ2013, minus 2.2 percent in IIQ2013 and minus 1.9 percent in IIIQ2013. GDP fell 0.9 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier. GDP fell 0.9 percent in IQ2014 relative to a year earlier. The aggregate demand components of consumption and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) have been declining at faster rates. The rates of decline of GDP, consumption and GFCF were somewhat milder in IIIQ2013 and IVQ2013 than in IQ2013 and the final three quarters of 2012. In IQ2014, consumption fell 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier and GFCF fell 1.3 percent.
Table VG-IT, Italy, GDP and Expenditure Components, Chained Volume Measures, Quarter ∆% on Same Quarter Year Earlier
GDP | Imports | Consumption | GFCF | Exports | |
2013 | |||||
IQ2014 | -0.5 | 1.3 | -0.3 | -1.3 | 3.3 |
IVQ | -0.9 | -0.1 | -1.1 | -2.8 | 1.0 |
IIIQ | -1.9 | -2.0 | -1.8 | -4.6 | -0.4 |
IIQ | -2.2 | -4.4 | -2.8 | -4.8 | 0.0 |
IQ | -2.4 | -5.0 | -3.0 | -6.1 | -0.7 |
2012 | |||||
IVQ | -2.8 | -6.4 | -4.0 | -7.3 | 1.0 |
IIIQ | -2.6 | -7.1 | -4.0 | -8.3 | 2.0 |
IIQ | -2.4 | -7.0 | -3.4 | -8.5 | 2.2 |
IQ | -1.7 | -7.9 | -3.2 | -8.1 | 3.0 |
2011 | |||||
IVQ | -0.6 | -6.8 | -1.9 | -3.8 | 3.5 |
IIIQ | 0.4 | 0.6 | -1.1 | -2.4 | 6.1 |
IIQ | 1.1 | 3.6 | 0.3 | -1.0 | 7.5 |
IQ | 1.4 | 9.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 11.0 |
2010 | |||||
IVQ | 2.2 | 15.6 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 13.4 |
IIIQ | 1.8 | 13.2 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 12.1 |
IIQ | 1.8 | 13.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 12.0 |
IQ | 0.9 | 7.0 | 1.0 | -2.4 | 7.1 |
2009 | |||||
IVQ | -3.5 | -6.3 | 0.2 | -8.2 | -9.3 |
IIIQ | -5.0 | -12.2 | -0.8 | -12.6 | -16.4 |
IIQ | -6.6 | -17.9 | -1.4 | -13.6 | -21.4 |
IQ | -6.9 | -17.2 | -1.8 | -12.4 | -22.8 |
2008 | |||||
IVQ | -3.0 | -8.2 | -0.9 | -8.3 | -10.3 |
IIIQ | -1.9 | -5.0 | -0.8 | -4.5 | -3.9 |
IIQ | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -1.5 | 0.4 |
IQ | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.1 | -1.0 | 2.9 |
GFCF: Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/124710
The Markit/ADACI Business Activity Index increased from 51.6 in May to 53.9 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/df7d4a9752744ddcb1dc5efff001e00a). Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italy Services PMI®, finds services with the highest quarterly growth in four years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/df7d4a9752744ddcb1dc5efff001e00a). The Markit/ADACI Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), decreased from 53.2 in May to 52.6 in Jun, which constitutes strong improvement in Italy’s manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/6b33bc99a5fd4a63b5879891082635dc). New export orders was strong. Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italian Manufacturing PMI®, finds continuing growth of manufacturing with the quarterly index at the highest performance in about three years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/6b33bc99a5fd4a63b5879891082635dc). Table IT provides the country data table for Italy.
Table IT, Italy, Economic Indicators
Consumer Price Index | Jun month ∆%: 0.1 |
Producer Price Index | May month ∆%: -0.1 Blog 7/6/14 |
GDP Growth | IQ2014/IVQ2013 SA ∆%: minus 0.1 |
Labor Report | May 2014 Participation rate 63.7% Employment ratio 55.5% Unemployment rate 12.6% Youth Unemployment 43.0% Blog 7/6/14 |
Industrial Production | May month ∆%: -1.2 |
Retail Sales | Apr month ∆%: 0.4 Apr 12-month ∆%: 2.6 Blog 6/29/14 |
Business Confidence | Mfg Jun 100.0, Feb 99.1 Construction Jun 81.1, Feb 76.9 Blog 6/29/14 |
Trade Balance | Balance Apr SA €3927 million versus Mar €3612 |
Links to blog comments in Table IT:
7/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/financial-valuations-twenty-seven.html
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
5/18/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
3/16/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/global-financial-risks-recovery-without.html
2/16/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/theory-and-reality-of-cyclical-slow.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
8/11/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/recovery-without-hiring-loss-of-full.html
6/16/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/recovery-without-hiring-seven-million.html
3/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
Italy’s industrial production decreased 1.2 percent in May 2014 seasonally adjusted and decreased 1.8 percent in 12 months calendar adjusted, as shown in Table VG-1. Industrial production increased 0.4 percent in Apr 2014 and 0.1 percent in 12 months. Industrial production decreased 0.4 percent in Mar 2014 and 0.1 percent in 12 months. Industrial production fell 0.5 percent in Feb 2014 but increased 0.4 percent in 12 months. Industrial production increased 1.0 percent in Jan 2014 and grew 1.3 percent in 12 months. Industrial production fell 0.9 percent in Dec 2013 and 1.2 percent in 12 months. Industrial production increased 0.2 percent in Nov 2013 and 0.9 percent CA relative to a year earlier. Industrial production increased 0.7 percent in Oct 2013 and fell 0.4 percent in 12 months. Industrial production increased 0.2 percent in Sep 2013 and fell 2.9 percent in 12 months. In Aug 2013, industrial production decreased 0.2 percent and fell 4.6 percent in 12 months. Industrial production decreased 0.7 percent in Jul 2013 and fell 3.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Jul 2013. In the quarter Sep-Nov 2012, industrial production fell cumulatively 4.1 percent, at the annual equivalent rate of 15.6 percent. Industrial production fell 7.7 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2012. There have been negative changes with oscillations in monthly industrial production. Industrial production fell 18.8 percent in 2009 after falling 3.2 percent in 2008. Industrial production fell 6.4 percent in 2012 and decreased 3.2 percent in 2013.
Table VG-1, Italy, Industrial Production ∆%
Index CA | ∆% CA | Index | ∆% | |||
2012 | - | - | 94.7 | -6.4 | 94.3 | -6.1 |
2013 | - | - | 91.7 | -3.2 | 91.4 | -3.1 |
2013 | Index SA | Quarter ∆% | Index CA | 4Q ∆% | Index | ∆% |
IIQ | 91.6 | -0.2 | 94.9 | -3.9 | 94.6 | -3.6 |
IIIQ | 91.3 | -0.3 | 87.2 | -3.6 | 87.0 | -2.0 |
IVQ | 91.9 | 0.7 | 92.5 | -0.2 | 92.3 | -0.3 |
2014 | ||||||
IQ | 91.8 | -0.1 | 92.7 | 0.4 | 91.5 | -0.1 |
Index SA | Month ∆% | Index CA | 12-Month ∆% | Index NCA | Month ∆% | |
2012 | ||||||
May | 95.8 | 0.8 | 104.1 | -5.7 | 105.4 | -5.7 |
Jun | 94.2 | -1.7 | 99.1 | -7.0 | 99.5 | -7.0 |
Jul | 94.7 | 0.5 | 108.6 | -5.6 | 107.6 | -2.6 |
Aug | 95.5 | 0.8 | 61.4 | -4.8 | 62.2 | -4.7 |
Sep | 94.1 | -1.5 | 101.4 | -4.7 | 96.5 | -10.5 |
Oct | 92.8 | -1.4 | 101.2 | -5.7 | 103.4 | 0.4 |
Nov | 91.6 | -1.3 | 95.6 | -7.7 | 96.0 | -7.7 |
Dec | 92.3 | 0.8 | 81.3 | -7.2 | 78.4 | -10.0 |
2013 | ||||||
Jan | 92.3 | 0.0 | 85.9 | -3.4 | 89.0 | -0.2 |
Feb | 91.8 | -0.5 | 92.1 | -4.5 | 90.9 | -8.2 |
Mar | 91.4 | -0.4 | 98.8 | -5.8 | 94.8 | -10.0 |
Apr | 90.9 | -0.5 | 88.7 | -4.8 | 89.0 | -0.4 |
May | 91.9 | 1.1 | 99.3 | -4.6 | 100.6 | -4.6 |
Jun | 92.0 | 0.1 | 96.8 | -2.3 | 94.2 | -5.3 |
Jul | 91.4 | -0.7 | 104.5 | -3.8 | 106.8 | -0.7 |
Aug | 91.2 | -0.2 | 58.6 | -4.6 | 57.5 | -7.6 |
Sep | 91.4 | 0.2 | 98.5 | -2.9 | 96.7 | 0.2 |
Oct | 92.0 | 0.7 | 100.8 | -0.4 | 103.0 | -0.4 |
Nov | 92.2 | 0.2 | 96.5 | 0.9 | 93.9 | -2.2 |
Dec | 91.4 | -0.9 | 80.3 | -1.2 | 79.9 | 1.9 |
2014 | ||||||
Jan | 92.3 | 1.0 | 87.0 | 1.3 | 87.3 | -1.9 |
Feb | 91.8 | -0.5 | 92.5 | 0.4 | 91.3 | 0.4 |
Mar | 91.4 | -0.4 | 98.7 | -0.1 | 96.0 | 1.3 |
Apr | 91.9 | 0.5 | 89.9 | 1.4 | 89.0 | 0.0 |
May | 90.8 | -1.2 | 97.5 | -1.8 | 95.7 | -4.9 |
SA: Seasonally Adjusted; CA: Calendar Adjusted Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/128146
Chart VG-1 provides 12-month percentage changes of Italy’s index of industrial production. Industrial production improved from decline of 4.6 percent the 12 months ending in May 2013 to increase of 1.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2014.
Chart VG-1, Italy, Industrial Production, 12-Month Percentage Changes
Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
VH United Kingdom. Annual data in Table VH-UK show the strong impact of the global recession in the UK with decline of GDP of 5.2 percent in 2009 after dropping 0.8 percent in 2008. Recovery of 1.7 percent in 2010 is relatively low in comparison with annual growth rates in 2007 and earlier years. Growth was only 1.1 percent in 2011 and 0.3 percent in 2012. Growth increased to 1.7 percent in 2013. The bottom part of Table VH-UK provides average growth rates of UK GDP since 1948. The UK economy grew at 2.6 percent per year on average between 1948 and 2013, which is relatively high for an advanced economy. The growth rate of GDP between 2000 and 2007 is higher at 3.0 percent. Growth in the current cyclical expansion has been only at 1.2 percent as advanced economies struggle with weak internal demand and world trade. GDP in 2013 was lower by 1.4 percent relative to 2007.
Table VH-UK, UK, Gross Domestic Product, ∆%
∆% on Prior Year | |
1998 | 3.6 |
1999 | 2.9 |
2000 | 4.4 |
2001 | 2.2 |
2002 | 2.3 |
2003 | 3.9 |
2004 | 3.2 |
2005 | 3.2 |
2006 | 2.8 |
2007 | 3.4 |
2008 | -0.8 |
2009 | -5.2 |
2010 | 1.7 |
2011 | 1.1 |
2012 | 0.3 |
2013 | 1.7 |
Average Growth Rates ∆% per Year | |
1948-2013 | 2.6 |
1950-1959 | 2.7 |
1960-1969 | 3.3 |
1970-1979 | 2.5 |
1980-1989 | 3.2 |
1990-1999 | 2.9 |
2000-2007 | 3.0 |
2007-2012* | -3.0 |
2007-2013* | -1.3 |
2000-2013 | 1.5 |
*Absolute change from 2007 to 2012 an from 2007 to 2013
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/naa2/quarterly-national-accounts/q1-2014/index.html
Table VI-1, Vo The Business Activity Index of the Markit/CIPS UK Services PMI® decreased from 58.6 in May to 57.7 in Jun (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7c9d0c8dec61431eacdd97f3c0575533). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds the combined indices consistent with the UK economy growing at 0.8 percent in IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7c9d0c8dec61431eacdd97f3c0575533). The Markit/CIPS UK Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®) increased to 57.5 in Jun from 57.0 in May (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7cf7600aa4e4125b7e58b397c4a065a). New export orders increased for the fifteenth consecutive month. New orders increased from Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Rob Dobson, Senior Economist at Markit that compiles the Markit/CIPS Manufacturing PMI®, finds that manufacturing conditions continue at solid pace with probable growth at 1.5 percent for IIQ2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7cf7600aa4e4125b7e58b397c4a065a). Table UK provides the economic indicators for the United Kingdom.
Table UK, UK Economic Indicators
CPI | May month ∆%: -0.1 |
Output/Input Prices | Output Prices: May 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.5; excluding food, petroleum ∆%: 1.0 |
GDP Growth | IQ2014 prior quarter ∆% 0.8; year earlier same quarter ∆%: 3.0 |
Industrial Production | May 2014/May 2013 ∆%: Production Industries 2.3; Manufacturing 3.7 |
Retail Sales | May month ∆%: -0.5 |
Labor Market | Feb-Apr Unemployment Rate: 6.6%; Claimant Count 3.2%; Earnings Growth 0.7% |
GDP and the Labor Market | IQ2014 Weekly Hours 102.8, GDP 99.3, Employment 103.1 IQ2008 =100 GDP IQ14 99.3 IQ2008=100 Blog 5/25/14 |
Trade Balance | Balance SA May minus ₤2418 million |
Links to blog comments in Table UK:
6/29/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financial-indecision-mediocre-cyclical.html
6/22/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/valuation-risks-world-inflation-waves.html
6/15/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/financialgeopolitical-risks-recovery.html
5/25/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html
5/4/2014 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/financial-volatility-mediocre-cyclical.html
4/6/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/interest-rate-risks-twenty-eight.html
3/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/03/financial-risks-slow-cyclical-united.html
2/2/14 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/mediocre-cyclical-united-states.html
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
10/27/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html
9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html
7/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html
5/26/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html
4/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_28.html
03/31/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
The UK Office for National Statistics provides the output of production industries with revisions. Table VH-1 incorporates the revisions released in Dec 2011 (http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/iop/index-of-production/november-2012/index.html) and the latest available data for May 2014. Manufacturing accounts for 68.4 percent of the production industries of the UK and increased 3.7 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Capital goods industries increased 4.5 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2014 after increasing 4.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2014 and 3.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2014. Output of capital goods industries decreased 1.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013, increasing 1.4 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013. Capital goods industries fell 2.3 percent in the 12 months ending in May 2013, grew 2.5 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2013 and had been growing at very high rates during the current cyclical recovery but falling from the unsustainable high of 12.0 percent in the 12 months ending in Feb 2011. Mining and quarrying increased 11.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013 and 3.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Dec 2013, decreasing 1.9 percent in the 12 months ending in Jan 2014. Mining and quarrying increased 2.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2014. The 12-month rates of growth of the entire index of production industries registered declines for all 12 months from Mar 2011 to Aug 2013 with exception of 1.3 percent in the 12 months ending in Jun 2013. With exception of most months for capital goods and Sep to Dec 2012 for consumer durables, 12-month percentage changes of all segments are mostly negative from Jan to Dec 2012. Energy and mining have been drivers of decline. The upper part of Table VH-1 provides rates of change of yearly output. Manufacturing output fell 10.2 percent in 2009 after falling 2.8 percent in 2008 but grew at 4.2 percent in the initial phase of the recovery in 2010 and 1.8 percent in 2011 but fell 1.7 percent in 2012. Manufacturing fell 0.7 percent in 2013.
Table VH-1, UK, Output of the Production Industries, Chained Volume Indices of Gross Value Added, 12-Month ∆%
PROD IND | MNG | MFG | CON DUR | CON NDUR | CAP | ENERGY | |
2009 | -9.5 | -9.7 | -10.2 | -6.8 | -0.8 | -12.1 | -6.5 |
2010 | 2.8 | -2.4 | 4.2 | -4.1 | -0.3 | 10.4 | -2.5 |
2011 | -1.2 | -14.8 | 1.8 | 0.6 | -0.7 | 6.7 | -10.7 |
2012 | -2.4 | -8.7 | -1.7 | -3.1 | -3.8 | 1.5 | -7.0 |
2013 | -0.4 | -2.5 | -0.8 | -2.3 | -1.2 | 1.0 | -3.5 |
PROD IND | MNG | MFG | CON DUR | CON NDUR | CAP | ENERGY | ||
2012 | Mar | -2.0 | -5.3 | -0.9 | -6.4 | -1.7 | 1.4 | -7.8 |
Apr | -1.3 | -9.7 | -1.2 | -2.7 | -5.0 | 2.7 | -5.9 | |
May | -1.4 | -5.6 | -1.2 | -3.4 | -5.9 | 2.8 | -4.4 | |
Jun | -4.0 | -3.0 | -4.0 | -10.9 | -6.3 | 0.3 | -4.8 | |
Jul | -0.7 | -0.4 | -0.8 | -3.5 | -5.0 | 4.4 | -3.6 | |
Aug | -0.9 | 1.5 | -1.5 | -2.9 | -3.9 | 2.1 | -2.4 | |
Sep | -3.7 | -16.1 | -1.6 | 1.2 | -1.7 | 0.1 | -11.9 | |
Oct | -3.7 | -18.8 | -2.5 | 4.1 | -4.7 | 0.1 | -10.7 | |
Nov | -2.9 | -11.8 | -2.8 | 0.5 | -5.5 | -0.5 | -6.9 | |
Dec | -3.0 | -8.1 | -2.7 | 0.7 | -6.3 | 1.1 | -5.7 | |
2013 | Jan | -3.1 | -5.1 | -4.1 | -1.4 | -6.1 | 0.1 | -3.2 |
Feb | -2.3 | -7.5 | -2.6 | -4.5 | -5.7 | 3.0 | -7.4 | |
Mar | -1.9 | -11.7 | -1.9 | 0.1 | -4.9 | 2.2 | -3.5 | |
Apr | -1.4 | -5.3 | -1.4 | -2.3 | -0.3 | 2.5 | -4.2 | |
May | -2.4 | -1.4 | -3.4 | -4.8 | -0.1 | -2.3 | -3.4 | |
Jun | 1.3 | -3.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | -5.7 | |
Jul | -1.4 | -7.3 | -1.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.7 | -6.4 | |
Aug | -1.7 | -9.8 | -1.0 | -3.3 | -2.9 | 0.1 | -7.9 | |
Sep | 2.0 | 10.9 | 0.1 | -2.5 | -1.5 | 1.1 | 3.3 | |
Oct | 2.7 | 11.1 | 1.9 | -5.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 0.5 | |
Nov | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | -2.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | -1.9 | |
Dec | 1.7 | 3.6 | 1.4 | -2.9 | 3.1 | -1.8 | -0.6 | |
2014 | Jan | 2.3 | -1.9 | 3.2 | 1.0 | -1.3 | 2.6 | -6.1 |
Feb | 2.5 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 3.3 | -4.4 | |
Mar | 2.5 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 2.0 | -4.5 | |
Apr | 2.9 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 4.1 | -4.5 | |
May | 2.3 | -0.2 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 4.5 | -3.6 |
Notes: PROD IND: Production Industries; MNG: Mining; MFG: Manufacturing; ENGY: Energy; CON DUR: Consumer Durables; CONS NDUR: Consumer Nondurables; CAP: Capital Goods
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/iop/index-of-production/may-2014/index.html
Percentage changes in the production industries and major components in a month relative to the prior month are shown in Table VH-2. The UK index of production decreased 0.7 percent in May 2014 with decline of manufacturing of 1.3 percent and decrease of capital goods of 2.1 percent. Energy increased 1.8 percent and capital goods fell 2.1 percent. The UK index of production increased 0.3 percent in Apr 2014 with growth of manufacturing of 0.3 percent and increase of capital goods of 1.3 percent. Energy increased 0.3 percent and mining and quarrying fell 1.1 percent. The production index increased 0.1 percent in Mar 2014 with growth of manufacturing of 0.5 percent and capital goods of 0.2 percent. The index of production increased 0.9 percent in Feb 2009 with growth of manufacturing of 1.1 percent and of capital goods of 1.0 percent. The index of production fell 0.2 percent in Jan 2014 with manufacturing increasing 0.3 percent and capital goods 2.0 percent. The index of production increased 0.3 percent in Dec 2013 with manufacturing increasing 0.5 percent. Mining and quarrying increased 3.4 percent in Dec 2013 and capital goods fell 0.9 percent. Energy increased 1.0 percent. The index of production fell 0.1 percent in Nov 2013 with manufacturing decreasing 0.2 percent while capital goods fell 0.9 percent. There is significant fluctuation in monthly percentage changes. Many segments fell in May and Apr 2013. Capital goods industries fell 2.4 percent in Jan 2013 and increased 1.4 percent in Mar and 3.3 percent in Jun while manufacturing fell 1.5 percent in Jan 2013 but increased 1.1 percent in Mar and 2.1 percent in Jun. Performance was strong in Dec 2012 with growth of manufacturing of 1.1 percent and capital goods of 2.3 percent. Fluctuations of monthly production are quite wide.
Table VH-2, UK, Output of the Production Industries, Chained Volume Indices of Gross Value Added, Latest Month on Previous Month ∆%
PROD IND | MNG | MFG | CON DUR | CON NDUR | CAP | ENERGY | ||
2012 | Mar | -0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | -0.4 | 2.3 | -4.4 |
Apr | -0.6 | -3.8 | -1.0 | 1.3 | -3.0 | -1.1 | 1.0 | |
May | 0.9 | -1.0 | 1.3 | - | - | 2.3 | - | |
Jun | -2.3 | 2.6 | -2.9 | -3.3 | -1.2 | -1.3 | -0.1 | |
Jul | 2.8 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 1.4 | |
Aug | -0.7 | 1.8 | -1.3 | -1.9 | 0.3 | -2.5 | 0.8 | |
Sep | -2.7 | -18.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | -10.6 | |
Oct | -0.7 | -1.4 | -1.7 | 2.4 | -3.2 | -1.0 | 0.7 | |
Nov | 0.6 | 7.7 | -0.2 | -2.7 | -1.0 | 0.7 | 3.4 | |
Dec | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.3 | -0.3 | |
2013 | Jan | -0.8 | 1.9 | -1.5 | -1.5 | 1.0 | -2.4 | 1.8 |
Feb | 0.8 | -0.1 | 0.3 | -3.9 | -0.5 | 0.4 | -0.6 | |
Mar | 0.1 | -4.4 | 1.1 | 5.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | -0.3 | |
Apr | -0.1 | 3.2 | -0.5 | -1.1 | 1.7 | -0.8 | 0.3 | |
May | -0.1 | 3.2 | -0.8 | -2.6 | 0.2 | -2.5 | 0.9 | |
Jun | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 3.3 | -2.5 | |
Jul | 0.1 | -0.5 | - | 2.9 | -0.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | |
Aug | -0.9 | -0.9 | -1.0 | -5.6 | -2.7 | -3.0 | -0.9 | |
Sep | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.3 | |
Oct | - | -1.3 | 0.1 | -0.3 | -0.7 | 0.8 | -2.1 | |
Nov | -0.1 | -1.7 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.8 | -0.9 | 0.9 | |
Dec | 0.3 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.1 | -0.9 | 1.0 | |
2014 | Jan | -0.2 | -3.6 | 0.3 | 2.4 | -3.3 | 2.0 | -3.8 |
Feb | 0.9 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
Mar | 0.1 | -0.9 | 0.5 | -0.6 | 1.3 | 0.2 | -0.4 | |
Apr | 0.3 | -1.1 | 0.3 | 1.9 | -0.4 | 1.3 | 0.3 | |
May | -0.7 | 0.8 | -1.3 | -3.7 | -0.6 | -2.1 | 1.8 |
Notes: PROD IND: Production Industries; MNG: Mining; MFG: Manufacturing; ENGY: Energy; CON DUR: Consumer Durables; CONS NDUR: Consumer Nondurables; CAP: Capital Goods
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/iop/index-of-production/may-2014/index.html
Weights of components of the production index and contributions by components to the monthly and 12-month percentage changes of volume are provided by the UK Office for National Statistics and shown in Table VH-3. The 12-month rate of output of the production industries of 2.3 percent was driven by positive contribution of 2.60 percentage points by manufacturing and 0.21 percentage points by water and sewage. The contribution of manufacturing is strong because of its share of 68.4 percent in the production index with growth of 3.7 percent in 12 months. The contributions do not add exactly because of rounding. Mining and quarrying deducted 0.02 percentage points to the output of the production industries in the 12 months ending in May 2014. Manufacturing decreased 1.3 percent in May 2014, deducting 0.95 percentage points. Mining increased 0.8 percent in May 2014, adding 0.09 percentage points. Electricity increased 3.8 percent in May, adding 0.29 percentage points.
Table VH-3, UK, Weights of Components, Volume 12-Month and Month ∆% and Percentage Point Contributions of Production Industries by Components
Weight % | Volume 12-Month ∆% Ending in May 2014 | % Point | Volume | % Point | |
PROD | 100.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | -0.7 | -0.7 |
MNG | 15.1 | -0.2 | -0.02 | 0.8 | 0.09 |
Division 06 | 12.4 | -1.5 | -0.13 | 0.9 | 0.07 |
MFG | 68.4 | 3.7 | 2.60 | -1.3 | -0.95 |
ELEC | 8.6 | -5.8 | -0.51 | 3.8 | 0.29 |
WATER | 7.9 | 2.3 | 0.21 | -1.1 | -0.10 |
Notes: Cont: Contribution
; PROD IND: Index of Production; MNG: Mining and Quarrying (of which 14.4 percent of the total weight in oil and gas extraction); MNG 06: Subdivision of Mining including oil and gas extraction; MFG: Manufacturing; ELEC: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning; WATER & SEW: water supply, sewerage and waste management
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/iop/index-of-production/may-2014/index.html
Table VH-4 provides the breakdown of production in 12-month and monthly growth and percentage contributions.
Table VH-4, UK, Growth Rates and Percentage Point Contributions to the Index of Production
Sector | Summary Description | % of production | Month on same month a year ago growth (%) | Contribution to production (% points) |
IoP | Index of Production | 100.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
B | Total Mining & Quarrying | 15.1 | -0.2 | -0.02 |
5 | Coal & Lignite | 0.2 | -17.9 | -0.02 |
6 | Crude petroleum & Natural gas | 12.4 | -1.5 | -0.13 |
786 | Other mining & Quarrying | 2.5 | 68.8 | 0.12 |
C | Total Manufacturing | 68.4 | 3.7 | 2.60 |
CA | Food, beverages and tobacco | 10.9 | 3.8 | 0.43 |
CB | Textiles and leather products | 2.1 | 6.3 | 0.13 |
CC | Wood, paper and printing | 5.5 | -1.0 | -0.05 |
CD | Coke and petroleum | 1.7 | -8.4 | -0.13 |
CE | Chemical Products | 4.2 | 2.4 | 0.10 |
CF | Pharmaceutical Products | 6.4 | -5.9 | -0.33 |
CG | Rubber and plastic products | 5.7 | 14.9 | 0.81 |
CH | Metal products | 7.7 | 4.5 | 0.36 |
CI | Computer, electronic & optical | 4.3 | 0.4 | 0.02 |
CJ | Electrical equipment | 2.1 | -7.0 | -0.16 |
CK | Machinery and equipment | 5.0 | 7.3 | 0.36 |
CL | Transport equipment | 7.7 | 6.5 | 0.63 |
CM | Other manufacturing & repair | 5.4 | 7.6 | 0.43 |
D | Total Electricity & Gas | 8.6 | -5.8 | -0.51 |
35.1 | Electric power generation, transmission & distribution | 6.0 | -2.8 | -0.18 |
35.2-3 | Manufacture of gas; distribution of gaseous fuels through mains; steam & aircon supply | 2.6 | -14.6 | -0.33 |
E | Total Water | 7.9 | 2.3 | 0.21 |
36 | Water collection, Treatment & Supply | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.01 |
37 | Sewerage | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.05 |
38 | Waste Collection, Treatment & Disposal Activities; Materials Recovery | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.14 |
39 | Remediation Activities & Other Waste Management Services | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.00 |
Sector | Summary Description | % of production | Month on previous month growth (%) | Contribution to production (% points) |
IoP | Index of Production | 100.0 | -0.7 | -0.7 |
B | Total Mining & Quarrying | 15.1 | 0.8 | 0.09 |
5 | Coal & Lignite | 0.2 | 23.1 | 0.02 |
6 | Crude petroleum & Natural gas | 12.4 | 0.9 | 0.07 |
786 | Other mining & Quarrying | 2.5 | 5.2 | 0.00 |
C | Total Manufacturing | 68.4 | -1.3 | -0.95 |
CA | Food, beverages and tobacco | 10.9 | -0.6 | -0.07 |
CB | Textiles and leather products | 2.1 | 4.7 | 0.09 |
CC | Wood, paper and printing | 5.5 | 0.9 | 0.04 |
CD | Coke and petroleum | 1.7 | -1.1 | -0.02 |
CE | Chemical Products | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.00 |
CF | Pharmaceutical Products | 6.4 | -3.6 | -0.19 |
CG | Rubber and plastic products | 5.7 | -0.7 | -0.04 |
CH | Metal products | 7.7 | -2.3 | -0.19 |
CI | Computer, electronic & optical | 4.3 | -4.1 | -0.18 |
CJ | Electrical equipment | 2.1 | -2.7 | -0.06 |
CK | Machinery and equipment | 5.0 | -1.0 | -0.05 |
CL | Transport equipment | 7.7 | -1.6 | -0.17 |
CM | Other manufacturing & repair | 5.4 | -2.1 | -0.13 |
D | Total Electricity & Gas | 8.6 | 3.8 | 0.29 |
35.1 | Electric power generation, transmission & distribution | 6.0 | 3.3 | 0.19 |
35.2-3 | Manufacture of gas; distribution of gaseous fuels through mains; steam & aircon supply | 2.6 | 5.5 | 0.1 |
E | Total Water | 7.9 | -1.1 | -0.1 |
36 | Water collection, Treatment & Supply | 2.1 | -0.3 | -0.01 |
37 | Sewerage | 2.2 | -1.3 | -0.03 |
38 | Waste Collection, Treatment & Disposal Activities; Materials Recovery | 3.6 | -1.4 | -0.06 |
39 | Remediation Activities & Other Waste Management Services | 0.1 | -3.4 | 0.00 |
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/iop/index-of-production/may-2014/index.html
The UK’s trade account is in Table VH-5. In May 2014, the UK ran a deficit in trade of goods and services (total trade) of ₤2418 million. The deficits in trade of goods was ₤9204 million and ₤8291 million in goods excluding oil. A surplus in services of ₤6786 million contributed to reducing the overall deficit in goods and services (-₤9204 million plus ₤6786 million equal to ₤2418 million). Services have contributed to lower deficits and have softened the impact of the global recession on the UK economy. Exports of goods and services increased 0.5 percent in May 2014 and decreased 3.6 percent in the quarter Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier with imports increasing 1.3 percent in May and decreasing 3.4 percent in Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier. Excluding oil, UK exports of goods increased 1.4 percent in May and fell 4.9 percent in Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier. Imports increased 1.7 percent in May and fell 3.1 percent in Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier. Services exports increased 0.3 percent in May and increased 1.2 percent in Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier while services imports increased 0.2 percent in May and increased 2.9 percent in Mar 2014-May 2014 relative to the same quarter a year earlier.
Table VH-5, Value of UK Trade in Goods and Services, Balance of Payments Basis, ₤ Million SA and ∆%
₤ Million SA May 2014 | Month ∆% | Mar 2014-May 2014 ∆% Mar 2013-May 2013 | ||
Total Trade | ||||
Exports | 40,936 | 0.5 | -3.6 | |
Imports | 43,354 | 1.3 | -3.4 | |
Balance | -2,418 | |||
Trade in Goods | ||||
Exports | 24,124 | 0.6 | -6.6 | |
Imports | 33,328 | 1.7 | -5.1 | |
Balance | -9,204 | |||
Trade in Goods Excluding Oil | ||||
Exports | 21,391 | 1.4 | -4.9 | |
Imports | 29,682 | 1.7 | -3.1 | |
Balance | -8,291 | |||
Trade in Services | ||||
Exports | 16,812 | 0.3 | 1.2 | |
Imports | 10,026 | 0.2 | 2.9 | |
Balance | 6,786 |
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/uktrade/uk-trade/may-2014/index.html
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment