Theory and Reality of Secular Stagnation, Peaking Valuations of Risk Financial Assets, Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation, World Economic Slowdown and Global Recession Risk
Carlos M. Pelaez
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Executive Summary
I Peaking Valuations of Risk Financial Assets
IB Collapse of United States Dynamism of Income Growth and Employment Creation
II United States Housing
III World Financial Turbulence
IIIA Financial Risks
IIIE Appendix Euro Zone Survival Risk
IIIF Appendix on Sovereign Bond Valuation
IV Global Inflation
V World Economic Slowdown
VA United States
VB Japan
VC China
VD Euro Area
VE Germany
VF France
VG Italy
VH United Kingdom
VI Valuation of Risk Financial Assets
VII Economic Indicators
VIII Interest Rates
IX Conclusion
References
Appendixes
Appendix I The Great Inflation
IIIB Appendix on Safe Haven Currencies
IIIC Appendix on Fiscal Compact
IIID Appendix on European Central Bank Large Scale Lender of Last Resort
IIIG Appendix on Deficit Financing of Growth and the Debt Crisis
IIIGA Monetary Policy with Deficit Financing of Economic Growth
IIIGB Adjustment during the Debt Crisis of the 1980s
V World Economic Slowdown. Table V-1 is constructed with the database of the IMF (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx) to show GDP in dollars in 2012 and the growth rate of real GDP of the world and selected regional countries from 2013 to 2016. The data illustrate the concept often repeated of “two-speed recovery” of the world economy from the recession of 2007 to 2009. The IMF has lowered its forecast of the world economy to 2.9 percent in 2013 but accelerating to 3.6 percent in 2014, 4.0 percent in 2015 and 4.1 percent in 2016. Slow-speed recovery occurs in the “major advanced economies” of the G7 that account for $34,560 billion of world output of $72,216 billion, or 47.9 percent, but are projected to grow at much lower rates than world output, 2.1 percent on average from 2013 to 2016 in contrast with 3.6 percent for the world as a whole. While the world would grow 15.4 percent in the four years from 2013 to 2016, the G7 as a whole would grow 8.6 percent. The difference in dollars of 2012 is rather high: growing by 15.4 percent would add $11.1 trillion of output to the world economy, or roughly, two times the output of the economy of Japan of $5,960 billion but growing by 8.6 percent would add $6.2 trillion of output to the world, or about the output of Japan in 2012. The “two speed” concept is in reference to the growth of the 150 countries labeled as emerging and developing economies (EMDE) with joint output in 2012 of $27,221 billion, or 37.7 percent of world output. The EMDEs would grow cumulatively 21.9 percent or at the average yearly rate of 5.1 percent, contributing $6.0 trillion from 2013 to 2016 or the equivalent of somewhat less than the GDP of $8,221 billion of China in 2012. The final four countries in Table V-1 often referred as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), are large, rapidly growing emerging economies. Their combined output in 2012 adds to $14,346 billion, or 19.9 percent of world output, which is equivalent to 41.5 percent of the combined output of the major advanced economies of the G7.
Table V-1, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Real GDP Growth
GDP USD 2012 | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | Real GDP ∆% | |
World | 72,216 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
G7 | 34,560 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 |
Canada | 1,821 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
France | 2,614 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
DE | 3,430 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
Italy | 2,014 | -1.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
Japan | 5,960 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
UK | 2,477 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
US | 16,245 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Euro Area | 12,199 | -0.4 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
DE | 3,430 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
France | 2,614 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Italy | 2,014 | -1.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
POT | 212 | -1.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Ireland | 211 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Greece | 249 | -4.2 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 3.7 |
Spain | 1,324 | -1.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
EMDE | 27,221 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 5.4 |
Brazil | 2,253 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Russia | 2,030 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
India | 1,842 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 6.5 |
China | 8,221 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries); POT: Portugal
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx
Continuing high rates of unemployment in advanced economies constitute another characteristic of the database of the WEO (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx). Table V-2 is constructed with the WEO database to provide rates of unemployment from 2012 to 2016 for major countries and regions. In fact, unemployment rates for 2012 in Table V-2 are high for all countries: unusually high for countries with high rates most of the time and unusually high for countries with low rates most of the time. The rates of unemployment are particularly high for the countries with sovereign debt difficulties in Europe: 15.7 percent for Portugal (POT), 14.7 percent for Ireland, 24.2 percent for Greece, 25.0 percent for Spain and 10.6 percent for Italy, which is lower but still high. The G7 rate of unemployment is 7.4 percent. Unemployment rates are not likely to decrease substantially if slow growth persists in advanced economies.
Table V-2, IMF World Economic Outlook Database Projections of Unemployment Rate as Percent of Labor Force
% Labor Force 2012 | % Labor Force 2013 | % Labor Force 2014 | % Labor Force 2015 | % Labor Force 2016 | |
World | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
G7 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 6.6 |
Canada | 7.3 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 6.9 |
France | 10.3 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 10.5 |
DE | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Italy | 10.7 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 12.0 | 11.2 |
Japan | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
UK | 8.0 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.0 |
US | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.4 |
Euro Area | 11.4 | 12.3 | 12.2 | 12.0 | 11.5 |
DE | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
France | 10.3 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 10.5 |
Italy | 10.7 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 12.0 | 11.2 |
POT | 15.7 | 17.4 | 17.7 | 17.3 | 16.8 |
Ireland | 14.7 | 13.7 | 13.3 | 12.8 | 12.4 |
Greece | 24.2 | 27.0 | 26.1 | 24.0 | 21.0 |
Spain | 25.0 | 26.9 | 26.7 | 26.5 | 26.2 |
EMDE | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Brazil | 5.5 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Russia | 6.0 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
India | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
China | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Notes; DE: Germany; EMDE: Emerging and Developing Economies (150 countries)
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook databank http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx
Table V-3 provides the latest available estimates of GDP for the regions and countries followed in this blog from IQ2012 to IIQ2013 available now for all countries. There are preliminary estimates for all countries for IIIQ2013. Growth is weak throughout most of the world. Japan’s GDP increased 0.9 percent in IQ2012 and 3.5 percent relative to a year earlier but part of the jump could be the low level a year earlier because of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan is experiencing difficulties with the overvalued yen because of worldwide capital flight originating in zero interest rates with risk aversion in an environment of softer growth of world trade. Japan’s GDP fell 0.5 percent in IIQ2012 at the seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of minus 2.0 percent, which is much lower than 3.5 percent in IQ2012. Growth of 3.2 percent in IIQ2012 in Japan relative to IIQ2011 has effects of the low level of output because of Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Japan’s GDP contracted 0.8 percent in IIIQ2012 at the SAAR of minus 3.2 percent and decreased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP grew 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 at the SAAR of 0.6 percent and decreased 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan grew 1.1 percent in IQ2013 at the SAAR of 4.5 percent and 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP increased 0.9 percent in IIQ2013 at the SAAR of 3.6 percent and increased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. Japan’s GDP grew 0.3 percent in IIIQ2013 at the SAAR of 1.1 percent and increased 2.4 pecent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.2 percent in IIQ2012, which annualizes to 9.1 percent and 7.6 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.0 percent in IIIQ2012, which annualizes at 8.2 percent and 7.4 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, China grew at 1.9 percent, which annualizes at 7.8 percent, and 7.9 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, China grew at 1.5 percent, which annualizes at 6.1 percent and 7.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, China grew at 1.9 percent, which annualizes at 7.8 percent and 7.5 percent relative to a year earlier. China grew at 2.2 percent in IIIQ2013, which annualizes at 9.1 percent and 7.8 percent relative to a year earlier. There is decennial change in leadership in China (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/index.htm). Growth rates of GDP of China in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier have been declining from 2011 to 2013. GDP fell 0.1 percent in the euro area in IQ2012 and decreased 0.2 in IQ2012 relative to a year earlier. Euro area GDP contracted 0.3 percent IIQ2012 and fell 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.1 percent and declined 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. In IVQ2012, euro area GDP fell 0.5 percent relative to the prior quarter and fell 1.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, the GDP of the euro area fell 0.2 percent and decreased 1.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of the euro area increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2013 and fell 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, euro area GDP increased 0.1 percent and fell 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP increased 0.7 percent in IQ2012 and 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2012, Germany’s GDP decreased 0.1 percent and increased 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier but 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier when adjusted for calendar (CA) effects. In IIIQ2012, Germany’s GDP increased 0.2 percent and 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. Germany’s GDP contracted 0.5 percent in IVQ2012 and increased 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.0 percent and fell 1.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIQ2013, Germany’s GDP increased 0.7 percent and 0.9 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Germany increased 0.3 percent in IIIQ2013 and 1.1 percent relative to a year earlier. Growth of US GDP in IQ2012 was 0.9 percent, at SAAR of 3.7 percent and higher by 3.3 percent relative to IQ2011. US GDP increased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012, 1.2 percent at SAAR and 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, US GDP grew 0.7 percent, 2.8 percent at SAAR and 3.1 percent relative to IIIQ2011. In IVQ2012, US GDP grew 0.0 percent, 0.1 percent at SAAR and 2.0 percent relative to IVQ2011. In IQ2013, US GDP grew at 1.1 percent SAAR, 0.3 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.3 percent relative to the same quarter in 2013. In IIQ2013, US GDP grew at 2.5 percent in SAAR, 0.6 percent relative to the prior quarter and 1.6 percent relative to IIQ2012. US GDP grew at 4.1 percent in SAAR in IIIQ2013, 1.0 percent relative to the prior quarter and 2.0 percent relative to the same quarter a year earlier (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html) with weak hiring (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html). In IQ2012, UK GDP changed 0.0 percent, increasing 0.6 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.4 percent in IIQ2012 and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIIQ2012 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP fell 0.1 percent in IVQ2012 relative to IIIQ2012 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.5 percent in IQ2013 and 0.7 percent relative to a year earlier. UK GDP increased 0.8 percent in IIQ2013 and 2.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2013, UK GDP increased 0.8 percent and 1.9 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy has experienced decline of GDP in nine consecutive quarters from IIIQ2011 to IIIQ2013. Italy’s GDP fell 1.1 percent in IQ2012 and declined 1.8 percent relative to IQ2011. Italy’s GDP fell 0.6 percent in IIQ2012 and declined 2.6 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, Italy’s GDP fell 0.5 percent and declined 2.8 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy contracted 0.9 percent in IVQ2012 and fell 3.0 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, Italy’s GDP contracted 0.6 percent and fell 2.5 percent relative to a year earlier. Italy’s GDP fell 0.3 percent in IIQ2013 and 2.2 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of Italy changed 0.0 percent in IIIQ2013 and declined 1.8 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP changed 0.0 percent in IQ2012 and increased 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP decreased 0.3 percent in IIQ2012 and increased 0.1 percent relative to a year earlier. In IIIQ2012, France’s GDP increased 0.2 percent and changed 0.0 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP fell 0.2 percent in IVQ2012 and declined 0.3 percent relative to a year earlier. In IQ2013, France GDP fell 0.1 percent and declined 0.4 percent relative to a year earlier. The GDP of France increased 0.6 percent in IIQ2013 and 0.5 percent relative to a year earlier. France’s GDP contracted 0.1 percent in IIIQ2013 and increased 0.2 percent relative to a year earlier.
Table V-3, Percentage Changes of GDP Quarter on Prior Quarter and on Same Quarter Year Earlier, ∆%
IQ2012/IVQ2011 | IQ2012/IQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.9 SAAR: 3.7 | 3.3 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.9 SAAR: 3.5 | 3.1 |
China | 1.4 | 8.1 |
Euro Area | -0.1 | -0.2 |
Germany | 0.7 | 1.8 |
France | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Italy | -1.1 | -1.8 |
United Kingdom | 0.0 | 0.6 |
IIQ2012/IQ2012 | IIQ2012/IIQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.3 SAAR: 1.2 | 2.8 |
Japan | QOQ: -0.5 | 3.2 |
China | 2.2 | 7.6 |
Euro Area | -0.3 | -0.5 |
Germany | -0.1 | 0.6 1.1 CA |
France | -0.3 | 0.1 |
Italy | -0.6 | -2.6 |
United Kingdom | -0.4 | 0.0 |
IIIQ2012/ IIQ2012 | IIIQ2012/ IIIQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.7 | 3.1 |
Japan | QOQ: –0.8 | -0.2 |
China | 2.0 | 7.4 |
Euro Area | -0.1 | -0.7 |
Germany | 0.2 | 0.4 |
France | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Italy | -0.5 | -2.8 |
United Kingdom | 0.8 | 0.2 |
IVQ2012/IIIQ2012 | IVQ2012/IVQ2011 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.0 | 2.0 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.1 SAAR: 0.6 | -0.3 |
China | 1.9 | 7.9 |
Euro Area | -0.5 | -1.0 |
Germany | -0.5 | 0.0 |
France | -0.2 | -0.3 |
Italy | -0.9 | -3.0 |
United Kingdom | -0.1 | 0.2 |
IQ2013/IVQ2012 | IQ2013/IQ2012 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.3 | 1.3 |
Japan | QOQ: 1.1 SAAR: 4.5 | 0.1 |
China | 1.5 | 7.7 |
Euro Area | -0.2 | -1.2 |
Germany | 0.0 | -1.6 |
France | -0.1 | -0.4 |
Italy | -0.6 | -2.5 |
UK | 0.5 | 0.7 |
IIQ2013/IQ2013 | IIQ2013/IIQ2012 | |
United States | QOQ: 0.6 SAAR: 2.5 | 1.6 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.9 SAAR: 3.6 | 1.2 |
China | 1.9 | 7.5 |
Euro Area | 0.3 | -0.6 |
Germany | 0.7 | 0.9 |
France | 0.6 | 0.5 |
Italy | -0.3 | -2.2 |
UK | 0.8 | 2.0 |
IIIQ2013/IIQ2013 | III/Q2013/ IIIQ2012 | |
USA | QOQ: 1.0 | 2.0 |
Japan | QOQ: 0.3 SAAR: 1.1 | 2.4 |
China | 2.2 | 7.8 |
Euro Area | 0.1 | -0.4 |
Germany | 0.3 | 1.1 |
France | -0.1 | 0.2 |
Italy | 0.0 | -1.8 |
UK | 0.8 | 1.9 |
QOQ: Quarter relative to prior quarter; SAAR: seasonally adjusted annual rate
Source: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/aboutus/stat_int.html
Table V-4 provides two types of data: growth of exports and imports in the latest available months and in the past 12 months; and contributions of net trade (exports less imports) to growth of real GDP. Japan provides the most worrisome data (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/global-financial-risk-world-inflation.html http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations_8763.html http://cmpass ocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/paring-quantitative-easing-policy-and_4699.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/world-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/world-inflation-waves-united-states.html and earlier at http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/thirty-one-million-unemployed-or.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_24.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/contraction-of-united-states-real_25.html and for GDP http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html and earlier http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html and earlier http://cmpassocreulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/recovery-without-hiring-united-states.html). In Nov 2013, Japan’s exports grew 18.4 percent in 12 months while imports increased 21.1 percent. The second part of Table V-4 shows that net trade deducted 1.3 percentage points from Japan’s growth of GDP in IIQ2012, deducted 2.1 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 and deducted 0.6 percentage points from GDP growth in IVQ2012. Net trade added 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth in IQ2012, 1.6 percentage points in IQ2013 and 0.6 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.9 percentage points from GDP growth in Japan. In Nov 2013, China exports increased 12.6 percent relative to a year earlier and imports increased 5.2 percent. Germany’s exports increased 0.2 percent in the month of Oct 2013 and increased 0.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct 2013. Germany’s imports decreased 2.9 percent in the month of Oct and decreased 1.6 percent in the 12 months ending in Oct. Net trade contributed 0.8 percentage points to growth of GDP in IQ2012, contributed 0.4 percentage points in IIQ2012, contributed 0.3 percentage points in IIIQ2012, deducted 0.5 percentage points in IVQ2012, deducted 0.2 percentage points in IQ2012 and added 0.3 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded deducted 0.4 percentage points from Germany’s GDP growth in IIIQ2013. Net trade deducted 0.8 percentage points from UK value added in IQ2012, deducted 0.8 percentage points in IIQ2012, added 0.7 percentage points in IIIQ2012 and subtracted 0.5 percentage points in IVQ2012. In IQ2013, net trade added 0.5 percentage points to UK’s growth of value added and contributed 0.2 percentage points in IIQ2013. In IIIQ2013, net trade deducted 1.2 percentage points from UK GDP growth. France’s exports decreased 0.3 percent in Oct 2013 while imports decreased 2.5. Net traded added 0.1 percentage points to France’s GDP in IIIQ2012 and 0.1 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.1 percentage points from France’s GDP growth in IQ2013 and added 0.1 percentage points in IIQ2013, deducting 0.6 percentage points in IIIQ2013. US exports increased 1.8 percent in Oct 2013 and goods exports increased 2.0 percent in Jan-Oct 2013 relative to a year earlier but net trade deducted 0.03 percentage points from GDP growth in IIIQ2012 and added 0.68 percentage points in IVQ2012. Net trade deducted 0.28 percentage points from US GDP growth in IQ2013 and deducted 0.07 percentage points in IIQ2013. Net traded added 0.14 percentage points to US GDP growth in IIIQ2013. US imports increased 0.4 percent in Oct 2013 and goods imports decreased 0.3 percent in Jan-Oct 2013 relative to a year earlier. Industrial production increased 1.1 percent in Nov 2013 after increasing 0.1 percent in Oct 2013 and increasing 0.5 percent in Se 2013, as shown in Table I-1, with all data seasonally adjusted. The report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System states (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm):
“Industrial production increased 1.1 percent in November after having edged up 0.1 percent in October; output was previously reported to have declined 0.1 percent in October. The gain in November was the largest since November 2012, when production rose 1.3 percent. Manufacturing output increased 0.6 percent in November for its fourth consecutive monthly gain. Production at mines advanced 1.7 percent to more than reverse a decline of 1.5 percent in October. The index for utilities was up 3.9 percent in November, as colder-than-average temperatures boosted demand for heating. At 101.3 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production was 3.2 percent above its year-earlier level. In November, industrial production surpassed for the first time its pre-recession peak of December 2007 and was 21 percent above its trough of June 2009. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 0.8 percentage point in November to 79.0 percent, a rate 1.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972-2012) average.”
In the six months ending in Nov 2013, United States national industrial production accumulated increase of 2.2 percent at the annual equivalent rate of 4.5 percent, which is higher than growth of 3.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013. Excluding growth of 1.1 percent in Nov 2013, growth in the remaining five months from Jun 2012 to Oct 2013 accumulated to 1.1 percent or 2.2 percent annual equivalent. Industrial production fell in one of the past six months. Business equipment accumulated growth of 1.4 percent in the six months from Jun to Nov 2013 at the annual equivalent rate of 2.8 percent, which is higher than growth of 2.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013. The Fed analyzes capacity utilization of total industry in its report (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm): “Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 0.8 percentage point in November to 79.0 percent, a rate 1.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972-2012) average.” United States industry apparently decelerated to a lower growth rate with possible acceleration in Nov 2013.
Manufacturing increased 0.3 percent in Oct 2013 after increasing 0.1 percent in Sep 2013 and increasing 0.7 percent in Aug 2013 seasonally adjusted, increasing 3.4 percent not seasonally adjusted in 12 months ending in Oct 2013, as shown in Table I-2 (http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html). Manufacturing increased 0.6 percent in No 2013 after increasing 0.5 percent in Oct 2013 and increasing 0.1 percent in Sep 2013 seasonally adjusted, increasing 3.0 percent not seasonally adjusted in 12 months ending in Nov 2013, as shown in Table I-2. Manufacturing grew cumulatively 1.7 percent in the six months ending in Nov 2013 or at the annual equivalent rate of 3.4 percent. Excluding the increase of 0.6 percent in Nov 2013, manufacturing accumulated growth of 1.1 percent from Jun 2013 to Oct 2013 or at the annual equivalent rate of 2.2 percent. Table I-2 provides a longer perspective of manufacturing in the US. There has been evident deceleration of manufacturing growth in the US from 2010 and the first three months of 2011 into more recent months as shown by 12 months rates of growth. Growth rates appeared to be increasing again closer to 5 percent in Apr-Jun 2012 but deteriorated. The rates of decline of manufacturing in 2009 are quite high with a drop of 18.2 percent in the 12 months ending in Apr 2009. Manufacturing recovered from this decline and led the recovery from the recession. Rates of growth appeared to be returning to the levels at 3 percent or higher in the annual rates before the recession but the pace of manufacturing fell steadily in the past six months with some weakness at the margin. Manufacturing fell by 21.9 from the peak in Jun 2007 to the trough in Apr 2009 and increase by 16.8 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Dec 2012. Manufacturing grew 20.5 percent from the trough in Apr 2009 to Nov 2013. Manufacturing output in Nov 2013 is 5.9 percent below the peak in Jun 2007.
Table V-4, Growth of Trade and Contributions of Net Trade to GDP Growth, ∆% and % Points
Exports | Exports 12 M ∆% | Imports | Imports 12 M ∆% | |
USA | 1.8 Oct | 2.0 Jan-Oct | 0.4 Oct | -0.3 Jan-Oct |
Japan | Nov 2013 18.4 Oct 2013 18.6 Sep 2013 11.5 Aug 2013 14.7 Jul 2013 12.2 Jun 2013 7.4 May 2013 10.1 Apr 2013 3.8 Mar 2013 1.1 Feb 2013 -2.9 Jan 2013 6.4 Dec -5.8 Nov -4.1 Oct -6.5 Sep -10.3 Aug -5.8 Jul -8.1 | Nov 2013 21.1 Oct 2013 26.1 Sep 2013 16.5 Aug 2013 16.0 Jul 2013 19.6 Jun 2013 11.8 May 2013 10.0 Apr 2013 9.4 Mar 2013 5.5 Feb 2013 7.3 Jan 2013 7.3 Dec 1.9 Nov 0.8 Oct -1.6 Sep 4.1 Aug -5.4 Jul 2.1 | ||
China | 12.6 Nov 5.6 Oct -0.3 Sep 7.2 Aug 5.1 Jul -3.1 Jun 1.0 May 14.7 Apr 10.0 Mar 21.8 Feb | 5.2 Nov 7.6 Oct 7.4 Sep 10.9 Jul -0.7 Jun -0.3 May 16.8 Apr 14.1 Mar -15.2 Feb | ||
Euro Area | 1.2 12-M Oct | 0.9 Jan-Oct | -3.4 12-M Oct | -3.4 Jan-Oct |
Germany | 0.2 Oct CSA | 0.6 Oct | -2.9 Oct CSA | -1.6 Oct |
France Oct | -0.3 | -2.0 | -2.5 | -2.7 |
Italy Oct | -0.5 | 0.8 | -2.6 | -4.3 |
UK | -1.4 Oct | 1.9 Aug-Oct 13 /Aug-Oct 12 | -1.4 Oct | 0.3 Aug-Oct 13/Aug-Oct 12 |
Net Trade % Points GDP Growth | % Points | |||
USA | IIIQ2013 0.14 IIQ2013 -0.07 IQ2013 -0.28 IVQ2012 +0.68 IIIQ2012 -0.03 IIQ2012 +0.10 IQ2012 +0.44 | |||
Japan | 0.4 IQ2012 -1.3 IIQ2012 -2.1 IIIQ2012 -0.6 IVQ2012 1.6 IQ2013 0.6 IIQ2013 -1.9 IIIQ2013 | |||
Germany | IQ2012 0.8 IIQ2012 0.4 IIIQ2012 0.3 IVQ2012 -0.5 IQ2013 -0.2 IIQ2013 0.3 IIIQ2013 -0.4 | |||
France | 0.1 IIIQ2012 0.1 IVQ2012 -0.1 IQ2013 0.1 IIQ2013 -0.6 IIIQ2013 | |||
UK | -0.8 IQ2012 -0.8 IIQ2012 +0.7 IIIQ2012 -0.5 IVQ2012 0.5 IQ2013 0.2 IIQ2013 -1.2 IIIQ2013 |
Sources: Country Statistical Agencies http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/ http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm
The geographical breakdown of exports and imports of Japan with selected regions and countries is provided in Table VB-7 for Nov 2013. The share of Asia in Japan’s trade is more than one-half for 55.0 percent of exports and 45.4 percent of imports. Within Asia, exports to China are 19.4 percent of total exports and imports from China 23.4 percent of total imports. While exports to China increased 33.1 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013, imports from China increased 19.4 percent. The second largest export market for Japan in Nov 2013 is the US with share of 19.2 percent of total exports, which is almost equal to that of China, and share of imports from the US of 9.0 percent in total imports. Western Europe has share of 10.2 percent in Japan’s exports and of 10.1 percent in imports. Rates of growth of exports of Japan in Nov 2013 are relatively high for several countries and regions with growth of 21.2 percent for exports to the US, 30.4 percent for exports to Brazil and 6.3 percent for exports to Australia. Comparisons relative to 2011 may have some bias because of the effects of the Tōhoku or Great East Earthquake and Tsunami of Mar 11, 2011. Deceleration of growth in China and the US and threat of recession in Europe can reduce world trade and economic activity. Growth rates of imports in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013 are positive for all trading partners with exception of France. Imports from Asia increased 19.8 percent in the 12 months ending in Nov 2013 while imports from China increased 19.4 percent. Data are in millions of yen, which may have effects of recent depreciation of the yen relative to the United States dollar (USD).
Table V-5, Japan, Value and 12-Month Percentage Changes of Exports and Imports by Regions and Countries, ∆% and Millions of Yen
Nov 2013 | Exports | 12 months ∆% | Imports Millions Yen | 12 months ∆% |
Total | 5,900,458 | 18.4 | 7,193,325 | 21.1 |
Asia | 3,243,626 | 18.9 | 3,268,586 | 19.8 |
China | 1,142,599 | 33.1 | 1,679,702 | 19.4 |
USA | 1,131,304 | 21.2 | 647,248 | 34.9 |
Canada | 68,688 | 15.2 | 96,957 | 7.6 |
Brazil | 43,821 | 30.4 | 96,632 | 5.4 |
Mexico | 74,569 | 0.2 | 35,001 | 11.0 |
Western Europe | 600,981 | 17.1 | 728,480 | 7.6 |
Germany | 165,555 | 25.9 | 201,831 | 6.1 |
France | 48,177 | 28.7 | 102,161 | -4.9 |
UK | 84,919 | -5.1 | 55,180 | -2.8 |
Middle East | 228,322 | 24.7 | 1,379,683 | 33.4 |
Australia | 128,145 | 6.3 | 387,037 | 14.3 |
Source: Japan, Ministry of Finance http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm
World trade projections of the IMF are in Table V-6. There is increasing growth of the volume of world trade of goods and services from 2.9 percent in 2013 to 5.4 percent in 2015 and 5.1 percent on average from 2013 to 2018. World trade would be slower for advanced economies while emerging and developing economies (EMDE) experience faster growth. World economic slowdown would more challenging with lower growth of world trade.
Table V-6, IMF, Projections of World Trade, USD Billions, USD/Barrel and ∆%
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Average ∆% 2013-2018 | |
World Trade Volume (Goods and Services) | 2.9 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Exports Goods & Services | 3.0 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Imports Goods & Services | 2.8 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Oil Price USD/Barrel | 104.49 | 101.35 | NA | NA |
Value of World Exports Goods & Services $B | 23,164 | 24,367 | NA | NA |
Value of World Exports Goods $B | 18,709 | 19,632 | NA | NA |
Exports Goods & Services | ||||
EMDE | 3.5 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 5.9 |
G7 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Imports Goods & Services | ||||
EMDE | 5.0 | 5.9 | 6.7 | 6.2 |
G7 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Terms of Trade of Goods & Services | ||||
EMDE | -0.5 | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.5 |
G7 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Terms of Trade of Goods | ||||
EMDE | -0.6 | -0.9 | -0.9 | -0.8 |
G7 | -0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.007 |
Notes: Commodity Price Index includes Fuel and Non-fuel Prices; Commodity Industrial Inputs Price includes agricultural raw materials and metal prices; Oil price is average of WTI, Brent and Dubai
Source: International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook databank
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx
The JP Morgan Global All-Industry Output Index of the JP Morgan Manufacturing and Services PMI™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, with high association with world GDP, increased to 54.3 in Nov from 52.1 in Oct, indicating expansion at a faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7af9c543698844248210df3c25786468). This index has remained above the contraction territory of 50.0 during 52 consecutive months. The employment index decreased from 52.2 in Oct to 51.2 in Nov with input prices rising at a slower rate, new orders increasing at faster rate and output increasing at faster rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7af9c543698844248210df3c25786468). The JP Morgan Global Manufacturing PMI™, produced by JP Morgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM, was higher at 53.3 in
Dec from 53.1 in Nov, which is the highest reading since May 2011 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7757ef12fcdf458ab9f3e1c2d7c0811a). New export orders expanded for the sixth consecutive months (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7757ef12fcdf458ab9f3e1c2d7c0811a). David Hensley, Director of Global Economic Coordination at JP Morgan finds acceleration of global manufacturing with output at the highest rate in about three years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7757ef12fcdf458ab9f3e1c2d7c0811a). The HSBC Brazil Composite Output Index, compiled by Markit, decreased marginally from 52.0 in Oct to 51.8 in Nov, indicating moderate expansion of Brazil’s private sector (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c12bfb84a41d428fbccd1dac97d000e5). The HSBC Brazil Services Business Activity index, compiled by Markit increased marginally from 52.1 in Oct to 52.3 in Nov, indicating continuing improvement in business activity in an nine-month high (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c12bfb84a41d428fbccd1dac97d000e5). André Loes, Chief Economist, Brazil, at HSBC, finds that the reading is stronger than the average of 50.2 in IIIQ2013 but that intput prices increased at the highest rate since Feb 2012 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c12bfb84a41d428fbccd1dac97d000e5). The HSBC Brazil Purchasing Managers’ IndexTM (PMI™) increased from 49.7 in Nov to 50.5 in Dec, indicating marginal improvement in manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/22c84c0c32a1483db57c2ec93cfb5ebc). André Loes, Chief Economist, Brazil at HSBC, finds improvement with growth of production and new orders (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/22c84c0c32a1483db57c2ec93cfb5ebc).
VA United States. The Markit Flash US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) seasonally adjusted decreased to 54.4 in Dec from 54.7 in Nov with the three-month average at 53.6 indicating moderate growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/409f3a8ff2a240c08dd65c2f747cab56). New export orders registered 51.4 in Dec unchanged from 51.4 in No, indicating marginal expansion. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that manufacturing output is growing at 4.0 percent per year with positive effects on employment (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/409f3a8ff2a240c08dd65c2f747cab56). The Markit Flash US Services PMI™ Business Activity Index increased from 55.9 in Nov to 56.0 in Dec with the average at 53.7l, which is the lowest quarterly average in 2013 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a3f2275774ad43e3b0e1b72f6b0b7b8b). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the surveys are consistent with growth at around 3 percent per year in IVQ2013 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a3f2275774ad43e3b0e1b72f6b0b7b8b). The Markit US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) increased to 55.0 in Dec from 54.7 in Nov, which indicates solid expansion (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3c6c524ef8474099a853c9cc449b5f1c). The index of new exports orders was unchanged from 51.4 in Nov to 51.4 in Dec while total new orders decreased from 56.2 in Dec to 56.1 in Dec. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the index suggests growth of production at 3.0 percent annual rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/3c6c524ef8474099a853c9cc449b5f1c). The purchasing managers’ index (PMI) of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Report on Business® increased 0.9 percentage points from 56.4 in Oct to 57.3 in Nov, which indicates growth at a higher rate (http://www.ism.ws/ISMReport/MfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=12942). The index of new orders increased 3.0 percentage points from 60.6 in Oct to 63.6 in Nov. The index of exports increased 2.5 percentage point from 57.0 in Oct to 59.5 in Nov, growing at a faster rate. The Non-Manufacturing ISM Report on Business® PMI decreased 4.2 percentage points from 59.7 in Oct to 55.5 in Nov, indicating growth of business activity/production during 52 consecutive months, while the index of new orders decreased 0.4 percentage points from 56.8 in Oct to 56.4 in Nov (http://www.ism.ws/ISMReport/NonMfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=12943). Table USA provides the country economic indicators for the US.
Table USA, US Economic Indicators
Consumer Price Index | Nov 12 months NSA ∆%: 1.2; ex food and energy ∆%: 1.7 Nov month SA ∆%: 0.0; ex food and energy ∆%: 0.2 |
Producer Price Index | Nov 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.7; ex food and energy ∆% 1.3 |
PCE Inflation | Nov 12-month NSA ∆%: headline 0.9; ex food and energy ∆% 1.1 |
Employment Situation | Household Survey: Nov Unemployment Rate SA 7.0% |
Nonfarm Hiring | Nonfarm Hiring fell from 63.8 million in 2006 to 52.0 million in 2012 or by 11.8 million |
GDP Growth | BEA Revised National Income Accounts IIQ2012/IIQ2011 2.8 IIIQ2012/IIIQ2011 3.1 IVQ2012/IVQ2011 2.0 IQ2013/IQ2012 1.3 IIQ2013/IIQ2012 1.6 IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 2.0 IQ2012 SAAR 3.7 IIQ2012 SAAR 1.2 IIIQ2012 SAAR 2.8 IVQ2012 SAAR 0.1 IQ2013 SAAR 1.1 IIQ2013 SAAR 2.5 IIIQ2013 SAAR 4.1 |
Real Private Fixed Investment | SAAR IIIQ2013 5.9 ∆% IVQ2007 to IIIQ2013: minus 3.6% Blog 12/22/13 |
Personal Income and Consumption | Nov month ∆% SA Real Disposable Personal Income (RDPI) SA ∆% 0.1 |
Quarterly Services Report | IIIQ13/IIQ12 NSA ∆%: Financial & Insurance 0.6 |
Employment Cost Index | Compensation Private IIIQ2013 SA ∆%: 0.4 |
Industrial Production | Nov month SA ∆%: 1.1 Manufacturing Nov SA ∆% 0.6 Nov 12 months SA ∆% 2.9, NSA 3.0 |
Productivity and Costs | Nonfarm Business Productivity IIIQ2013∆% SAAE 3.0; IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 ∆% 0.3; Unit Labor Costs SAAE IIIQ2013 ∆% -1.4; IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 ∆%: 2.1 Blog 12/22/2013 |
New York Fed Manufacturing Index | General Business Conditions From Nov -2.21 to Dec 0.98 |
Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index | General Index from Nov 6.5 to Dec 7.0 |
Manufacturing Shipments and Orders | New Orders SA Oct ∆% -0.9 Ex Transport 0.0 Jan-Oct NSA New Orders 2.4 Ex transport 1.5 |
Durable Goods | Nov New Orders SA ∆%: 3.5; ex transport ∆%: 1.2 |
Sales of New Motor Vehicles | Jan-Dec 2013 15,600,199; Jan-Dec 2012 14,491,873. Dec 13 SAAR 16.40 million, Nov 13 SAAR 16.41 million, Dec 2012 SAAR 15.24 million Blog 1/5/14 |
Sales of Merchant Wholesalers | Jan-Oct 2013/Jan-Oct 2012 NSA ∆%: Total 3.9; Durable Goods: 4.2; Nondurable |
Sales and Inventories of Manufacturers, Retailers and Merchant Wholesalers | Oct 13/Oct 12-M NSA ∆%: Sales Total Business 4.0; Manufacturers 1.6 |
Sales for Retail and Food Services | Jan-Nov 2013/Jan-Nov 2012 ∆%: Retail and Food Services 4.3; Retail ∆% 4.3 |
Value of Construction Put in Place | Nov SAAR month SA ∆%: 1.0 Nov 12-month NSA: 1.1 Jan-Nov 2013 ∆% 5.0 |
Case-Shiller Home Prices | Oct 2013/Oct 2012 ∆% NSA: 10 Cities 13.6; 20 Cities: 13.6 |
FHFA House Price Index Purchases Only | Oct SA ∆% 0.5; |
New House Sales | Nov 2013 month SAAR ∆%: minus 2.1 |
Housing Starts and Permits | Nov Starts month SA ∆% 22.7; Permits ∆%: -3.1 |
Trade Balance | Balance Oct SA -$40,641 million versus Sep -$38,945 million |
Export and Import Prices | Nov 12-month NSA ∆%: Imports -1.5; Exports -1.6 |
Consumer Credit | Oct ∆% annual rate: Total 7.1; Revolving 6.1; Nonrevolving 7.5 |
Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term Treasury Securities | Oct Net Foreign Purchases of Long-term US Securities: $35.4 billion |
Treasury Budget | Fiscal Year 2014/2013 ∆% Nov: Receipts 10.2; Outlays minus 4.7; Individual Income Taxes 2.7 Deficit Fiscal Year 2012 $1,087 billion Blog 12/15/2013 |
CBO Budget and Economic Outlook | 2012 Deficit $1087 B 6.8% GDP Debt 11,281 B 70.1% GDP 2013 Deficit $642 B, Debt 12,036 B 72.5% GDP Blog 8/26/12 11/18/12 2/10/13 9/22/13 |
Commercial Banks Assets and Liabilities | Nov 2013 SAAR ∆%: Securities 4.6 Loans 1.0 Cash Assets 30.5 Deposits 3.7 Blog 12/29/13 |
Flow of Funds | IIIQ2013 ∆ since 2007 Assets +$8554.2 MM Nonfinancial -$1228.7 MM Real estate -$1838.9 MM Financial +9782.9 MM Net Worth +$9269.0 MM Blog 12/29/13 |
Current Account Balance of Payments | IIIQ2013 -110,055 MM %GDP 2.2 Blog 12/22/13 |
Links to blog comments in Table USA:
12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/8/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/24/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
9/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
2/10/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/united-states-unsustainable-fiscal.html
11/18/12 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/united-states-unsustainable-fiscal.html
Motor vehicle sales and production in the US have been in long-term structural change. Table VA-1 provides the data on new motor vehicle sales and domestic car production in the US from 1990 to 2010. New motor vehicle sales grew from 14,137 thousand in 1990 to the peak of 17,806 thousand in 2000 or 29.5 percent. In that same period, domestic car production fell from 6,231 thousand in 1990 to 5,542 thousand in 2000 or -11.1 percent. New motor vehicle sales fell from 17,445 thousand in 2005 to 11,772 in 2010 or 32.5 percent while domestic car production fell from 4,321 thousand in 2005 to 2,840 thousand in 2010 or 34.3 percent. In Jan-Dec 2013, light vehicle sales accumulated to 15,600,199, which is higher by 7.6 percent relative to 14,491,873 a year earlier (http://motorintelligence.com/m_frameset.html). The seasonally adjusted annual rate of light vehicle sales in the US reached 15.40 million in Dec 2013, lower than 16.41 million in Nov 2013 and higher than 15.24 million in Dec 2012 (http://motorintelligence.com/m_frameset.html).
Table VA-1, US, New Motor Vehicle Sales and Car Production, Thousand Units
New Motor Vehicle Sales | New Car Sales and Leases | New Truck Sales and Leases | Domestic Car Production | |
1990 | 14,137 | 9,300 | 4,837 | 6,231 |
1991 | 12,725 | 8,589 | 4,136 | 5,454 |
1992 | 13,093 | 8,215 | 4,878 | 5,979 |
1993 | 14,172 | 8,518 | 5,654 | 5,979 |
1994 | 15,397 | 8,990 | 6,407 | 6,614 |
1995 | 15,106 | 8,536 | 6,470 | 6,340 |
1996 | 15,449 | 8,527 | 6,922 | 6,081 |
1997 | 15,490 | 8,273 | 7,218 | 5,934 |
1998 | 15,958 | 8,142 | 7,816 | 5,554 |
1999 | 17,401 | 8,697 | 8,704 | 5,638 |
2000 | 17,806 | 8,852 | 8,954 | 5,542 |
2001 | 17,468 | 8,422 | 9,046 | 4,878 |
2002 | 17,144 | 8,109 | 9,036 | 5,019 |
2003 | 16,968 | 7,611 | 9,357 | 4,510 |
2004 | 17,298 | 7,545 | 9,753 | 4,230 |
2005 | 17,445 | 7,720 | 9,725 | 4,321 |
2006 | 17,049 | 7,821 | 9,228 | 4,367 |
2007 | 16,460 | 7,618 | 8,683 | 3,924 |
2008 | 13,494 | 6,814 | 6.680 | 3,777 |
2009 | 10,601 | 5,456 | 5,154 | 2,247 |
2010 | 11,772 | 5,729 | 6,044 | 2,840 |
Source: US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/wholesale_retail_trade/motor_vehicle_sales.html
Chart VA-1 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve provides output of motor vehicles and parts in the United States from 1972 to 2013. Output virtually stagnated since the late 1990s.
Chart VA-1, US, Motor Vehicles and Parts Output, 1972-2013
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
VB Japan. Table VB-BOJF provides the forecasts of economic activity and inflation in Japan by the majority of members of the Policy Board of the Bank of Japan, which is part of their Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130711a.pdf). For fiscal 2013, the forecast is of growth of GDP between 2.6 and 3.0 percent, with the all items CPI less fresh food of 0.6 to 1.0 percent. The critical difference is forecast of the CPI excluding fresh food of 2.8 to 3.6 percent in 2014 and 1.6 to 2.9 percent in 2015. Consumer price inflation in Japan excluding fresh food was 0.3 percent in Oct 2013 and 0.9 percent in 12 months (http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/cpi/1581.htm). The new monetary policy of the Bank of Japan aims to increase inflation to 2 percent. These forecasts are biannual in Apr and Oct. The Cabinet Office, Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan released on Jan 22, 2013, a “Joint Statement of the Government and the Bank of Japan on Overcoming Deflation and Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130122c.pdf) with the important change of increasing the inflation target of monetary policy from 1 percent to 2 percent:
“The Bank of Japan conducts monetary policy based on the principle that the policy shall be aimed at achieving price stability, thereby contributing to the sound development of the national economy, and is responsible for maintaining financial system stability. The Bank aims to achieve price stability on a sustainable basis, given that there are various factors that affect prices in the short run.
The Bank recognizes that the inflation rate consistent with price stability on a sustainable basis will rise as efforts by a wide range of entities toward strengthening competitiveness and growth potential of Japan's economy make progress. Based on this recognition, the Bank sets the price stability target at 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index.
Under the price stability target specified above, the Bank will pursue monetary easing and aim to achieve this target at the earliest possible time. Taking into consideration that it will take considerable time before the effects of monetary policy permeate the economy, the Bank will ascertain whether there is any significant risk to the sustainability of economic growth, including from the accumulation of financial imbalances.”
The Bank of Japan also provided explicit analysis of its view on price stability in a “Background note regarding the Bank’s thinking on price stability” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/data/rel130123a1.pdf http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130123a.htm/). The Bank of Japan also amended “Principal terms and conditions for the Asset Purchase Program” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130122a.pdf): “Asset purchases and loan provision shall be conducted up to the maximum outstanding amounts by the end of 2013. From January 2014, the Bank shall purchase financial assets and provide loans every month, the amount of which shall be determined pursuant to the relevant rules of the Bank.”
Financial markets in Japan and worldwide were shocked by new bold measures of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing” by the Bank of Japan (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The objective of policy is to “achieve the price stability target of 2 percent in terms of the year-on-year rate of change in the consumer price index (CPI) at the earliest possible time, with a time horizon of about two years” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf). The main elements of the new policy are as follows:
- Monetary Base Control. Most central banks in the world pursue interest rates instead of monetary aggregates, injecting bank reserves to lower interest rates to desired levels. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has shifted back to monetary aggregates, conducting money market operations with the objective of increasing base money, or monetary liabilities of the government, at the annual rate of 60 to 70 trillion yen. The BOJ estimates base money outstanding at “138 trillion yen at end-2012) and plans to increase it to “200 trillion yen at end-2012 and 270 trillion yen at end 2014” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
- Maturity Extension of Purchases of Japanese Government Bonds. Purchases of bonds will be extended even up to bonds with maturity of 40 years with the guideline of extending the average maturity of BOJ bond purchases from three to seven years. The BOJ estimates the current average maturity of Japanese government bonds (JGB) at around seven years. The BOJ plans to purchase about 7.5 trillion yen per month (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/rel130404d.pdf). Takashi Nakamichi, Tatsuo Ito and Phred Dvorak, wiring on “Bank of Japan mounts bid for revival,” on Apr 4, 2013, published in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323646604578401633067110420.html ), find that the limit of maturities of three years on purchases of JGBs was designed to avoid views that the BOJ would finance uncontrolled government deficits.
- Seigniorage. The BOJ is pursuing coordination with the government that will take measures to establish “sustainable fiscal structure with a view to ensuring the credibility of fiscal management” (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/release_2013/k130404a.pdf).
- Diversification of Asset Purchases. The BOJ will engage in transactions of exchange traded funds (ETF) and real estate investment trusts (REITS) and not solely on purchases of JGBs. Purchases of ETFs will be at an annual rate of increase of one trillion yen and purchases of REITS at 30 billion yen.
Table VB-BOJF, Bank of Japan, Forecasts of the Majority of Members of the Policy Board, % Year on Year
Fiscal Year | Real GDP | CPI All Items Less Fresh Food | Excluding Effects of Consumption Tax Hikes |
2013 | |||
Oct 2013 | +2.6 to +3.0 [+2.7] | +0.6 to +1.0 [+0.7] | |
Jul 2013 | +2.5 to +3.0 [+2.8] | +0.5 to +0.8 [+0.6] | |
2014 | |||
Oct 2013 | +0.9 to +1.5 [+1.5] | +2.8 to +3.6 [+3.3] | +0.8 to +1.6 [+1.3] |
Jul 2013 | +0.8 to +1.5 [+1.3] | +2.7 to +3.6 [+3.3] | +0.7 to +1.6 [+1.3] |
2015 | |||
Oct 2013 | +1.3 to +1.8 [+1.5] | +1.6 to +2.9 [+2.6] | +0.9 to +2.2 [+1.9] |
Jul 2013 | +1.3 to +1.9 [+1.5] | +1.6 to +2.9 [+2.6] | +0.9 to +2.2 [+1.9] |
Figures in brackets are the median of forecasts of Policy Board members
Source: Policy Board, Bank of Japan
http://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/outlook/gor1310b.pdf
Private-sector activity in Japan expanded with the Markit Composite Output PMI™ Index decreased from 56.0 in Oct, which was the highest reading in the six-year history of the survey, to 54.0 in Nov, (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/84e5de2e85dc4979b44676d284eb3780). Claudia Tillbrooke, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds that the survey data suggest continuing strong growth of the economy of Japan with strength in new orders for manufacturing (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/84e5de2e85dc4979b44676d284eb3780). The Markit Business Activity Index of Services decreased from the record of 55.3 in Oct to 51.8 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/84e5de2e85dc4979b44676d284eb3780). Claudia Tillbrooke, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds growth in services with strength in new orders but concern on possible effects of increase of sale taxes (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/84e5de2e85dc4979b44676d284eb3780). The Markit/JMMA Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™), seasonally adjusted, increased from 55.1 in Nov to 55.2 in Dec, which is the highest level since Jul 2006 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a42e8a52c4114460ad2b9f8cea030c3f). New orders grew at a high rate for the tenth consecutive month. New export orders increased for the fourth consecutive month. Claudia Tillbrooke, Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds improving manufacturing conditions at the highest levels since 2006 with some concerns about the sales tax increase in Apr and employment (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a42e8a52c4114460ad2b9f8cea030c3f).Table JPY provides the country data table for Japan.
Table JPY, Japan, Economic Indicators
Historical GDP and CPI | 1981-2010 Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation 1981-2010 |
Corporate Goods Prices | Nov ∆% 0.1 |
Consumer Price Index | Nov NSA ∆% 0.0; Nov 12 months NSA ∆% 1.5 |
Real GDP Growth | IIIQ2013 ∆%: 0.3 on IIQ2013; IIIQ2013 SAAR 1.1; |
Employment Report | Nov Unemployed 2.49 million Change in unemployed since last year: minus 110 thousand |
All Industry Indices | Oct month SA ∆% -0.2 Blog 12/22/13 |
Industrial Production | Nov SA month ∆%: 0.1 |
Machine Orders | Total Oct ∆% -4.6 Private ∆%: 7.0 Oct ∆% Excluding Volatile Orders 0.6 |
Tertiary Index | Oct month SA ∆% -0.7 |
Wholesale and Retail Sales | Nov 12 months: |
Family Income and Expenditure Survey | Nov 12-month ∆% total nominal consumption 2.1, real 0.2 Blog 12/29/13 |
Trade Balance | Exports Nov 12 months ∆%: 18.4 Imports Nov 12 months ∆% 21.1 Blog 12/22/13 |
Links to blog comments in Table JPY:
12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
VC China. China estimates an index of nonmanufacturing purchasing managers based on a sample of 1200 nonmanufacturing enterprises across the country (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Table CIPMNM provides this index and components. The total index increased from 55.7 in Mar 2012 to 58.0 in Mar 2012, decreasing to 53.9 in Aug 2013. The index decreased from 56.0 in Nov 2013 to 54.6 in Dec 2013. The index of new orders increased from 52.2 in Jan 2012 to 54.3 in Dec 2012 but fell to 50.1 in May 2013, barely above the neutral frontier of 50.0. The index of new orders stabilized at 51.0 in Nov-Dec 2013.
Table CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted
Total Index | New Orders | Interm. | Subs Prices | Exp | |
Dec 2013 | 54.6 | 51.0 | 56.9 | 52.0 | 58.7 |
Nov | 56.0 | 51.0 | 54.8 | 49.5 | 61.3 |
Oct | 56.3 | 51.6 | 56.1 | 51.4 | 60.5 |
Sep | 55.4 | 53.4 | 56.7 | 50.6 | 60.1 |
Aug | 53.9 | 50.9 | 57.1 | 51.2 | 62.9 |
Jul | 54.1 | 50.3 | 58.2 | 52.4 | 63.9 |
Jun | 53.9 | 50.3 | 55.0 | 50.6 | 61.8 |
May | 54.3 | 50.1 | 54.4 | 50.7 | 62.9 |
Apr | 54.5 | 50.9 | 51.1 | 47.6 | 62.5 |
Mar | 55.6 | 52.0 | 55.3 | 50.0 | 62.4 |
Feb | 54.5 | 51.8 | 56.2 | 51.1 | 62.7 |
Jan | 56.2 | 53.7 | 58.2 | 50.9 | 61.4 |
Dec 2012 | 56.1 | 54.3 | 53.8 | 50.0 | 64.6 |
Nov | 55.6 | 53.2 | 52.5 | 48.4 | 64.6 |
Oct | 55.5 | 51.6 | 58.1 | 50.5 | 63.4 |
Sep | 53.7 | 51.8 | 57.5 | 51.3 | 60.9 |
Aug | 56.3 | 52.7 | 57.6 | 51.2 | 63.2 |
Jul | 55.6 | 53.2 | 49.7 | 48.7 | 63.9 |
Jun | 56.7 | 53.7 | 52.1 | 48.6 | 65.5 |
May | 55.2 | 52.5 | 53.6 | 48.5 | 65.4 |
Apr | 56.1 | 52.7 | 57.9 | 50.3 | 66.1 |
Mar | 58.0 | 53.5 | 60.2 | 52.0 | 66.6 |
Feb | 57.3 | 52.7 | 59.0 | 51.2 | 63.8 |
Jan | 55.7 | 52.2 | 58.2 | 51.1 | 65.3 |
Notes: Interm.: Intermediate; Subs: Subscription; Exp: Business Expectations
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Chart CIPMNM provides China’s nonmanufacturing purchasing managers’ index. The index fell from 56.1 in Dec 2012 to 53.9 in Jun 2013. The index recovered to 56.3 in Oct 2013, decreasing marginally to 54.6 in Dec 2013.
Chart CIPMNM, China, Nonmanufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Table CIPMMFG provides the index of purchasing managers of manufacturing seasonally adjusted of the National Bureau of Statistics of China. The general index (IPM) rose from 50.5 in Jan 2012 to 53.3 in Apr 2012, falling to 49.2 in Aug 2012, rebounding to 50.6 in Dec 2012. The index fell to 50.1 in Jun 2013, barely above the neutral frontier at 50.0, recovering to 51.4 in Nov 2013 but falling to 51.0 in Dec 2013. The index of new orders fell from 57.2 in Apr 2012 to 52.0 in Dec 2012. The index of new orders fell from 54.5 in Nov 2013 to 53.9 in Dec 2013.
Table CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, %, Seasonally Adjusted
IPM | PI | NOI | INV | EMP | SDEL | |
Dec 2013 | 51.0 | 53.9 | 52.0 | 47.6 | 48.7 | 50.5 |
Nov | 51.4 | 54.5 | 52.3 | 47.8 | 49.6 | 50.6 |
Oct | 51.4 | 54.4 | 52.5 | 48.6 | 49.2 | 50.8 |
Sep | 51.1 | 52.9 | 52.8 | 48.5 | 49.1 | 50.8 |
Aug | 51.0 | 52.6 | 52.4 | 48.0 | 49.3 | 50.4 |
Jul | 50.3 | 52.4 | 50.6 | 47.6 | 49.1 | 50.1 |
Jun | 50.1 | 52.0 | 50.4 | 47.4 | 48.7 | 50.3 |
May | 50.8 | 53.3 | 51.8 | 47.6 | 48.8 | 50.8 |
Apr | 50.6 | 52.6 | 51.7 | 47.5 | 49.0 | 50.8 |
Mar | 50.9 | 52.7 | 52.3 | 47.5 | 49.8 | 51.1 |
Feb | 50.1 | 51.2 | 50.1 | 49.5 | 47.6 | 48.3 |
Jan | 50.4 | 51.3 | 51.6 | 50.1 | 47.8 | 50.0 |
Dec 2012 | 50.6 | 52.0 | 51.2 | 47.3 | 49.0 | 48.8 |
Nov | 50.6 | 52.5 | 51.2 | 47.9 | 48.7 | 49.9 |
Oct | 50.2 | 52.1 | 50.4 | 47.3 | 49.2 | 50.1 |
Sep | 49.8 | 51.3 | 49.8 | 47.0 | 48.9 | 49.5 |
Aug | 49.2 | 50.9 | 48.7 | 45.1 | 49.1 | 50.0 |
Jul | 50.1 | 51.8 | 49.0 | 48.5 | 49.5 | 49.0 |
Jun | 50.2 | 52.0 | 49.2 | 48.2 | 49.7 | 49.1 |
May | 50.4 | 52.9 | 49.8 | 45.1 | 50.5 | 49.0 |
Apr | 53.3 | 57.2 | 54.5 | 48.5 | 51.0 | 49.6 |
Mar | 53.1 | 55.2 | 55.1 | 49.5 | 51.0 | 48.9 |
Feb | 51.0 | 53.8 | 51.0 | 48.8 | 49.5 | 50.3 |
Jan | 50.5 | 53.6 | 50.4 | 49.7 | 47.1 | 49.7 |
IPM: Index of Purchasing Managers; PI: Production Index; NOI: New Orders Index; EMP: Employed Person Index; SDEL: Supplier Delivery Time Index
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
China estimates the manufacturing index of purchasing managers on the basis of a sample of 820 enterprises (http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/pressrelease/t20121009_402841094.htm). Chart CIPMMFG provides the manufacturing index of purchasing managers. The index fell to 50.1 in Feb 2013 and in Jun 2013. The index decreased from 51.4 in Nov 2013 to 51.0 in Dec 2013.
Chart CIPMMFG, China, Manufacturing Index of Purchasing Managers, Seasonally Adjusted
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China
http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Cumulative growth of China’s GDP in IIIQ2013 relative to the same period in 2012 was 7.7 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDP. Secondary industry accounts for 45.3 percent of GDP in IIIQ2013. In IIQ2013, industry alone accounts for 38.5 percent in IIQ2013 and construction with the remaining 6.8 percent in the first three quarters of 2012. Tertiary industry accounts for 45.5 percent of cumulative GDP in IIIQ2013 and primary industry for 9.2 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). The bottom block of Table VC-GDP provides quarter-on-quarter growth rates of GDP and their annual equivalent. China’s GDP growth decelerated significantly from annual equivalent 10.8 percent in IIQ2011 to 7.4 percent in IVQ2011 and 5.7 percent in IQ2012, rebounding to 9.1 percent in IIQ2012, 8.2 percent in IIIQ2012 and 7.8 percent in IVQ2012. Annual equivalent growth in IQ2013 fell to 6.1 percent and to 7.8 percent in IIQ2013, rebounding to 9.1 percent in IIIQ2013.
Table VC-GDP, China, Quarterly Growth of GDP, Current CNY 100 Million and Inflation Adjusted ∆%
Cumulative GDP IIIQ2013 | Value Current CNY Billion | 2013 Year-on-Year Constant Prices ∆% |
GDP | 38,676.2 | 7.7 |
Primary Industry | 3,566.9 | 3.4 |
Farming | 3,566.9 | 3.4 |
Secondary Industry | 17,511.8 | 7.8 |
Industry | 14,900.0 | 7.6 |
Construction | 2,611.8 | 9.7 |
Tertiary Industry | 17,597.5 | 8.4 |
Transport, Storage, Post | 21,449.9 | 7.2 |
Wholesale, Retail Trades | 3,056.7 | 10.4 |
Hotel & Catering Services | 772.7 | 5.1 |
Financial Intermediation | 2,623.8 | 10.4 |
Real Estate | 2,454.6 | 7.3 |
Other | 6,094.8 | 7.6 |
Growth in Quarter Relative to Prior Quarter | ∆% on Prior Quarter | ∆% Annual Equivalent |
2013 | ||
IIIQ2013 | 2.2 | 9.1 |
IIQ2013 | 1.9 | 7.8 |
IQ2013 | 1.5 | 6.1 |
2012 | ||
IVQ2012 | 1.9 | 7.8 |
IIIQ2012 | 2.0 | 8.2 |
IIQ2012 | 2.2 | 9.1 |
IQ2012 | 1.4 | 5.7 |
2011 | ||
IVQ2011 | 1.8 | 7.4 |
IIIQ2011 | 2.2 | 9.1 |
IIQ2011 | 2.6 | 10.8 |
IQ2011 | 2.3 | 9.5 |
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Growth of China’s GDP in IIIQ2013 relative to the same period in 2012 was 7.8 percent, as shown in Table VC-GDPA. Secondary industry accounts for 45.3 percent of GDP of which industry alone for 38.5 percent in cumulative IIIQ2013 and construction with the remaining 6.8 percent in the first three quarters of 2013. Tertiary industry accounts for 45.5 percent of GDP in the cumulative to IIIQ2013 and primary industry for 9.2 percent. China’s growth strategy consisted of rapid increases in productivity in industry to absorb population from agriculture where incomes are lower (Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 56-80). GDP growth decelerated from 12.1 percent in IQ2010 and 11.2 percent in IIQ2010 to 7.7 percent in IQ2013, 7.5 percent in IIQ2013 and 7.8 percent in IIIQ2013.
Table VC-GDPA, China, Growth Rate of GDP, ∆% Relative to a Year Earlier and ∆% Relative to Prior Quarter
IQ 2013 | IIQ 2013 | IIIQ 2013 | ||||||
GDP | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.8 | |||||
Primary Industry | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.4 | |||||
Secondary Industry | 7.8 | 7.6 | 7.8 | |||||
Tertiary Industry | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.4 | |||||
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.2 | |||||
IQ 2011 | IIQ 2011 | IIIQ 2011 | IVQ 2011 | IQ 2012 | IIQ 2012 | IIIQ 2012 | IVQ 2012 | |
GDP | 9.7 | 9.5 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.9 |
Primary Industry | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Secondary Industry | 11.1 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 8.1 |
Tertiary Industry | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8.1 |
GDP ∆% Relative to a Prior Quarter | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
IQ 2010 | IIQ 2010 | IIIQ 2010 | IVQ 2010 | |||||
GDP | 12.1 | 11.2 | 10.7 | 12.1 | ||||
Primary Industry | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 | ||||
Secondary Industry | 14.5 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 14.5 | ||||
Tertiary Industry | 10.5 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 10.5 |
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
Chart VC-GDP of the National Bureau of Statistics of China provides annual value and growth rates of GDP. China’s GDP growth in 2012 is still high at 7.8 percent but at the lowest rhythm in five years
Chart VC-GDP, China, Gross Domestic Product, Million Yuan and ∆%, 2008-2012
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
The HSBC Flash China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) compiled by Markit (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/2d9203c17a714e2382ce2e5ea6555448) is slowing. The overall Flash HSBC China Manufacturing PMI™ decreased from 50.8 in Nov to 50.5 in Dec, which is moderately above the contraction frontier of 50.0, while the Flash HSBC China Manufacturing Output Index decreased from 52.2 in Nov to 51.8 in Dec, moving into moderate expansion territory. Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds that the index is consistent with GDP growth at 7.8 percent in IVQ2013 relative to a year earlier (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/2d9203c17a714e2382ce2e5ea6555448). The HSBC China Services PMI™, compiled by Markit, shows marginal improvement in business activity in China with the HSBC Composite Output, combining manufacturing and services, increasing from 51.8 in Oct to 52.3 in Nov, indicating moderate growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7d6f88e711a42a09011498c599785ca). Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds support of manufacturing combined with services (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7d6f88e711a42a09011498c599785ca). The HSBC Business Activity index decreased from 52.6 in Oct to 52.5 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7d6f88e711a42a09011498c599785ca). Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China & Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds softening growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/a7d6f88e711a42a09011498c599785ca). The HSBC Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™), compiled by Markit, decreased marginally to 50.5 in Dec from 50.8 in Nov, indicating marginally expanding manufacturing at slower rate (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c3747b7d95134930925b6676bf0db89c). New export orders increased marginally with growth of total new orders originating in domestic demand. Hongbin Qu, Chief Economist, China and Co-Head of Asian Economic Research at HSBC, finds China moving in the path of moderate recovery of growth into 2014 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/c3747b7d95134930925b6676bf0db89c). Table CNY provides the country data table for China.
Table CNY, China, Economic Indicators
Price Indexes for Industry | Nov 12-month ∆%: minus 2.0 Nov month ∆%: 0.0 |
Consumer Price Index | Nov month ∆%: -0.1 Nov 12 months ∆%: 3.0 |
Value Added of Industry | Nov month ∆%: 0.76 Jan-Nov 2013/Jan-No 2012 ∆%: 9.7 Nov 12-Month ∆%: 10.0 |
GDP Growth Rate | Year IIIQ2013 ∆%: 7.8 |
Investment in Fixed Assets | Total Jan-Nov 2013 ∆%: 19.9 Real estate development: 19.5 |
Retail Sales | Nov month ∆%: 1.32 Jan-No ∆%: 13.0 |
Trade Balance | Nov balance $33.8 billion Cumulative Nov: $234.27 billion |
Links to blog comments in Table CNY:
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
10/27/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html
VD Euro Area. Table VD-EUR provides yearly growth rates of the combined GDP of the members of the European Monetary Union (EMU) or euro area since 1996. Growth was very strong at 3.3 percent in 2006 and 3.0 percent in 2007. The global recession had strong impact with growth of only 0.4 percent in 2008 and decline of 4.4 percent in 2009. Recovery was at lower growth rates of 2.0 percent in 2010 and 1.6 percent in 2011. EUROSTAT estimates growth of GDP of the euro area of minus 0.7 percent in 2012 and minus 0.4 percent in 2013 but 1.1 percent in 2014 and 1.7 percent in 2015.
Table VD-EUR, Euro Area, Yearly Percentage Change of Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices, Unemployment and GDP ∆%
Year | HICP ∆% | Unemployment | GDP ∆% |
1999 | 1.2 | NA | 2.9 |
2000 | 2.2 | 9.4 | 3.8 |
2001 | 2.4 | 8.3 | 2.0 |
2002 | 2.3 | 8.6 | 0.9 |
2003 | 2.1 | 9.0 | 0.7 |
2004 | 2.2 | 9.3 | 2.2 |
2005 | 2.2 | 9.1 | 1.7 |
2006 | 2.2 | 8.4 | 3.3 |
2007 | 2.1 | 7.6 | 3.0 |
2008 | 3.3 | 7.6 | 0.4 |
2009 | 0.3 | 9.6 | -4.4 |
2010 | 1.6 | 10.1 | 2.0 |
2011 | 2.7 | 10.2 | 1.6 |
2012 | 2.5 | 11.4 | -0.7 |
2013* | -0.4 | ||
2014* | 1.1 | ||
2015* | 1.7 |
*EUROSTAT forecast Source: EUROSTAT
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
The GDP of the euro area in 2012 in current US dollars in the dataset of the World Economic Outlook (WEO) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is $12,199.1 billion or 16.9 percent of world GDP of $72,216.4 billion (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx). The sum of the GDP of France $2613.9 billion with the GDP of Germany of $3429.5 billion, Italy of $2014.1 billion and Spain $1323.5 billion is $9381.0 billion or 76.9 percent of total euro area GDP and 13.0 percent of World GDP. The four largest economies account for slightly more than three quarters of economic activity of the euro area. Table VD-EUR1 is constructed with the dataset of EUROSTAT, providing growth rates of the euro area as a whole and of the largest four economies of Germany, France, Italy and Spain annually from 1996 to 2011 with the estimate of 2012 and forecasts for 2013, 2014 and 2015 by EUROSTAT. The impact of the global recession on the overall euro area economy and on the four largest economies was quite strong. There was sharp contraction in 2009 and growth rates have not rebounded to earlier growth with exception of Germany in 2010 and 2011.
Table VD-EUR1, Euro Area, Real GDP Growth Rate, ∆%
Euro Area | Germany | France | Italy | Spain | |
2015* | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
2014* | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
2013* | -0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | -1.8 | -1.3 |
2012 | -0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0* | -2.5 | -1.6 |
2011 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
2010 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | -0.2 |
2009 | -4.4 | -5.1 | -3.1 | -5.5 | -3.8 |
2008 | 0.4 | 1.1 | -0.1 | -1.2 | 0.9 |
2007 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 3.5 |
2006 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4.1 |
2005 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 3.6 |
2004 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 3.3 |
2003 | 0.7 | -0.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 3.1 |
2002 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.7 |
2001 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 3.7 |
2000 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 |
1999 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 4.7 |
1998 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.5 |
1997 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.9 |
1996 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.5 |
Source: EUROSTAT
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
The Flash Eurozone PMI Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI®, combining activity in manufacturing and services, increased from 51.7 in Nov to 52.1 in Dec, which is a three month high after a high in 27 months in Sep (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d92ab787877e4484849a94b75c6ebfff). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds that the Markit Flash Eurozone PMI index suggests that the index is consistent with modest growth of GDP of 0.2 percent based on growth in two consecutive months in IVQ2013 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/d92ab787877e4484849a94b75c6ebfff). The Markit Eurozone PMI® Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing activity with close association with GDP, decreased from 51.9 in Oct to 51.7 in Nov in the fifth consecutive monthly expansion (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9f5ed06473dc4a23b83e6a2eef32e2fa). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds growth in IVQ2013 at the rate of about 0.2 percent similar to 0.1 percent IIIQ2013 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9f5ed06473dc4a23b83e6a2eef32e2fa). The Markit Eurozone Services Business Activity Index decreased from 51.6 in Oct to 51.2 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9f5ed06473dc4a23b83e6a2eef32e2fa). The Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® increased to 52.7 in Dec from 51.6 in Nov with the reading for IVQ2013 at the highest level in two-and-a-half years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b2dfe04a4c1e4e71802d7338b698602f). New orders increased for the sixth consecutive month with foreign orders at the highest in more than two-and-a-half years. Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds industrial growth in the euro area at a quarterly rate of 1.0 percent. (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b2dfe04a4c1e4e71802d7338b698602f). Table EUR provides the data table for the euro area.
Table EUR, Euro Area Economic Indicators
GDP | IIIQ2013 ∆% 0.1; IIIQ2013/IIIQ2012 ∆% -0.4 Blog 12/15/13 |
Unemployment | Oct 2013: 12.1 % unemployment rate Oct 2013: 19.298 million unemployed Blog 12/1/13 |
HICP | Nov month ∆%: -0.1 12 months Nov ∆%: 0.9 |
Producer Prices | Euro Zone industrial producer prices Oct ∆%: -0.5 |
Industrial Production | Oct month ∆%: -1.1; Oct 12 months ∆%: 0.2 |
Retail Sales | Oct month ∆%: minus 0.2 |
Confidence and Economic Sentiment Indicator | Sentiment 98.5 Nov 2013 Consumer minus 15.4 Nov 2013 Blog 12/1/13 |
Trade | Jan-Oct 2013/Jan-Oct 2012 Exports ∆%: 0.9 Oct 2013 12-month Exports ∆% 1.2 Imports ∆% -3.4 |
Links to blog comments in Table EUR:
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/8/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
VE Germany. Table VE-DE provides yearly growth rates of the German economy from 1992 to 2012, price adjusted chain-linked and price and calendar-adjusted chain-linked. Germany’s GDP fell 5.1 percent in 2009 after growing below trend at 1.1 percent in 2008. Recovery has been robust in contrast with other advanced economies. The German economy grew at 4.0 percent in 2010, 3.3 percent in 2011 and 0.7 percent in 2012.
The Federal Statistical Agency of Germany analyzes the fall and recovery of the German economy (http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/EN/Content/Statistics/VolkswirtschaftlicheGesamtrechnungen/Inlandsprodukt/Aktuell,templateId=renderPrint.psml):
“The German economy again grew strongly in 2011. The price-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 3.0% compared with the previous year. Accordingly, the catching-up process of the German economy continued during the second year after the economic crisis. In the course of 2011, the price-adjusted GDP again exceeded its pre-crisis level. The economic recovery occurred mainly in the first half of 2011. In 2009, Germany experienced the most serious post-war recession, when GDP suffered a historic decline of 5.1%. The year 2010 was characterised by a rapid economic recovery (+3.7%).”
Table VE-DE, Germany, GDP Year ∆%
Price Adjusted Chain-Linked | Price- and Calendar-Adjusted Chain Linked | |
2012 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
2011 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
2010 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
2009 | -5.1 | -5.1 |
2008 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
2007 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
2006 | 3.7 | 3.9 |
2005 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
2004 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
2003 | -0.4 | -0.4 |
2002 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2001 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
2000 | 3.1 | 3.3 |
1999 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
1998 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
1997 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
1996 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
1995 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
1994 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
1993 | -1.0 | -1.0 |
1992 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (Destatis) https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/08/PE13_278_811.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/PressServices/Press/pr/2013/11/PE13_381_811.html
The Flash Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Flash Germany PMI®, combining manufacturing and services, decreased from 55.4 in Nov to 55.2 in Dec. The index of manufacturing output reached 57.5 in Dec, for a 31-month high, from 54.9 in Nov, while the index of services decreased to 54.0 in Dec from 55.7 in Nov. The overall Flash Germany Manufacturing PMI® increased from 52.7 in Nov to 54.2 in Dec, which is a 30-month high (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7b431b589cec404abbd8256d72ad1a6e). New export work volumes increased at the fastest pace in more than two and a half years. Tim Moore, Senior Economist at Markit, finds expansion of Germany’s private sector in eight consecutive months (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/7b431b589cec404abbd8256d72ad1a6e). The Markit Germany Composite Output Index of the Markit Germany Services PMI®, combining manufacturing and services with close association with Germany’s GDP, increased from 53.2 in Oct to 55.4 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b84ee870740e4d1f920ab290a975c1eb). Tim Moore, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds that German private sector companies expanded output at the fastest rate since the middle of 2011 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b84ee870740e4d1f920ab290a975c1eb). The Germany Services Business Activity Index increased from 52.9 in Oct to 55.7 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b84ee870740e4d1f920ab290a975c1eb). The Markit/BME Germany Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), showing close association with Germany’s manufacturing conditions, increased from 52.7 in Nov to 54.3 in Dec, in the best reading in two-and-a-half years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/13f1cfefa2034863a31e87812f389789). New export orders increased for the sixth consecutive month at the highest rate in two-and-a-half years. Tim Moore, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds the highest growth of manufacturing in two-and-a-half years (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/13f1cfefa2034863a31e87812f389789).Table DE provides the country data table for Germany.
Table DE, Germany, Economic Indicators
GDP | IIIQ2013 0.3 ∆%; III/Q2013/IIIQ2012 ∆% 1.1 2012/2011: 0.7% GDP ∆% 1992-2012 Blog 8/26/12 5/27/12 11/25/12 2/24/13 5/19/13 5/26/13 8/18/13 8/25/13 11/17/13 11/24/13 |
Consumer Price Index | Nov month NSA ∆%: 0.2 |
Producer Price Index | Nov month ∆%: -0.1 CSA, -0.1 |
Industrial Production | MFG Oct month CSA ∆%: minus -1.1 |
Machine Orders | MFG Oct month ∆%: -2.2 |
Retail Sales | Oct Month ∆% -0.8 12-Month ∆% -0.2 Blog 12/1/13 |
Employment Report | Unemployment Rate SA Sep 5.2% |
Trade Balance | Exports Oct 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.6 Blog 12/15/13 |
Links to blog comments in Table DE:
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/24/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html
8/18/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/duration-dumping-and-peaking-valuations.html
http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/twenty-nine-million-unemployed-or.html
5/26/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html
VF France. Table VF-FR provides growth rates of GDP of France with the estimates of Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE). The long-term rate of GDP growth of France from IVQ1949 to IVQ2012 is quite high at 3.2 percent. France’s growth rates were quite high in the four decades of the 1950s, 1960, 1970s and 1980s with an average growth rate of 4.0 percent compounding the average rates in the decades and discounting to one decade. The growth impulse diminished with 1.9 percent in the 1990s and 1.7 percent from 2000 to 2007. The average growth rate from 2000 to 2012, using fourth quarter data, is 1.0 percent because of the sharp impact of the global recession from IVQ2007 to IIQ2009. The growth rate from 2000 to 2012 is 1.0 percent. Cobet and Wilson (2002) provide estimates of output per hour and unit labor costs in national currency and US dollars for the US, Japan and Germany from 1950 to 2000 (see Pelaez and Pelaez, The Global Recession Risk (2007), 137-44). The average yearly rate of productivity change from 1950 to 2000 was 2.9 percent in the US, 6.3 percent for Japan and 4.7 percent for Germany while unit labor costs in USD increased at 2.6 percent in the US, 4.7 percent in Japan and 4.3 percent in Germany. From 1995 to 2000, output per hour increased at the average yearly rate of 4.6 percent in the US, 3.9 percent in Japan and 2.6 percent in Germany while unit labor costs in US fell at minus 0.7 percent in the US, 4.3 percent in Japan and 7.5 percent in Germany. There was increase in productivity growth in the G7 in Japan and France in the second half of the 1990s but significantly lower than the acceleration of 1.3 percentage points per year in the US. Lucas (2011May) compares growth of the G7 economies (US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada) and Spain, finding that catch-up growth with earlier rates for the US and UK stalled in the 1970s.
Table VF-FR, France, Average Growth Rates of GDP Fourth Quarter, 1949-2012
Period | Average ∆% |
1949-2012 | 3.2 |
2000-2012 | 1.0 |
2000-2011 | 1.1 |
2000-2007 | 1.7 |
1990-1999 | 1.9 |
1980-1989 | 2.5 |
1970-1979 | 3.8 |
1960-1969 | 5.7 |
1950-1959 | 4.2 |
Source: Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques
http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=28&date=20131224
The Markit Flash France Composite Output Index decreased from 48.0 in Nov to 47.0 in Dec for a seven-month low (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/29ff41a3c1d547a7ac763502a35efc35). Andrew Harker, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the report, finds economic weakness in the French private sector (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/29ff41a3c1d547a7ac763502a35efc35). The Markit France Composite Output Index, combining services and manufacturing with close association with French GDP, fell from 50.5 in Oct to 48.0 in Nov, indicating moderate contraction (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9ae3c4978e5448f0bd6f5f9d5cbb41f4). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Services PMI®, finds risks of contraction in IVQ2013 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9ae3c4978e5448f0bd6f5f9d5cbb41f4). The Markit France Services Activity index decreased from 50.9 in Oct to 48.0 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/9ae3c4978e5448f0bd6f5f9d5cbb41f4). The Markit France Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® decreased to 47.0 in Dec from 48.4 in Nov for the lowest reading in seven months (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/45fadf38ca6745b1b423f91ecb61df83). Jack Kennedy, Senior Economist at Markit and author of the France Manufacturing PMI®, finds sharper decline of output and new orders with weak internal demand (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/45fadf38ca6745b1b423f91ecb61df83). Table FR provides the country data table for France.
Table FR, France, Economic Indicators
CPI | Nov month ∆% 0.0 |
PPI | Nov month ∆%: 0.5 Blog 12/29/13 |
GDP Growth | IIIQ2013/IIQ2013 ∆%: minus 0.1 |
Industrial Production | Oct ∆%: |
Consumer Spending | Manufactured Goods |
Employment | Unemployment Rate: IIIQ2013 10.5% |
Trade Balance | Nov Exports ∆%: month -0.3, 12 months -2.0 Nov Imports ∆%: month -2.5, 12 months -2.7 Blog 12/15/13 |
Confidence Indicators | Historical averages 100 Dec Mfg Business Climate 100 Blog 12/22/13 |
Links to blog comments in Table FR:
12/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/collapse-of-united-states-dynamism-of.html
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/8/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
6/30/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/tapering-quantitative-easing-policy-and.html
5/19/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/word-inflation-waves-squeeze-of.html
VG Italy. Table VG-IT provides percentage changes in a quarter relative to the same quarter a year earlier of Italy’s expenditure components in chained volume measures. GDP has been declining at sharper rates from minus 0.6 percent in IVQ2011 to minus 3.0 percent in IVQ2012, minus 2.5 percent in IQ2013, minus 2.2 percent in IIQ2013 and minus 1.8 percent in IIIQ2013. The aggregate demand components of consumption and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) have been declining at faster rates. The rates of decline of GDP, consumption and GFCF were somewhat milder in IIIQ2013, IIQ2013 than in IQ2013 and the final three quarters of 2012.
Table VG-IT, Italy, GDP and Expenditure Components, Chained Volume Measures, Quarter ∆% on Same Quarter Year Earlier
GDP | Imports | Consumption | GFCF | Exports | |
2013 | |||||
IIIQ | -1.8 | -1.2 | -1.5 | -5.1 | 0.0 |
IIQ | -2.2 | -4.7 | -2.5 | -5.8 | 0.2 |
IQ | -2.5 | -4.8 | -2.6 | -7.3 | -0.6 |
2012 | |||||
IVQ | -3.0 | -6.9 | -4.0 | -8.1 | 0.8 |
IIIQ | -2.8 | -7.5 | -4.1 | -8.7 | 1.8 |
IIQ | -2.6 | -7.3 | -3.6 | -8.8 | 2.1 |
IQ | -1.8 | -8.2 | -3.4 | -8.1 | 2.8 |
2011 | |||||
IVQ | -0.6 | -6.8 | -2.0 | -3.8 | 3.5 |
IIIQ | 0.5 | 0.5 | -1.0 | -2.4 | 6.0 |
IIQ | 1.1 | 3.7 | 0.4 | -0.7 | 7.5 |
IQ | 1.4 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 11.0 |
2010 | |||||
IVQ | 2.3 | 15.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 13.4 |
IIIQ | 1.8 | 13.2 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 12.1 |
IIQ | 1.8 | 13.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 12.0 |
IQ | 0.9 | 7.0 | 1.0 | -2.4 | 7.1 |
2009 | |||||
IVQ | -3.5 | -6.3 | 0.2 | -8.2 | -9.3 |
IIIQ | -5.0 | -12.2 | -0.8 | -12.6 | -16.4 |
IIQ | -6.6 | -17.9 | -1.4 | -13.6 | -21.4 |
IQ | -6.9 | -17.2 | -1.8 | -12.4 | -22.8 |
2008 | |||||
IVQ | -3.0 | -8.2 | -0.9 | -8.3 | -10.3 |
IIIQ | -1.9 | -5.0 | -0.8 | -4.5 | -3.9 |
IIQ | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -1.5 | 0.4 |
IQ | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.1 | -1.0 | 2.9 |
GFCF: Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/106657
The Markit/ADACI Business Activity Index decreased from 50.5 in Oct to 47.2 in Nov (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/27e3c87dec6e4903a5c1c97d6247b44f). Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italy Services PMI®, finds the index suggesting doubts of Italy’s rebounding from recession (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/27e3c87dec6e4903a5c1c97d6247b44f). The Markit/ADACI Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®), increased from 51.4 in Nov to 53.3 in Dec for the highest reading since Apr 2011 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/337850bc94a34a3a892567600df53850). New export orders grew at the fastest rate in 32 months in Nov and Dec. Phil Smith, Economist at Markit and author of the Italian Manufacturing PMI®, finds the best conditions in more than two-and-a-half years with concern on the margins of sales prices relative to input costs (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/337850bc94a34a3a892567600df53850). Table IT provides the country data table for Italy.
Table IT, Italy, Economic Indicators
Consumer Price Index | Dec month ∆%: 0.2 |
Producer Price Index | Nov month ∆%: -0.1 Blog 1/5/14 |
GDP Growth | IIIQ2013/IIQ2013 SA ∆%: 0.0 |
Labor Report | Oct 2013 Participation rate 63.6% Employment ratio 55.5% Unemployment rate 12.5% Blog 12/1/13 |
Industrial Production | Oct month ∆%: 0.5 |
Retail Sales | Oct month ∆%: -0.1 Oct 12-month ∆%: -1.6 Blog 12/22/13 |
Business Confidence | Mfg Dec 92.3, Aug 93.5 Construction Dec 77.1, Aug 76.8 Blog 1/5/14 |
Trade Balance | Balance Oct SA €2832 million versus Sep €2198 |
Links to blog comments in Table IT:
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
11/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/risks-of-unwinding-monetary-policy.html
9/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
8/11/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/recovery-without-hiring-loss-of-full.html
6/16/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/recovery-without-hiring-seven-million.html
3/17/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/recovery-without-hiring-ten-million.html
Italy’s index of business confidence in manufacturing and construction is provided in Table VG-1. There has been improvement of manufacturing confidence below the historical average of 100 from 93.5 in Aug 2013 to 98.1 in Nov 2013 with decline to 92.3 in Dec 2013. Order books deteriorated to minus 32 in Aug 2013 but improved to minus 25 in Nov 2013, deteriorating to minus 36 in Dec 2013. There is oscillation in construction with the index moving from 76.8 in Aug 2013 to 80.0 in Nov 2013, declining to 77.1 in Dec 2013.
Table VG-1, Italy, Index of Business Confidence in Manufacturing and Construction 2005=100
Dec 2013 | Nov 2013 | Oct 2013 | Sep 2013 | Aug 2013 | |
Mfg Confidence | 92.3 | 98.1 | 97.4 | 96.8 | 93.5 |
Order Books | -36 | -25 | -27 | -28 | -32 |
Stocks Finished Products | 0 | -1 | -2 | -1 | 0 |
Production | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Construction Confidence | 77.1 | 80.0 | 80.9 | 79.0 | 76.8 |
Order Books | -51 | -45 | -46 | -48 | -52 |
Employment | -20 | -21 | -19 | -16 | -18 |
Mfg: manufacturing
Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/108622
VH United Kingdom. Annual data in Table VH-UK show the strong impact of the global recession in the UK with decline of GDP of 5.2 percent in 2009 after dropping 0.8 percent in 2008. Recovery of 1.7 percent in 2010 is relatively low in comparison with annual growth rates in 2007 and earlier years. Growth was only 1.1 percent in 2011 and 0.1 percent in 2012. The bottom part of Table VH-UK provides average growth rates of UK GDP since 1948. The UK economy grew at 2.6 percent per year on average between 1948 and 2012, which is relatively high for an advanced economy. The growth rate of GDP between 2000 and 2007 is higher at 3.1 percent. Growth in the current cyclical expansion has been only at 1.0 percent as advanced economies struggle with weak internal demand and world trade. GDP in 2012 was lower by 3.1 percent relative to 2007.
Table VH-UK, UK, Gross Domestic Product, ∆%
∆% on Prior Year | |
1998 | 3.6 |
1999 | 2.9 |
2000 | 4.4 |
2001 | 2.2 |
2002 | 2.3 |
2003 | 3.9 |
2004 | 3.2 |
2005 | 3.2 |
2006 | 2.8 |
2007 | 3.4 |
2008 | -0.8 |
2009 | -5.2 |
2010 | 1.7 |
2011 | 1.1 |
2012 | 0.1 |
Average Growth Rates ∆% per Year | |
1948-2012 | 2.6 |
1950-1959 | 2.7 |
1960-1969 | 3.3 |
1970-1979 | 2.5 |
1980-1989 | 3.2 |
1990-1999 | 2.9 |
2000-2007 | 3.0 |
2007-2012* | -3.1 |
2000-2012 | 1.5 |
*Absolute change from 2007 to 2012
Source: UK Office for National Statistics
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/naa2/quarterly-national-accounts/q3-2013/index.html
The Business Activity Index of the Markit/CIPS UK Services PMI® decreased from 62.5 in Oct, indicating increase in activity in every month since the beginning of 2013 at the highest rate since May 1997, to 60.0 in Nov, at a historically fast rate of growth (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/6a58c44af9df4ae9ba48586f1d74697a). Chris Williamson, Chief Economist at Markit, finds continuing improvement in the UK’s economy with possible higher growth of GDP in IVQ2013 at the quarterly rate above 1.0 percent, which would be the highest since the period before the 2007 financial crisis while creation of new jobs exceeds 100,000 per quarter (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/6a58c44af9df4ae9ba48586f1d74697a). The Markit/CIPS UK Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index® (PMI®) decreased to 57.3 in Dec from 58.1 in Nov with continuing strength close to the highest reading since Feb 2011 (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f1cb2cbaa8794e7eb8ca538a5d252a2a). New export orders increased for the ninth consecutive month but with the lowest rate since Sep. New orders increased from Brazil, China, Ireland, Russia and the US. Rob Dobson, Senior Economist at Markit that compiles the Markit/CIPS Manufacturing PMI®, finds that manufacturing conditions continue around the levels in Nov with output and new orders close to the fastest pace in 22 years and growth in IVQ2013 probably above 1.0 percent (http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/f1cb2cbaa8794e7eb8ca538a5d252a2a). Table UK provides the economic indicators for the United Kingdom.
Table UK, UK Economic Indicators
CPI | Nov month ∆%: 0.1 |
Output/Input Prices | Output Prices: Nov 12-month NSA ∆%: 0.8; excluding food, petroleum ∆%: 0.7 |
GDP Growth | IIIQ2013 prior quarter ∆% 0.8; year earlier same quarter ∆%: 1.9 |
Industrial Production | Oct 2013/Oct 2012 ∆%: Production Industries 3.2; Manufacturing 2.7 |
Retail Sales | Nov month ∆%: 0.2 |
Labor Market | Aug-Oct Unemployment Rate: 7.4%; Claimant Count 3.8%; Earnings Growth 0.9% |
GDP and the Labor Market | IIIQ2013 Weekly Hours 101.4, GDP 98.0, Employment 101.5 IQ2008 =100 Blog 12/22/13 |
Trade Balance | Balance SA Oct minus ₤2619 million |
Links to blog comments in Table UK:
12/22/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/tapering-quantitative-easing-mediocre.html
12/15/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/theory-and-reality-of-secular.html
12/1/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/exit-risks-of-zero-interest-rates-world.html
10/27/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/10/twenty-eight-million-unemployed-or.html
9/29/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
8/25/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/interest-rate-risks-duration-dumping.html
7/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/duration-dumping-steepening-yield-curve.html
5/26/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/united-states-commercial-banks-assets.html
4/28/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states_28.html
03/31/13 http://cmpassocregulationblog.blogspot.com/2013/04/mediocre-and-decelerating-united-states.html
© Carlos M. Pelaez, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment